DEI Under a Microscope – Update on EEOC Enforcement Trends and the Evolving Legal Landscape

Alissa A. Horvitz
Alissa A. Horvitz
Roffman Horvitz, PLC

Alissa A. Horvitz is a Member Attorney and co-founder of Roffman Horvitz, PLC, a firm that provides employers with one-stop human resources and regulatory compliance counsel, distinguished by advanced capabilities in employment data analytics.

Joshua S. Roffman
Joshua S. Roffman
Horvitz, PLC

Joshua S. Roffman is the Managing Attorney and co-founder of Roffman Horvitz, PLC, a firm that advises employers on a broad array of human resources compliance matters with distinctive in-house capabilities in employment data analytics.

Live Video-Broadcast: September 22, 2026

2 hour CLE

Tuition: $195.00
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary


The EEOC’s DEI target list is long. Its docket is not

In June 2026, the EEOC issued a National Enforcement Plan aimed squarely at policies, programs, and practices labeled “diversity, equity, and inclusion.” It departs from the Biden-era Strategic Enforcement Plan in priorities, investigative approach, and authority to self-initiate DEI investigations.

The consequences are already visible. Commissioner charges now self-initiate investigations into DEI programs, policies, compensation structures, and workplace practices. Publicized investigative document requests and subpoena enforcement actions follow. The Nike subpoena action and the NYT countersuit are already testing the limits of the agency's authority. Ames v. Ohio and Muldrow v. City of St. Louis may shift the standards for DEI-related discrimination claims.

This program separates established litigation risks from emerging areas of concern. Attendees will see which DEI initiatives have already generated filed cases and which have not. They leave able to identify the DEI practices that carry litigation risk, grounded in cases litigated and settlements through mid-2026.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Enforcement Priorities Reset
    How the June 2026 National Enforcement Plan redirects the EEOC's priorities, investigative approach, and self-initiation authority away from the Biden-era Strategic Enforcement Plan.
  • Litigated vs. Emerging Risk
    Which DEI initiatives have already generated filed cases and which remain enforcement priorities without litigation — the line between established risk and emerging concern.
  • Practices Drawing Charges
    The specific DEI programs, policies, compensation structures, and workplace practices prompting commissioner charges, subpoenas, or lawsuits through mid-2026 — and how the commissioner-charge mechanism initiates and advances them.
  • Limits of EEOC Authority
    What the NYT countersuit and the Nike subpoena enforcement action reveal about how far the agency can reach under the 2026 NEP.
  • Multi-Front Federal Pressure
    How the EEOC, DOJ, and Trump Administration combine enforcement, investigative, and regulatory strategies to challenge, discourage, or influence employer DEI programs.
  • Supreme Court Standards
    How Ames v. Ohio and Muldrow v. City of St. Louis change the standards counsel should apply when evaluating potential DEI-related discrimination claims.

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Date / Time: September 22, 2026

  • 2:30 pm – 4:40 pm Eastern
  • 1:30 pm – 3:40 pm Central
  • 12:30 pm – 2:40 pm Mountain
  • 11:30 am – 1:40 pm Pacific

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Alissa A. Horvitz, Member Attorney & Co-founder | Roffman Horvitz, PLC

Alissa A. Horvitz is a Member Attorney and co-founder of Roffman Horvitz, PLC, a firm that provides employers with one-stop human resources and regulatory compliance counsel, distinguished by advanced capabilities in employment data analytics. With more than 35 years of experience advising employers, Alissa serves as the firm’s lead or co-lead attorney across a wide range of practice areas, including federal contractor EEO and affirmative action plans, statistical analysis of hiring, promotion, and termination decisions, privileged audits of DEI programs, I-9/E-Verify compliance, exempt/non-exempt classification, the use of artificial intelligence in employment, and reductions in force under the WARN Act and OWBPA.

  • Education & Credentials

Alissa earned her J.D. from The George Washington University Law School in 1990 and her B.S. from Cornell University’s School of Industrial and Labor Relations (ILR) in 1987. She is admitted to practice in Maryland (1990), the District of Columbia (1991), and Virginia (2017).

  • Recognition & Leadership

As a co-founder and Member Attorney of Roffman Horvitz, Alissa has helped build a firm recognized for its unique expertise in employment data analytics and federal contractor compliance. She serves as the firm’s lead or co-lead attorney in its core practice areas, reflecting her standing as an authority on affirmative action, DEI program audits, False Claims Act defense, and the emerging area of AI in employment.

  • Professional Involvement

Alissa particularly enjoys educating the employer community, regularly conducting live and web-based training on employment topics such as lawful inclusion and training programs, applicant tracking, and regulatory compliance. Through the firm’s webinars, client updates, and events, she is a consistent voice keeping employers informed on developments in EEO, affirmative action, and human resources compliance.

  • Experience

Over more than three decades, Alissa has developed deep experience advising clients on inclusion and diversity programs, federal contractor employment regulations, and the analysis of employment data, giving her a thorough understanding of the full range of human resources issues and how they affect businesses and organizations. She counsels employers on EEO and affirmative action plan development, statistical analyses of hire, promotion, and termination decisions, privileged DEI program audits, unlawful DEI and False Claims Act defense, I-9 and E-Verify compliance, wage-and-hour classification, the use of AI in employment decisions, EEO and inclusion training, employment manuals and workplace policies, and reductions in force. Her work provides employers an affordable outside-counsel option combining practical HR guidance with sophisticated data-analytics capabilities.

 

Joshua S. Roffman, Managing Attorney and Co-Founder | Roffman Horvitz, PLC

Joshua S. Roffman is the Managing Attorney and co-founder of Roffman Horvitz, PLC, a firm that advises employers on a broad array of human resources compliance matters with distinctive in-house capabilities in employment data analytics. With more than 20 years of experience advising employers, Josh serves as the firm’s lead or co-lead attorney across key practice areas, including federal contractor EEO and affirmative action plans, statistical analysis of hiring, promotion, and termination decisions, pay equity analyses, unlawful DEI and False Claims Act defense, I-9/E-Verify compliance, exempt/non-exempt classification, the use of artificial intelligence in employment, and reductions in force under the WARN Act and OWBPA.

  • Education & Credentials

Josh earned his J.D. from Georgetown University Law Center in 2002 and his B.A. from Johns Hopkins University in 1996. He is admitted to practice in Virginia (2002) and the District of Columbia (2004).

  • Recognition & Leadership

As Managing Attorney and co-founder of Roffman Horvitz, Josh leads a firm recognized for its unique blend of employment law and statistical analytics. He serves as the firm’s lead or co-lead attorney in its core practice areas—from federal contractor compliance to pay equity and AI in employment—and brings a rare combination of legal, statistical, and business acumen to the counsel he provides.

  • Professional Involvement

Josh’s practice reflects deep engagement with the evolving landscape of pay equity and workplace regulation, including emerging frameworks such as the EU Pay Transparency Directive and Canadian pay equity plans. Through the firm’s webinars, client updates, and events, he helps keep the employer community informed on developments in compensation analysis, federal contractor obligations, and human resources compliance.

  • Experience

Josh has deep experience advising clients on pay equity, inclusion and diversity programs, federal contractor employment regulations, and the analysis of employment data, giving him a thorough understanding of the full range of human resources issues and how they affect businesses and organizations. He combines his command of employment law, statistics, and business operations to develop regressions and other statistical analyses of employment practices—including compensation—tailored to each client’s specific goals and circumstances. Working closely with clients to determine how best to structure the analyses, Josh and the firm run these studies in-house, providing employers an affordable outside-counsel option that pairs practical compliance guidance with sophisticated data-analytics capabilities.

Agenda

SESSION 1 – The EEOC’s DEI Enforcement Plan: Eight Target Practices Versus Actual Case Selection | 2:30pm – 2:45pm

This session compares the EEOC’s 2026 National Enforcement Plan with the Biden-era Strategic Enforcement Plan, focusing on how the agency’s priorities, investigative approach, and authority to self-initiate DEI investigations have changed.

SESSION 2 – DEI Initiatives Facing Litigation | 2:45pm – 3:00pm

This session examines which types of DEI initiatives have already generated litigation and which remain enforcement priorities without resulting in filed cases, helping employers distinguish established litigation risks from emerging areas of concern.

SESSION 3 – DEI Practices Triggering EEOC Action | 3:00pm – 3:15pm

This session identifies the specific DEI programs, policies, compensation structures, and workplace practices that have prompted EEOC commissioner charges, subpoenas, or lawsuits through mid-2026.

SESSION 4 – Commissioner Charges and DEI Enforcement | 3:15pm – 3:30pm

This session explains how the EEOC’s commissioner-charge mechanism works and examines how it has been used to initiate or advance enforcement actions involving employer DEI practices.

BREAK | 3:30pm – 3:40pm

SESSION 5 – The Limits of EEOC Authority | 3:40pm – 4:00pm

This session examines the NYT countersuit and Nike subpoena enforcement action to assess what these disputes reveal about the scope and limits of the EEOC’s enforcement authority under the 2026 NEP.

SESSION 6 – Federal Pressure on Employer DEI Programs | 4:00pm – 4:20pm

This session explores the enforcement, investigative, and regulatory strategies used by the EEOC, DOJ, and Trump Administration to challenge, discourage, or influence employer DEI programs and policies.

SESSION 7 – Supreme Court Impact on DEI Cases | 4:20pm – 4:40pm

This session examines how Ames v. Ohio and Muldrow v. City of St. Louis may affect DEI-related discrimination claims, including the standards employers and counsel should consider when evaluating potential litigation.

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

California

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Florida

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 General Hours

Receive CLE credit in Florida via attorney submission.
Georgia

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Illinois

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Indiana

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
2 Substantive

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maryland

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Michigan

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Minnesota

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Missouri

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
120 General minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Nevada

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Pennsylvania

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Tennessee

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Virginia

Not Eligible
2 General Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 Law & Legal Hours

Receive CLE credit in Washington via attorney submission.
Wisconsin

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
2.4 General

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
Derivatives, Digital Assets, and AI in Financial Markets
Derivatives, Digital Assets, and AI in Financial Markets Fri, September 11, 2026
Live Webcast