Before the Lawsuit: Protecting Trustees from Beneficiary Claims and Fiduciary Exposure

Jonathan H. Park
Jonathan H. Park
Holland & Knight LLP

Jonathan H. Park represents trustees, beneficiaries, private fiduciaries, and financial institutions in fiduciary litigation as a partner in the Los Angeles office of Holland & Knight LLP.

Amber N. Morton
Amber N. Morton
Holland & Knight LLP

Amber N. Morton advises clients on mitigating, avoiding, and resolving trust and estate disputes before a lawsuit is filed, and litigates them when one is.

Live Video-Broadcast: November 18, 2026

2 hour CLE

Tuition: $195.00
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

 

The Trustee’s Best Defense Is Built Before Anyone Objects

This program is not about winning a trust lawsuit. It is about the stretch before one is filed, while the trustee still controls the record. Trustee duties under the Uniform Trust Code, the Restatement, and common law, with a look at California law, set the standard every later decision is measured against.

Take a trustee fee without support, and the fee becomes the objection. Exercise discretion over a distribution without documentation, and the decision invites a claim. Prepare the accounting carelessly, and it becomes the beneficiary’s exhibit. Lose track of the statute of limitations, and exposure stays open. Change the trust instrument the wrong way, and the modification becomes the dispute.

You leave with the practices that keep trustees out of court: documenting administrative actions, keeping records, relying on professionals, and communicating with beneficiaries. You will weigh court approval and non-judicial settlements as ways to modify a trust without a lawsuit. And you will have a plan for the objection that arrives anyway: analyze it, preserve privilege, pursue early resolution, and prepare for litigation.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Trustee Duty Standards
    Measure every administrative decision against the trustee duties set by the Uniform Trust Code, the Restatement, and common law, including how California law applies them.
  •  Claim Triggers in Administration
    Identify how trustee fees, discretionary distributions, accountings, trust interpretation, and final distributions create exposure to beneficiary claims, and define the trustee’s role when beneficiaries dispute the trust or will among themselves.
  •  Protective Trustee Practices
    Build a defensible record by documenting administrative actions, keeping complete records, preparing accountings, relying on professionals, tracking statutes of limitations, and communicating with beneficiaries throughout the administration.
  •  Modifying Without Litigation
    Choose among court approval and non-judicial settlements to change a trust instrument, matching each option to the circumstances in which it is appropriate.
  •  Answering Beneficiary Objections
    Analyze and respond to common beneficiary objections and claims while preserving the attorney-client privilege at every stage of the trustee’s response.
  •  Resolution and Litigation Readiness
    Pursue early dispute resolution while preparing the trustee for litigation, so the case is ready to proceed if the objection cannot be resolved.

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Date / Time: November 18, 2026

  • 2:30 pm – 4:40 pm Eastern
  • 1:30 pm – 3:40 pm Central
  • 12:30 am – 2:40 pm Mountain
  • 11:30 am – 1:40 pm Pacific

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Jonathan H. Park, Partner | Holland & Knight LLP

Jonathan H. Park represents trustees, beneficiaries, private fiduciaries, and financial institutions in fiduciary litigation as a partner in the Los Angeles office of Holland & Knight LLP. His practice centers on complex trust and estate litigation together with probate and trust administration, and he approaches each trust dispute by pinpointing the issues actually driving it and pursuing the most efficient route to the client’s goal, often through informal dispute resolution and formal mediation.

  • Education & Credentials

Mr. Park received his J.D. from New York University School of Law and his B.A. in Public Policy Studies from The University of Chicago. He is admitted to practice in California.

  • Recognition & Leadership

Mr. Park is listed in The Best Lawyers in America for Litigation – Trust and Estates (2024–2027) and in the Chambers High Net Worth guide for Private Wealth Disputes: California (2026). In 2025, the Los Angeles Business Journal named him to its Leaders of Influence lists for both Thriving in Their 40s and Minority Attorneys. He was earlier recognized as a Rising Star by Southern California Super Lawyers magazine (2013–2016), and Holland & Knight has named him a Pro Bono All-Star (2020, 2021) and a Public and Charitable Service All-Star (2014–2018).

  • Professional Involvement

He is a former co-chair of the Trusts and Estates Committee of the National Asian Pacific American Bar Association and belongs to the Trust and Estates Sections of both the State Bar of California and the Los Angeles County Bar Association. From 2018 to 2019 he served as a provisional director of the Korean American United Foundation, and he has given pro bono legal help to organizations including We The Action (Election Protection), Public Counsel, Bet Tzedek, and the Alliance for Children’s Rights.

  • Experience

Mr. Park litigates fiduciary matters on both sides, pursuing claims for individual beneficiaries and defending trustees who face suit. At the trial and appellate levels, he has handled will and trust disputes, breach of fiduciary duty claims, contested conservatorships and guardianships, and financial elder abuse matters, including cases involving trusts and estates that hold complex commercial businesses and substantial real estate. He also works with individuals and families to evaluate potential disputes before they arise and to build succession plans for an orderly transition of control, administration, and distribution of estate assets.

A significant part of his practice serves national charities, universities, and other nonprofit, educational, religious, and tax-exempt organizations. For these clients he works to carry out donor intent by reducing administration fees, maximizing gift value, and expediting distributions, and he litigates when necessary to protect their interests, including recovering misappropriated assets.

 

Amber N. Morton, Associate | Holland & Knight LLP

Amber N. Morton advises clients on mitigating, avoiding, and resolving trust and estate disputes before a lawsuit is filed, and litigates them when one is. She is a Los Angeles attorney in Holland & Knight LLP’s Private Wealth Services Group and a member of its Trusts, Estates and Fiduciary Litigation Team, with a practice focused on complex trusts and estates litigation, including breach of fiduciary duty matters, trust and will contests, contested conservatorships, and financial elder abuse claims.

  • Education & Credentials

Ms. Morton earned her J.D. from the University of Southern California Gould School of Law, where she was president of the Latino Law Students Association, a copy editor for the Southern California Review of Law and Social Justice, and a certified intern with the Post-Conviction Justice Project. She holds a B.S. in Foreign Service from Georgetown University, along with a Certificate in International Development. She is admitted in California and before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California.

  • Recognition & Leadership

Ms. Morton is listed in Southern California Super Lawyers magazine for Estate & Trust Litigation (2023–2026), after being named a Rising Star in the same category from 2020 to 2022. She is also listed in The Best Lawyers in America for Litigation – Trust and Estates (2024–2027), and Los Angeles magazine included her in Best of L.A. Legal for 2026.

  • Professional Involvement

She is a member of the American Bar Association, the California Young Lawyers Association, and the Los Angeles County Bar Association.

  • Experience

Ms. Morton represents clients across every phase of a fiduciary dispute in state and federal courts. Before suit, she counsels clients on mitigating, avoiding, or resolving the dispute; once litigation begins, she handles discovery, law and motion practice, trial preparation, and trial, while pursuing resolution through settlement negotiations and mediation as well as at trial. Earlier, she served as a judicial extern to the Honorable Stephen Reinhardt of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

Agenda

SESSION 1 – Trustee Duties, Discretionary Decisions, and Preventing Fiduciary Claims | Jonathan Park, Amber Morton | 2:30pm – 3:30pm

This session examines the duties that govern every trustee decision under the Uniform Trust Code, the Restatement, and common law, including a brief discussion of California law. It then identifies the discretionary actions most likely to draw beneficiary claims and objections: trustee fees, discretionary distributions, accountings, trust interpretation, final distributions, and the trustee’s role when beneficiaries dispute a trust or will among themselves. The session closes with the practical steps that reduce fiduciary exposure, including documenting administrative actions, keeping records, preparing accountings, relying on professionals, tracking statutes of limitations, and communicating with beneficiaries.

BREAK | 3:30pm – 3:40pm

SESSION 2 – Trust Modifications, Beneficiary Objections, and Pre-Litigation Strategy | Jonathan Park, Amber Morton | 3:40pm – 4:40pm

This session addresses what to do when a trust instrument needs to change or a beneficiary pushes back. It compares the options for modifying a trust without a lawsuit, including court approval and non-judicial settlements, and the circumstances in which each is appropriate. It then turns to common beneficiary objections and claims: how to analyze and respond to them, how to preserve the attorney-client privilege, when to pursue early dispute resolution, and how to prepare for litigation. The session closes with a recap of best practices for administering a trust to avoid and defend against beneficiary objections and claims.

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

California

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Florida

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 General Hours

Receive CLE credit in Florida via attorney submission.
Georgia

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Illinois

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Indiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
2 Substantive

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maryland

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Michigan

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Minnesota

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Missouri

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
120 General minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Nevada

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Pennsylvania

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Tennessee

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Virginia

Not Eligible
2 General Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 Law & Legal Hours

Receive CLE credit in Washington via attorney submission.
Wisconsin

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
2.4 General

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
iPad for Lawyers: The Complete Mobile Practice Toolkit
iPad for Lawyers: The Complete Mobile Practice Toolkit Mon, October 26, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay
Using AI in Your Law Practice: A Step-by-Step Guide
Using AI in Your Law Practice: A Step-by-Step Guide Wed, October 28, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay
The AI Skills Every Attorney Needs: Think, Prompt, Win
The AI Skills Every Attorney Needs: Think, Prompt, Win Wed, October 28, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay
A, B, C’s of Revocable and Irrevocable Trusts
A, B, C’s of Revocable and Irrevocable Trusts Thu, October 29, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay