Commanding the Courtroom: Trial Persuasion Techniques That Win

Ed Dudensing
Ed Dudensing | Dudensing Law

Ed Dudensing founded Dudensing Law and serves as its lead counsel. Since 2003, his practice has been devoted entirely to representing victims of elder neglect and abuse in skilled nursing facilities, assisted living facilities, acute hospitals, home health agencies, and hospice agencies. Over a career of more than two decades, he has secured four of the largest elder abuse verdicts in California history and recovered well over $200 million on behalf of his clients, earning national recognition as one of the leading elder abuse attorneys in the United States.

Live Video-Broadcast: September 22, 2026

2 hour CLE

Tuition: $195.00
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

 

A winning trial narrative is built long before it is delivered

Trial persuasion programs usually stop at legal theory. This one starts with a case file. Ed Dudensing recently secured a nine-figure elder neglect and wrongful death verdict. The defendants were Colony Capital, a publicly traded Real Estate Investment Trust, and Formation Capital, a private equity investment firm. He walks through the persuasion techniques he used at every phase of that trial.

Every phase carries its own risk. Precondition the jury and the defense will use it; weeding out beats preconditioning. Skip the roadmap in opening and jurors drop the themes before the case-in-chief. Stay too long on cross and hard-won concessions unravel. Mishandle the punitive phase and reprehensibility goes unproven, the defendant’s financial condition unused.

Attendees see exactly how a winning trial narrative is built and delivered, with real slides, witness strategy, and courtroom moments pulled directly from the case file. That includes anchor slides, statistical evidence, and syllogisms in closing, plus the structure of a rebuttal closing. This is courtroom judgment, not a doctrine walk-through.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Jury Selection
    Read panelists for authenticity, likability, and vulnerability, and weed out rather than precondition.
  • Opening Statement
    Use the roadmap technique, define the defendants early, and set themes jurors will carry through trial.
  • Case-in-Chief Strategy
    Organize witnesses to tell a story, use documents tactically, and handle “surprise” evidence.
  • Cross-Examining the Defense
    Extract concessions and know when to get in and out.
  • Closing and Rebuttal
    Deploy anchor slides, statistical evidence, and syllogisms, confront defense arguments head-on, and structure the rebuttal closing argument.
  • Punitive Damages Phase
    Prove reprehensibility and use the defendant’s financial condition effectively.

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Date / Time: September 22, 2026

  • 12:00 pm – 2:10 pm Eastern
  • 11:00 am – 1:10 pm Central
  • 10:00 am – 12:10 pm Mountain
  • 9:00 am – 11:10 am Pacific

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Ed Dudensing, Founder and Lead Counsel | Dudensing Law

Ed Dudensing founded Dudensing Law and serves as its lead counsel. Since 2003, his practice has been devoted entirely to representing victims of elder neglect and abuse in skilled nursing facilities, assisted living facilities, acute hospitals, home health agencies, and hospice agencies. Over a career of more than two decades, he has secured four of the largest elder abuse verdicts in California history and recovered well over $200 million on behalf of his clients, earning national recognition as one of the leading elder abuse attorneys in the United States.

  • Education & Credentials

Mr. Dudensing earned his undergraduate degree in political science from the University of California, Berkeley, and his Juris Doctor from the University of California, Davis School of Law, where he graduated in the top 3% of his class, was inducted into the Order of the Coif, served as Executive Editor of the UC Davis Law Review, and was elected to the Order of the Barrister for his skills in oral advocacy. After passing the bar in 1994, he clerked for two years for the Honorable Robert C. Broomfield, Chief Judge of the Federal District Court in Arizona, then practiced as a litigation associate at Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe from 1996 to 1999. From 1999 to 2003, he served as a Deputy District Attorney in Sacramento County, where he first-chaired more than 50 trials to verdict, including murder, rape, and financial elder abuse cases. He is admitted to the State Bar of California.

  • Recognition & Leadership

Mr. Dudensing has been repeatedly selected as a Northern California Super Lawyer between 2011 and 2026. In 2026, the USA Chambers & Partners Guide ranked both him and his firm Band 3 for Litigation: Mainly Plaintiffs in California, and he was named an Attorney of the Year finalist for Law.com’s California Legal Awards, listed among Lawdragon’s 500 Leading Lawyers in America, and included in Lawdragon’s 100 Managing Partners You Need to Know. His 2025 honors include selection as a Top 100 Lawyer by the Daily Journal, the William F. Taylor Memorial Award from California Advocates for Nursing Home Reform for lifetime achievement in elder abuse, and the Mentorship Award at the ALM/Law.com California Legal Awards. The Capitol City Trial Lawyers Association named him Advocate of the Year in 2023 and awarded him the Morton Friedman Humanitarian Award in 2026.

  • Professional Involvement

Mr. Dudensing was named to the Board of Directors of the Consumer Attorneys of California in 2025. He is the sole author of The Rutter Group’s Elder Abuse Litigation treatise and teaches elder abuse litigation as an adjunct professor at UC Law San Francisco. He speaks frequently before the American Association for Justice Nursing Home Litigation Group, the Consumer Attorneys of California, and California Advocates for Nursing Home Reform (CANHR), and holds memberships in the National Consumer Voice for LongTerm Care, CANHR, the San Francisco Trial Lawyers Association, and the Capitol City Trial Lawyers Association. His commentary on long-term care accountability has appeared in national and state media, including The New York Times, the Los Angeles Times, The Hill, and The Sacramento Bee.

  • Experience

Mr. Dudensing has brought cases against some of California’s largest nursing home, assisted living, and healthcare operators. His jury verdicts include $29.1 million in 2010, $42.5 million in 2019, and $30.9 million in 2023. In March 2026, a Sacramento County jury returned a $110 million verdict against Colony Capital, a publicly traded Real Estate Investment Trust, and Formation Capital, a private equity investment firm, in a case arising from Greenhaven Estates, the largest elder abuse verdict against an assisted living facility in United States history. As lead appellate counsel, he has established significant precedents in elder law, including Valentine v. Plum Healthcare Group, 37 Cal. App. 5th 1076 (2019), Hutcheson v. Eskaton Fountainwood Lodge, 17 Cal. App. 5th 937 (2017), and Goldman v. Sunbridge Healthcare, 220 Cal. App. 4th 1160 (2013).

Agenda

SESSION 1 – Building the Winning Narrative: Jury Selection, Opening Statement, and the Case-in-Chief | 12:00pm – 1:00pm

Trial attorney Ed Dudensing opens with the foundation of his recent nine-figure elder neglect and wrongful death verdict against Colony Capital, a publicly traded Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT), and Formation Capital, a private equity investment firm. Using real slides, witness strategy, and courtroom moments pulled directly from the case file, he shows how to read jurors for authenticity, likability, and vulnerability, and why weeding out beats preconditioning. He then turns to the roadmap technique for the opening statement, defining defendants early and setting themes jurors will carry through trial, and to case-in-chief strategy: organizing witnesses to tell a story, using documents tactically, and handling “surprise” evidence.

BREAK | 1:00pm – 1:10pm

SESSION 2 – Closing the Case: Cross-Examination, Closing Arguments, and Punitive Damages | 1:10pm – 2:10pm

The second hour moves from the case-in-chief to the verdict. Mr. Dudensing demonstrates how to crossexamine the defense by extracting concessions and knowing when to get in and out. He then breaks down closing argument techniques, including anchor slides, statistical evidence, syllogisms, and confronting defense arguments head-on, and walks through the structure of the rebuttal closing argument. The session ends with the punitive damages phase: proving reprehensibility and using the defendant’s financial condition effectively.

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

California

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Florida

Pending CLE Approval
2 General Hours

Georgia

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Illinois

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Indiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
2 Substantive

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maryland

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Michigan

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Minnesota

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Missouri

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
120 General minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Nevada

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Pennsylvania

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Tennessee

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Virginia

Not Eligible
2 General Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 Law & Legal Hours

Receive CLE credit in Washington via attorney submission.
Wisconsin

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
2.4 General

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
iPad for Lawyers: The Complete Mobile Practice Toolkit
iPad for Lawyers: The Complete Mobile Practice Toolkit Wed, August 26, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay
When AI Notetakers Break Privilege in Internal Investigations
When AI Notetakers Break Privilege in Internal Investigations Fri, August 28, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay