Self-Defense Law: Understanding The Role Values Play (And Should Play) In Self-Defense Law

$195.00

CLE credits earned: 2 General Credits (WA 2 Law and Legal)

Self-defense is a right so fundamental that the scholarly literature regularly refers to it as the “ancient” or “first civil” right. And at the risk of stating the obvious, it has never been more relevant than in the present era of widespread calls for criminal justice reform. In this presentation, Markus, building on his 2021 critically acclaimed book on the subject, will advance the patinaed discussion by introducing for the first time a comprehensive value-centric approach to thinking about the defense’s deeper rationale.

Tackling a topic that has bedeviled the law since before the carving of Hammurabi’s Code is inherently ambitious. But that will not stop us from addressing core issues such as the relative importance of the State’s claimed monopoly on force, procedural justice and the need to shore up the justice system’s legitimacy and creditworthiness, everyone’s presumptive ‘right to life,’ and the importance of ensuring equal standing between citizens. And, in so doing, we will address public perceptions of ‘just’ and ‘right’ outcomes, as well as the emphasis legal systems place (and should place) on State power.

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Key topics to be discussed:

•  The necessity of a fundamental re-thinking of our approach to self-defense in this era of wide-spread calls for criminal justice reform.
•  Deficiencies in the legislative and scholarly community’s historical approach to the “first civil right”(self-defense).
•  How US self-defense law looks from abroad – a comparison with Germany and the UK’s self-defense regimes (spoiler alert – contrary to media portrayals and popular thought, US self-defense law is far more restrictive than you might think).
•  Understanding the best path forward by examining common theoretical self-defense questions through the value-centric lens.

Date / Time: September 2, 2021

•   12:00 pm – 2:10 pm Eastern
•   11:00 am – 1:10 pm Central
•   10:00 am – 12:10 pm Mountain
•   9:00 am – 11:10 am Pacific

Choose a format:

•   Live Video Broadcast/Re-Broadcast: Watch Program “live” in real-time, must sign-in and watch program on date and time set above. May ask questions during presentation via chat box. Qualifies for “live” CLE credit.

•   On-Demand Video: Access CLE 24/7 via on-demand library and watch program anytime. Qualifies for self-study CLE credit. On-demand versions are made available 5 business days after the original recording date and are viewable for up to one year.

Closed-captioning available

Select your state to see if this class is approved for CLE credit.

Choose the format you want.

Clear

Original Broadcast Date: September 2, 2021

Markus Funk | Perkins Coie

Markus Funk is a former federal prosecutor in Chicago, and a former section chief with the U.S. State Department-Balkans. He earned a PhD (DPhil) in law from Oxford University, where he started his career as a Lecturer in Law. Institutions as diverse as the U.S. Senate, the Vatican, Harvard Law School, Yale Law School, the New York City Office of the Mayor, and the World Bank Group have invited Markus to speak on cutting-edge criminal law, compliance, litigation, and internal investigation issues.

In 2021, he authored Rethinking Self-Defence: The ‘Ancient Right’s’ Rationale Disentangled (Hart/Bloomsbury Publishing). He in 2021 also penned Understanding The Role Values Play (And Should Play) In Self-Defense Law (American Criminal Law Review – Georgetown Law Center), What U.S. Lawmakers Can Learn from Germany’s Value-Explicit Approach to Self-Defense (South Carolina Law Review, forthcoming), and Cracking Self-Defense’s Intractable Cases (Nebraska Law Review, 2021).

 
 
 
 

Accreditation Policy

myLawCLE seeks accreditation for all programs in all states except, ME, VA, and WV. Each attending attorney/paralegal will receive a certificate of completion following the close of the CLE program as proof of attendance. In required states, myLawCLE records attorney/paralegals attendance, in all other states attorney/paralegal is provided with the approved CLE certificate to submit to their state bar or governing association.

    Automatic MCLE Approvals

All myLawCLE CLE programs are accredited automatically either directly or via reciprocity in the following states: AK, AR, CA, CT, FL, HI, ME, MO, MT, ND, NM, NJ, NY and VT. (AZ does not approve CLE programs, but accepts our certificates for CLE credit.)

    Live Video Broadcasts

Live video broadcasts are new live CLE programs being streamed and recorded for the first time. All of these programs qualify for “Live” CLE credit in all states except NV, OH, MS, IN, UT, PA, GA, and LA —these states require in-person attendance to qualify for “Live” CLE credit.

    “Live” Re-Broadcasts

“Live” Re-broadcasts are replays of previously recorded CLE programs, set on a specific date and time and where the original presenting speakers calls in live at the end of the event to answer questions. This “live” element allows for “live” Re-broadcast CLEs to qualify for “Live” CLE credits in most states. [The following states DO NOT allow for “live” CLE credits on re-broadcast CLEs: NV, OH, MS, IN, UT, PA, GA, and LA]

Reciprocity

Many states allow for credit to be granted on a 1:1 reciprocal basis for courses approved in another mandatory CLE jurisdiction state. This is known as a reciprocity provision and includes the following states: AK, AR, HI, CT, FL, ME, MO, MT, ND, NM, NJ, and NY. myLawCLE does not seek direct accreditation of live webinars or teleconferences in these states.

I. Setting the Stage | 12:00pm – 12:30pm
•  A short thought experiments.
•  The legislative and scholarly community’s surprising neglect of values as self-defense “decision grounds”
•  The German “Fruit Thief” case and controversial contemporary cases

II. Advancing the Debate Through a More Value-Centric Dialogue | 12:30pm – 1:00pm
Introduction of the Seven Proposed Decision Grounds
•  Reducing overall societal violence by protecting the state’s collective “monopoly on force”
•  Protecting the attacker’s individual (presumptive) right to life
•  Maintaining the equal standing between people
•  Protecting the defender’s autonomy
•  Ensuring the primacy of the legal process
•  Maintaining the legitimacy of the legal order
•  Deterring (potential) attackers

Break | 1:00pm – 1:10pm

III. The Value-Based Model’s Answer to Common Theoretical (“Hard Case”) Questions | 1:10pm – 1:25 pm

IV. Examining the US Law’s Treatment of Self-DefenseFrom a Value-Centric Perspective (and Answering the Question How it Stacks Up to the Self-Defense Law in Germany and the UK) | 1:25pm – 1:45pm

V. Parting Observations | 1:45pm – 2:10pm