The Intersection of Government Requests and Data Privacy: Europe meets the US

$95.00

CLE credits earned: 1 General Credit (WA 1 Law and Legal)

Companies can receive government requests for information from a variety of sources including subpoenas, CIDs, national security letters, and discovery requests. Such requests often seek personal information about individuals believed to have committed crimes. Growing concern has been raised internationally about the data privacy implications when companies respond to such requests, particularly when they originate from the United States government.

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Key topics to be discussed:

•   Types of information requests that companies may receive from US government agencies (state and federal)
•   Process that US regulators expect companies will follow when responding to requests for information
•   Identify the tension between government requests for information and European data privacy laws including the European GDPR
•   Explain how multinational companies can attempt to navigate that tension by creating a law enforcement request policy
•   Describe the components of an effective law enforcement request policy
•   Provide practical takeaways for handling requests for personal information

Date / Time: July 29, 2021

•   12:00 pm – 1:00 pm Eastern
•   11:00 am – 12:00 pm Central
•   10:00 am – 11:00 am Mountain
•   9:00 am – 10:00 am Pacific

Choose a format:

•   Live Video Broadcast/Re-Broadcast: Watch Program “live” in real-time, must sign-in and watch program on date and time set above. May ask questions during presentation via chat box. Qualifies for “live” CLE credit.

•   On-Demand Video: Access CLE 24/7 via on-demand library and watch program anytime. Qualifies for self-study CLE credit. On-demand versions are made available 5 business days after the original recording date and are viewable for up to one year.

Closed-captioning available

Select your state to see if this class is approved for CLE credit.

Choose the format you want.

Clear

Original Broadcast Date: July 29, 2021

Cuneyt A. Akay | Greenberg Traurig, LLP

Cuneyt A. Akay is an anti-corruption lawyer focused on helping clients comply with the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) and the UK Bribery Act. Cuneyt designs, builds, and implements effective compliance programs for clients around the world.

Cuneyt’s experience includes conducting internal investigations, performing compliance risk assessments, handling pre-and post-acquisition compliance due diligence, training staff and third parties on compliance requirements, and assisting in the monitoring and auditing of anti-corruption programs.

Cuneyt also represents clients in complex civil litigation, class actions, and appellate proceedings in both state and federal courts throughout the country. In addition, he advises clients on governmental matters, including election law issues, ballot initiatives, campaign finance, and administrative proceedings.

 
David Zetoony| Greenberg Traurig, LLP

David Zetoony, Co-Chair of the firm’s U.S. Data, Privacy and Cybersecurity Practice, focuses on helping businesses navigate data privacy and cyber security laws from a practical standpoint.

David has helped hundreds of companies establish and maintain ongoing privacy and security programs, and he has defended corporate privacy and security practices in investigations initiated by the Federal Trade Commission, and other data privacy and security regulatory agencies around the world, as well as in class action litigation.

David receives regular recognition from clients and peers for his knowledge and experience in the fields of data privacy and security. The National Law Journal named him a “Cybersecurity and Data Privacy Trailblazer,” JD Supra recognized him four times as one of the most widely read names when it comes to data privacy, cybersecurity, or the collection and use of data, and Lexology identified him seven times as the top “legal influencer” in the area of technology, media, and telecommunications in the United States, the European Union, and in the context of cross-border transfers of information.

He is the author of the American Bar Associations primary publication on the European General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and is writing the American Bar Association’s primary publication on the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA).

 
 
 
 

Accreditation Policy

myLawCLE seeks accreditation for all programs in all states except, ME, VA, and WV. Each attending attorney/paralegal will receive a certificate of completion following the close of the CLE program as proof of attendance. In required states, myLawCLE records attorney/paralegals attendance, in all other states attorney/paralegal is provided with the approved CLE certificate to submit to their state bar or governing association.

    Automatic MCLE Approvals

All myLawCLE CLE programs are accredited automatically either directly or via reciprocity in the following states: AK, AR, CA, CT, FL, HI, ME, MO, MT, ND, NM, NJ, NY and VT. (AZ does not approve CLE programs, but accepts our certificates for CLE credit.)

    Live Video Broadcasts

Live video broadcasts are new live CLE programs being streamed and recorded for the first time. All of these programs qualify for “Live” CLE credit in all states except NV, OH, MS, IN, UT, PA, GA, and LA —these states require in-person attendance to qualify for “Live” CLE credit.

    “Live” Re-Broadcasts

“Live” Re-broadcasts are replays of previously recorded CLE programs, set on a specific date and time and where the original presenting speakers calls in live at the end of the event to answer questions. This “live” element allows for “live” Re-broadcast CLEs to qualify for “Live” CLE credits in most states. [The following states DO NOT allow for “live” CLE credits on re-broadcast CLEs: NV, OH, MS, IN, UT, PA, GA, and LA]

Reciprocity

Many states allow for credit to be granted on a 1:1 reciprocal basis for courses approved in another mandatory CLE jurisdiction state. This is known as a reciprocity provision and includes the following states: AK, AR, HI, CT, FL, ME, MO, MT, ND, NM, NJ, and NY. myLawCLE does not seek direct accreditation of live webinars or teleconferences in these states.

i. Types of information requests that companies may receive from US government agencies (state and federal) | 12:00pm – 12:10pm

ii. Process that US regulators expect companies will follow when responding to requests for information | 12:10pm – 12:20pm

iii. Tensions between government requests for information and European data privacy laws including the European GDPR | 12:20pm – 12:30pm

iv. Multinational companies can attempt to navigate that tension by creating a law enforcement request policy | 12:30pm – 12:40pm

v. Components of an effective law enforcement request policy | 12:40pm– 12:50pm

vi. Practical takeaways for handling requests for personal information | 12:50pm – 1:00pm