Risks in Construction Project Management: Design/build methods, Building Information Modeling (BIM), Integrated Project Delivery (IPD), and green practices

John D. Broghammer
John D. Broghammer | Sims, Lawrence & Broghammer, LLP

John is an attorney specializing in insurance coverage disputes and the representation of design professionals.

On-Demand: August 8, 2024

2 hour CLE

This program is only available to All-Access Pass Members.
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ live webinars.
Learn More

Program Summary

In this session, we’ll cover key topics to help you understand and handle risks in project management. We’ll start by looking at risks in design/build methods, using Building Information Modeling (BIM), Integrated Project Delivery (IPD), and green practices. Then, we’ll discuss different types of legal responsibilities, including those from contracts, accidents (torts), breaking trust (fiduciary duties), and third-party liabilities. We’ll also explore current trends in increasing liability and common legal defenses like the economic loss rule, time limits for suing, and sharing blame. Finally, we’ll share tips on reducing risk through good contracts and project documents. This will provide useful insights to better manage legal risks in your projects.

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Understanding Risks in Project Delivery Methods
  • Types of Legal Liability
  • Current Trends in Liability Expansion
  • Common Legal Defenses
  • Evolving Trends in Legal Defenses
  • Strategies for Risk Mitigation in Contracts and Documentation

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

John D. Broghammer_FedBarJohn D. Broghammer | Sims, Lawrence & Broghammer, LLP

John is an attorney specializing in insurance coverage disputes and the representation of design professionals. He completed both his undergraduate and legal education at Creighton University in Omaha, Nebraska, graduating with honors at both levels.

Following admission to the California Bar in 1990, his practice area has focused on Civil Litigation with a particular emphasis on the representation and defense of architects and engineers in construction defect litigation, the defense of general contractors in construction litigation, and the defense of human service entities and schools. John advises and counsels design professionals in all aspects of contract preparation, risk allocation and insurance issues.

John has given countless seminars, presentations and webinars nationally, regionally and locally on design professional’s risk allocation, contract formation and negotiations, and construction defect litigation. He effectively (and with humor) teaches his clients the law on standard of care, insurance, scope of work issues, risk understanding and risk transfer, and contract negotiation techniques. John has served as an expert witness in the area of design professional litigation.

John currently represents many of the area’s preeminent architectural and engineering firms. He also actively represents prominent insurance carriers in insurance coverage disputes and bad faith actions. His emphasis is on the defense of carriers in environmental coverage disputes. He has litigated coverage for contamination sites involving the laws of many states including California, New Jersey, Texas, Arizona, Florida, Virginia and numerous others.

John has aggressively litigated, arbitrated and mediated countless disputes for his clients in virtually every county in Central and Northern California. His goal is litigating actions in a manner that fully protects his clients’ interests in a business-conscious and cost-effective manner. He practices aggressive representation with attention to his clients’ current and long-term business and community interests. John has substantial trial experience and always remains prepared to protect his client’s interests at trial, if required.

John was born and raised in the Midwest and brings his Midwest work ethic to the representation of his clients. He is married and has two wonderful children.

Agenda

I. Understanding Risks in Project Delivery Methods | 1:00pm – 1:10pm

  • Traditional Design/Build Approach
  • Utilizing Building Information Modeling (BIM)
  • Integrated Project Delivery (IPD)
  • Implementing Green and Sustainable Practices

II. Types of Legal Liability | 1:10pm – 1:45pm

  • Contract-Based Liability
  • Liability in Tort Law
  • Fiduciary Duty Breaches
  • Liability to Third Party Beneficiaries
  • Indemnity

III. Current Trends in Liability Expansion | 1:45pm – 2:00pm

Break | 2:00pm – 2:10pm

IV. Common Legal Defenses | 2:10pm – 2:30pm

  • Economic Loss Rule
  • Statutes of Limitations and Repose
  • Comparative Negligence Defense

V. Evolving Trends in Legal and Contractual Defenses | 2:30pm – 2:40pm

VI. Strategies for Risk Mitigation in Contracts and Documentation | 2:40pm – 3:10pm

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska's recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Arkansas's recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

California

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
2 General Hours

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Florida

Reciprocity
2.5 General

Receive CLE credit in Florida via reciprocity
Georgia

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Illinois

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General

Indiana

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
2 General Hours

Maryland

No MCLE Required
2 General Hours

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Michigan

No MCLE Required
2 General Hours

Minnesota

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Missouri

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2.4 General

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney's behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey's recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General

Nevada

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “A”.
Ohio

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Pennsylvania

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
2 General Hours

Tennessee

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Virginia

Not Eligible
2 General Hours Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 Law and Legal

For CLE course attendance credit, Washington state attorneys must self-apply to the Washington State Bar. myLawCLE will supply Washington state attorneys with the self-application package and instructions on how to gain credit.
Wisconsin

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Preview
More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
Insurance and Bad Faith Litigation in Fire Loss Cases
Insurance and Bad Faith Litigation in Fire Loss Cases Thu, March 20, 2025
On-Demand
Live Replay
Divorce Law 101 (2025 Edition)
Divorce Law 101 (2025 Edition) Fri, March 21, 2025
Live Webcast
Gun Trust 101 (2025 Edition)
Gun Trust 101 (2025 Edition) Fri, March 21, 2025
On-Demand
Live Replay
Ethical Strategies with Law Firm Podcasts
Ethical Strategies with Law Firm Podcasts Mon, March 24, 2025
Live Webcast
AI-Generated Trade Secret Litigation
AI-Generated Trade Secret Litigation Wed, March 26, 2025
Live Webcast
1031 Exchanges 101 (2025 Edition)
1031 Exchanges 101 (2025 Edition) Thu, March 27, 2025
On-Demand
Live Replay