Forming a 501(c)(3): Bylaws That Match the 2026 State Defaults and Classification That Survives Year Six

Jacob Ferrari
Jason J. Kohout
Emmaline S. Jurgena
Jacob Ferrari | Apex Law Group
Jason J. Kohout | Foley & Lardner LLP
Emmaline S. Jurgena | Foley & Lardner LLP

Live Video-Broadcast: December 1, 2026

2 hour CLE

Tuition: $195.00
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

 

A new charity’s classification now matters to its donors

Two things changed for new charities in 2026. Florida rewrote its nonprofit corporation act, North Carolina amended its act through S.L. 2026-52, and Alabama revised its act with HB 248. Washington’s Nonprofit Corporation Act adds another set of defaults to draft against. Separately, § 170(p) now let’s non-itemizers deduct cash gifts to public charities, up to $1,000 ($2,000 on a joint return).

Leave the articles silent, and member rights can arise by default. Organize in North Carolina on or after October 1, 2026, and the board needs three directors. Form a § 509(a)(3) supporting organization, and donors lose the § 170(p) deduction. Fail both the fifth- and sixth-year tests, and private foundation treatment starts on the first day of year six. Delay the application, and the automatic revocation clock runs anyway.

You walk out with a formation failure checklist. You also get an annotated redline of a pre-2026 bylaw form against the state acts. Session 2 adds a classification decision tree and guidance on projecting the five-year support test, plus the formation-date clocks to calendar. Each turns the 2026 changes into drafting and classification judgment you can apply the next day.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Governance Structure Choices
    Choosing a self-perpetuating board, members, or founder control in the articles, with a no-members statement, prevents the accidental-member problem under the 2026 defaults and Washington’s Nonprofit Corporation Act.
  • Small-Board Deadlock Fixes
    How North Carolina’s three-director minimum, the two-member committee rule, and the quorum and written-consent defaults shape provisions that keep a small board from locking up.
  • Articles and Bylaw Redline
    How the organizational test drives the purpose and dissolution clauses, and how a pre-2026 bylaw form holds up against S.L. 2026-52, CS/CS/HB 797, Alabama HB 248, and Washington’s Nonprofit Corporation Act.
  • Section 170(p) Classification
    How the § 170(p) non-itemizer deduction turns the classification requested on Form 1023 or Form 1023-EZ into an important data point for potential donors.
  • Public Support and Year Six
    How to choose between Part II and Part III support computations, project the support ratio through year six, and plan founder gifts.
  • Form 8940 and Deadlines
    How to calendar the 27-month window, the first Form 990-series due date, state annual reports, the automatic revocation process and reinstatement, and when to use Form 8940 for unusual grants or reclassification.

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Date / Time: December 1, 2026

  • 2:30 pm – 4:40 pm Eastern
  • 1:30 pm – 3:40 pm Central
  • 12:30 pm – 2:40 pm Mountain
  • 11:30 am – 1:40 pm Pacific

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Jacob Ferrari, Managing Partner | Apex Law Group

Jacob Ferrari is the managing partner of Apex Law Group in Seattle, where his primary practice serves nonprofit organizations at every stage of growth, from formation and applications for tax exemption to board governance and corporate exit plans. He also advises social enterprises and businesses on transactions and related services.

  • Education & Credentials

He earned his J.D. from the University of Washington School of Law in 2016 and his B.A. in American Literature and Culture, cum laude, from the University of California, Los Angeles, in 2013. He was admitted to the Washington State Bar in 2016.

  • Recognition & Leadership

Super Lawyers has named Jacob a Washington Rising Star for Nonprofit Organizations (2025–2026). He serves on the board of Communities Rise, where he has volunteered pro bono legal services, and the organization honored him with its Volunteer Appreciation Award in 2021. He is one of Apex Law Group’s managing partners and serves on committees working to improve the regulatory environment for nonprofits. The sources are his Super Lawyers profile for the Rising Star honor and the Communities Rise board page for the board seat. The award is from his Avvo profile, the pro bono work from a Nonprofit Association of Washington speaker bio, and the managing partner title from the Apex Law Group site. The committee line comes from his own Communities Rise bio, which doesn’t name the committees.

  • Professional Involvement

He has presented programs on Washington’s Nonprofit Corporation Act, including sessions on youth on boards and on membership (2022), and led the Let’s Go Legal nonprofit training webinar series (2021–2022). He has also guest lectured on forming and maintaining a nonprofit organization at Highline College (Spring 2021 and Spring 2022).

  • Experience

He served as lead attorney and consultant on the board governance restructure of a $1 million nonprofit corporation and has guided many organizations through applying for and receiving tax-exempt status from the IRS. He was also lead attorney and drafter for a $5 million church property and asset transfer and for the merger of two Washington churches, and he managed to review several loan transactions with the Washington Department of Commerce and the Washington Public Housing Commission, each over $1 million.

 

Jason J. Kohout, Partner | Foley & Lardner LLP

Jason J. Kohout is a partner with Foley & Lardner LLP and chair of the firm’s Family Offices Team. He works extensively with nonprofit organizations on formation, governance, fundraising, and tax exemption, and advises families and business owners on tax planning, business succession, and philanthropy.

  • Education & Credentials

He earned his J.D. from Harvard Law School in 2007, where he organized the school’s Volunteer Income Tax Assistance Program and received the Sidney I. Roberts Award for the best paper on taxation. He received his A.B., magna cum laude, from Harvard College in 2004, where he was a member of Phi Beta Kappa and received the Hoopes Prize. He is admitted in Wisconsin, Illinois, Michigan, and the District of Columbia.

  • Recognition & Leadership

He is an elected Fellow of the American College of Trust and Estate Counsel and has been recognized by Best Lawyers in America for Charities Law and Trusts and Estates (2020–2024). The Greater Milwaukee Foundation gave him its 2015 Herbert J. Mueller Society Award for Outstanding Professional Adviser of the Year, and he has been named to Wisconsin Super Lawyers Rising Stars lists and as a Wisconsin Law Journal “Up and Coming Attorney” (2015). He is a director of the Wisconsin Philanthropy Network and serves as director and treasurer of the Milwaukee Bar Association Foundation.

  • Professional Involvement

He wrote the tax issues chapter of the Guide to Wisconsin Nonprofit Law in the Wisconsin Bar Association Desk book (2018) and co-authored a Journal of Taxation article on the regulations for Type III supporting organizations. He has presented “Tax Exempt Organizations from Start to Finish” for the National Business Institute (2016–2018) and “Tax-Exemption and Ethics Issues for Private Foundations” for the Wisconsin Philanthropy Network, and he developed Foley’s Charitable Academy to prepare professionals for nonprofit board service.

  • Experience

Jason advises tax-exempt organizations, including health care systems, universities and schools, churches, and social service agencies, on formation, operations, tax compliance, governance, and significant transactions. He drafts specialty governing provisions for bylaws and conflict of interest policies, advises directors on fiduciary duties and excess benefit rules, and provided tax and corporate structuring advice for a for-profit college’s conversion to nonprofit status. He also advised on the merger of two major nonprofit health care organizations, including drafting new bylaws, and serves as counsel and corporate secretary to a donor advised fund making more than $8 million in grants annually.

 

Emmaline S. Jurgena, Associate | Foley & Lardner LLP

Emmaline S. Jurgena is an associate in Foley & Lardner LLP’s Estate Planning Practice in Milwaukee, with extensive experience in tax-exempt and charitable issues. She counsels tax-exempt organizations on formation, ongoing administration, tax compliance, and IRS audits, and works with high-net-worth individuals and families on estate and tax planning.

  • Education & Credentials

She earned her J.D. from The University of Chicago Law School in 2019, where she was a clinical student in the Housing Initiative Transactional Clinic, and her B.A. in Journalism and Political Science, summa cum laude, from Marquette University in 2016, where she was a Diederich Scholar and a member of the Kappa Tau Alpha honors society. She is admitted to Wisconsin.

  • Recognition & Leadership

She serves as co-chair of the Milwaukee Association for Women Lawyers and as a board member of the Friends of the Milwaukee Public Library, and she took part in the Greater Milwaukee Foundation’s 2021–2022 Young Professional Adviser Council.

  • Professional Involvement

She has co-presented on charitable giving and philanthropy for the Milwaukee Estate Planning Forum, the Planned Giving Council of Eastern Wisconsin, the Association of Corporate Counsel’s Wisconsin Branch, and the Wisconsin Philanthropy Network, including programs on protecting donor intent and succession planning for family foundations. She also volunteers with Wills for Heroes and is a member of the Herbert J. Mueller Society.

  • Experience

Her tax-exempt work spans colleges and universities, hospital systems, religious organizations, museums, private foundations, and social welfare organizations, including formation, tax return preparation, IRS audits, and litigation. She helped create and continued to counsel several name, image, and likeness collectives at large colleges, completed a secondment advising one of the nation’s largest tax-exempt social welfare organizations on exemption issues and its related foundation, and assisted with tax planning for a $24 million bequest to a large charity.

Agenda

SESSION 1 – Drafting Charity Articles and Bylaws Against the 2026 State Nonprofit Act Changes| Jacob Ferrari | 2:30pm – 3:30pm

This hour is for organization-side formation counsel. It teaches how to draft charity articles, bylaws, and the organizational consent against the 2026 changes to the North Carolina, Florida, and Alabama nonprofit corporation acts, with North Carolina’s S.L. 2026-52 as the working text. It also walks through Washington’s Nonprofit Corporation Act as a point of comparison, including its rules for membership organizations and its express allowance for individuals under 18 to serve on a nonprofit’s board, and shows how the same drafting choices play out under it. The hour covers the accidental-member problem, small-board deadlock, the IRS purpose and dissolution clauses, and a live redline of a pre-2026 form bylaw set. Attendees leave with a formation failure checklist and the annotated redline.

BREAK | 3:30pm – 3:40pm

SESSION 2 – Choosing Public Charity Classification for a New 501(c)(3) Under the 2026 Giving Rules | Jason J. Kohout & Emmaline S. Jurgena | 3:40pm – 4:40pm

This hour is for organization-side exempt organizations counsel. It teaches how to choose public charity classification for a new 501(c)(3) now that § 170(p) ties a donor’s deduction to the recipient’s classification. The hour covers the Part II and Part III support computations, the five-year and sixth-year rules and founder-gift planning, the Form 8940 unusual-grant and reclassification tools, the classification requested in the application, and the 27-month and automatic-revocation clocks. Attendees leave with a classification decision tree and information about how to project the outcome of an organization’s five-year support test.

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

California

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Florida

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 General Hours

Receive CLE credit in Florida via attorney submission.
Georgia

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Illinois

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Indiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
2 Substantive

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maryland

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Michigan

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Minnesota

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Missouri

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
120 General minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Nevada

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Pennsylvania

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Tennessee

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Virginia

Not Eligible
2 General Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 Law & Legal Hours

Receive CLE credit in Washington via attorney submission.
Wisconsin

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
2.4 General

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
AI-Augmented Legal Workflows: A Map to Success
AI-Augmented Legal Workflows: A Map to Success Thu, November 19, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay
Using Adobe Acrobat’s AI Assistant for Legal
Using Adobe Acrobat’s AI Assistant for Legal Fri, November 20, 2026
Live Webcast