Drilling Title Opinions on Dormant, Stale, and Double-Fraction Mineral Interests: Requirements Through Quiet Title

Matthew W. Onest
Matthew W. Onest
Krugliak, Wilkins, Griffiths & Dougherty Co., L.P.A

Matthew W. Onest brings and defends lawsuits under the Ohio Dormant Mineral Act and the Ohio Marketable Title Act, together with declaratory judgment, slander of title, and adverse possession claims and disputes over the breach, interpretation, and enforcement of oil and gas leases.

Wayne A. Boyer
Wayne A. Boyer
Krugliak, Wilkins, Griffiths & Dougherty Co., L.P.A.

Wayne A. Boyer advises energy producers and other clients on mineral and lease acquisitions and divestitures, the due diligence behind them, and the title and lease disputes that arise from Utica Shale activity in Ohio.

Live Video-Broadcast: November 24, 2026

2 hour CLE

Tuition: $195.00
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

 

The Quiet-Title Case Is Won or Lost in the Drilling Opinion

Four Ohio decisions now shape every call on an old severed interest. Examiners grade notice, publication, and savings-event records against Fonzi (2022-Ohio-901). Double-fraction deeds are read through Mineral Development Inc. v. SWN Production Co. (2023-Ohio-4749). And Cardinal Minerals, LLC v. Miller (2024Ohio-2133) and 1803 Resources, LLC v. Lineback (2025-Ohio-3271) raise standing issues for anyone claiming through an abandoned mineral interest.

Credit a thin DMA notice record, and the abandonment is exposed. Skip the rolling root-of-title search, and the MTA route fails. Misread a double fraction, and the error rides into division orders, suspense, and pooling. Ignore standing, and the quiet-title suit is vulnerable before it is filed. Overlook the statute of limitations, and the driller's protection against trespass damages goes with it.

You walk out with two decision trees: credit/require/advise for the drilling opinion, and stipulation/ratification/quiet title for curative. You also get an annotated checklist for the abandonment and quiet-title record. Each tool captures the judgment layer rarely written down: how experienced examiners in Appalachia weigh curative risk, and what a quiet-title litigator needs the opinion to say before filing.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Grading Thin Notice Records
    How to grade an Ohio DMA notice, publication, and savings-event record against Fonzi before you credit an abandonment, write a requirement, or issue an advisory.
  • Running the MTA Route
    How the rolling root-of-title search on Ohio tracts decides whether a marketable-title extinguishment is credited or carried as a requirement.
  • Reading Double-Fraction Deeds
    How to make the Ohio double-fraction call under Mineral Development Inc. v. SWN Production Co. (2023-Ohio-4749) before a fixed royalty fraction goes into the opinion.
  • Testing Claimant Standing
    How the standing issues raised by Cardinal Minerals and 1803 Resources change your analysis of anyone claiming through an abandoned mineral interest.
  • Writing Satisfiable Requirements
    How to word requirements an operator can satisfy before spud and carry them into division orders, suspense, and pooling.
  • Litigating Quiet Title
    How to choose among stipulation, ratification, and quiet title, protect drillers on limitations and trespass damages, and hold the case through appeal.

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Date / Time: November 24, 2026 

  • 2:30 pm – 4:40 pm Eastern
  • 1:30 pm – 3:40 pm Central
  • 12:30 pm – 2:40 pm Mountain
  • 11:30 am – 1:40 pm Pacific

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Matthew W. Onest_FedBarMatthew W. Onest, Chairman KWGD’s Oil & Gas Practice Group | Krugliak, Wilkins, Griffiths & Dougherty Co., L.P.A

Matthew W. Onest brings and defends lawsuits under the Ohio Dormant Mineral Act and the Ohio Marketable Title Act, together with declaratory judgment, slander of title, and adverse possession claims and disputes over the breach, interpretation, and enforcement of oil and gas leases. He chairs the oil and gas practice group at Krugliak, Wilkins, Griffiths & Dougherty Co., L.P.A. (KWGD), which he joined in 2012, and he has handled appeals before the Ohio Supreme Court and Ohio’s Fifth, Seventh, Ninth, Eleventh, and Twelfth District Courts of Appeal.

  • Education & Credentials

He received his Juris Doctor, magna cum laude, from the University of Akron School of Law, where he served as an assistant editor of the Akron Law Review and earned CALI awards for academic excellence in Bankruptcy, Evidence, and Health Law, the ABA-BNA Award for Excellence in the Study of Health Law, and The American Bankruptcy Law Journal Student Prize. He holds a B.A. in Sociology and Criminal Justice, cum laude, from the University of Mount Union, where he received the William H. Porter Award in Sociology and a Board of Trustees Scholarship. He is licensed in Ohio and admitted to the U.S. District Courts for the Northern and Southern Districts of Ohio.

  • Recognition & Leadership

The Best Lawyers in America® named him Lawyer of the Year for 2027, and he has been listed in Best Lawyers in America® from 2025 to the present, after recognition as one of its “Ones To Watch” in 2021 and 2022. Within KWGD, he leads the oil and gas practice group and is a member of the litigation and appellate practice group.

  • Professional Involvement

He has written on the Ohio Supreme Court’s holding that the Ohio Marketable Title Act applies to all severed mineral interests, issued a legal alert on the Peppertree MTA case, and analyzed Ohio House Bill No. 152 and the state’s oil and gas unitization process. From 2018 through 2020 he co-authored the Ohio survey on oil and gas for the Texas A&M Journal of Property Law. His presentations include “Preserving Severed Mineral Interests” for the Stark County Bar Association (2014), the “2015 Oil and Gas Caselaw Update” for the Ohio Bar Association, and “Defining Trespass and Adverse Possession and Accommodating the Rights of Mineral Owners and Surface Owners” for Half Moon Education, Inc. (2018), along with programs on easements, condemnation, and landlord-tenant law.

He is a member of the Energy & Mineral Law Foundation, the National Association of Royalty Owners, and the Ohio State, Stark County, Akron, and Trumbull County Bar Associations. He serves on the board of the Spano Foundation and is a member of The Hubbard Rotary Club.

  • Experience

His oil and gas work includes counseling producers and drillers and litigating on their behalf in Ohio state and federal courts, and representing companies and landowners in civil litigation, arbitration, and administrative proceedings before the Public Utilities Commission and the Ohio Oil and Gas Commission. He also negotiates oil and gas leases, easements, and other energy-related agreements.

Beyond energy matters, he handles complex business and tort litigation, real estate litigation, commercial arbitration, and appellate work, and he practices in several federal courts across the United States. He works from KWGD’s Canfield and Canton offices.

 

Wayne A. Boyer, Director | Krugliak, Wilkins, Griffiths & Dougherty Co., L.P.A.

Wayne A. Boyer advises energy producers and other clients on mineral and lease acquisitions and divestitures, the due diligence behind them, and the title and lease disputes that arise from Utica

Shale activity in Ohio. He is a Director of Krugliak, Wilkins, Griffiths & Dougherty Co., L.P.A. (KWGD) and Secretary of Alpha Land Title Agency, Inc., the firm’s title company, where he assists with drafting title commitments and curing title defects. Before joining KWGD, he served as a project manager and in-house counsel for an oil and gas firm overseeing projects in the Appalachian Land Basin.

  • Education & Credentials

He earned his Juris Doctorate, magna cum laude, from the University of Akron School of Law in 2011 and his B.A. in Criminology, cum laude, from The Ohio State University in 2007. He was admitted to practice in Ohio in 2011.

  • Recognition & Leadership

He is listed in Best Lawyers in America® for 2026 and 2027, following recognition in Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America from 2022 through 2025. In addition to his role as a KWGD Director and Secretary of Alpha Land Title Agency, Inc., he sits on the Stark County Bar Association Grievance Committee.

  • Professional Involvement

His published articles address a Fifth District Court of Appeals decision on the “reasonable search” required in abandonment procedures under the Dormant Mineral Act, a Seventh District Court of Appeals holding that a surface owner’s attempts to locate the heirs of a mineral holder were inadequate, the persuasive force of the Duhig Rule in interpreting oil and gas reservations, and Blackstone v. Moore. He has also contributed to the firm’s Utica Shale & Pipeline newsletter (November 2020) and its Utica Shale & Pipeline Update and Review (May 2026).

He is a member of the Stark County Bar Association, the Ohio State Bar Association, and the Building Industry of Stark County (BIA). He serves on the Board of Directors of the Friends of the Children’s Network and is a former board member of the Stark County YMCA.

  • Experience

His oil and gas practice covers transactional work tied to the Utica Shale play, due diligence for mineral and lease acquisitions, and the resolution of oil and gas contract, title, and lease disputes, including through litigation. Through Alpha Land Title Agency, he supports residential and commercial closings, drafting title commitments and curing title defects.

His broader real estate practice includes negotiating and drafting deeds, leases, mortgages, and purchase agreements and reviewing zoning and land use codes, along with municipal law matters.

Agenda

SESSION 1 – Writing Drilling Title Requirements for Abandoned Minerals and Double-Fraction Royalty Reservations | 2:30pm – 3:30pm

This advanced session works through a composite horizontal unit with tracts in Ohio. For each severed interest, the panel decides whether to credit a dormant-mineral abandonment, a marketable-title extinguishment, or a fixed royalty fraction, or instead to write a requirement or an advisory. Speakers will grade thin notice, publication, and savings-event records against Fonzi (2022-Ohio-901), and apply Mineral Development Inc. v. SWN Production Co. (2023-Ohio-4749) to double-fraction deeds. Speaker will also discuss the standing issues for purported successees to abandoned mineral interests raised by Cardinal Minerals, LLC v. Miller (2024-Ohio-2133) and 1803 Resources, LLC v. Lineback (2025-Ohio-3271). Attendees will leave with a credit/require/advise decision tree, and the judgment layer rarely written down: how experienced examiners in Appalachia actually weigh curative risk.

BREAK | 3:30pm – 3:40pm

SESSION 2 – From Title Requirement to Judgment: Mineral Curative and Quiet Title That Survives Appeal | 3:40pm – 4:40pm

This session follows problem mineral tracts from drilling-opinion requirement to curative instrument or final judgment: an Ohio severed interest with a marginal notation of abandonment of record and a disputed root of title, or other MTA issues, and separately fraction interpretation issues. Drawing on Duhig, Gerrity, Fonzi, Cardinal Minerals, and Crozier, and other Ohio cases, the presentation will work through the process of preparing for quiet title litigation to cure title to the minerals, from both the surface owner’s and mineral owner’s perspective and then carrying that process through the litigation process, including appeals. Attendees will leave with a stipulation/ratification/quiet-title decision tree and an annotated checklist for the abandonment and quiet-title record, organized around what a quiet-title litigator needs the drilling opinion to have said before the case is filed and what to expect during the litigation.

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

California

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Florida

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 General Hours

Receive CLE credit in Florida via attorney submission.
Georgia

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Illinois

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Indiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
2 Substantive

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maryland

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Michigan

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Minnesota

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Missouri

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
120 General minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Nevada

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Pennsylvania

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Tennessee

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Virginia

Not Eligible
2 General Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 Law & Legal Hours

Receive CLE credit in Washington via attorney submission.
Wisconsin

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
2.4 General

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
The Necessary Evils of Funding a Trust
The Necessary Evils of Funding a Trust Wed, October 14, 2026
Live Webcast
How Qualified Settlement Funds Streamline Settlements
How Qualified Settlement Funds Streamline Settlements Thu, October 15, 2026
Live Webcast