Concussion Litigation: What Neuroscience Tells Us About Brain Injuries

Michael Flomenhaft
Michael Flomenhaft
The Flomenhaft Law Firm

Michael Flomenhaft is a trial attorney at The Flomenhaft Law Firm whose practice is devoted primarily to representing victims of traumatic brain injury (TBI) and severe chronic pain. He has tried cases throughout the United States, frequently involving Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS), Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy (RSD), and other neurologically based pain conditions.

Bruce H. Stern
Bruce H. Stern
Stark & Stark, PC

Bruce H. Stern is a nationally recognized civil trial attorney and traumatic brain injury litigator at Stark & Stark, PC, where he focuses on representing victims of traumatic brain injuries, spinal cord injuries, construction incidents, and wrongful death matters. Certified as a Civil Trial Attorney by the Supreme Court of New Jersey and the National Board of Trial Advocacy, Bruce has built a distinguished reputation through decades of complex plaintiff-side litigation and leadership within the trial lawyer community.

Re-Broadcast: June 11, 2026

2 hour CLE

Tuition: $195.00
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

Master concussion litigation by leveraging neuroscience evidence, expert collaboration, and advanced imaging to overcome causation challenges, counter defense tactics, and maximize recovery in traumatic brain injury cases.

What will you learn

Attorneys will learn how neuroscience distinguishes gray matter from white matter injuries and why most concussions are white matter events undetectable by conventional imaging.

What will you gain

Attorneys will gain strategies to transform modest concussion recoveries into substantial ones using advanced imaging techniques, lay witnesses, and economic evidence anchoring.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Brain Anatomy
    Gray matter contains nerve cells; white matter provides connectivity between them.
  • Diagnostic Imaging
  • DTI, qEEG, PET scans, and SWI detect white matter damage invisible on conventional MRIs.
  • Brain Atrophy
    Wallerian degeneration causes gray matter atrophy months after injury, proving proximate cause.
  • Chronic Disease
    Mild TBI increases long-term risk of dementia, epilepsy, depression, and Parkinson's disease.
  • Lay Witnesses
    Before-and-after witnesses prove both damages and the injury itself in TBI cases.
  • Economic Damages
    Anchoring bias research shows economic evidence helps jurors understand appropriate case values.

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Date / Time: June 11, 2026

  • 2:00 pm – 4:10 pm Eastern
  • 1:00 pm – 3:10 pm Central
  • 12:00 pm – 2:10 pm Mountain
  • 11:00 am – 1:10 pm Pacific

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Michael Flomenhaft | The Flomenhaft Law Firm

Michael Flomenhaft is a trial attorney at The Flomenhaft Law Firm whose practice is devoted primarily to representing victims of traumatic brain injury (TBI) and severe chronic pain. He has tried cases throughout the United States, frequently involving Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS), Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy (RSD), and other neurologically based pain conditions. Known for his deep knowledge of the neurosciences, including neuroimaging, neuropsychology, neurobiology, and neuroanatomy, he brings a highly specialized approach to litigating complex injury claims. He is also recognized for his work addressing the psychological effects of trauma, such as Post-Traumatic Stress Syndrome (PTSD), and the evidentiary challenges associated with presenting these claims in court. His work has helped secure significant outcomes in cases where brain injuries were initially unrecognized or minimized, and he is frequently retained by attorneys to take over trial of complex brain injury and chronic pain cases.

  • Education & Credentials

Michael Flomenhaft earned his J.D. from Boston University School of Law and is a graduate of the Trial Lawyers College. He also holds a master’s degree in British and American Literature from Hofstra University, reflecting a multidisciplinary academic background that supports his work in complex litigation.

  • Recognition & Leadership

Michael Flomenhaft is recognized for achieving major awards in cases involving traumatic brain injuries that were initially unrecognized or medically minimized, including those without loss of consciousness or early diagnostic confirmation. He is also distinguished for securing landmark evidentiary rulings in New York courts establishing the scientific validity of advanced neuroimaging techniques such as Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI), Quantitative Electroencephalography (qEEG), and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) in litigation.

  • Professional Involvement

Michael Flomenhaft is actively involved in advancing the legal understanding and courtroom use of neuroscientific evidence in traumatic brain injury and chronic pain cases. He is frequently retained by New York attorneys to take over ongoing trials involving complex neurological injuries and contributes to the development of evidentiary standards for emerging medical technologies in litigation.

  • Experience

Michael Flomenhaft has extensive experience trying traumatic brain injury and chronic pain cases across the United States, including cases involving CRPS/RSD and other trauma-induced neurological conditions. His work includes litigating claims involving neuroimaging and neurological evidence, as well as addressing the psychological impacts of trauma such as PTSD. He has played a pioneering role in introducing advanced scientific evidence in court, including being the first New York lawyer to admit diffusion tensor imaging, quantitative MRI analysis showing brain atrophy, electrical evidence of sleep disturbance linked to brain injury, and fMRI evidence demonstrating severe chronic pain. His experience also includes taking over complex cases already in progress and securing outcomes in cases where injuries were initially overlooked or underestimated.

 

Bruce H. Stern | Stark & Stark, PC

Bruce H. Stern is a nationally recognized civil trial attorney and traumatic brain injury litigator at Stark & Stark, PC, where he focuses on representing victims of traumatic brain injuries, spinal cord injuries, construction incidents, and wrongful death matters. Certified as a Civil Trial Attorney by the Supreme Court of New Jersey and the National Board of Trial Advocacy, Bruce has built a distinguished reputation through decades of complex plaintiff-side litigation and leadership within the trial lawyer community. In addition to his active trial practice, he is widely known for his contributions to brain injury litigation scholarship, including publishing the Traumatic Brain Injury Law Blog, co-authoring the book Litigating Brain Injuries, and lecturing extensively on brain injury evidence, trial techniques, and advocacy strategies. Bruce has also served in major leadership roles within national and international legal organizations, including as President of the American Association for Justice from 2019–2020.

  • Education & Credentials

Bruce H. Stern is certified as a Civil Trial Attorney by both the Supreme Court of New Jersey and the National Board of Trial Advocacy, reflecting his advanced litigation experience and professional qualifications. He also completed OSHA’s 30-hour outreach training program for the construction industry, strengthening his expertise in construction-related injury litigation. In addition, Bruce is a Fellow of the International Academy of Trial Lawyers and the International Society of Barristers, two highly selective organizations recognizing exceptional trial lawyers.

  • Recognition & Leadership

Bruce has held numerous leadership positions throughout his career, most notably serving as President of the American Association for Justice from 2019 to 2020. He is also a member of the AAJ Executive Committee and National Board of Governors, and previously chaired both the Traumatic Brain Injury Litigation Group and AAJ’s Motor Vehicle Collision, Highway and Premises Section. In New Jersey, Bruce served as President of the New Jersey Association for Justice and received the organization’s highest honor, the Gold Medal for Distinguished Service. He additionally serves as Treasurer of the North American Brain Injury Society and is the past Treasurer of the International Brain Injury Association.

  • Professional Involvement

Bruce is deeply involved in legal education and professional advocacy related to traumatic brain injury litigation. Since 2004, he has published the Traumatic Brain Injury Law Blog to share insights and developments in the field. He is also a frequent lecturer on traumatic brain injury litigation, evidence, and trial techniques, and has authored numerous articles on these subjects. His contributions to legal scholarship include co-authoring Litigating Brain Injuries and contributing the chapter “Brain Injuries” to the AAJ Litigation Tort Case Series published by AAJ Press.

  • Experience

Bruce specializes in representing victims of traumatic brain injuries, spinal cord injuries, wrongful death, and construction-related incidents. Through his practice at Stark & Stark, PC, he has developed extensive experience handling complex injury litigation and advocating for catastrophically injured clients. His work combines advanced trial advocacy with a strong understanding of brain injury medicine, evidentiary issues, and construction safety standards, making him a highly sought-after attorney and speaker in the field of catastrophic injury litigation.

Agenda

SESSION 1 – The Hidden Severity of Concussions: Their Lasting Impact in Litigation | 2:00pm – 3:00pm

This session explores how concussions can become life-changing traumatic brain injuries, covering imaging pitfalls, warning signs of persistent impairment, essential assessments for proving damages, and common defense challenges in litigating traumatic brain injury cases.

BREAK | 3:00pm – 3:10pm

SESSION 2 – Litigating Complex Concussion Claims: Neuro-Evidence for Recovery | 3:10pm – 4:10pm

This session examines effective collaboration with medical and forensic experts, strategies for proving long-term damages, persuasive trial themes for educating juries on brain injury science, and causation challenges involving biomechanical forces and clinical presentation in traumatic brain injury litigation.

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General

Arkansas

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

California

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Florida

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 General Hours

Receive CLE credit in Florida via Attorney Submission.
Georgia

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Illinois

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General

Indiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
2 Substantive

Kentucky

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maryland

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Michigan

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Minnesota

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General

Missouri

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2.4 General

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Montana

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
120 General minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General

Nevada

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Oregon

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General

Pennsylvania

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General

Rhode Island

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Tennessee

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Utah

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General

Virginia

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 Law & Legal Hours

Receive CLE credit in Washington via Attorney Submission. myLawCLE will supply Washington state attorneys with instructions on how to gain credit.
Wisconsin

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General

West Virginia

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2.4 General

Wyoming

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General

Preview
More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
The AI Skills Every Attorney Needs: Think, Prompt, Win
The AI Skills Every Attorney Needs: Think, Prompt, Win Thu, May 28, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay
How to Resolve IRS Tax Debts 2026 Edition
How to Resolve IRS Tax Debts 2026 Edition Mon, June 1, 2026
Live Webcast
iPad for Lawyers: The Complete Mobile Practice Toolkit
iPad for Lawyers: The Complete Mobile Practice Toolkit Thu, June 4, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay
A, B, C’s of Revocable and Irrevocable Trusts
A, B, C’s of Revocable and Irrevocable Trusts Fri, June 5, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay
Playing Defense at 30(b)(6) Depositions (2026 Edition)
Playing Defense at 30(b)(6) Depositions (2026 Edition) Wed, June 10, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay
Professionalism and Civility [2026 Edition]
Professionalism and Civility [2026 Edition] Fri, June 19, 2026
Live Webcast
Branding for Firms: Ethics & Strategy
Branding for Firms: Ethics & Strategy Thu, July 16, 2026
Live Webcast