James D. Snyder is the Managing Shareholder of Klinedinst PC’s San Diego office, where he serves as Chair of the firm’s Transactional Practice Group and Co-Chair of its Artificial Intelligence (AI) Group. His practice centers on business transactions, mergers and acquisitions, and data privacy and security, and he is regularly engaged as an outside general counsel by emerging startups and established companies alike.
Lori S. Ross is a Partner with OGC with over 25 years of experience advising companies on data privacy, AI governance, and commercial contracts, including SaaS/IaaS agreements and licensing for clients ranging from startups to Fortune 100 companies giving her a practical, business-first approach to structuring deals that manage risk while enabling growth. She holds the AIGP, CIPP/U.S., CIPP/E, and CIPM and FIP designations from the IAPP and is admitted to practice in California, Colorado, and D.C.
Live Video-Broadcast: September 17, 2026
Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs
A consent banner alone may not be enough — and a pre-load banner can destroy the defense
Plaintiffs’ firms are recasting the California Invasion of Privacy Act as a weapon against everyday website tools. Session-replay software, chat widgets, analytics tools, and advertising pixels now draw wiretap and pen register claims. Demand letters arrive before any lawsuit, and SB 690’s proposed fix remains unenacted.
The stakes compound quickly. Let a tracking tool transmit before opt-in, and the consent banner may not be enough. Deploy a pre-load banner, and it can destroy the defense rather than support it. Miss the Ninth Circuit’s party exception or § 638.51’s scope, and pleading-stage defenses slip away. Choose the wrong forum, and a removable case stays in state court.
This program is built around work product, not doctrine. Attendees leave with a concrete framework for evaluating CIPA exposure, demand letters, forum selection, and settlement strategy — plus a practical website tracking audit checklist and a remediation guide covering consent configuration, server-side tagging, and vendor contract protections. These are judgment-driven tools, applied client-by-client, that no automated summary can substitute for.
Key topics to be discussed:
This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.
Date / Time: September 17, 2026
Closed-captioning available
James D. Snyder, Managing Shareholder | Klinedinst PC
James D. Snyder is the Managing Shareholder of Klinedinst PC’s San Diego office, where he serves as Chair of the firm’s Transactional Practice Group and Co-Chair of its Artificial Intelligence (AI) Group. His practice centers on business transactions, mergers and acquisitions, and data privacy and security, and he is regularly engaged as an outside general counsel by emerging startups and established companies alike.
Mr. Snyder earned his J.D. from California Western School of Law and his B.A. from the University of California, Santa Barbara. He is admitted to practice in California and before the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California.
Mr. Snyder is recognized in Legal 500’s City Elite Series for Corporate and M&A (2026) and received the John D. Klinedinst Entrepreneurial Spirit Award (2023). At Klinedinst, he leads as Managing Shareholder of the San Diego office, Chair of the Transactional Practice Group, and Co-Chair of the AI Group.
Appointed in 2020 to the USLAW NETWORK Data Privacy and Security Practice Group, Mr. Snyder serves as its Educational Coordinator. He is a member of the International Association of Privacy Professionals (IAPP) and the San Diego County Bar Association, and mentors through Ignite at the University of California, San Diego.
Mr. Snyder has counseled clients at the leading edge of data privacy, advising on the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), negotiating data processing agreements with major auto manufacturers, and building GDPR-compliant processes for international connected and autonomous car connectivity providers. He previously served as Chief Legal and Compliance Executive of a software development testing company, where he helped grow annual revenue from $10 million to more than $100 million in approximately three years and led the company’s $375 million acquisition by a publicly held international technology company. His work spans commercial SaaS, financial services, licensing, and professional services contracts, along with export and open-source software compliance.
Lori S. Ross, Partner | Outside General Counsel LLP
Lori S. Ross is a Partner with OGC with over 25 years of experience advising companies on data privacy, AI governance, and commercial contracts, including SaaS/IaaS agreements and licensing for clients ranging from startups to Fortune 100 companies giving her a practical, business-first approach to structuring deals that manage risk while enabling growth. She holds the AIGP, CIPP/U.S., CIPP/E, and CIPM and FIP designations from the IAPP and is admitted to practice in California, Colorado, and D.C.
Ms. Ross earned her J.D. from UCLA Law School, an LL.M. from University College London, where she was a Bentham Scholar, and her B.A. from the University of California, Berkeley. She is admitted to the bars of California, Colorado, and the District of Columbia.
Ms. Ross was named a Bentham Scholar at University College London, and her career includes senior legal leadership posts as Vice President of Legal and Business Affairs at FanDragon Technologies and Chief Legal Officer of Global Mobile Vision in Dublin, Ireland.
She is a member of the International Association of Privacy Professionals (IAPP) and holds the AIGP, CIPP/US, CIPP/E, and CIPM designations.
Across more than 25 years of practice, Ms. Ross has advised new, emerging, and established technology, manufacturing, pharmaceutical, and media companies, with broad experience counseling SaaS and IaaS providers. Her prior roles include Vice President of Legal and Business Affairs at FanDragon Technologies, Chief Legal Officer of Global Mobile Vision in Dublin, Ireland, legal consultant through Lori S. Ross, LLC, and attorney with Paige & Co. in London, England. She speaks fluent French and has lived and worked on three continents.
SESSION 1 – Defending CIPA Web-Tracking Demand Letters and Wiretap Lawsuits | 1:00pm – 2:00pm ET
This session equips defense counsel to respond to California Invasion of Privacy Act demand letters and defend wiretap and pen register lawsuits arising from website tracking technologies. Attorneys will learn how to evaluate your client’s potential exposure, the current circuit-level authority, strategies for defenses, forum selection strategies, key elements for settlements and the status of SB 690’s attempt to unwind CIPA issues for California businesses. Attendees leave with a concrete framework for evaluating client’s CIPA exposure, CIPA demand letters, forum selection, procedural defenses, as well as settlement and client triage strategies.
BREAK | 2:00pm – 2:10pm ET
SESSION 2 – Auditing and Fixing Website Tracking Before the Next CIPA Letter | 2:10pm – 3:10pm ET
In this session, I will walk attorneys through how to evaluate a client’s website for potential CIPA exposure before a demand letter arrives. I will explain how to identify the tracking technologies operating on a website, determine what information they collect and transmit, and prioritize the tools that present the greatest litigation risk. We will look closely at session-replay software, chat widgets, analytics tools, and advertising pixels, as well as why simply displaying a consent banner may not be enough if those technologies begin transmitting information before the user opts in. I will also discuss how consent platforms should be configured, how server-side tagging and data minimization can reduce exposure, and what protections should be included in vendor contracts. Finally, I will cover how attorneys should counsel clients regarding SB 690 while it remains unenacted and what ongoing testing and monitoring should occur after remediation. Attendees will leave with a practical audit checklist and remediation framework they can use with their own clients.
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved via Attorney Submission
2 General Hours
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 Substantive
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)
No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
120 General minutes
Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Not Eligible
2 General Hours
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Approved via Attorney Submission
2 Law & Legal Hours
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2.4 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General