Private Equity M&A Fundamentals 2026: How Sponsors Structure Deals and Exits — and How to Draft Earnouts That Survive J&J v. Fortis

Patrick Reagin
Zachary B. Singerman
Abigail Grise
Patrick Reagin | Holland & Knight
Zachary B. Singerman | K&L Gates
Abigail Grise | Holland & Knight

Live Video-Broadcast: November 17, 2026

2 hour CLE

Tuition: $195.00
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

 

The Seller Takes the Earnout. The Buyer Keeps the Keys.

Private equity deals are not strategic deals. Sponsors build platforms through add-ons, take minority and growth positions, roll management into the equity, and plan the exit from day one. Fund life, LP expectations, and co-investors shape terms from entry through exit. Now three Delaware decisions— Johnson & Johnson v. Fortis Advisors, Fortis Advisors v. Krafton, and Fortis Advisors v. Stillfront—are reshaping how the earnouts on those exits get drafted.

Lean on buyer discretion or the implied covenant, and J&J shows Delaware will enforce the efforts clause the parties actually negotiated. Take operational control away from the sellers, and Krafton shows the remedy can be specific performance and a longer earnout period. Send the earnout calculation to an accounting firm, and Stillfront shows that arbitration versus expert determination decides who hears the fight. Meanwhile, SRS Acquiom data shows how often earnouts actually pay.

You leave with a framework for negotiating PE deal structures from the sponsor, management, and buyer perspective. You also leave with a drafting checklist: precise milestones, the right efforts standard, antiinterference covenants, control and information rights, and clear dispute allocation. That is negotiating judgment no template supplies.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Buy-and-Build Add-Ons
    Structure and finance platform acquisitions and add-ons the way a sponsor does, including the diligence, financing, and integration terms that recur across a buy-and-build strategy.
  • Minority Deal Protections
    Secure the governance and protective rights that matter in minority and growth equity investments, and use drag-along and tag-along provisions to set up a future exit.
  • Rollover Equity Alignment
    Structure rollover equity so management incentives track the sponsor's exit timeline, and know which terms management counsel should prioritize.
  • Exits to Strategic Buyers
    Allocate post-closing risk with rep and warranty insurance, escrows, and earnouts when a sponsor sells to a strategic buyer, with fund life, LP expectations, and co-investors in view.
  • Earnout Market Reality
    Use current SRS Acquiom data on earnout frequency, size, duration, achievement rates, and postclosing claims to frame the core questions every earnout must answer.
  • Fortis Drafting Lessons
    Apply J&J, Krafton, and Stillfront to efforts covenants, anti-interference and operational-control provisions, information rights, fraud carveouts, and dispute-resolution clauses through a practical drafting checklist.

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Date / Time: November 17, 2026

  • 2:30 pm – 4:40 pm Eastern
  • 1:30 pm – 3:40 pm Central
  • 12:30 pm – 2:40 pm Mountain
  • 11:30 am – 1:40 pm Pacific

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Patrick Reagin, Partner | Holland & Knight

Patrick Reagin is a partner in Holland & Knight’s Atlanta office whose practice centers on post-closing M&A disputes. He represents both buyers and sellers in fights over earnouts, purchase price adjustments, representations and warranties, and indemnity, including litigation and trial in the Delaware courts. He also handles business tort, fraud, contract, fiduciary duty, restrictive covenant, trade secret, and antitrust disputes in U.S. courts and international arbitration, and he writes regularly on directors and officers liability and developments in the Delaware Court of Chancery.

  • Education & Credentials

Mr. Reagin received his J.D., summa cum laude, from Loyola University New Orleans College of Law, where he graduated first in his class and served as articles editor of the Loyola Law Review. He also holds a B.S. in Music Industry Studies from Loyola University New Orleans. After law school, he clerked for the Honorable Ivan L.R. Lemelle of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana. He is admitted to practice in Georgia and Louisiana and before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, the U.S. District Courts for the Eastern, Middle, and Western Districts of Louisiana, and the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia.

  • Recognition & Leadership

The Best Lawyers in America has listed him among its “Ones to Watch” for Atlanta Commercial Litigation (2023 2025), and Georgia Super Lawyers named him a Rising Star in 2023 and 2024. He led the Atlanta Council of Younger Lawyers as president in 2023, following service as vice president (2022 2023), and has served on the Atlanta Bar Association board. Holland & Knight recognized him as a Pro Bono All-Star in 2020. In law school, he received the Faculty Award for the student graduating with the highest GPA (2014) and earned Highest Grade Certificates in 12 courses, including Securities Regulation and Business Organizations II.

  • Professional Involvement

He is a member of the Association for Corporate Growth’s Atlanta Chapter, the Atlanta Bar Association, the State Bar of Georgia Young Lawyers Division, and the Louisiana State Bar Association, and he sits on the Federal Bar Association’s Admiralitas Editorial Committee. Earlier in his career, he served as a New Orleans Bar Association Young Lawyers Section Ambassador (2017 2018) and on its Bench Bar Committee (2017), took part in the Louisiana State Bar Association’s Suit Up for the Future Program (2015 2018), and was an associate member of the Thomas More Inn of Court (2015 2018). He also supports the Piedmont Park Conservancy.

  • Experience

Much of Mr. Reagin’s work arises after private company acquisitions close. He has represented the sellers of a regional tree care business against a private equity buyer on earnout, representations, and fraud claims; an independent sponsor that acquired a cybersecurity platform in an earnout dispute; and buyers in an earnout dispute with the founder and former members of a chemicals management software business. He has handled a net working capital dispute for an engineering systems provider, representations and warranties litigation and a rollover equity redemption valuation dispute for a national home healthcare provider, and a representations, warranties, and indemnity dispute arising from a private equity acquisition of applied behavioral analysis centers.

He represented a seller in a nine-figure fraud and representations and warranties claim arising from an asset purchase, won complete summary judgment for former directors and officers in a fraud and representations suit tied to a nine-figure acquisition by a major poultry processor, and first-chaired a multiday ICC arbitration for a foreign textiles conglomerate asserting fraud and representations claims against the seller of a U.S. denim manufacturer.

 

Zachary B. Singerman, Associate | K&L Gates

Zachary B. Singerman is an associate in the Corporate practice of K&L Gates in Charlotte, where his work concentrates on mergers and acquisitions, private equity transactions, and corporate law matters for clients across a range of industries and sectors.

  • Education & Credentials

Mr. Singerman earned his J.D. from William and Mary School of Law in 2018 and his B.A. from The Ohio State University in 2015. He is admitted to practice in North Carolina and Ohio.

  • Recognition & Leadership

He graduated cum laude from law school, where he served as Lead Notes Editor of the William & Mary Law Review, and magna cum laude from The Ohio State University.

  • Professional Involvement

Mr. Reagin speaks often on post-closing M&A risk, including CLE webinars for Strafford (2025) and BARBRI Association, and he serves on the Federal Bar Asso

  • Experience

Before joining K&L Gates, Mr. Singerman was an associate in the private equity group of another global law firm. There he worked on mergers and acquisitions, private fund formation, and general corporate governance matters, and he represented institutional investors in private equity and venture capital investments. At K&L Gates, his practice remains focused on M&A and private equity transactions.

 

Abigail Grise, Associate | Holland & Knight

Abigail Grise is a litigation associate in Holland & Knight’s Charlotte office, where she handles complex commercial and business litigation in state and federal courts. Her practice also includes white collar criminal defense, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission investigations and enforcement actions, internal investigations, and insurance coverage matters.

  • Education & Credentials

Ms. Grise received her J.D., cum laude, from Seton Hall University School of Law and her B.A., summa cum laude, from The University of North Carolina at Wilmington. She is admitted to practice in New York and North Carolina.

  • Recognition & Leadership

At Seton Hall, she served as an article editor of the Seton Hall Law Review and competed nationally on the Interscholastic Moot Court Board.

  • Professional Involvement

Ms. Grise was an article editor of the Seton Hall Law Review and competed nationally on the and won an appeal before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

  • Experience

Before joining Holland & Knight, Ms. Grise was a litigation associate at an international law firm in New York. As a student attorney in her law school’s Impact Litigation Clinic, she argued an appeal before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit and prevailed. She also interned in the Economic Crimes Unit of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of New Jersey.

Agenda

SESSION 1 – Private Equity M&A in Practice: How Sponsors Structure Platform Acquisitions, Add-Ons, and Exits | Zachary B. Singerman | 2:30pm – 3:30pm

This session takes a transaction-level look at how private equity deal structures are built to serve sponsor strategy across the full investment cycle—from platform acquisitions and buy-and-build add-ons to minority and growth equity investments, to the sale of a portfolio company. Drawing on lower middle market deal practice, the session covers how sponsors structure and finance platform and add-on acquisitions, the governance and protective rights that matter in minority deals, rollover equity and management alignment, and how rep and warranty insurance, escrows, and earnouts allocate postclosing risk when a sponsor exits. Attorneys will learn where sponsor-side and strategic-side expectations diverge, how fund-level considerations shape deal terms, and what recent developments—including J&J v. Fortis—mean for drafting. Participants will leave with a practical framework for negotiating PE deal structures from the sponsor, management, and buyer perspective.

BREAK | 3:30pm – 3:40pm

SESSION 2 – Earnouts After the 2026 Delaware Fortis Decisions: Market Data, Case Law, and Drafting Lessons for PE M&A | Patrick Reagin & Abigail Grise | 3:40pm – 4:40pm

This program will examine how recent Delaware earnout decisions and current private-target M&A deal data are shaping the drafting and negotiation of contingent consideration provisions. The discussion will begin with current market data on purchase price adjustments, earnout usage, earnout achievement, and post-closing claims activity. The program will then analyze three recent Fortis decisions — Johnson & Johnson v. Fortis Advisors, Fortis Advisors v. Krafton, and Fortis Advisors v. Stillfront — as practical case studies in efforts covenants, anti-interference protections, operational-control rights, information rights, fraud carveouts, and dispute-resolution mechanisms. The focus will be on practical drafting lessons for deal counsel representing buyers, sellers, and private equity sponsors in transactions involving earnouts or other post-closing value-adjustment mechanisms.

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

California

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Florida

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 General Hours

Receive CLE credit in Florida via attorney submission.
Georgia

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Illinois

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Indiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
2 Substantive

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maryland

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Michigan

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Minnesota

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Missouri

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
120 General minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Nevada

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Pennsylvania

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Tennessee

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Virginia

Not Eligible
2 General Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 Law & Legal Hours

Receive CLE credit in Washington via attorney submission.
Wisconsin

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
2.4 General

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
AI-Augmented Legal Workflows: A Map to Success
AI-Augmented Legal Workflows: A Map to Success Tue, November 10, 2026
Live Webcast