PFAS Contamination at Brownfield Sites: Due Diligence, CERCLA Liability, and Regulatory Compliance

Jason S. Lichtstein
Jason S. Lichtstein
Akerman LLP

Jason S. Lichtstein advises buyers and developers on the environmental due diligence and transactional issues that come with acquiring contaminated property, including current work on data center site acquisitions across the country. He is the managing partner of Akerman LLP's Atlanta office, and over more than 25 years his practice has centered on the cleanup and redevelopment of brownfields and other contaminated sites in the Southeast.

Michael J. Larson
Michael J. Larson
Akerman LLP

Michael J. Larson regularly guides clients through obtaining environmental regulatory closure of contaminated sites, and through the cleanup, reuse, and redevelopment of brownfields and other contaminated properties. A partner in Akerman LLP's Tallahassee office, he has worked on numerous redevelopment projects across Florida and has extensive experience working with regulatory agencies.

Live Video-Broadcast: November 18, 2026

2 hour CLE

Tuition: $195.00
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

 

A Closed Brownfield Site Can Still Hold PFAS — and Reopener Risk

The designation of PFOA and PFOS as CERCLA hazardous substances changed how contaminated-property transactions must be handled. PFAS now shapes how a Phase I or Phase II assessment is scoped. It shapes what liability a buyer may face. And it shapes how a brownfield site reaches regulatory closure.

Discover PFAS, and notification and reporting obligations may follow. Fail to preserve bona fide prospective purchaser status, and that liability protection is at risk. Enroll in a state brownfield or voluntary cleanup program, and the cleanup agreement defines the work. Close with PFAS remaining, and institutional and engineering controls carry continuing obligations. Transfer a controlled property, and reopener risk becomes part of the deal.

You walk out able to make the PFAS sampling decision and compare federal and state standards. You can evaluate representations, indemnification provisions, and environmental insurance for PFAS exposure. You will know how Florida, Georgia, and Southeast programs approach PFAS. And you can negotiate site rehabilitation and voluntary cleanup agreements. These are site-by-site judgment calls, not doctrine you can look up.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Scoping PFAS Assessments
    How to scope Phase I and Phase II environmental assessments for PFAS, including when to sample and which ASTM standards apply.
  • Liability and Purchaser Protections
    How the designation of PFOA and PFOS as CERCLA hazardous substances changes liability analysis, and what it takes to preserve bona fide prospective purchaser status and other applicable protections.
  • Federal and State Standards
    How to compare federal and state PFAS standards and determine which notification and reporting obligations apply when PFAS is found.
  • Contractual and Insurance Tools
    How to evaluate representations, indemnification provisions, and environmental insurance as tools for managing PFAS exposure in an acquisition.
  • State Cleanup Programs
    How state brownfield and voluntary cleanup programs in Florida, Georgia, and the Southeast approach PFAS, and how to negotiate site rehabilitation and voluntary cleanup agreements for PFAS-impacted properties.
  • Closure With Residual PFAS
    How to pursue risk-based regulatory closure with residual PFAS through institutional and engineering controls, and how to address reopener risk and continuing obligations when a controlled property is transferred.

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Date / Time: November 18, 2026

  • 12:00 pm – 2:10 pm Eastern
  • 11:00 am – 1:10 pm Central
  • 10:00 am – 12:10 pm Mountain
  • 9:00 am – 11:10 am Pacific

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Jason S. Lichtstein, Office Managing Partner | Akerman LLP

Jason S. Lichtstein advises buyers and developers on the environmental due diligence and transactional issues that come with acquiring contaminated property, including current work on data center site acquisitions across the country. He is the managing partner of Akerman LLP’s Atlanta office, and over more than 25 years his practice has centered on the cleanup and redevelopment of brownfields and other contaminated sites in the Southeast. His work also covers environmental regulatory compliance and state incentives matters, and his areas of experience include PFAS litigation and regulatory counseling.

  • Education & Credentials

Jason received his J.D. from Emory University School of Law in 1999 and his B.A., with distinction, from the University of Michigan in 1995. He is admitted to practice in Florida and Georgia.

  • Recognition & Leadership

Chambers USA has ranked Jason in Florida for Environmental Law from 2009 through 2026, and Best Lawyers lists him for Environmental Law in Georgia (2024–2027) after listing him in Florida from 2019 to 2023. He has also been recommended for Environmental by The Legal 500 (2020), listed by Super Lawyers in Florida for Environmental (2020–2021) following earlier Rising Star recognition, and named to the GaBiz Magazine Top Lawyers List in 2026.

His leadership roles include service on the Superfund Working Group of the National Environmental Justice Advisory Council (2019–2021) and on the Steering Committee of the National Brownfields Coalition (2020–2023). He twice served as President of the Florida Brownfields Association, in 2009–2010 and 2019–2020, and has held board, treasurer, and legislative and policy committee roles with that organization. Within the American Bar Association’s Section of Environment, Energy, and Resources, he is Co-Chair of the Waste and Resource Recovery Committee for 2026–2027 and served as Vice Chair of the 2025–2026 Year in Review.

  • Professional Involvement

Jason speaks frequently on PFAS, due diligence, and brownfield issues. His presentations include an Akerman webinar on the practical implications of EPA’s PFAS Strategic Road Map for business transactions (2023), a 2022 Georgia Brownfield Association panel on the new ASTM Phase I ESA standard for All Appropriate Inquiries, and “How Not to Lose: Tools for Managing Environmental Risk/Liabilities in Transactions for the Win” at the 2025 Georgia Brownfields Conference. In 2026 he spoke at the Florida Brownfields Association conference on how state brownfield programs work across the South and on data center siting, and at the Alabama Brownfields Conference and Georgia Environmental Conference on cleanup and redevelopment in data center siting.

He is a member of the Alabama, Florida, and Georgia brownfield associations and sits on the Georgia Brownfield Association’s 2026 Brownfield Seminar Committee. He taught the Practicing Environmental Law in Florida course as an adjunct instructor at Florida State University College of Law in fall 2018 and co-authored a 2020 Bloomberg Law article on Biden-era environmental actions and Supreme Court deference.

  • Experience

Jason’s transactional work includes environmental due diligence and acquisition issues for data center sites nationwide, and representation of the buyer and property owner on environmental transactional, due diligence, and redevelopment planning issues in the $236 million purchase of the Miami Herald site in downtown Miami. He served as lead environmental counsel to the purchaser and developer of the roughly 90,000-acre Babcock Ranch property in Charlotte and Lee County, Florida, and represented Faena Group on environmental matters in an approximately $1 billion mixed-use development in Miami Beach.

On brownfield redevelopment, he represents the buyer and master developer of the former JEA Southside Generating Station site in Jacksonville and the master developer of Dania Live, a more than 100-acre brownfield project in Broward County. He represented the redevelopment partner on the Lot J site in Jacksonville, which has a Brownfield Site Rehabilitation Agreement with FDEP, and the developer of the Broadstone River House project, which obtained regulatory closure from FDEP in 2019 through Florida’s brownfield program. He has obtained Florida Voluntary Cleanup Tax Credit awards for multiple clients and has taken part in drafting, lobbying for, and passing brownfields legislation.

Earlier in his career, Jason was a staff attorney at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit (1999– 2000) and a legal intern with U.S. EPA Region IV in Atlanta (1998–1999).

 

Michael J. Larson, Partner | Akerman LLP

Michael J. Larson regularly guides clients through obtaining environmental regulatory closure of contaminated sites, and through the cleanup, reuse, and redevelopment of brownfields and other contaminated properties. A partner in Akerman LLP’s Tallahassee office, he has worked on numerous redevelopment projects across Florida and has extensive experience working with regulatory agencies. His environmental practice also includes due diligence and risk evaluation, permitting and compliance, and administrative litigation over agency permitting and final agency action. He is the 2026 President of the Florida Brownfields Association.

  • Education & Credentials

Michael received his J.D. from Emory University School of Law in 2008, where he was on the Dean’s List and served as Managing Editor of the Emory International Law Review. He earned his B.A. in Economics from Emory University in 2005, summa cum laude and Phi Beta Kappa. He is admitted in Florida, New York, Illinois, and Georgia, and before the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the Seventh, Eleventh, and Federal Circuits; the Middle, Northern, and Southern Districts of Florida; the Eastern and Southern Districts of New York; and the U.S. Court of International Trade.

  • Recognition & Leadership

Michael serves as 2026 President of the Florida Brownfields Association, following his term as PresidentElect in 2025, and sits on its Board of Directors for 2025–2026. He is also a member of the Florida Brownfields Advisory Committee of the New Jersey Institute of Technology’s Technical Assistance to Brownfield Communities Program.

Best Lawyers lists him in Florida for Litigation – Environmental (2025–2027). Super Lawyers listed him in Florida as a Rising Star for Environmental in 2023 and for Appellate from 2017 to 2022.

  • Professional Involvement

Michael’s recent presentations focus on state cleanup practice. He spoke on “Rewriting the Rules: Institutional Controls, PFAS Accountability and Florida’s Brownfields Surge” at the 2025 Florida Remediation Conference and on waste cleanup and management at the 40th Annual Environmental Permitting Summer School in 2026. For The Florida Bar’s Environmental and Land Use Law Section he has presented “Florida Site Contamination: The Legal Fundamentals” (2024) and a 2025 Florida legislative and rulemaking update on brownfields, and he has moderated “Brownfields 101” at the annual Florida Brownfields Conference. In 2026 he spoke on the impact of S.B. 484 on Florida’s data center future.

He is a member of ULI North Florida, the Tallahassee Chapter of the Florida Association of Environmental Professionals, and the William H. Stafford American Inn of Court, as well as the Tallahassee, New York State, and American Bar Associations, and served on the board of the Tallahassee Bar Association’s Young Lawyers Section from 2016 to 2019. His writing includes a 2020 Bloomberg Law article and a 2015 Florida Bar Journal article on untimely notice of appealable orders, each co-authored.

  • Experience

Michael advises the owner of a 100-acre mixed-use brownfield redevelopment in Broward County on site redevelopment and environmental regulatory closure work, and advises on environmental issues for a large mixed-use brownfield redevelopment in Duval County. He helps clients prepare Voluntary Cleanup Tax Credit applications to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection and handles the sale and transfer of those credits. He has assisted with construction bid documents for a significant project at a federal Superfund site.

His transactional work includes environmental due diligence, risk assessment, permit transfers, and environmental insurance matters for owners and prospective purchasers, along with due diligence on data center site acquisitions nationwide and compliance and permitting issues in a national self-storage acquisition program. In environmental litigation, he obtained a favorable final order defending a protective seawall in a Coastal Construction Control Line permit challenge before the Florida Division of Administrative Hearings, won dismissal of a permit challenge against a large South Florida marina, and was part of the team that settled a petroleum discharge lawsuit involving a redeveloped former gas station site.

Michael has also briefed, argued, or participated in more than 150 appeals in state and federal appellate courts, including White v. Ring Power Corp., 261 So. 3d 689 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018), and handles international trade litigation focused on tariff and antidumping disputes. Before joining Akerman, he practiced in the New York City office of an international law firm.

Agenda

SESSION 1 – PFAS Contamination: Environmental Due Diligence and CERCLA Liability | Jason S. Lichtstein | 12:00pm – 1:00pm

This session examines the legal and regulatory challenges PFAS contamination presents in contaminatedproperty transactions. Attorneys will explore how to scope environmental assessments for PFAS, evaluate the implications of federal and state regulatory requirements, and assess potential liability when contamination is discovered. The discussion will address the designation of PFOA and PFOS as CERCLA hazardous substances, the importance of preserving bona fide prospective purchaser protections, and the contractual and insurance tools available to manage PFAS-related exposure. Particular attention will be given to sampling decisions, notification and reporting obligations, and the legal considerations that arise when acquiring property with known or suspected PFAS contamination.

BREAK | 1:00pm – 1:10pm

SESSION 2 – PFAS Remediation Standards, State Cleanup Programs, and Regulatory Closure | Michael J. Larson | 1:10pm – 2:10pm

This session focuses on the regulatory process for addressing PFAS contamination at brownfield sites, from enrollment in state cleanup programs through remediation and regulatory closure. Attorneys will examine how state brownfield and voluntary cleanup programs approach PFAS-impacted properties, including program requirements and the negotiation of site rehabilitation and cleanup agreements. The discussion will address regulatory closure when PFAS remains at a site, the use of institutional and engineering controls, and the continuing obligations that may affect future owners and occupants. Attendees will also examine reopener risks and the legal implications of transferring properties subject to ongoing environmental controls.

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

California

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Florida

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 General Hours

Receive CLE credit in Florida via attorney submission.
Georgia

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Illinois

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Indiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
2 Substantive

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maryland

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Michigan

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Minnesota

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Missouri

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
120 General minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Nevada

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Pennsylvania

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Tennessee

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Virginia

Not Eligible
2 General Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 Law & Legal Hours

Receive CLE credit in Washington via attorney submission.
Wisconsin

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
2.4 General

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
iPad for Lawyers: The Complete Mobile Practice Toolkit
iPad for Lawyers: The Complete Mobile Practice Toolkit Mon, October 26, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay
The AI Skills Every Attorney Needs: Think, Prompt, Win
The AI Skills Every Attorney Needs: Think, Prompt, Win Wed, October 28, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay