Zachary Pyers, Esq. is a partner in the Columbus, Ohio, office of Reminger Co., L.P.A., and is licensed to practice in Ohio, West Virginia, and the District of Columbia. His practice focuses on civil litigation, including complex litigation, corporate and commercial litigation, professional liability, and general liability. Mr. Pyers has represented numerous professions in professional liability claims, including attorneys, accountants, architects, engineers, surveyors, builders, insurance agents, and investment advisors. He is an Adjunct Professor at Capital University Law School, where he teaches courses in Depositions, Expert Witnesses, E-Discovery, and the school’s Mock Trial Competition team. Mr. Pyers earned his J.D. and LL.M. from Capital University Law School, and his B.B.A. degree from Ohio University.
Jury Selection: Advanced Techniques
CLE Credits earned: 2 GEN
Jury Selection is a key component in any trial. The Jury Selection process is the one opportunity that a lawyer has to talk to and receive direct feedback from with jurors. The Voir Dire process can make or break the entire trial. This course will focus on strategy and techniques for selecting a jury, putting your best foot forward in the process and ensuring you do so in an ethical manner.
This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.
Key topics to be discussed:
• Preparing for jury selection
• Asking the right questions during the selection process
• Choosing the best jury possible for your case
Date / Time: August 10, 2018
• 2:00 pm – 4:00 pm Eastern
• 1:00 pm – 3:00 pm Central
• 12:00 pm – 2:00 pm Mountain
• 11:00 am – 1:00 pm Pacific
Choose a format:
• Live Video Broadcast/Re-Broadcast: Watch Program “live” in real-time, must sign-in and watch program on date and time set above. May ask questions during presentation via chat box. Qualifies for “live” CLE credit.
• On-Demand Video: Access CLE 24/7 via on-demand library and watch program anytime. Qualifies for self-study CLE credit. On-demand versions are made available 7 business days after the original recording date and are view-able for up to one year.
mylawCLE seeks approval in all states.
CLE 2.00 – AK
CLE 2.00 – IA
CLE 2.00 – MP
CLE 2.40 – NY
CLE 2.00 – UT
myLawCLE will seek credit where attending attorneys are primarily licensed for all of its live webinars and live teleconferences, except in states which allow for reciprocity (see reciprocity section below). Credit for CLE in a self-study format is sought for in most states; however, some states do not allow for CLE credit to be earned in a self-study format (see the self-study section below). Many states typically decide whether a program qualifies for MCLE credit in their jurisdiction 4-8 weeks after the program application is submitted. For many live events, credit approval is not received prior to the program. Credit hours granted are subject to approval from each state.
Date originally recorded: April 17, 2018
Additionally, some states allow for credit to be granted on a 1:1 reciprocal basis for courses approved in another mandatory CLE jurisdiction state. This is known as a reciprocity provision and includes the following states: AK, AR, CO, FL, ME, MT, ND, NH, NJ, NY, PR, and SD. myLawCLE does not seek direct accreditation of live webinars or teleconferences in these states.
myLawCLE will seek on-demand approval in all states except Virginia and Arkansas (outside reciprocal provisions stated above).
myLawCLE Credit Guarantee
myLawCLE offers a program and credit approval guarantee. If a registered attendee is unhappy with a CLE program they have attended, myLawCLE will offer that attended access to another complimentary CLE or a full refund in order to insure the attendee’s satisfaction.
Additionally, on all online CLE programs application for approval will be made in all states where attending attorneys are primarily licensed in. If a registered attorney does not receive credit from their state for any reason, a full refund will be granted.
Section I. Preparing for Jury Selection
Section II. Social Media Use In Jury Selection
Section III. Asking the Right Questions
Section IV. Selecting the Best Jury