Hemp’s Federal Reclassification: Auditing Products and Planning the Transition When They Become Schedule I

Agustin E. Rodriguez
Agustin E. Rodriguez
Troutman Pepper Locke LLP

Agustin E. Rodriguez advises cannabis, tobacco, gambling, and other highly regulated businesses on the federal and state rules that govern their products. A partner in the Richmond and Washington, D.C. offices of Troutman Pepper Locke, he counsels manufacturers, distributors, retailers, and suppliers on licensing, taxation, marketing, advertising, and product sales, including manufacturers and suppliers of smokeable hemp and cannabis products.

Christopher W. Baxter
Christopher W. Baxter
Troutman Strategies

Christopher W. Baxter develops legislative initiatives and political strategy and leads advocacy before Congress and federal agencies as Senior Manager, Federal Affairs at Troutman Strategies, the government affairs arm of Troutman Pepper Locke, in Washington, D.C. His policy work spans food safety, appropriations, tax, trade, health care, and health information technology, and his clients include agricultural groups, trade associations, Fortune 500 companies, health care entities, educational institutions, multinational corporations, and nonprofits.

Live Video-Broadcast: November 16, 2026

1 hour CLE

Tuition: $195.00
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

 

A Product’s Legality Now Turns on Total THC, Not Delta-9

Section 781 of Public Law 119-37 rewrites the federal definition of hemp. The measure is now total THC, not just Delta-9. Each container is capped at 0.4 mg. Synthetic cannabinoids are excluded outright. A product that fails any part of the test is no longer “hemp”; it is Schedule I marijuana under the CSA.

Hold noncompliant stock once the new definition applies, and a client holds Schedule I contraband with criminal exposure. Leave customer and supplier contracts written to the old definition, and the compliance risk stays in them. Sell in Minnesota or Texas, and state law applies a different framework than federal law. Wait on FDA guidance, and the ambiguities stay unresolved. Congress, meanwhile, may still delay or re-work the change.

You walk out with a working framework for sorting every product into three groups: survives as hemp, can be reformulated, or has no compliant path. You also get an approach to inventory disposition and contract review, plus a read on the congressional outlook. This is judgment no search tool supplies: deciding which products a client keeps, reformulates, or winds down.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • The New Hemp Definition
    How Section 781 moves products from “hemp” to Schedule I through the total THC standard, the 0.4 mg per-container cap, and the synthetic cannabinoid exclusion, and how the change interacts with the CSA.
  • SKU-Level Exposure Audits
    How to audit a client’s product portfolio and sort each SKU into one of three groups: survives as hemp, can be reformulated or repackaged, or has no compliant path.
  • Inventory and Criminal Exposure
    What clients must do with existing inventory to avoid holding Schedule I contraband, and the criminal exposure if they do not.
  • Customer and Supplier Contracts
    How to evaluate outstanding contracts with customers and suppliers and minimize a client’s compliance risk under them once the “hemp” definition changes.
  • FDA Gaps and State Divergence
    How to advise clients now while FDA guidance on ambiguous concepts is outstanding and states such as Minnesota and Texas impose different requirements than federal law.
  • The Congressional Outlook
    How potential legislation to delay or re-work the definition, and other federal hemp and cannabis policy on the horizon, should factor into the advice you give today.

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Date / Time: November 16, 2026

  • 12:00 pm – 1:30 pm Eastern
  • 11:00 am – 12:30 pm Central
  • 10:00 am – 11:30 pm Mountain
  • 9:00 am – 10:30 pm Pacific

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Agustin E. Rodriguez, Partner | Troutman Pepper Locke LLP

Agustin E. Rodriguez advises cannabis, tobacco, gambling, and other highly regulated businesses on the federal and state rules that govern their products. A partner in the Richmond and Washington, D.C. offices of Troutman Pepper Locke, he counsels manufacturers, distributors, retailers, and suppliers on licensing, taxation, marketing, advertising, and product sales, including manufacturers and suppliers of smokeable hemp and cannabis products. He co-authored the firm’s analysis “Congress Narrows Federal Definition of ‘Hemp,’ Effectively Banning Most Intoxicating Hemp Products.” He is fluent in Spanish and proficient in Portuguese.

  • Education & Credentials

Mr. Rodriguez earned his J.D. from The University of Chicago Law School in 1994 and his B.A. from the Princeton School of Public and International Affairs in 1990. He has completed executive education programs in Corporate Governance & Leadership in the Boardroom at Harvard Business School and in Mergers and Acquisitions at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business. He is admitted to practice in Virginia and the District of Columbia.

  • Recognition & Leadership

He is recognized by The Best Lawyers in America® for Cannabis Law (2027) and served on the Law360 Cannabis Editorial Board in 2022 and 2023. He was named a Super Lawyers Virginia Rising Star in 2007 and received the Emerson G. Spies Award from the Virginia Bar Association. He sits on the Board of Directors of the Nicotine Resource Consortium (2026). In the community, he is Board Chair Emeritus and a Director of Housing Opportunities Made Equal of Virginia, Inc., Secretary and Director of the Virginia Museum of Fine Arts Foundation, a Director of the Richmond SPCA, and President of the Princeton Association of Virginia.

  • Professional Involvement

Mr. Rodriguez serves on the Food & Drug Law Institute’s Cannabis-Derived Products Committee and previously served on its Tobacco and Nicotine Products Committee (2021–2023). He writes regularly for the Regulatory Oversight blog, the Tobacco Law Blog, and Law360 on hemp-derived products, state cannabis regulation, FDA enforcement, nicotine pouches, and tobacco taxation. His recent speaking includes “The Cannabis Industry in Transition: Rescheduling, Banking Constraints, and Financial Distress Risks” (CeriFi CLE Webinar, September 2026) and the “Cannabis & Hemp 101” and lending panels at the Cannabis and Hemp Financial Services eSchool (February 2026), as well as programs at the FTA Tobacco Tax Section Annual Conference, Next Generation Nicotine Delivery USA, and The American Tobacco + Nicotine Forum. He also mentors founders through Startup Virginia.

  • Experience

His cannabis work includes counseling Harvest Health and Recreation Inc. on regulatory matters in its sale to Trulieve Inc., advising issuers listing on U.S. securities exchanges on cannabis regulation, and counseling mezzanine financiers investing in state medical marijuana licensees and payment processors serving the industry. He also advises manufacturers and suppliers of smokeable hemp and cannabis products.

On the tobacco and consumer products side, he represented a tobacco company in a multiyear arbitration with 18 states and territories over Master Settlement Agreement payments and advises on FDA regulation, state litigation, excise taxes, licensing, antitrust (Sherman Act and Robinson-Patman Act), and anticorruption compliance. He has represented a retailer in state attorney general investigations into product marketing, advised clients on FDA, FTC, and NAD advertising rules, and counseled gaming clients on Virginia casino and sports betting licensing.

Before joining the firm, he was Vice President and Associate General Counsel at Altria Group, Inc., where he managed legal work for the company’s cigarette, cigar, and smokeless tobacco divisions, coordinated MSA-related litigation with state attorneys general, and built supply chain compliance programs across Europe, Latin America, Asia, and Africa.

 

Christopher W. Baxter, Senior Manager, Federal Affairs | Troutman Strategies

Christopher W. Baxter develops legislative initiatives and political strategy and leads advocacy before Congress and federal agencies as Senior Manager, Federal Affairs at Troutman Strategies, the government affairs arm of Troutman Pepper Locke, in Washington, D.C. His policy work spans food safety, appropriations, tax, trade, health care, and health information technology, and his clients include agricultural groups, trade associations, Fortune 500 companies, health care entities, educational institutions, multinational corporations, and nonprofits.

  • Education & Credentials

Mr. Baxter earned his B.A. in Political Science from the University of Maryland in 2012. He is registered as a federal lobbyist.

  • Recognition & Leadership

Mr. Baxter leads advocacy efforts before Congress and federal agencies as Senior Manager, Federal Affairs at Troutman Strategies, a role he has held since January 2025. He develops legislative initiatives and political strategy for agricultural groups, trade associations, Fortune 500 companies, health care entities, educational institutions, multinational corporations, and nonprofits. He has been part of the Troutman Strategies team since 2013 and is registered as a federal lobbyist

  • Professional Involvement

He co-authored “Policies in Focus: Opportunities and Challenges Expected for M&A and VC in 2025” (January 2025) and contributes to the firm’s insights on tariff and trade policy and health IT policy. He is a member of Electing a Democratic Generation (EDGE), a network of young professionals.

  • Experience

Mr. Baxter joined Troutman Strategies in 2013 and has more than a decade of government affairs experience, working on legislative and regulatory matters that include appropriations and food safety policy for agricultural, trade association, and corporate clients.

Before joining the firm, he was a legal research assistant in the government affairs group of another law firm, focusing on agricultural and international trade issues, and a research assistant in the Washington, D.C. office of Senator Robert Menendez, where he covered banking and housing issues.

Agenda

SESSION 1 – Diagnosing Product Exposure and Transition Paths Under the New Hemp Definition | 12:00pm – 1:30pm

This session walks through how Section 781 of Public Law 119-37 (Continuing Appropriations, Agriculture, Legislative Branch, Military Construction and Veterans Affairs, and Extensions Act, 2026) narrows the federal definition of hemp and reclassifies most hemp-derived cannabinoid products as Schedule I controlled substances.

Attorneys will learn how to assess whether certain products will still be considered “hemp” under the new regime, or if such products will be considered Schedule I marijuana instead. In large part, this discussion will highlight the key forthcoming changes to the definition of “hemp,” including the new total (not just Delta-9) THC concentration standard, the 0.4 mg per-container cap, and the blanket exclusion of synthetic cannabinoids. Attorneys will also learn how to advise clients on reformulation, inventory disposition, and contractual obligations changes as the new definition takes effect. Attendees leave with a working framework for sorting products into three groups: those that survive as “hemp,” those that can be reformulated to meet the new definition, and those with no compliant path forward. The session closes with a look at whether Congress might still act to delay or re-work the changes to the “hemp” definition, and what else could be on the horizon for federal hemp and cannabis policy.

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General

California

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
1.5 CLE Hour(s)

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Florida

Approved via Attorney Submission
1.5 General Hours

Receive CLE credit in Florida via attorney submission.
Georgia

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Illinois

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General

Indiana

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 Substantive

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
1.5 CLE Hour(s)

Maryland

No MCLE Required
1.5 CLE Hour(s)

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Michigan

No MCLE Required
1.5 CLE Hour(s)

Minnesota

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Missouri

Approved for CLE Credits
1.8 General

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
90 General minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General

Nevada

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Approved for Self-Study Credits
1.5 General

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Pennsylvania

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
1.5 CLE Hour(s)

Tennessee

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Virginia

Not Eligible
1.5 General Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
1.5 Law & Legal Hours

Receive CLE credit in Washington via attorney submission.
Wisconsin

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
1.8 General

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
The Necessary Evils of Funding a Trust
The Necessary Evils of Funding a Trust Wed, October 14, 2026
Live Webcast
How Qualified Settlement Funds Streamline Settlements
How Qualified Settlement Funds Streamline Settlements Thu, October 15, 2026
Live Webcast