Attorney–Client Privilege and Work Product: Managing Waiver Risk, Internal Investigations, Regulatory Scrutiny, and Third-Party Communications (2026 Edition) [Includes 1 Ethics hour]

Erin J. Hoyle
Adam Schwartz
Francesca Giannoni-Crystal
Erin J. Hoyle | Carlton Fields
Adam Schwartz | Carlton Fields
Francesca Giannoni-Crystal | Crystal & Giannoni-Crystal, LLC

Live Video-Broadcast: March 11, 2026

2 hour CLE

Tuition: $195.00
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

Session I – Protecting Attorney-Client Privilege and Work Product: Common Pitfalls, Waivers, and Practical Safeguards – Erin J. Hoyle and Adam Schwartz

This session examines best practices to assist counsel facing determinations as to the applicability of the attorney client privilege and work product doctrine. The discussion will address the nearly universal misunderstanding of the privileges’ applicability and the key legal advice component, as well as the danger of widespread intra corporate communications beyond those with a need to know. The session will also identify waivers, joint defense/common interest agreements, and issues arising before, during, and after internal corporate investigations. This session further examines best practices to assist in-house counsel facing determinations as to the applicability of the attorney-client privilege and work product doctrine.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Applicability of the attorney-client privilege in the in-house setting
  • Best practices to preserve privilege while engaging third party consultants
  • Preserving the privilege during internal corporate investigations

Session II – Preserving Attorney–Client Privilege and Protecting Work Product: Challenges Facing Corporate In House Counsel and Law Firm General Counsel – Francesca Giannoni-Crystal

This session examines attorney–client privilege (“ACP”) and work-product protection (“WP”) from the perspective of both corporate in-house counsel (“CIH”) and law firm general counsel (“LGC”). It addresses the shared and divergent challenges facing CIH who straddle legal and business functions, and LGC who advise the firm on ethics, risk management, internal investigations, and malpractice exposure while the firm simultaneously serves as a provider of legal services. The session will focus on practical strategies for structuring communications and managing relationships with outside counsel, regulators, insurers, and third parties, with the goal of minimizing waiver risk in an environment of increased regulatory scrutiny, discovery pressure, and cross-border practice. It will go through ABA Model Rules 1.6, 1.13, 1.4, 1.7, 1.1, 4.4(b), 8.3, 5.3, and 7.1.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Understanding the similarities and differences among the ethical duty of confidentiality, the attorney-client privilege, work product protection
  • Common facts patterns that pose risks of loss of ACP or WP
  • Policy recommendations based on the risks presented by common fact patterns

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Date / Time: March 11, 2026

  • 1:00 pm – 3:10 pm Eastern
  • 12:00 pm – 2:10 pm Central
  • 11:00 am – 1:10 pm Mountain
  • 10:00 am – 12:10 pm Pacific

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Erin J. Hoyle | Carlton Fields

Erin J. Hoyle concentrates her practice on government investigations, corporate internal investigations, and white-collar criminal defense, with significant experience advising organizations on sensitive legal communications, compliance issues, and risk management. Her work routinely involves whistleblower complaints, healthcare fraud allegations, securities litigation, OFAC licensing and compliance, and cybersecurity and privacy matters—areas where attorney-client privilege and work product protections are critical. Ms. Hoyle has been recognized in The Best Lawyers in America: Ones to Watch in Commercial Litigation, Criminal Defense: White-Collar, Health Care Law, and Litigation – Securities from 2021 through 2025. She is a frequent speaker and author on the False Claims Act, corporate compliance, and telehealth issues, drawing on her investigative and litigation experience to address practical strategies for preserving privilege in complex, evolving legal environments.

 

Adam Schwartz | Carlton Fields

Mr. Schwartz is a former Assistant U.S. Attorney with the Eastern District of New York and currently chairs Carlton Fields’ White Collar and Government Investigations Practice Group. His practice focuses on white collar criminal defense, False Claims Act (Qui Tam/Whistleblower) matters, and complex civil fraud defense, with extensive experience advising corporations and individuals in internal investigations, grand jury proceedings, and government enforcement actions.

A significant aspect of Mr. Schwartz’s work involves navigating attorney-client privilege and work product issues arising in internal investigations, regulatory compliance reviews, and interactions with third parties, including consultants, auditors, and insurers. He regularly advises clients on privilege preservation in the context of corporate communications, in-house counsel involvement, and investigative processes, and speaks frequently to practitioners on attorney-client privilege considerations during internal investigations.

Mr. Schwartz also counsels drug manufacturers and pharmaceutical wholesalers on compliance with federal health care and regulatory laws, including the Drug Quality and Security Act. He has served as Co-Chair of the ABA Criminal Justice Section’s White Collar Crime Subcommittee for the Florida Region since 2007.

 

Francesca Giannoni-Crystal | Crystal & Giannoni-Crystal, LLC

Ms. Francesca Giannoni-Crystal is a dually qualified U.S. and Italian attorney whose practice uniquely bridges Civil Law and Common Law systems. With over two decades of experience advising multinational corporations, law firms, and financial institutions, she has developed deep expertise in cross-border ethics, international professional responsibility, and multijurisdictional practice issues.

As a “lawyer for lawyers,” Ms. Giannoni-Crystal frequently counsels firms on conflicts of interest, international privileges, and professional-conduct compliance across jurisdictions. Her work often addresses complex choice of-law problems in attorney discipline and malpractice exposure, particularly in matters involving international transactions and cross-border representation.

Prior to co-founding Crystal & Giannoni-Crystal, LLC with Professor Nathan M. Crystal in 2011, she served as a legal consultant for the Italian Industrial Association and practiced with Deloitte Legal, where she handled transactional and regulatory matters for global enterprises. She later managed legal affairs for a major publicly traded Italian company with subsidiaries in the U.S., U.K., China, Brazil, and other jurisdictions, overseeing international contract negotiation, data privacy, and corporate governance.

Ms. Giannoni-Crystal is also co-responsible for Technethics (www.technethics.com), an educational platform dedicated to the intersection of ethics, technology, and cross-border legal compliance. Her practice and scholarship focus on helping law firms and attorneys anticipate and manage risks arising from the application of multiple jurisdictions’ professional-conduct rules.

Agenda

Session I – Protecting Attorney-Client Privilege and Work Product: Common Pitfalls, Waivers, and Practical Safeguards | 1:00pm – 2:00pm

  • Attorney-Client privilege
    • Defining the scope
    • Policy justifications
    • Who may raise the privilege?
    • Elements
      1.  Communication
      2. Privileged people
        a. Corporation as client
        b. Functional equivalent test
      3. Confidentiality
      4. Seeking legal advice
        a. Primary purpose test
        b. Professional legal capacity test
      5. Waiver
      6. Exceptions
  • Work product doctrine
    • Defining the scope
    • Policy justifications
    • Elements
      1. In anticipation of litigation
      2. Substantial need
  • Recent case law recap
    • DOJ filter-team protocol for review of in-house attorney’s emails
    • Consultants
    • Outside/Independent auditors
    • Insurance carriers
    • Internal investigations
    • Presence of third parties
    • In-house counsel position statements
  • AI, cloud collaboration tools & privilege considerations
    • Special considerations for preserving privilege while using artificial intelligence tools
    • Explaining online collaboration tools
    • Modified subject matter test
    • Strategies to preserve privilege in this context
  • Practical suggestions to preserve privilege
    • Label written materials
    • Communicate legal and business advice separately
    • Corporate meetings
    • Internal investigations
    • Avoiding inadvertent disclosures when using AI & document management systems
    • Use of an affidavit when asserting privileges in litigation
  • Questions

Break | 2:00pm – 2:10pm

Session II – Preserving Attorney–Client Privilege and Protecting Work Product: Challenges Facing Corporate In House Counsel and Law Firm General Counsel | 2:10pm – 3:10pm

  • Understanding the similarities and differences among the ethical duty of confidentiality, the attorney-client privilege, work product protection
  • Common facts patterns that pose risks of loss of ACP or WP
    • CIH involved in business transactions
    • LGC advising firm members about ethical obligations when significant risks of liability to clients or third parties exist
    • Communicating with and monitoring the activities of outside counsel to protect ACP and WP
    • Managing communications with insurers, auditors, regulators, and consultants without waiving ACP and WP
    • Significant difference among federal and state law regarding ACP and WP
    • Cross-border and multi-jurisdictional considerations affecting ACP and WP
  • Policy recommendations based on the risks presented by common fact patterns

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General, 1 Ethics

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General, 1 Ethics

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General, 1 Ethics

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General, 1 Professional Responsibility/Ethics

California

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General, 1 Ethics

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics / Professionalism

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General, 1 Ethics / Professionalism

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Enhanced Ethics

Florida

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General, 1 Ethics

Georgia

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General, 1.2 Ethics or Professional Responsibility Education

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics / Professionalism

Illinois

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General, 1 Ethics, Civility, Professionalism

Indiana

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General, 1 Ethics

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
1 Substantive, 1 Ethics / Professionalism

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maryland

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics / Professionalism

Michigan

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Minnesota

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics

Missouri

Approved for CLE Credits
1.2 General, 1.2 Ethics

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Professional Fitness and Integrity

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General, 1 Ethics

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Professional Responsibility

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
60 General minutes, 60 Ethics / Professionalism minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
1.2 General, 1.2 Ethics / Professionalism

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General, 1 Ethics / Professionalism

Nevada

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General, 1 Ethics / Professionalism

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
1.2 General, 1.2 Ethics / Professionalism

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General, 1 Professional Conduct

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics / Professionalism

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics

Pennsylvania

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General, 1 Ethics / Professionalism

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics / Professionalism

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics / Professionalism

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Tennessee

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General, 1 Dual

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General, 1 Ethics / Professionalism

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics / Professionalism

Virginia

Not Eligible
1 General Hours, 1 Ethics / Professionalism Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General, 1 Ethics

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
1 Law & Legal Hours, 1 Ethics Hours

Receive CLE credit in Washington via attorney submission.
Wisconsin

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
1.2 General, 1.2 Ethics / Professionalism

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics / Professionalism

More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
Using AI in Your Law Practice: A Step-by-Step Guide
Using AI in Your Law Practice: A Step-by-Step Guide Tue, January 27, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay
AI Disclosures: Wording, Liability & Litigation Risks
AI Disclosures: Wording, Liability & Litigation Risks Thu, January 29, 2026
Live Webcast
A, B, C’s of Revocable and Irrevocable Trusts
A, B, C’s of Revocable and Irrevocable Trusts Thu, January 29, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay
The AI-Powered Litigator: Real Tools, Real Cases, Real Results
The AI-Powered Litigator: Real Tools, Real Cases, Real Results Fri, January 30, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay
Mini-Med School for Lawyers (2026 Edition)
Mini-Med School for Lawyers (2026 Edition) Wed, February 4, 2026
Live Webcast
iPad for Lawyers: The Complete Mobile Practice Toolkit
iPad for Lawyers: The Complete Mobile Practice Toolkit Wed, February 18, 2026
Live Webcast