When AI Is the Target: Prompt Injection and Responding to AI-Related Data Exposure

Frank Ramos
Frank Ramos | Goldberg Segalla

Frank Ramos is a partner in the Miami office of Goldberg Segalla, where he helps clients adopt artificial intelligence in a safe, effective, and legally sound way, advises them on the rules and regulations that govern its use, and litigates AI-related matters when disputes arise. He has served as Vice Chair of the Federation of Defense and Corporate Counsel's AI Committee and is a member of DRI's AI Task Force.

Live Video-Broadcast: December 2, 2026

2 hour CLE

Tuition: $195.00
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

 

The Document You Asked AI to Summarize May Be Giving It Orders

Legal teams now use AI assistants to summarize discovery, review claim files, and draft correspondence. A PDF, spreadsheet, email, or web page can carry hidden instructions aimed at the AI, not at you. And an AI tool connected to firm and client systems can become a path for confidential data to leak.

Let a planted instruction rewrite the assignment, and the summary you rely on is contaminated. Give the tool broad permissions, and a fake system message can request privileged files. Repair before you preserve, and the evidence of what was exposed is gone. Treat the forensic report as an ordinary internal document, and privilege and work product are at risk. Miss a regulatory, contractual, or insurer notice duty, and the fallout reaches clients, carriers, and regulators.

The program follows two case files. You walk out with a safer review workflow, sensible limits on tool permissions, and a simple way to test your own tools with harmless sample documents. You also walk out with a response checklist for clients, carriers, and regulators, plus the controls, training, and vendor terms that reduce the next exposure. Every piece is a decision point and a working document you can apply right away.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Spotting Prompt Injection
    How to find instructions hidden in PDFs, spreadsheets, emails, transcripts, images, and vendor portals before they rewrite the assignment you gave your AI.
  • Recognizing Common Traps
    How fake system messages, false urgency, secret-disclosure requests, and summary contamination work, and why an assistant may follow them.
  • Locking Down Your Tools
    How to set limited tool permissions, require human approval before anything is sent, and test your own tools safely with harmless sample documents.
  • Running the First Response
    How to preserve before repair, contain the exposure, assemble the response team, and trace access controls, shared credentials, integrations, and cloud file sharing.
  • Protecting Privilege
    How incident counsel, forensic independence, and careful handling of internal reports keep the investigation within privilege and work product.
  • Meeting Notice Duties
    How to manage notice and fallout with regulators, carriers, clients, and vendors, including preservation holds and the vendor terms that reduce the next exposure.

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Date / Time: December 2, 2026

  • 12:00 pm – 2:10 pm Eastern
  • 11:00 am – 1:10 pm Central
  • 10:00 am – 12:10 pm Mountain
  • 9:00 am – 11:10 am Pacific

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Frank Ramos, Partner | Goldberg Segalla

Frank Ramos is a partner in the Miami office of Goldberg Segalla, where he helps clients adopt artificial intelligence in a safe, effective, and legally sound way, advises them on the rules and regulations that govern its use, and litigates AI-related matters when disputes arise. He has served as Vice Chair of the Federation of Defense and Corporate Counsel’s AI Committee and is a member of DRI’s AI Task Force. A civil defense trial lawyer and member of The Florida Bar since 1997, he has taken numerous trials and arbitrations to verdict or award.

  • Education & Credentials

Frank earned his J.D., magna cum laude, from the University of Miami School of Law in 1997 and his B.A., summa cum laude, from Florida International University in 1993. He is admitted to practice in Florida and before the U.S. District Courts for the Middle and Southern Districts of Florida, and he holds an AV Preeminent peer review rating from Martindale-Hubbell.

  • Recognition & Leadership

Frank holds senior leadership in the Federation of Defense and Corporate Counsel (FDCC), where he serves as Secretary-Treasurer for 2026 after terms on the Executive Committee (2023–25), as Senior Director (2022–25), and as Director (2020–22). Within the FDCC he has also served as AI Committee Vice Chair (2024–25), chaired the Diversity, Sponsorship, Virtual Programming, and Website and Social Media committees, and chaired the 2026 Winter Meeting Convention. He served on the DRI Board (2013–16) and as President of the Florida Defense Lawyers Association (2009).

The Florida Bar named him its 2025 Mentor of the Year. Best Lawyers in America named him Miami’s “Lawyer of the Year” for Personal Injury Litigation – Defendants (2025) and Product Liability Litigation – Defendants (2020, 2023), and lists him in Commercial Litigation, Insurance Litigation, Product Liability Litigation – Defendants, and Personal Injury Litigation – Defendants. He has been recognized by Florida Super Lawyers every year from 2013 through 2026, by Forbes among America’s Best-in-State Lawyers (2025), and by Florida Trend’s Florida Legal Elite. The FDCC has honored him with the Andrew C. Hecker Award (2024), the President’s Award (2020, 2022), the Freddie Award (2022), the Strategic Plan Award (2018), and the Joseph R. Olshan Award (2015, 2017).

  • Professional Involvement

Frank writes and teaches extensively on AI risk in legal and insurance practice. His recent presentations include “Attorney-Client Privilege and Work Product When Using AI” for the Florida Defense Lawyers Association (2026), “Artificial Intelligence and Legal Ethics: Risks, Responsibilities and Best Practices” at The Florida Bar Annual Technology Symposium (2026), and “The Risks of AI and How to Mitigate Them” for the Risk Management Society Greater Miami Chapter (2025). He has also presented for myLawCLE, including “Verifying the Machine: Catching AI Hallucinations in Your Briefs and Your Opponent’s” (2026).

His AI writing includes “AI Discovery for the Defense: Finding the Inputs, Outputs, Logs, and Disclosures that Matter” (For The Defense, 2026), “Pitfalls of AI Use and Avoidance Strategies,” “AI Agents in Law Firms,” and “Checklist: Build Internal AI Tools” (Bloomberg Law, 2025), and “Build it Right Before You Build it Big: A 52 Week AI Adoption Plan for Law Firms” (Florida Bar News, 2026). In all, he has written more than 500 articles, given more than 400 presentations, and authored more than 20 books published by the FDCC, DRI, the American Bar Association, and The Florida Bar.

He is a member of The Florida Bar, the FDCC (since 2006), the Florida Defense Lawyers Association (since 1998), and the Association of Defense Trial Attorneys. He has served on the board of the Miami-Dade Defense Bar Association (2013–16) and chaired the Eleventh Judicial Circuit Historical Society (2010). In the community, he has served on the boards of Parent to Parent of Miami and Florida Christian School and has volunteered with Legal Services of Greater Miami.

  • Experience

Alongside his AI counseling and litigation work, Frank advises insurance industry clients on best practices for using their own data to improve efficiency and outcomes. His defense practice centers on retail, product liability, premises liability, trucking, insurance, and commercial disputes.

He counsels and defends retailers, developers, restaurants, fitness chains, hotels, resorts, and other hospitality businesses in claims involving negligent security, slip/trip and falls, catastrophic personal injury, trucking and motor vehicle accidents, and employment and construction matters. His commercial work spans intellectual property, breach of contract, bad faith, franchise agreements, and landlord-tenant disputes. In product liability, he represents manufacturers and distributors facing toxic exposure and personal injury claims in the pharmaceutical, medical, construction, asbestos and silica, machinery, household product, safety equipment, recreational vehicle, trucking, and automotive industries.

Known as the “Miami Mentor,” Frank also trains and mentors lawyers through articles, podcasts, how-to videos, and one-on-one conversations, and has met with hundreds of young lawyers to offer guidance on the practice and life in the law.

Agenda

SESSION 1 – Prompt Injection: When Outside Documents Try to Direct Your AI | Frank Ramos | 12:00pm – 1:00pm

This session explains prompt injection: instructions planted in PDFs, spreadsheets, emails, transcripts, and web pages that try to take over an AI assistant reviewing them. Attorneys will learn the common traps, from fake system messages and false urgency to requests for privileged files, and why an assistant may follow them. Attendees leave with a safer review workflow, sensible limits on tool permissions, and a simple way to test their own tools with harmless sample documents.

BREAK | 1:00pm – 1:10pm

SESSION 2 – The Breach File: Responding to AI-Related Data Exposure | Frank Ramos | 1:10pm – 2:10pm

This session follows an AI-related data exposure from the first suspicious login through containment, investigation, and recovery. Attorneys will learn how to preserve evidence, assess what was exposed, protect privilege and work product, and meet regulatory, contractual, and insurer notice duties. Attendees leave with a response checklist covering communications with clients, carriers, and regulators, plus the controls, training, and vendor terms that reduce the next exposure.

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

California

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Florida

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Georgia

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Illinois

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Indiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
2 Substantive

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maryland

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Michigan

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Minnesota

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Missouri

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
120 General minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Nevada

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Pennsylvania

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Tennessee

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Virginia

Not Eligible
2 General Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 Law & Legal Hours

Receive CLE credit in Washington via attorney submission.
Wisconsin

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
2.4 General

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
iPad for Lawyers: The Complete Mobile Practice Toolkit
iPad for Lawyers: The Complete Mobile Practice Toolkit Mon, October 26, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay
The AI Skills Every Attorney Needs: Think, Prompt, Win
The AI Skills Every Attorney Needs: Think, Prompt, Win Wed, October 28, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay