The Separation Agreement Audit: Whistleblower Carve-Outs After the Foot Locker Order

Mark Risk
Mark Risk
Mark Risk, P.C

Mark Risk practices employment law and litigation in New York through Mark Risk, P.C. His practice includes negotiating severance and departure agreements, employment agreements and offer letters, and restrictions on competitive activity.

Jonathan Ben-Asher
Jonathan Ben-Asher
Ritz Clark & Ben-Asher LLP

Jonathan Ben-Asher represents executives, professionals, and other employees in disputes involving whistleblowing, retaliation, employment contracts, and executive compensation.

Live Video-Broadcast: November 11, 2026

1 hour CLE

Tuition: $395.00
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
This program is only available to All-Access Pass Members.
Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

 

The Carve-Out Held. The Award Waiver Didn’t

Provisions barring departed employees from receiving money in government proceedings are now common in separation agreements. In May 2026, the SEC issued a settled cease-and-desist order against Foot Locker, Inc. The agency took the position that a prohibition on whistleblower recoveries in SEC proceedings is an improper impediment under the Dodd-Frank Act. A reporting carve-out alone no longer protects the agreement.

Pair a carve-out with an award waiver, and Rule 21F-17(a) applies. Rely on a savings clause, and Foot Locker shows it can fail. Remediate before enforcement, and the historical period may still count. The order carried a $148,000 civil penalty covering 148 affected employees. It extends an enforcement line from KBR (2015) through the 2024 seven-company sweep. Other federal agencies may take similar positions.

This panel turns the SEC position into practical work product. You will leave with a framework for auditing existing and future separation agreements. You will gain negotiating positions for counsel on both the employer and executive side. You will also have a plan for outstanding agreements that appear to offend the program. That is judgment a template cannot supply.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • The Foot Locker Order
    How the SEC’s settled order against Foot Locker, Inc. treats a bar on whistleblower recoveries as an improper impediment, backed by a $148,000 penalty covering 148 affected employees.
  • Why Savings Clauses Fail
    How a government-reporting carve-out paired with an award-waiver provision still falls short under Rule 21F-17(a), and what that means for the language you draft.
  • Enforcement Doctrine and Precedent
    How the financial-incentive doctrine and the line from KBR (2015) through the 2024 sevencompany sweep shape the SEC’s strict-liability-like reading of contract language.
  • Outstanding Agreement Exposure
    How to evaluate outstanding separation agreements that appear to offend the program, including whether pre-enforcement remediation reaches the historical period.
  • Negotiating Both Sides
    How counsel for employers and executive employees should negotiate separation agreements in view of the SEC position.
  • Beyond the SEC
    How the possibility that other federal agencies take similar positions should shape future separation agreements.

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Date / Time: 

  • 1:00 pm – 3:10 pm Eastern
  • 12:00 pm – 2:10 pm Central
  • 11:00 am – 1:10 pm Mountain
  • 10:00 am – 12:10 pm Pacific

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Mark Risk | Mark Risk, P.C

Mark Risk practices employment law and litigation in New York through Mark Risk, P.C. His practice includes negotiating severance and departure agreements, employment agreements and offer letters, and restrictions on competitive activity. He also litigates discrimination, retaliation, contract, wage and hour, and unfair competition matters in federal and state courts, in arbitration, and before the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

  • Education & Credentials

He earned his J.D. from New York University School of Law in 1984, where he was a Hays Civil Liberties Fellow. He also holds an M.A. in Political Science from the University of Chicago (1981) and a B.A. from Swarthmore College (1978). He is admitted in New York, the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York, and the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the Second, Third, and Fourth Circuits.

  • Recognition & Leadership

He has been a Fellow of the College of Labor and Employment Lawyers since 2008 and is a Fellow of the American Bar Foundation. He holds an AV Rating through Martindale Hubbell Peer Review Ratings and has been listed in Best Lawyers (New York) since 2011 and New York Super Lawyers since 2007.

  • Professional Involvement

He serves on the Advisory Board of the NYU Law Center for Labor and Employment Law and has been a faculty member of the National Institute for Trial Advocacy since 1996. Within the ABA Labor and Employment Section, he co-edited the Labor and Employment Law Newsletter (2002–2014), co-chaired the Technology Subcommittee (2008–2014), and served as Co-Chair/Vice Chair of the Section’s Annual Conferences (2016–2018). He has also chaired the CLE Conference Committee of the National Employment Lawyers Association/New York.

  • Experience

His transactional work includes employment contract and severance negotiations, departure agreements, and restrictions on competitive activity. He pairs that work with litigation of discrimination, restrictive covenant, wage and hour, and contract and benefits disputes.

 

Jonathan Ben-Asher | Ritz Clark & Ben-Asher LLP

Jonathan Ben-Asher represents executives, professionals, and other employees in disputes involving whistleblowing, retaliation, employment contracts, and executive compensation. His work at Ritz Clark & Ben-Asher LLP in New York includes Dodd-Frank Act matters, Sarbanes-Oxley whistleblower claims, and Qui Tam claims under the False Claims Act, together with compensation disputes in the financial services sector.

  • Education & Credentials

He holds a J.D. from New York University School of Law and a B.A. from Columbia University. He is admitted to practice in New York State, before the U.S. District Courts for the Southern, Eastern, and Northern Districts of New York, and before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

  • Recognition & Leadership

He has been a Fellow of the College of Labor and Employment Lawyers since 2006. Across 2007–2025, his recognitions include New York Super Lawyers – Metro, Best Lawyers in America, the Lawdragon 500 Leading Plaintiffs Employment and Civil Rights Lawyers, and a Martindale-Hubbell AV Rating, with Benchmark Litigation recognition in 2022–2023. He chaired the New York State Bar Association Labor and Employment Law Section in 2012–2013 and sat on the Council of the ABA Section of Labor and Employment Law from 2014 to 2022.

  • Professional Involvement

He speaks frequently before the ABA, state bar associations, and specialty conferences on whistleblower protections, severance negotiations, executive compensation, AI in employment, and emerging workplace issues. He has published on whistleblower law, employment discrimination, and employment arbitration. He has served on the Board of Advisors of the NYU School of Law Center for Labor and Employment Law since 2010 and was Vice President of the National Employment Lawyers Association / New York from 2005 to 2008.

  • Experience

His matters include whistleblower and retaliation claims under Sarbanes-Oxley and the False Claims Act, including Qui Tam litigation establishing a three-year statute of limitations in New York. He has also handled discrimination claims under the Rehabilitation Act and Title VII and matters opposing arbitration.

Before joining his current firm, he was a partner at Beranbaum Menken Ben-Asher & Bierman LLP (1998– 2009). Earlier, he was a Clinical Associate Professor at Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law (1989–1996), an Assistant Attorney General in the New York Labor Bureau (1988–1989), and a Staff Attorney at the Legal Aid Society (1980–1988), where he began as a Reginald Heber Smith Community Lawyer Fellow (1980–1982).

Agenda

SESSION 1 – The Separation Agreement Audit: Whistleblower Carve-Outs After the Foot Locker Order | 12:00pm – 1:00pm

Provisions prohibiting departed employees from receiving money compensation in connection with posttermination  government  proceedings are now common in separation agreements. But in a settled case cease-and-desist order issued in May against Foot Locker, Inc., the SEC took the position that a prohibition on recoveries by whistleblowers in SEC proceedings is an improper impediment  to the whistleblower program under the Dodd-Frank Act. This panel will discuss the SEC position and its impact on existing as well as future separation agreements. Might other federal agencies take similar positions? How should counsel for employer and executive employees negotiate separation agreements in view of the SEC position? What is the effect on outstanding separation agreements  that appear to offend the Dodd-Frank whistleblower program as interpreted by the SEC??

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

California

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
1 CLE Hour(s)

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Florida

Approved via Attorney Submission
1 General Hours

Receive CLE credit in Florida via attorney submission.
Georgia

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Illinois

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Indiana

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
1 Substantive

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
1 CLE Hour(s)

Maryland

No MCLE Required
1 CLE Hour(s)

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Michigan

No MCLE Required
1 CLE Hour(s)

Minnesota

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Missouri

Approved for CLE Credits
1.2 General

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
60 General minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

Nevada

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Pennsylvania

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
1 CLE Hour(s)

Tennessee

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Virginia

Not Eligible
1 General Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
1 Law & Legal Hours

Receive CLE credit in Washington via attorney submission.
Wisconsin

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
1.2 General

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
Getting Rid of Tax Penalties (Presented by Tax Rep)
Getting Rid of Tax Penalties (Presented by Tax Rep) Mon, October 12, 2026
Live Webcast
The Necessary Evils of Funding a Trust
The Necessary Evils of Funding a Trust Wed, October 14, 2026
Live Webcast
How Qualified Settlement Funds Streamline Settlements
How Qualified Settlement Funds Streamline Settlements Thu, October 15, 2026
Live Webcast