Verifying the Machine: Catching AI Hallucinations in Your Briefs and Your Opponent’s

Frank Ramos
Frank Ramos | Goldberg Segalla

Frank Ramos is a nationally recognized litigator with more than 26 years of experience defending clients in civil matters, including retail, product liability, premises liability, trucking, insurance, and commercial disputes. He has taken numerous cases to verdict and advises businesses across the hospitality, retail, development, and fitness industries. His product liability work spans toxic exposure and personal injury claims in pharmaceuticals, construction, medical devices, and automotive sectors.

Live Video-Broadcast: October 9, 2026

2 hour CLE

Tuition: $195.00
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

 

Fabricated authority now cuts both ways — the question is who catches it first

Generative AI has moved from novelty to daily research tool, and the ground rules have moved with it. ABA Formal Opinion 512 and a spreading patchwork of local AI-disclosure rules now define what competent, candid use of these tools requires. Courts are no longer treating fabricated authority as an innocent mistake.

File a brief with a hallucinated citation and Rule 11 exposure follows. Miss a fabricated case in an opponent's filing and a decisive sanctions vehicle goes unused. Choose the wrong framework — Rule 11, 28 U.S.C. § 1927, or inherent power — and the motion fails on procedure. Ignore a local disclosure rule and the liability compounds.

You leave with practitioner work product, not theory. For your own filings: a six-step verification protocol, a repeatable pre-filing checklist, and a documented, defensible workflow. For your opponent's: a replicable litigation playbook running from the first suspicious citation through a sanctions motion or bar referral. No AI tool exercises that judgment for you — this program shows you where it must be applied.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • AI Failure Modes
    How hallucination rates and misgrounding across leading AI tools — including legal-specific platforms — change what you must verify before any citation reaches a brief.
  • Six-Step Verification Protocol
    A repeatable pre-filing checklist covering citation existence, holding accuracy, quotation fidelity, and subsequent history, integrated into a documented office workflow.
  • Ethics and Disclosure
    What ABA Formal Opinion 512 and evolving local AI-disclosure rules require attorneys to do — and to document — before filing.
  • Sanctions Landscape and Vehicles
    What courts are imposing and why, and how to select among Rule 11, 28 U.S.C. § 1927, and inherent-power frameworks in a given fact pattern.
  • Opponent-Brief Red Flags
    The textual and citation-level signals that distinguish genuine AI confabulation from ordinary citation error in an opposing brief.
  • The Litigation Playbook
    The procedural sequence to execute from the first suspicious citation through a sanctions motion or bar referral.

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Date / Time: October 9, 2026

  • 2:30 pm – 4:40 pm Eastern
  • 1:30 pm – 3:40 pm Central
  • 12:30 pm – 2:40 pm Mountain
  • 11:30 am – 1:40 pm Pacific

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Frank Ramos, Partner | Goldberg Segalla

Frank Ramos is a nationally recognized litigator with more than 26 years of experience defending clients in civil matters, including retail, product liability, premises liability, trucking, insurance, and commercial disputes. He has taken numerous cases to verdict and advises businesses across the hospitality, retail, development, and fitness industries. His product liability work spans toxic exposure and personal injury claims in pharmaceuticals, construction, medical devices, and automotive sectors. Twice named Miami’s Product Liability Lawyer of the Year by Best Lawyers in America, Frank is also a leading voice on AI adoption, helping clients navigate legal and regulatory challenges. A prolific author and mentor known as the “Miami Mentor,” he has written 20 books and over 500 articles guiding the next generation of lawyers.

  • Education & Credentials

Frank earned his J.D., magna cum laude, from the University of Miami School of Law in 1997 and his B.A., summa cum laude, from Florida International University in 1993. He has been a member of The Florida Bar since 1997 and is admitted to practice before the U.S. District Courts for the Middle and Southern Districts of Florida. He holds an AV Preeminent peer review rating from Martindale-Hubbell.

  • Recognition & Leadership

Best Lawyers in America named Frank Miami’s “Lawyer of the Year” for Product Liability Litigation – Defendants in 2020 and 2023 and for Personal Injury Litigation – Defendants in 2025, and lists him for Commercial Litigation and Insurance Litigation in 2026. His further honors include Florida Super Lawyers (2013–26), Florida Trend’s Florida Legal Elite (2009–23), Forbes America’s Best-in-State Lawyers (2025), and recognition by The Florida Bar as its 2025 Mentor of the Year. The Federation of Defense and Corporate Counsel has honored him with the Andrew C. Hecker Award (2024), the President’s Award (2020, 2022), and several additional service awards.

  • Professional Involvement

A member of the Federation of Defense and Corporate Counsel since 2006, Frank serves as its Secretary-Treasurer for 2026 following board service as Director, Senior Director, and Executive Committee member, and served as Vice Chair of its AI Committee (2024–25). He sits on the Defense Research Institute’s Artificial Intelligence Task Force and previously served on the DRI board (2013–16). A member of the Florida Defense Lawyers Association since 1998, he served as its President in 2009 and has held board roles with the Miami-Dade Defense Bar Association and the Eleventh Judicial Circuit Historical Society.

  • Experience

Frank has defended clients in civil litigation for more than 26 years, taking numerous trials and arbitrations to verdict or award across the retail, hospitality, transportation, manufacturing, health care, and construction industries. His product liability practice covers pharmaceutical, construction, medical device, and automotive matters, including toxic exposure and personal injury claims. He has given more than 400 presentations to lawyers and claims professionals, written 20 books and over 500 published articles, and is an active thought leader on artificial intelligence in legal practice.

Agenda

SESSION 1 – A Repeatable System for Verifying AI-Generated Citations and Holdings | 2:30pm – 3:30pm

This session equips attorneys with a structured, six-step verification protocol for AI-generated legal research, covering citation existence, holding accuracy, quotation fidelity, and subsequent history. Attendees will learn how leading AI tools—including legal-specific platforms—fail, what the current sanctions landscape requires of them, and how to build a defensible, documented workflow before any AI-assisted brief leaves the office. Attorneys completing this session will be able to identify the specific failure modes of generative AI in legal research, apply a repeatable pre-filing checklist, and select the right verification tools for their practice.

BREAK | 3:30pm – 3:40pm

SESSION 2 – Catching AI Hallucinations in an Opponent’s Brief and Litigating What Follows | 3:40pm – 4:40pm

This session equips litigators to identify fabricated or distorted AI-generated authority in opposing briefs, select the correct sanctions vehicle, and execute the procedural steps that follow discovery of a hallucination. Attorneys will learn the red flags that distinguish genuine AI confabulation from ordinary citation error, the Rule 11, § 1927, and inherent-power frameworks courts have applied, and how local AI-disclosure rules create compounding liability. Attendees leave with a replicable litigation playbook — from the first suspicious citation through a sanctions motion or bar referral.

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General, 1 Ethics

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General, 1 Ethics

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General, 1 Professional Responsibility/Ethics

California

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General, 1 Ethics

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics / Professionalism

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General, 1 Ethics / Professionalism

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Enhanced Ethics

Florida

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics

Georgia

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General, 1 Ethics or Professional Responsibility Education

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics / Professionalism

Illinois

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics, Civility, Professionalism

Indiana

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
1 Substantive, 1 Ethics / Professionalism

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maryland

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics / Professionalism

Michigan

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Minnesota

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics

Missouri

Approved for CLE Credits
1.2 General, 1.2 Ethics

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Professional Fitness and Integrity

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General, 1 Ethics

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Professional Responsibility

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
60 General minutes, 60 Ethics / Professionalism minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General, 1 Ethics / Professionalism

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General, 1 Ethics / Professionalism

Nevada

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics / Professionalism

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General, 1 Ethics / Professionalism

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Professional Conduct

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics / Professionalism

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics

Pennsylvania

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General, 1 Ethics / Professionalism

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics / Professionalism

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics / Professionalism

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Tennessee

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Dual

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General, 1 Ethics / Professionalism

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics / Professionalism

Virginia

Not Eligible
1 General Hours, 1 Ethics / Professionalism Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General, 1 Ethics

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
1 Law & Legal Hours, 1 Ethics Hours

Receive CLE credit in Washington via attorney submission.
Wisconsin

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
1.2 General, 1.2 Ethics / Professionalism

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
1 General, 1 Ethics / Professionalism

More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
iPad for Lawyers: The Complete Mobile Practice Toolkit
iPad for Lawyers: The Complete Mobile Practice Toolkit Wed, August 26, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay
When AI Notetakers Break Privilege in Internal Investigations
When AI Notetakers Break Privilege in Internal Investigations Fri, August 28, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay