Officials’ Texts, Chats, and AI Transcripts Under Public Records Laws: Agency Search Protocols and Defending Public Records Lawsuits

J. Leah Castella
J. Leah Castella
Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP

Leah Castella is a partner in the Oakland office of Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP, and a seasoned public law lawyer, litigator, and appellate advocate.

Alexandra Mulhall
Alexandra Mulhall
Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP

Alexandra (Alex) Mulhall is an associate in the Los Angeles office of Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP, and a member of the firm’s Public Law and Litigation practice groups.

Live Video-Broadcast: November 30, 2026

2 hour CLE

Tuition: $195.00
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

 

The Agency Never Holds the Phone — But It Still Owns the Search

Government business no longer stays on government systems. Public officials now conduct it on personal phones, disappearing-message apps like Signal, and AI meeting tools such as Microsoft Copilot. Teams chats, AI applications, and notetakers create records every day. The question is no longer only what the agency holds, but what sits on an official’s own device.

The stakes arrive with a single request. Miss a council member’s texts, and the search becomes the lawsuit. Skip written search instructions, and the certification is hard to defend. Leave AI transcripts unclassified, and retention policies for transitory records lose reliability. Mishandle a resistant official, and exposure under the California Public Records Act grows, fee demands included.

This panel walks city and agency attorneys through both stages: preserving and collecting records from personal devices, then defending the search. You leave with a personal-device search certification/affidavit template, a retention and policy guide chart by record type, a guide for drafting strong search criteria and extraction instructions, and an electronic record policy checklist — practitioner judgment for the produce, supplement, or litigate decision.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Proactive Device Guidance
    Set communication and personal device guidance before a request arrives, so officials know
    where government business belongs.
  • Custodian Search Instructions
    Give custodians notice and written search instructions, then choose between self-export and
    neutral-examiner extraction.
  • Defensible Search Certifications
    Craft self-search certifications and affidavits that encourage compliance and hold up when the
    search is challenged.
  • AI and Chat Retention
    Configure retention for Teams chat, AI applications, and notetakers, decide whether AI transcripts
    are official records or transitory drafts, and test how reliable your transitory-record policies are.
  • Pre-Litigation Risk Control
    Identify and minimize risk before a suit through strategic and compliant withholding, with a clear
    view of the scope of public records suits and potential exposure.
  • Post-Filing Strategy
    Decide after filing whether to produce, supplement, or stand on the record, and manage resistant
    officials before and after the suit.

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Date / Time: November 30, 2026

  • 12:00 pm – 2:10 pm Eastern
  • 11:00 am – 1:10 pm Central
  • 10:00 am – 12:10 pm Mountain
  • 9:00 am – 11:10 am Pacific

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Leah Castella, Partner | Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP

Leah Castella is a partner in the Oakland office of Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP, and a seasoned public law lawyer, litigator, and appellate advocate. She currently serves as General Counsel of the Ironhouse Sanitary District, the Valley of the Moon Water District, and the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District, and as Assistant General Counsel for the Union Sanitary District. Deeply familiar with the full range of laws affecting California public agencies—including the Brown Act, the Public Records Act, the Political Reform Act, Proposition 218, and the Public Trust Doctrine—Leah has particular expertise advising public agencies on governance, rate setting, election law, and constitutional law.

  • Education & Credentials

Leah received her J.D. with Honors from the University of Texas School of Law in 1999 and her B.A. in Philosophy from Lewis & Clark College in 1995. She is admitted to the State Bar of California and before the U.S. Supreme Court, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, and all four U.S. District Courts in California.

  • Recognition & Leadership

Leah was recognized by Women’s eNews as one of its “21 Leaders for the 21st Century” (2011) and received the 2003 Burton Award for Excellence in Legal Writing. Within the firm, she serves as a partner in its public law and litigation practices, and her leadership extends to multiple public agencies for which she serves as general or assistant general counsel.

  • Professional Involvement

Leah is the founder and Board Chair of the Women’s Debate Institute and a board member of the Bay Area Urban Debate League, reflecting a longstanding commitment to advocacy education and mentorship. She is also a frequent speaker on public law topics, presenting on subjects such as the Brown Act and public records challenges in the AI era, and she has authored publications on redevelopment dissolution and related public finance matters.

  • Experience

Over the last decade, Leah has built a team that can be quickly marshalled to assist public agencies across the state with their responses to voluminous and politically sensitive PRA requests.

As a seasoned public law lawyer, Leah is familiar with the full range of laws affecting California public agencies, including the Brown Act, the Public Records Act, the Political Reform Act, Proposition 218, and the Public Trust Doctrine. She has particular expertise advising public agencies on governance, rate setting, election law, and constitutional law.

Leah is also an experienced litigator and appellate advocate. She has handled dozens of cases in state and federal court on behalf of public and private clients. And she has successfully argued over a dozen cases in the California Court of Appeal. Her areas of expertise include eminent domain, inverse condemnation, regulatory takings, municipal finance, government ethics and transparency, and constitutional challenges to local legislative enactments.

 

Alexandra (Alex) Mulhall, Associate | Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP

Alexandra (Alex) Mulhall is an associate in the Los Angeles office of Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP, and a member of the firm’s Public Law and Litigation practice groups. Alex advises and represents public entity clients on a wide variety of matters, including the California Public Records Act, the Brown Act, election law issues, leasing and grant disputes, constitutional First Amendment issues, and code enforcement. She has defended public entities in litigation ranging from inverse condemnation and premises liability to public contract disputes and Public Records Act matters.

  • Education & Credentials

Alex earned her J.D. from the University of California, Los Angeles School of Law, where she served as a Managing Editor of the UCLA Journal of Gender & Law and worked as a law fellow for the UCLA Voting Rights Project. During law school, she also interned for the Housing Authority of the City of Los Angeles and the Los Angeles County Counsel’s Government Services Division. Before law school, Alex graduated summa cum laude from the University of Wyoming with a B.A. in Political Science and a minor in the Interdisciplinary Honors Program.

  • Recognition & Leadership

Alex served as a Managing Editor of the UCLA Journal of Gender & Law. Throughout her undergraduate studies, Alex served in student government which allowed her to engage with both the local city council and state legislature, lobbying for student needs.

  • Professional Involvement

During law school, Alex interned for the Housing Authority of the City of Los Angeles, as well as the Los Angeles County Counsel in the Government Services Division. Alex also worked for the UCLA Voting Rights Project as a law fellow, assisting in voting rights litigation and policy initiatives.

  • Experience

Alex frequently advises clients on the California Public Records Act. This includes managing the response to numerous PRA requests, collecting and searching documents, applying exemption analysis to specific documents, and negotiating with PRA requesters. Alex has also conducted extensive research on the Public Records Act, including researching the factors to assess for determining whether chats and text messages from public officials constitute a public record. In addition, Alex has developed and administered trainings about the Public Records Act and defended public entities against claims made  under the Public Records Act. Alex has also assisted with the development of record retention schedules and advised clients on appropriate retention practices in light of applicable laws and best practices.

Alex has defended public entities in various types of litigation, including inverse condemnation, premises liability, public contract disputes, and Public Records Act litigation.

Agenda

SESSION 1 – Collecting Officials’ Texts, Chats, and AI Records | J. Leah Castella & Alexandra Mulhall | 12:00pm – 1:00pm

This session teaches public-body advisory and defense counsel how to collect a council member’s texts, chat messages, and AI records under state records acts without the agency ever taking custody of the phone. The hour runs from proactive communication guidance and retention polices, through the selfsearch certification and the choice between self-export and neutral-examiner extraction, to Teams chat, AI application and notetaker retention settings. This session is led by practitioners who have constructed and managed these searches for officials, created agency retention policies and guidance, and who can speak to current data storage challenges and the pitfalls of record mismanagement in the digital era.

BREAK | 1:00pm – 1:10pm

SESSION 2 – Defending Public Bodies in Records-Act Suits Over Incomplete Personal Device Searches | J. Leah Castella & Alexandra Mulhall | 1:10pm – 2:10pm

This session teaches defense and advisory counsel to public bodies facing records-act suits that claim an agency search missed an official’s texts or chat messages, or failed to produce them altogether. The hour runs from the identification of litigation risks and common triggers for a public records lawsuit under California law, through the produce, supplement, or litigate decision. The speakers’ experience defending these suits is what turns the statutes and critical decisions into judgment attendees can use: how to navigate pre-litigation interactions with requesters, the role of self-search certifications and affidavits, managing resistant officials, and navigating fee demands.

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

California

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Florida

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Georgia

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Illinois

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Indiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
2 Substantive

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maryland

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Michigan

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Minnesota

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Missouri

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
120 General minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Nevada

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Pennsylvania

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Tennessee

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Virginia

Not Eligible
2 General Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 Law & Legal Hours

Receive CLE credit in Washington via attorney submission.
Wisconsin

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
2.4 General

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
A, B, C’s of Revocable and Irrevocable Trusts
A, B, C’s of Revocable and Irrevocable Trusts Thu, October 29, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay
False Claims Act Hot Topics (2026 Edition)
False Claims Act Hot Topics (2026 Edition) Tue, November 3, 2026
Live Webcast
HIPAA Privacy, Security and AI – Oh My!
HIPAA Privacy, Security and AI – Oh My! Tue, November 3, 2026
Live Webcast
AI-Augmented Legal Workflows: A Map to Success
AI-Augmented Legal Workflows: A Map to Success Tue, November 10, 2026
Live Webcast