From Policy to Practice: The Appeals Council Since SSR 24-3p – NOSSCR 2026 Fall National Conference – Track II (Presented by National Organization of Social Security Claimants’ Representatives)

Erica Cortizas
Erica Cortizas
Genex Services, LLC

Since being admitted to practice in 2001, Erica has practiced primarily in the area of Social Security Disability Benefits and Workers Compensation.

Sarah Deaver
Sarah Deaver
Enlyte

Sarah Deaver, Esq. serves as the Senior Director for Disability Programs at Enlyte, where she oversees the entire Social Security program as well as the Disability Absence and Ticket to Work divisions from an operations and customer perspective.

Live Video-Broadcast: October 16, 2026

1 hour CLE

Tuition: $395.00
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
This program is only available to All-Access Pass Members.
Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

 

Everyone Expected SSR 24-3p to Reshape Appeals Council Review. The Decisions Say Otherwise

When SSR 24-3p was first introduced, there was considerable interest in how it would influence Appeals Council review. This presentation answers with data rather than prediction: a review of approximately 100 recent Appeals Council decisions, spanning a wide range of age categories, past relevant work backgrounds, and appellate issues.

The finding cuts against the expectation. The recent decisions examined suggest the Council has generally continued to focus on other appeal issues. That is itself the practical lesson — knowing what the Council is actually deciding on tells a representative where an appeal's real chances lie, and where SSR 24-3p arguments fit in the larger appellate picture.

You walk out with the emerging trends, notable outcomes, and practical lessons — useful insight for evaluating whether to pursue Appeals Council review, and what the recent decisions mean for appeals after SSR 24-3p.

Eligible for up to 1 CLE Credit Hour

This session was originally submitted for CLE as a live, in-person presentation and a live webcast for the 2026 Fall National Conference and may be eligible for self-study credit. Each state handles self-study credit differently; for questions, please consult your State Bar Association.

Recorded Friday, October 16, 2026.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • The 100-Appeal Review
    Findings from approximately 100 recent Appeals Council decisions examined for this presentation.
  • SSR 24-3p at the Council
    How the Appeals Council has addressed SSR 24-3p since it took effect.
  • What the Council Actually Decides
    The finding that the Council has generally continued to focus on other appeal issues.
  • Trends Across Case Types
    Emerging trends across a wide range of age categories, past relevant work backgrounds, and appellate issues.
  • Whether to Pursue Review
    Using the decisions to evaluate whether Appeals Council review is worth pursuing.
  • Appeals After SSR 24-3p
    What the recent decisions may mean for appeals going forward.

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Date / Time: October 16, 2026

  • 1:00 pm – 2:00 pm Eastern
  • 12:00 pm – 1:00 pm Central
  • 11:00 am – 12:00 pm Mountain
  • 10:00 am – 11:00 am Pacific

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Erica Cortizas | Genex Services, LLC

Since being admitted to practice in 2001, Erica has practiced primarily in the area of Social Security Disability Benefits and Workers Compensation.

  • Professional Involvement

She has previously spoken at NOSSCR and FOSSCR conferences and has represented thousands of claimants at hearings.

  • Experience

Erica currently works for Genex Services, LLC where she handles mostly referrals from LTD companies, so she has the benefit of being able to appeal a large number of cases to the Appeals Council. Her senior managers are also regular speakers at NOSSCR. Erica appreciates the opportunity to share her findings from Appeals Council decisions since the implementation of SSR 24-3p in January of 2025.

 

Sarah Deaver, Esq., Senior Director for Disability Programs | Enlyte

Sarah Deaver, Esq. serves as the Senior Director for Disability Programs at Enlyte, where she oversees the entire Social Security program as well as the Disability Absence and Ticket to Work divisions from an operations and customer perspective.

  • Education & Credentials

She holds a Juris Doctorate from the University of Memphis School of Law and a Bachelor of Science in Nursing from Emory University. Sarah is licensed to practice law and a registered nurse in the state of Georgia.

  • Recognition & Leadership

Additionally, as the head of legislative affairs with more than 17 years of diversified Social Security experience, she leads the department on emerging enforcement trends and regulatory interpretations before they impact case outcomes. Her workshops on strategic case development have been particularly valuable for her team navigating complex or changing fact patterns in the evolving disability landscape.

  • Experience

Drawing from her unique combination of legal practice, nursing expertise, and claims management leadership, Sarah has developed a systematic approach to translating complex regulatory shifts into actionable strategies for practitioners. Working as a licensed attorney and registered nurse, Sarah brings an interdisciplinary perspective to program integrity issues and medical evidence development—offering practitioners a blueprint for excellence in an increasingly complex field.

Agenda

SESSION 1 – From Policy to Practice: The Appeals Council Since SSR 24-3p | 1:00pm – 2:00pm

How has the Appeals Council addressed SSR 24-3p since it took effect? A review of recent Appeals Council decisions highlights emerging trends, notable outcomes, and practical lessons for representatives. Based on a review of approximately 100 appeals, this presentation examines Appeals Council decisions involving a wide range of age categories, past relevant work backgrounds, and appellate issues. When SSR 24-3p was first introduced, there was considerable interest in how it would influence Appeals Council review. However, the recent Appeals Council decisions examined suggest that the Council has generally continued to focus on other appeal issues. These decisions provide useful insight for representatives evaluating whether to pursue Appeals Council review and what recent Appeals Council decisions may mean for appeals after SSR 24-3p.

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

California

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
1 CLE Hour(s)

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Florida

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Georgia

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Illinois

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Indiana

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
1 Substantive

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
1 CLE Hour(s)

Maryland

No MCLE Required
1 CLE Hour(s)

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Michigan

No MCLE Required
1 CLE Hour(s)

Minnesota

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Missouri

Approved for CLE Credits
1.2 General

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
60 General minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

Nevada

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Pennsylvania

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
1 CLE Hour(s)

Tennessee

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Virginia

Not Eligible
1 General Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
1 Law & Legal Hours

Receive CLE credit in Washington via attorney submission.
Wisconsin

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
1.2 General

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
Derivatives, Digital Assets, and AI in Financial Markets
Derivatives, Digital Assets, and AI in Financial Markets Fri, September 11, 2026
Live Webcast