Surveillance Tech Meets Statutory Damages: Nationwide ALPR Compliance and Class Action Defense

Logan S. Booth
Logan S. Booth
Fisher Phillips LLP

Logan S. Booth is Of Counsel at Fisher Phillips, practicing from the firm's Denver and Chicago offices. He advises organizations on data privacy and cybersecurity, complex technology transactions, high-stakes investigations, compliance with federal and state employment statutes, workplace policy development, and reputational and crisis management.

Elisabeth Hutchinson
Elisabeth Hutchinson
Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P

Elisabeth “Liz” Hutchinson is a Partner at Shook, Hardy & Bacon in Denver. Her practice centers on defending businesses, from startups to Fortune 50 companies, in complex privacy and data security class actions involving biometrics, artificial intelligence, and website-tracking technologies. She handles these matters at every stage of litigation, from pretrial strategy through appeal.

Live Video-Broadcast: August 26, 2026

2 hour CLE

Tuition: $195.00
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

 

One Missing Privacy Policy Can Cost $2,500 Per Scan

Private-sector license plate readers were an operations issue until February 2026. In Bartholomew v. Parking Concepts, Inc., a missing ALPR policy became actionable without any data breach or misuse. Washington's SB 6002, signed March 2026, adds new private-operator obligations, and the Flock Safety litigation wave is already active.

The exposure math is unforgiving. Deploy readers without a posted policy and Cal. Civ. Code § 1798.90.54 sets a $2,500-per-person statutory damages floor. Touch DMV data in an ALPR-linked workflow and the federal Driver's Privacy Protection Act adds per-violation penalties. Multiply either across class sizes potentially reaching millions of members and enterprise-scale exposure follows.

This program delivers the working tools. Attendees leave with a multistate compliance framework covering policy posting, retention schedules, DMV workflow audits, and vendor contracts. They also gained the post-Bartholomew defense playbook, from the operator and end-user distinction to TransUnion v. Ramirez removal. Both sessions close with a framework for evaluating client exposure and positioning cases for early resolution.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Multistate Regulatory Patchwork
    State ALPR statutes impose different private-operator obligations across jurisdictions.
  • Statutory Damages Exposure
    Cal. Civ. Code § 1798.90.54's $2,500 floor drives class action economics.
  • Federal DPPA Risk
    DMV-linked ALPR workflows and vendor contracts trigger federal per-violation penalties.
  • The Bartholomew Ruling
    The February 2026 decision makes a missing policy actionable harm.
  • Post-Bartholomew Defenses
    Operator and end-user distinctions, certification challenges, and TransUnion removal strategies.
  • Compliance and Resolution Framework
    Policy posting, retention schedules, workflow audits, and early resolution positioning.

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Date / Time: August 26, 2026

  • 2:00 pm – 4:10 pm Eastern
  • 1:00 pm – 3:10 pm Central
  • 12:00 pm – 2:10 pm Mountain
  • 11:00 am – 1:10 pm Pacific

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Logan S. Booth, CIPP/US, Of Counsel | Fisher Phillips LLP

Logan S. Booth is Of Counsel at Fisher Phillips, practicing from the firm’s Denver and Chicago offices. He advises organizations on data privacy and cybersecurity, complex technology transactions, high-stakes investigations, compliance with federal and state employment statutes, workplace policy development, and reputational and crisis management. A Certified Information Privacy Professional/United States (CIPP/US), he regularly guides clients on the use, licensing, acquisition, and commercialization of data and technology.

  • Education & Credentials

Logan earned his J.D. from Columbia Law School in 2014, an M.B.A. from Northwestern University in 2021, an M.A. from New York University in 2011, and a B.A., summa cum laude and Phi Beta Kappa, from New York University in 2010. He is admitted to practice in Illinois and New York and practices under the supervision of a licensed Colorado bar member.

  • Recognition & Leadership

Logan was named a Chicago Council on Global Affairs Emerging Leaders Fellow in 2025 and an Aspen Strategy Group Rising Leaders Fellow in 2023. That same year, the Jewish United Fund of Metropolitan Chicago honored him with its 36-Under-36 Award. He chairs the Repair the World Chicago Advisory Council and serves as Young Leadership Division Campaign Chair for the Jewish United Fund of Metropolitan Chicago.

  • Professional Involvement

Logan is a member of the International Association of Privacy Professionals. He is also an officer in the United States Navy Reserve, having served in the intelligence and public affairs communities, and is a graduate of the Center for Information Warfare Training and the Defense Information School.

  • Experience

Before joining Fisher Phillips, Logan was an associate at a global law firm, representing organizations in proactive and reactive data privacy and cybersecurity matters and leading teams through multijurisdictional regulatory probes. He began his career as a transactional attorney working on domestic and cross-border mergers and acquisitions, leveraged buyouts, and securities offerings, and later spent five years as a management consultant. His crisis management work includes advising boards and executives through misconduct investigations, reductions in force, WARN Act compliance, unionization initiatives, and leadership transitions, as well as Congressional, federal agency, and state attorneys general investigations. Notably, he served as the principal crisis communications consultant for Norfolk Southern in the aftermath of the East Palestine train derailment.

 

Elisabeth “Liz” Hutchinson, Partner | Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P

Elisabeth “Liz” Hutchinson is a Partner at Shook, Hardy & Bacon in Denver. Her practice centers on defending businesses, from startups to Fortune 50 companies, in complex privacy and data security class actions involving biometrics, artificial intelligence, and website-tracking technologies. She handles these matters at every stage of litigation, from pretrial strategy through appeal.

  • Education & Credentials

Liz earned her J.D. from the University of Denver Sturm College of Law, where she graduated in the top ten percent of her class as a member of the Order of St. Ives, served as Managing Editor of the University of Denver Water Law Review, received the Reese Persuasive Writing Award, and attended on full tuition scholarships. She holds a B.A. with honors in International Relations from the University of California, Davis, where she competed on the NCAA Division I women’s rowing team. She is admitted to practice in Colorado, Illinois, and Wyoming.

  • Recognition & Leadership

Liz has been recognized by The Best Lawyers in America: Ones to Watch in Commercial Litigation (20212026), Mass Tort Litigation/Class Actions – Defendants (2022-2026), and Personal Injury Litigation – Defendants (2024-2026). She received the Sylvan Siegler Award for Excellence in Mentoring in 2022.

  • Professional Involvement

Liz is a member of the Colorado Bar Association, the Denver Bar Association, the Colorado Women’s Bar Association, and the William E. Doyle Inn of Court. She maintains an active pro bono practice assisting low-income clients fleeing gender- and political-based violence, and volunteers with the Colorado High School Cycling League.

  • Experience

Liz’s statutory experience spans the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA), the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), HIPAA, the California Medical Information Act (CMIA), California’s Automated License Plate Recognition (ALPR) law, the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA), and other state wiretap statutes, at both the trial and appellate levels. She has defended privacy class actions nationwide, winning dismissals at the pleading stage, prevailing on appeal on questions of first impression, and securing favorable early settlements when that aligned with client goals. Before entering private practice, she spent six years clerking in federal and state appellate courts, including for the Hon. Gregory A. Phillips of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, Associate Justice William W. Hood, III of the Colorado Supreme Court, and the Hon. John R. Webb of the Colorado Court of Appeals. Her broader litigation experience spans forums from Alaska to the U.S. Supreme Court and includes product liability, breach of contract, trade secrets, consumer protection, and toxic tort matters.

Agenda

SESSION 1 – Counseling Multistate Businesses on License Plate Reader Privacy Compliance | 2:00pm – 3:00pm

This session maps the multistate statutory landscape governing private-sector ALPR deployment, with a focus on the compliance obligations, data retention limits, and vendor-contract issues that counsel must address for clients operating license plate reader systems across jurisdictions. Attorneys will learn how California’s $2,500-per-scan statutory damages regime, the federal Driver’s Privacy Protection Act, and emerging state frameworks combine to create enterprise-scale class action exposure. Attendees will leave with a practical compliance framework covering policy posting, data retention schedules, DMV data workflow audits, and law enforcement data-sharing restrictions.

BREAK | 3:00pm – 3:10pm

SESSION 2 – Defending License Plate Reader Privacy Class Actions in California Courts | 3:10pm – 4:10pm

This session equips defense counsel with the strategic and tactical tools needed to defend license plate reader (ALPR) privacy class actions in California courts following the landmark February 2026 ruling in Bartholomew v. Parking Concepts, Inc. Attorneys will learn how the $2,500-per-person statutory damages floor under Cal. Civ. Code § 1798.90.54 drives class-action economics, what viable defense arguments survive Bartholomew, and how the operator/end-user distinction, class certification challenges, and federal removal strategies apply to the current wave of active litigation. Attendees will leave with a practical framework for evaluating client exposure, identifying which defenses remain viable, and positioning cases for early resolution.

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

California

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Florida

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 General Hours

Receive CLE credit in Florida via attorney submission.
Georgia

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Illinois

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Indiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
2 Substantive

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maryland

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Michigan

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Minnesota

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Missouri

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
120 General minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Nevada

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Pennsylvania

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Tennessee

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Virginia

Not Eligible
2 General Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 Law & Legal Hours

Receive CLE credit in Washington via attorney submission.
Wisconsin

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
2.4 General

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
Branding for Firms: Ethics & Strategy
Branding for Firms: Ethics & Strategy Thu, July 16, 2026
Live Webcast
Using AI in Your Law Practice: A Step-by-Step Guide
Using AI in Your Law Practice: A Step-by-Step Guide Wed, July 22, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay
iPad for Lawyers: The Complete Mobile Practice Toolkit
iPad for Lawyers: The Complete Mobile Practice Toolkit Thu, July 23, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay
The AI Skills Every Attorney Needs: Think, Prompt, Win
The AI Skills Every Attorney Needs: Think, Prompt, Win Thu, July 30, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay