Churches and Charities After the Unsuccessful Settlement: Protecting Exemption Through Campaign Limits, Lobbying, and Affiliates

Patrick Sternal
Patrick Sternal | Holtzman Vogel

Patrick Sternal is of counsel at Holtzman Vogel in Washington D.C. He has extensive experience in tax-exempt and nonprofit organization law, including as an Attorney Advisor in the IRS Office of Chief Counsel, where he worked on drafting regulations and other guidance and advising the IRS Exempt Organizations operating division, and as a Tax Law Specialist in the IRS Office of Tax Exempt and Government Entities, Rulings and Agreements, where he focused on exempt organization determinations and compliance.

Live Video-Broadcast: November 12, 2026

2 hour CLE

Tuition: $195.00
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

 

The Endorsement Settlement Collapsed. Your Clients’ Midterm Questions Didn’t

The National Religious Broadcasters consent judgment was never entered. Churches and charities face the November 3, 2026 midterms with the same prohibition and uncertain enforcement. The Rev. Rul. 2007-41 and 78-248 facts-and-circumstances and bias tests still decide every request.

Endorse a candidate from the pulpit, and exemption and §4955 excise taxes are at risk. Offer lists or space to one candidate on unequal terms, and a rental becomes campaign intervention. Blur the line with an affiliate, and its activity may be attributed to the 501(c)(3). Exceed the “insubstantial part” standard or the 501(h) limits, and lobbying becomes an exemption problem. Cross a federal LDA, state, or local threshold, and registration and reporting deadlines follow.

You walk out with work product, not doctrine: a ten-pattern decision matrix linking each request to its controlling facts, likely answer, and fix; an advice-letter framework for incomplete facts; a spending tracker coded to IRS, LDA, and state definitions; a c3/c4/PAC cost-sharing agreement; and registration checklists. These are judgment calls a generic summary cannot make for your client.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Post-Settlement Enforcement Reality
    Assess what the unentered judgment never reached, and how the §7611 gate and Form 13909 referrals shape exposure for churches and non-church 501(c)(3)s before November 3, 2026.
  • Ten Midterm Fact Patterns
    Run pulpit, livestream, repost, list, title, facility, candidate-appearance, forum, and voter-guide requests through the Rev. Rul. 2007-41 and 78-248 tests using the facts that control each answer.
  • Ballot Measures and Lobbying
    Decide when a ballot-measure effort is lobbying rather than campaign intervention, and make the 501(h) election call on a real budget while tracking direct, grassroots, and excluded communications.
  • §4955 Correction and Advice
    Correct §4955 problems, address manager liability, and advise on incomplete facts with the decision matrix and an advice-letter framework.
  • Federal, State, and Local Registration
    Confirm when Federal LDA registration and state and local lobbying registration and other triggers apply to nationally active clients, and track the thresholds and deadlines.
  • c3/c4/PAC Cost Sharing
    Structure the c3/c4/PAC relationship so campaign intervention stays out of the c3, affiliates remain separate, and the cost-sharing agreement is signed before resources are shared.

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Date / Time: November 12, 2026

  • 12:00 pm – 2:10 pm Eastern
  • 11:00 am – 1:10 pm Central
  • 10:00 am – 12:10 pm Mountain
  • 9:00 am – 11:10 am Pacific

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Patrick Sternal, Of Counsel | Holtzman Vogel

Patrick Sternal is of counsel at Holtzman Vogel in Washington D.C. He has extensive experience in tax-exempt and nonprofit organization law, including as an Attorney Advisor in the IRS Office of Chief Counsel, where he worked on drafting regulations and other guidance and advising the IRS Exempt Organizations operating division, and as a Tax Law Specialist in the IRS Office of Tax Exempt and Government Entities, Rulings and Agreements, where he focused on exempt organization determinations and compliance. Before entering the IRS, he practiced law  in Los Angeles, working primarily with exempt organization and nonprofit clients, including churches and religious organizations, charities, and social clubs. He is a graduate of Thomas Aquinas College (B.A. Liberal Arts), Ave Maria School of Law (J.D.), and Loyola Law School (LL.M. Taxation).

  • Education & Credentials

Patrick earned his LL.M. in Taxation with high distinction from Loyola Law School, his J.D. from Ave Maria School of Law, and his B.A. in Liberal Arts from Thomas Aquinas College. He is admitted to practice in California and the District of Columbia.

  • Recognition & Leadership

Patrick writes regularly on election-year rules for exempt organizations, including “Religious Organizations and Political Activity: A 2026 Election-Year Guide,” “Charitable Organizations in an Election Year: Frequently Asked Questions,” and “IRS Enters into Consent Decree Limiting Application of Johnson Amendment; New Position Allows Churches to Endorse Candidates in  Certain Situations.” His other published work includes “IRS Form 990 Is Changing; Here’s Why Your Nonprofit Should Pay Attention,” “Back to Basics: Good Governance as Regulatory Prophylaxis,” and contributions to the firm’s In- Compliance political law updates.

  • Professional Involvement

Patrick is a member of the TEGE Exempt Organizations Council and the Catholic Bar Association. He has spoken alongside William M. Klimon at the Conservative Organizational Entrepreneur School.

  • Experience

At Holtzman Vogel, Patrick’s practice spans Non-Profit and Tax-Exempt Organizations, Faith-Based Organizations, Political Law, Corporate Governance, Government Ethics Compliance, and Higher Education Compliance. He counsels charities, social welfare organizations, and other exempt clients from formation and exemption applications through ongoing tax and governance questions, mergers, and dissolutions, and he drafts the contracts and agreements their transactions require.

Within government, Patrick served roughly ten years as a Tax Law Specialist in the IRS Office of Tax Exempt and Government Entities, Rulings and Agreements, working on exempt organization determinations and compliance, and later as an Attorney Advisor in the IRS Office of Chief Counsel, Exempt Organizations, where he drafted guidance and advised the operating division. Before joining the firm, he provided nonprofit tax and governance advice at a boutique law firm.

Agenda

SESSION 1 – Ten Midterm Fact Patterns for Church and Charity Campaign Activity After the Unsuccessful Settlement | Patrick Sternal | 12:00pm – 1:00pm

This hour runs ten common election-season requests through the Rev. Rul. 2007-41 and 78-248 tests: a pulpit endorsement, livestream, repost, rented email list, leader’s use of title, candidate appearance, candidate forum, voter guide, facility rental, and ballot measure. For each, it identifies the key facts to collect—such as the speaker’s capacity, whether content stays posted, whether lists and space are offered to all candidates on equal terms at fair market value, how forum candidates are invited, and whether a ballot-measure effort is lobbying rather than campaign intervention. It also considers what the unentered National Religious Broadcasters consent judgment might have changed and practical ways to avoid §4955 taxes: a different  channel, a disclaimer where a leader speaks in an individual capacity, fair-market-value reimbursement, or an affiliate. Attendees take away a ten-pattern decision matrix linking each request to its controlling facts, likely answer, and fix, plus an advice-letter framework.

BREAK | 1:00pm – 1:10pm

SESSION 2 – Building the c3/c4/PAC Structure With the 501(h) Election and State Lobbying Registration| Patrick Sternal | 1:10pm – 2:10pm

This hour follows one advocacy client that wants to lobby and play a role in elections. Starting with the facts to collect—lobbying budget, staff time, communication types, list ownership, and jurisdictions—it builds the Form 5768 “h-election” call, a spending tracker coded to IRS, LDA, and state definitions, and a c3/c4/PAC cost-sharing agreement. It separates c3 lobbying (stay within limits and register when required), affiliate activity (maintain separation to avoid attribution), and campaign intervention (keep it out of the c3 and run it through the c4 or PAC). Attendees learn to update the tracker throughout the year, sign the cost-sharing agreement before sharing resources, and use the checklists to confirm registration and reporting deadlines.

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

California

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Florida

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 General Hours

Receive CLE credit in Florida via attorney submission.
Georgia

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Illinois

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Indiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
2 Substantive

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maryland

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Michigan

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Minnesota

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Missouri

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
120 General minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Nevada

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Pennsylvania

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Tennessee

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Virginia

Not Eligible
2 General Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 Law & Legal Hours

Receive CLE credit in Washington via attorney submission.
Wisconsin

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
2.4 General

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
How Qualified Settlement Funds Streamline Settlements
How Qualified Settlement Funds Streamline Settlements Thu, October 15, 2026
Live Webcast
Recovering Elder Financial Exploitation Losses
Recovering Elder Financial Exploitation Losses Tue, October 20, 2026
Live Webcast