EHR Audit Trails for Plaintiff’s Medical Malpractice Lawyers: The Production Is Almost Always Incomplete

Megan Shore
Megan Shore | Shore Injury Law

Megan Shore is the founder of Shore Injury Law in Chicago, where she represents plaintiffs in medical malpractice, birth injury, and nursing home and assisted living abuse and neglect cases. Attorneys across the country retain her as a consultant on electronic medical records and audit trails in nursing home and medical malpractice litigation.

Live Video-Broadcast: December 8, 2026

2 hour CLE

Tuition: $195.00
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

 

The Record You Were Handed Is Not the Record the System Kept

Every EHR system logs each time a patient record is accessed, created, or modified. Plaintiffs' attorneys now use that audit trail metadata to expose late entries, backdating, and post-incident alterations. HIPAA, the 21st Century Cures Act, and ONC certification requirements compel defendants to produce what their systems actually capture, not a filtered or truncated export.

Request "the medical record," and you get the legal chart without the audit data. Accept a PDF export, and you lose the fields a complete production must carry. Skip the completeness audit, and a short production goes unchallenged. Miss a backdated note, and it reads as contemporaneous care. Nursing home EMRs add their own software, their own audits, and their own clinical and risk management views. When audit trails are withheld or destroyed, sanctions and adverse inference instructions come into play.

You leave with reusable discovery request language, a completeness audit framework, a deposition preparation checklist, and a two-column timeline demonstrative. These are working tools for EMR inspections, corporate representative depositions, and impeachment at trial, built on how hospital and nursing home systems actually log activity.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Audit Data, Fields, and Formats
    How the hospital EHR software generates audit data, which fields a complete production must carry, and why the format battle decides what you can actually use.
  • Compelling Complete Production
    How to draft discovery requests that reach audit data rather than the legal chart, backed by HIPAA, the 21st Century Cures Act, and ONC certification requirements.
  • Proving What Is Missing
    How to run a completeness audit, then use EMR inspections and corporate representative depositions to prove the production is short.
  • Late Entries Versus Backdating
    How to separate legitimate late entries, addenda, and amendments from backdating by reading the red-flag patterns the audit trail reveals.
  • Deposition, Trial, and Sanctions
    How to structure depositions around metadata contradictions, admit audit trail evidence at trial, and seek sanctions or adverse inference instructions when audit trails are withheld or destroyed.
  • Nursing Home EMR Audits
    How to work nursing home EMR software from both the clinical and risk management side and read its audits, which differ from hospital systems.

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Date / Time: December 8, 2026

  • 2:30 pm – 4:40 pm Eastern
  • 1:30 pm – 3:40 pm Central
  • 12:30 pm – 2:40 pm Mountain
  • 11:30 am – 1:40 pm Pacific

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Megan Shore, Founder / Trial Attorney | Shore Injury Law

Megan Shore is the founder of Shore Injury Law in Chicago, where she represents plaintiffs in medical malpractice, birth injury, and nursing home and assisted living abuse and neglect cases. Attorneys across the country retain her as a consultant on electronic medical records and audit trails in nursing home and medical malpractice litigation. She also works with special monitors of skilled nursing facilities appointed by the Attorney General, reviewing abuse and neglect and auditing facilities’ electronic medical records. Her cases have drawn coverage from CBS, NBC 5 Chicago, The Chicago Tribune, The Washington Post, and Law360.

  • Education & Credentials

Ms. Shore received her J.D. from The John Marshall Law School in 2016. There she made the Dean’s List, earned a CALI Award in Civil Procedure, was a Dean Johnston Academic Scholar and a member of the Phi Delta Phi Honor Society, served as a Student Ambassador, and finished second of 124 competitors for her appellate brief in the Herzog Moot Court Competition. She studied pre-medicine and biology, along with business management, at Loyola University Chicago, where she earned her B.A. She has been licensed to practice in Illinois since 2016.

  • Recognition & Leadership

Ms. Shore serves on the Executive Committee of the American Association for Justice Nursing Home Litigation Group. Crain’s Chicago Business named her one of its Notable Women in Law in 2026. The National Trial Lawyers has listed her among its Top 10 Nursing Home Lawyers and Top 40 Under 40 every year since 2021, and among its Top 100 Lawyers since 2022. She has been selected as a Super Lawyers Illinois Rising Star since 2021 and named to the National Academy of Personal Injury Attorneys Top 10 since 2023.

With the Women’s Bar Association of Illinois, she has co-chaired the Small Firms Committee, the Annual Dinner Committee, and the Top Women in Leadership Reception Committee. She mentors younger lawyers through the Illinois Supreme Court Commission on Professionalism, the Illinois State Bar Association, the Women’s Bar Association of Illinois, and the UIC Law alumni program.

  • Professional Involvement

Ms. Shore teaches lawyers and legal nurse consultants how to use electronic medical records and audit trails in hospital and nursing home cases, along with preventing obstruction of justice, written and oral discovery, defeating motions to compel arbitration, and the Medical Studies Act. Recent programs include the AAJ Annual Convention (2023 and 2025), the AAJ Elder Abuse College (2023 and 2024), the Elder Abuse Trial College (2025), a Pennsylvania Association for Justice webinar and the Cleveland Academy of Trial Attorneys (2025), the Dallas Nursing Home Abuse Conference and the Georgia Trial Lawyers Association (2024), and the Legal Nurse Consultants Conference (2022). She has also taught at Chicago-Kent College of Law and served as a guest speaker in Trial Advocacy at The John Marshall Law School.

Her writing includes “Point and Click: Exposing Nursing Homes” in Trial magazine (2022), “Understanding the Leading Nursing Home EMR System” in the Illinois Trial Lawyers Journal (2020), and “Nothing Good Happens After 3 Hours…” in the AAJ Birth Trauma Litigation Group Journal (2021). Within AAJ, she belongs to the Nursing Home, Medical Malpractice, Birth Trauma, and Medical Record Retrieval CIOX Litigation Groups and the Women’s Trial Lawyers Caucus. She is also a member of the Illinois Trial Lawyers Association, the Illinois State Bar Association, the Ohio State Bar, the Ohio and Maryland Associations for Justice, the Chicago Bar Association, and the National Academy of Personal Injury Attorneys.

  • Experience

Ms. Shore’s nursing home results include a $9 million jury verdict against a facility that failed to prevent a sacral bed sore from developing and worsening, a $6 million jury verdict in the choking death of a resident the facility failed to monitor, and a $5 million settlement for a resident who died after a facility failed to prevent bedsores, dehydration, malnutrition, and falls. In hospital malpractice, she obtained a $4 million settlement for a patient who died after a delay in diagnosing and treating sepsis. She brought the first federal motion to remand within the Seventh Circuit that established nursing homes were not immune from liability under the PREP Act or federal officer immunity during COVID-19.

Before founding her firm, she litigated hundreds of cases at a top-rated Chicago law firm. She has trained with and litigated alongside nationally known birth injury attorneys, on matters that produced jury verdicts from $4.5 million to $143 million, then the largest obstetrical malpractice verdict in United States history. Earlier, she served with the Illinois State’s Attorneys Appellate Prosecutor. She has also consulted for AARP.

Agenda

SESSION 1 – Electronic Medical Records, Digital Evidence, and Audit Trails in Hospitals | Megan Shore | 2:30pm – 3:30pm

This session equips plaintiff’s medical malpractice attorneys to identify, challenge, and correct incomplete EHR audit trail productions. Attorneys will learn the two-component architecture of EHR audit data, the specific fields that must appear in a complete production, and the legal framework under HIPAA, the 21st Century Cures Act, and ONC certification requirements that compels defendants to produce what their systems actually capture. By the end of the session, attorneys will be able to draft targeted discovery requests, identify filtered or truncated exports, and execute a structured completeness audit to prove what is missing.

This session also teaches plaintiff’s medical malpractice attorneys how to read EHR audit trail data against the clinical chart to identify late entries, backdating, and post-event amendments. Attorneys will learn how to cross-reference system timestamps against chart narratives, use audit trail evidence for deposition preparation and trial impeachment, and seek sanctions or adverse inference instructions when audit trails are withheld or destroyed. By the end of this session, attorneys will be able to build a two-column timeline demonstrative, structure depositions around metadata contradictions, and lay the foundation for admissibility of audit trail evidence at trial.

BREAK | 3:30pm – 3:40pm

SESSION 2 – Electronic Medical Records, Digital Evidence, and Audit Trails in Nursing Homes & Assisted Living | Megan Shore | 3:40pm – 4:40pm

Not all EMR systems are alike, and nursing home software is very different from the hospital systems covered in Session 1. This session applies the same audit trail approach to nursing homes and assisted living facilities. Attorneys will learn how nursing home EMR software works on both the clinical and risk management side, how to read and interpret its audit data, and how to use those audits to expose gaps, late entries, and inconsistencies in a facility’s records.

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

California

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Florida

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 General Hours

Receive CLE credit in Florida via attorney submission.
Georgia

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Illinois

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Indiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
2 Substantive

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maryland

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Michigan

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Minnesota

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Missouri

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
120 General minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Nevada

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Pennsylvania

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Tennessee

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Virginia

Not Eligible
2 General Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 Law & Legal Hours

Receive CLE credit in Washington via attorney submission.
Wisconsin

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
2.4 General

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
iPad for Lawyers: The Complete Mobile Practice Toolkit
iPad for Lawyers: The Complete Mobile Practice Toolkit Mon, October 26, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay
The AI Skills Every Attorney Needs: Think, Prompt, Win
The AI Skills Every Attorney Needs: Think, Prompt, Win Wed, October 28, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay