Bringing DEI Qui Tams for Relators After Deloitte: From Insider Evidence to Paid Share

Rachel V. Rose
Rachel V. Rose | Rachel V. Rose – Attorney at Law, PLLC

Rachel V. Rose is the Principal of Rachel V. Rose – Attorney at Law, PLLC, a Houston-based practice advising and representing clients nationally and internationally on the False Claims Act, Dodd-Frank, securities law, healthcare, cybersecurity, HIPAA, and the HITECH Act.

Live Video-Broadcast: November 23, 2026

2 hour CLE

Tuition: $195.00
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

 

Three paid settlements just wrote the template for the next DEI qui tam

In February 2026, the Department of Justice drew a line between lawful and false diversity, equity, and inclusion practices. Paid resolutions with IBM, Deloitte, and Accenture Federal Services followed. False Claims Act whistleblower suits against federal contractors are now a live practice area, and the coveredconduct recitals in those settlements give relator’s counsel a working template that did not exist a year ago.

Sort an insider’s scorecards against DOJ’s stated line, and you have a certification or cost-allocation count on FAR 52.222-26. Skip the Rule 9(b) link from practice to contract, certification, and invoice, and the complaint fails. Mishandle the insider’s documents, and the public-disclosure bar is in play. File through the wrong vehicle, or in the wrong forum after Zafirov, and the share can go with the case.

Attendees leave with a falsity-sorting checklist, an annotated disclosure-statement outline under 31 U.S.C. § 3730(b)(2), an organization–insider term sheet, a state-count screening chart, and a share-negotiation memo outline, plus a working view of the 20% pre-litigation share and declined-case value after the Justice Manual § 4-4.111 revision. This is relator-side judgment — which evidence to lead with, which vehicle to use, what a share is worth — not a doctrine walk-through.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Sorting Falsity Against DOJ’s Line
    How to sort an insider’s scorecards, spreadsheets, and emails against DOJ’s February 2026 line between lawful and false DEI practices before any count is pleaded.
  • Pleading the Contract-Invoice Link
    How to plead certification and cost-allocation falsity on binding obligations under FAR 52.222-26 and tie each practice to a specific contract, certification, and invoice under Rule 9(b).
  • Pleading from the Paid Record
    How to plead materiality and scienter from the government’s payment record and the IBM, Deloitte, and Accenture covered-conduct recitals, and how to frame single damages in the annotated disclosure statement required by 31 U.S.C. § 3730(b)(2).
  • Clearing the Public-Disclosure Bar
    How to clear the public-disclosure bar and handle the insider’s documents so the evidence that makes the case does not become the problem that ends it.
  • Choosing the Relator Vehicle
    How to choose between a named insider and an organizational relator, draft the organization– insider agreement and its identity term, and manage seal discipline and Fifth Circuit forum risk after Zafirov.
  • Negotiating the Relator Share
    How to screen and plead Florida- and Indiana-style state add-on counts, negotiate the 20% prelitigation share, and value a declined case after Justice Manual § 4-4.111.

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Date / Time: November 23, 2026 

  • 12:00 pm – 2:10 pm Eastern
  • 11:00 am – 1:10 pm Central
  • 10:00 am – 12:10 pm Mountain
  • 9:00 am – 11:10 am Pacific

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Rachel-V.-Rose_Principal-with-Rachel-V.-Rose-–-Attorney-at-Law,-P.L.L.C.Houston,-TX_FedBarRachel V. Rose, JD, MBA, Principal | Rachel V. Rose – Attorney at Law, PLLC

Rachel V. Rose is the Principal of Rachel V. Rose – Attorney at Law, PLLC, a Houston-based practice advising and representing clients nationally and internationally on the False Claims Act, Dodd-Frank, securities law, healthcare, cybersecurity, HIPAA, and the HITECH Act. She presents on qui tam and Dodd-Frank matters and is admitted to practice before the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, the D.C. Circuit, and the Supreme Court of the United States. A Director on the Federal Bar Association’s National Board, she came to private practice from Wall Street, a Big Four consulting firm, the staff of the Chairman of the House Reform and Oversight Committee, and the Department of Health and Human Services.

  • Education & Credentials

Ms. Rose earned her Doctorate of Jurisprudence from Stetson University College of Law, where she served as Editor of The Journal of International Law and Aging, an MBA from Vanderbilt University, and a BA in History from Pennsylvania State University. She also holds an Executive Education Certification from Harvard Law School’s Program on Negotiation & Leadership. She is licensed in Texas and admitted to practice before the Supreme Court of the United States, the United States Courts of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit and the Fifth Circuit, the Southern, Northern, Western, and Eastern Districts of Texas, the District of Colorado, and the District of Columbia.

  • Recognition & Leadership

Ms. Rose is a Fellow of the Federal Bar Association and a Fellow of the American Bar Association. She has been named to the National Trial Lawyers Top 100 (2019–2023), the National Women Trial Lawyers Association Top 25 (2018–2023), the National Association of Distinguished Counsel’s Nation’s Top One Percent (2022 and 2023), Super Lawyers (2023 and 2024), the Texas Bar College (2018–2022), and Houstonia Magazine’s Top Lawyers in Healthcare Law (2018 and 2019). She has received the National Scribes Award and the William F. Blews Pro Bono Service Award.

  • Professional Involvement

Ms. Rose serves as a Director on the Federal Bar Association’s National Board and sits on its Government Relations Committee. She is an Affiliated Member of Baylor College of Medicine’s Center for Health Policy and Medical Ethics, where she teaches bioethics. She co-authored the American Bar Association books The ABCs of ACOs and What Are International HIPAA Considerations? and co-edited the second edition of the American Health Lawyers Association’s Enterprise Risk Management Handbook.

  • Experience

Ms. Rose’s practice spans the False Claims Act, Dodd-Frank, securities law, healthcare, cybersecurity, HIPAA, and the HITECH Act, and she presents on qui tam, Dodd-Frank, physician reimbursement, antikickback and Stark laws, Supreme Court cases affecting medical devices, international healthcare law, and HIPAA/HITECH. Before founding her firm, she served as Director of Business Development and Assistant General Counsel at a healthcare advisory company. Her earlier career included work on Wall Street and at a Big Four consulting firm, producing material for the Chairman of the House Reform and Oversight Committee, an internship at the Department of Health and Human Services, compiling policy papers at the Royal College of Nursing in London, consulting for pharmaceutical and medical device companies, and a clerkship for the Honorable Linda R. Allan of Florida’s Sixth Judicial Circuit.

Agenda

SESSION 1 – Pleading a DEI Certification Qui Tam from Insider Evidence and Paid Settlement Recitals | Rachel V. Rose | 12:00pm – 1:00pm

This session teaches relator’s counsel how to turn a DEI insider’s scorecards, spreadsheets and emails into a sealed FCA complaint and disclosure statement, using the IBM, Deloitte and Accenture covered-conduct recitals as templates. The hour covers falsity sorting against DOJ’s stated line, certification and costallocation counts on FAR 52.222-26, and the Rule 9(b) contract-invoice link. It also covers the publicdisclosure bar and single damages, and attendees leave with a falsity-sorting checklist and an annotated disclosure-statement outline.

BREAK | 1:00pm – 1:10pm

SESSION 2 – Filing the DEI Qui Tam Through an Organizational Relator and Negotiating the Share | Rachel V. Rose | 1:10pm – 2:10pm

This session teaches relator’s counsel how to file a DEI civil-rights certification qui tam through an organizational relator and how to negotiate the share, using the Deloitte file as the model. The hour covers vehicle choice, the organization–insider agreement, seal and Fifth Circuit forum risk, Florida- and Indianastyle state counts, the 20% pre-litigation share, and declined-case value after the Justice Manual revision. The speaker’s experience negotiating relator shares and serving state attorneys general under seal is the layer this audience cannot find written down.

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

California

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Florida

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 General Hours

Receive CLE credit in Florida via attorney submission.
Georgia

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Illinois

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Indiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
2 Substantive

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maryland

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Michigan

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Minnesota

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Missouri

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
120 General minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Nevada

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Pennsylvania

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Tennessee

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Virginia

Not Eligible
2 General Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 Law & Legal Hours

Receive CLE credit in Washington via attorney submission.
Wisconsin

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
2.4 General

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
Recovering Elder Financial Exploitation Losses
Recovering Elder Financial Exploitation Losses Tue, October 20, 2026
Live Webcast
iPad for Lawyers: The Complete Mobile Practice Toolkit
iPad for Lawyers: The Complete Mobile Practice Toolkit Fri, October 23, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay