Filing a Detained Client’s First Federal Habeas Petition: Admission, Case Opening, and District General Order Deadlines

Caridad Pastor
Caridad Pastor
Pastor & Associates P.C.

Caridad Pastor founded Pastor & Associates P.C., where she and her team defend immigrants in complex removal proceedings and take on the federal appeals and denaturalization matters that many other firms choose not to handle.

Matthew K. Borowski
Matthew K. Borowski
Borowski Witmer Immigration Lawyers

Matthew K. Borowski is an attorney at Borowski Witmer Immigration Lawyers who won an order in a federal court habeas corpus action blocking the Trump administration’s detention policy for undocumented immigrants.

Live Video-Broadcast: December 3, 2026

2 hour CLE

Tuition: $195.00
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

 

A habeas petition can be right on the merits and still die at the clerk’s window

More than 24,400 immigration-detention habeas suits have been filed since January 2025, and clerks and judges have grown strict about filing defects. Districts now run § 2241 cases under their own general orders. C.D. Cal. GO 26-05 sets the schedule by docketed notice, W.D. Wash. GO 08-26 replaced its predecessor within seven months, and D. Ariz. asks for magistrate-judge consent at case opening. The statutory defaults have been displaced.

File without admission and the petition dies: Ico-Choc was dismissed after seven weeks. Verify a fact copied from another client’s file and the result is a sanctions warning. Calendar from § 2243 instead of the docketed notice and the reply clock runs on the court’s terms. Skip the Rule 5.2 pass and the exhibits land on a tracked, republished docket.

Attendees leave with a first-filing checklist and calendar cards for the first 14 days in the Central District of California, District of Arizona, and Middle District of Louisiana. They also take home a decision tree for choosing among the standard schedule, a joint motion to expedite, or a TRO. Every item is a judgment call — which route, which schedule, which district’s trap — that no form bank supplies.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Admission Before Filing
    How Ico-Choc’s seven-week dismissal reshapes the first decision — full admission, pro hac vice, or local counsel — with same-day PACER and CM/ECF access and the fee bill settled before the petition goes in.
  • Verification That Survives
    Why the § 2242 verification demands a cross-client fact-proof, and how a fact carried from another client’s file becomes a concession of fundamental error and a sanctions warning.
  • The Opening Packet
    How to code the JS-44 at NOS 463 with each district’s add-ons, file the cover-sheet event, follow the after-hours rules, and serve the government district by district.
  • Redacting for Public Dockets
    How the Rule 5.2 pass changes exhibit preparation when NOS 463 cases are tracked and republished, and how M.D. La., W.D. La., W.D. Pa., and judge-set districts handle clerk service, reply clocks, and redaction.
  • Calendaring Under General Orders
    How to run the first 14 days from the C.D. Cal. GO 26-05 notice instead of § 2243, avoid the W.D. Wash. GO 08-26 superseded-order trap, and make the magistrate-judge consent call district by district.
  • Speed of Relief
    When to take the standard schedule, file a joint motion to expedite, or seek a TRO, and how transfer and removal notice windows and Rhoney stay and hold requests change the schedule.

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Date / Time: December 3, 2026

  • 2:30 pm – 4:40 pm Eastern
  • 1:30 pm – 3:40 pm Central
  • 12:30 pm – 2:40 pm Mountain
  • 11:30 am – 1:40 pm Pacific

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Caridad Pastor, Founder | Pastor & Associates P.C.

Caridad Pastor founded Pastor & Associates P.C., where she and her team defend immigrants in complex removal proceedings and take on the federal appeals and denaturalization matters that many other firms choose not to handle. She is admitted to eight United States District Courts across Michigan, New York, the District of Columbia, Maryland, and Texas, as well as the U.S. Supreme Court and the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the Second, Sixth, and D.C. Circuits.

  • Education & Credentials

Ms. Pastor earned her J.D. from New York University School of Law in 1989, where she was a Root-Tilden Snow Scholar. She is admitted to the bars of Michigan and New York. Her federal admissions include the U.S. District Courts for the Eastern and Western Districts of Michigan, the Eastern and Southern Districts of New York, the District of Columbia, the District of Maryland, and the Northern and Eastern Districts of Texas; the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the Second, Sixth, and D.C. Circuits; and the U.S. Supreme Court. Her languages include Spanish, French, and Italian.

  • Recognition & Leadership

Ms. Pastor has been listed in Who’s Who Among Hispanic Americans and recognized by Super Lawyers. She is an Honored Member of the International Executives Guild and a founding member of the National Campaign for Tolerance, which has recognized her on its Wall of Tolerance.

  • Professional Involvement

As the founder of Pastor & Associates P.C., Ms. Pastor leads a team whose practice concentrates on immigration and naturalization law, including removal defense, federal appeals, and denaturalization matters. She is a founding member of the National Campaign for Tolerance.

  • Experience

Ms. Pastor’s practice centers on assertive defense for immigrants facing high-stakes matters, including complex removal proceedings and the federal appeals and denaturalization cases that many firms decline. She also represents professionals working to protect their future in the United States while keeping their families together and managing demanding careers, with representation tailored to each client’s circumstances.

 

Matthew K. Borowski, Founding Partner | Borowski Witmer Immigration Lawyers

Matthew K. Borowski is an attorney at Borowski Witmer Immigration Lawyers who won an order in a federal court habeas corpus action blocking the Trump administration’s detention policy for undocumented immigrants. He is admitted to seventeen United States District Courts — among them the Western District of Pennsylvania and all four districts of New York — and to six U.S. Courts of Appeals, and his practice concentrates on immigration, criminal defense, and appellate work.

  • Education & Credentials

Mr. Borowski holds a Juris Doctor from the Drexel University Earle Mack School of Law, where he graduated cum laude in 2012 and studied appellate practice and procedure. He is admitted to the bars of New York, Virginia, and Ontario, Canada. His federal admissions span the U.S. District Courts for the Western, Northern, Southern, and Eastern Districts of New York; the Eastern and Western Districts of Virginia; the District of Maryland; the District of Columbia; the Western District of Pennsylvania; the Western, Southern, Northern, and Eastern Districts of Texas; the Southern and Northern Districts of Indiana; the District of Colorado; and the District of New Mexico, along with the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the Second, Third, Fourth, Fifth, Ninth, and Eleventh Circuits.

  • Recognition & Leadership

Mr. Borowski has won several high-profile immigration cases that received significant media coverage. The Buffalo News has reported on firm clients detained in ICE enforcement despite no criminal background and pending court dates, and has quoted him on humanitarian parole denials at the Buffalo Federal Detention Facility; the Toronto Star has quoted him on the effect of U.S. immigration policy on Canadians. He has also been featured for representing a Dreamer whose status was revoked despite dropped criminal charges and for winning a Syrian asylum case.

  • Professional Involvement

Mr. Borowski is a member of the American Immigration Lawyers Association and the Law Society of Ontario (formerly the Law Society of Upper Canada). Earlier in his career he worked at Philadelphia’s Nationalities Service Center, a non-profit immigrant aid organization, on asylum, waiver, visa, and deportation-defense matters, and at South Jersey Legal Services in Vineland, New Jersey, on contract, landlord/tenant, consumer-law, and other civil matters.

  • Experience

Mr. Borowski’s practice concentrates on immigration, criminal defense, and appellate work, including the federal court habeas corpus action in which he won an order blocking the Trump administration’s detention policy for undocumented immigrants. He has practiced before federal and state courts in complex immigration and criminal appeals, represented individuals in removal proceedings in the Immigration Courts and before the Board of Immigration Appeals, and appeared in Immigration Courts throughout the nation and in courts throughout New York State. A first-generation American and the child of immigrants, he became a lawyer to give a voice to people whose rights might otherwise be overlooked.

Agenda

SESSION 1 – Getting Admitted and Opening an Immigration Habeas Case Without a Dismissal | Caridad Pastor | 2:30pm – 3:30pm

This session covers the petitioner-side opening hour of an immigration habeas case: choosing an admission route, getting same-day ECF access, verifying under § 2242, coding NOS 463 with each district’s add-ons, serving the government, and redacting exhibits for a public docket. The audience is removal-defense lawyers who have never opened a civil case in CM/ECF, and the anchor is Ico-Choc, where a petition filed without admission was dismissed after seven weeks.

BREAK | 3:30pm – 3:40pm

SESSION 2 – Running the First Days of an Immigration Habeas Case Under District General Orders | Matthew K. Borowski | 3:40pm – 4:40pm

This session teaches immigration habeas practitioners, from the petitioner’s side, how to run the first 14 days of a detained client’s § 2241 case under district general orders. The hour covers calendaring from the docketed notice in C.D. Cal. and W.D. Wash., the magistrate-judge consent decision, the choice among the standard schedule, a joint motion to expedite and a TRO, and the reply, transfer and superseded-order traps. The audience is immigration lawyers new to district court.

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

California

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Florida

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 General Hours

Receive CLE credit in Florida via attorney submission.
Georgia

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Illinois

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Indiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
2 Substantive

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maryland

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Michigan

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Minnesota

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Missouri

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
120 General minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Nevada

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Pennsylvania

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Tennessee

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Virginia

Not Eligible
2 General Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 Law & Legal Hours

Receive CLE credit in Washington via attorney submission.
Wisconsin

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
2.4 General

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
AI-Augmented Legal Workflows: A Map to Success
AI-Augmented Legal Workflows: A Map to Success Thu, November 19, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay
Using Adobe Acrobat’s AI Assistant for Legal
Using Adobe Acrobat’s AI Assistant for Legal Fri, November 20, 2026
Live Webcast