Defending Housing Providers in Assistance Animal Disputes: Accommodation Requests, Enforcement, and Litigation

John W. Egan
Gwen Roy-Harrison
Jennifer Jean-Gilles
Luke LaHaye
John W. Egan | Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Gwen Roy-Harrison | Offit Kurman
Jennifer Jean-Gilles | Offit Kurman
Luke LaHaye | Adams & Reese

Live Video-Broadcast: August 21, 2026

2 hour CLE

Tuition: $195.00
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

 

The federal checklist is gone — the liability isn't

In September 2025, HUD withdrew FHEO Notices 2020-01 and 2013-01, the checklist defense counsel relied on for years. Yet 24 C.F.R. §§ 100.202(d) and 100.204 remain fully in force. DOJ enforcement continues through settlements like Estrada, Gregory Estates, and Menendez.

The stakes are already concrete. Deny a request without a documented record, and summary judgment slips away. Waive fees automatically, and Henderson v. Five Properties LLC says you conceded too much. Ask the wrong verification questions, and a new dispute follows. State and local ESA statutes now add certification and documentation rules of their own.

Attendees walk out with a litigation-ready Henderson five-factor framework, a denial-letter outline anchored in observed behavioral incidents, intake and verification protocols, and a defense playbook for HUD investigations, testimony preparation, and policy revisions that reduce repeat claims.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Post-Withdrawal Landscape
    How defense obligations under 24 C.F.R. §§ 100.202(d) and 100.204 survive HUD's withdrawal of FHEO Notices 2020-01 and 2013-01, and what continued DOJ enforcement (Estrada, Gregory Estates, Menendez) signals about exposure.
  • Henderson Fee-Waiver Defense
    How to apply the multi-factor reasonableness test from Henderson v. Five Properties LLC and build the property-level record that shifts the burden back to the tenant.
  • Defensible Denial Letters
    How to structure intake and response timelines without the withdrawn 10-day benchmark and draft denials anchored in observed behavioral incidents rather than breed, weight, or size.
  • Necessity, Nexus, and Verification
    How to evaluate what a requester must establish — disability, equal opportunity, and necessity — and set the permissible scope of inquiry, third-party documentation, and disputes over non-obvious disabilities.
  • State ESA Trends
    How recent state and local statutes and regulations governing ESA documentation, healthcare provider certifications, and fraudulent requests change compliance obligations.
  • Enforcement and Litigation Defense
    How to respond to HUD and state agency investigations, preserve privilege, build the evidentiary record for testimony and trial, and counsel boards and property managers on policies that reduce repeat claims.

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Date / Time: August 21, 2026

  • 1:00 pm – 3:20 pm Eastern
  • 12:00 pm – 2:20 pm Central
  • 11:00 am – 1:20 pm Mountain
  • 10:00 am – 12:20 pm Pacific

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

John W. Egan, partner | Seyfarth Shaw LLP

John W. Egan defends public accommodation, housing providers, and employers in single-plaintiff and class action disability access litigation in courts across the country. His practice spans the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), the Fair Housing Act (FHA), Sections 504 and 508 of the Rehabilitation Act, and related federal, state, and local civil rights laws, along with agency proceedings before the U.S. Department of Justice, the New York State Division of Human Rights, and the New York City Commission on Human Rights.

  • Education & Credentials

John earned his J.D. from Emory University School of Law, where he served as editor-in-chief of the Emory International Law Review, and his B.A., summa cum laude, from the State University of New York at Geneseo. He is admitted to practice in New York, before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, and in the U.S. District Courts for the Eastern and Southern Districts of New York.

  • Recognition & Leadership

John chaired the Disability Law Committee of the New York City Bar Association from 2017 to 2020 and currently serves as vice-chair of the New York State Bar Association’s Committee on Disability Rights. A national thought leader on complex accessibility issues, he has been quoted in The New York Times, ABA Journal, Corporate Counsel, Crain’s New York Business, and the New York Observer, and has appeared as a television commentator on Spectrum News – NY1.

  • Professional Involvement

A member of Seyfarth’s ADA Title III & Public Access team, John lectures regularly on emerging disability law issues, contributes frequently to the firm’s ADA Title III News & Insights Blog, and conducts presentations and training for clients and national CLE providers on ADA compliance and best practices. He is active in the firm’s inclusion and diversity communities, and his pro bono practice includes counseling and representing veterans and 9/11 First Responders in applications for disability government benefits.

  • Experience

John’s experience covers all facets of disability access litigation and counseling, from first-chairing defenses through summary judgment and trial to negotiating early, favorable resolutions and advising on novel digital accessibility questions. In his housing accessibility practice, he counsels and defends landlords, developers, condominiums, and cooperatives in disability matters under the FHA and state and municipal housing discrimination laws, works with New York City condominium and cooperative boards and their managing agents on accommodation issues, and advises property owners, developers, lenders, and investors on accessibility issues arising in real estate due diligence. He also defends employers in matters involving workplace accommodation for employees with disabilities and leave-related issues.

 

Gwen Roy-Harrison, Principal | Offit Kurman

Gwen Roy-Harrison represents multi-family housing providers, developers, and business owners of all sizes, litigating residential and commercial landlord disputes on behalf of large property management companies, small and mid-sized businesses, and individual owners. She has developed depth in the Fair Housing Act (FHA) and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) as they apply to housing providers and HUD compliance, advising and representing clients in HUD complaints, state and local discrimination investigations, and regulatory compliance, and conducting Fair Housing Act trainings.

  • Education & Credentials

Gwen earned her J.D. from the University of San Diego School of Law, where she served as Lead Articles Editor of the San Diego Law Review, and her B.S. from the University of Mary Washington. She is admitted to practice in Virginia, the District of Columbia, and Maryland.

  • Recognition & Leadership

Gwen has been named to Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch® in America for Litigation – Real Estate and Real Estate Law (2021–2025), selected to Maryland Rising Stars® for Real Estate (2023–2027), and selected to Washington, D.C. Rising Stars® for Real Estate (2023). She serves as a Principal at Offit Kurman and Co-Chair of the firm’s DEI Committee.

  • Professional Involvement

Gwen has served as a board member of the Coalition of Women’s Initiatives in the Law (DC Chapter) since 2020 and is a member of the D.C. Bar Association’s Real Estate, Housing and Land Use Section and The Barristers. She frequently presents, virtually and in person, across D.C., Maryland, and Virginia on HUD compliance, Fair Housing Act training, and best practices housing providers can use to avoid fair housing and discrimination complaints.

  • Experience

Gwen spends much of her time in court prosecuting and defending cases for housing providers and has honed a specialty in resolving disputes for condominium and cooperative associations. Outside the courtroom, she devotes considerable time to transactional work, including lease review and drafting, non-disclosure agreements, and confidential settlement and general release agreements.

 

Jennifer Jean-Gilles, Principal | Offit Kurman

Jennifer Jean-Gilles concentrates her real estate practice on resolving landlord-tenant disputes, representing landlords of all sizes in residential and commercial litigation. Her representation also includes lease drafting, resolving fair housing disputes, and prosecuting breach of lease actions.

  • Education & Credentials

Jennifer earned her J.D. from Widener University Delaware Law School and her B.S. from Drexel University. She is admitted to practice in the District of Columbia.

  • Recognition & Leadership

Jennifer serves as a Principal at Offit Kurman and as Treasurer of the National Black Prosecutors Association Foundation.

  • Professional Involvement

Jennifer is a member of the D.C. Bar Association and of its Real Estate, Housing, and Land Use Section.

  • Experience

Before joining Offit Kurman, Jennifer served as a prosecutor at both the Office of the Attorney General for the District of Columbia and the Philadelphia District Attorney’s Office, trying numerous cases to verdict in both bench and jury trials. She also spent several years managing affordable housing sites, with experience in Low-Income Housing Credit (LIHTC) properties, recertifications, and lease disputes.

 

Luke LaHaye, Associate | Adams & Reese

Luke LaHaye maintains a diverse practice centered on litigation and on regulatory and compliance counseling. He represents clients principally in commercial litigation and labor and employment matters, and his regulatory practice ranges from advising clients on customs and international trade issues to counseling financial institutions and service providers on compliance with federal and state consumer protection statutes and regulations.

  • Education & Credentials

Luke earned his J.D., cum laude, with a Civil Law Certificate from Tulane University Law School in 2019 and holds an M.S. in Finance (2013) and a B.S. in Finance (2012) from Louisiana State University. He is admitted to practice in the District of Columbia, Louisiana, and New York.

  • Recognition & Leadership

Luke has been selected to the Louisiana Super Lawyers® Rising Stars list for Business Litigation (2024 and 2025). In law school, he served as Senior Managing Editor of the Tulane Law Review and received the Class of 2000 Law Review Award.

  • Professional Involvement

Luke served as legal research and writing senior fellow at Tulane University Law School and as a judicial extern for both the Honorable Sarah S. Vance and the Honorable Jane Triche Milazzo of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana. He is the author of an article on abandonment and land banking in New Orleans published in the Tulane Law Review Online (2019).

  • Experience

Luke’s litigation practice covers a variety of areas, predominantly commercial litigation and labor and employment. His compliance practice spans customs and international trade counseling and consumer protection regulatory advice for financial institutions and service providers.

Agenda

SESSION 1 – Assistance Animals After the Reset: What Defense Counsel Need to Know | 1:00pm – 1:40pm ET

When HUD withdrew FHEO Notices 2020-01 and 2013-01 in September 2025, defense counsel lost the federal checklist they had relied on for years — yet the underlying obligations under 24 C.F.R. §§ 100.202(d) and 100.204 remain fully in force, and DOJ enforcement has continued through settlements like Estrada, Gregory Estates, and Menendez. In this 40-minute session, we will focus on three things defense attorneys representing housing providers need to operationalize now: what guidance still binds and what no longer applies; how to deploy the multi-factor reasonableness test from Henderson v. Five Properties LLC to defeat automatic fee-waiver demands; and how to build defensible response timelines and denial letters under § 100.204 — anchored in observed behavioral incidents rather than breed, weight, or size. Attendees will leave with a litigation-ready Henderson five-factor analysis framework, a denial-letter outline built to withstand summary judgment, and the counseling points to advise clients before the next accommodation dispute escalates.

BREAK | 1:40pm – 1:50pm ET

SESSION 2 – Defense-Side Assistance: Evaluating Reasonable Accommodation Requests such as Necessity, Nexus, and Compliance | 1:50pm – 2:30pm ET

I will focus on the legal standard governing reasonable accommodation requests. I will cover the elements a requestor must establish, and how courts and HUD evaluate whether a requested accommodation is “necessary” to afford an individual with a disability an equal opportunity to use and enjoy a dwelling and the impact of Henderson. I will also address the interactive process that housing providers should engage in upon receiving a reasonable accommodation request, including best practices for intake and documentation of requests, the permissible scope of inquiry into the nature of an individual’s disability and the nexus between the disability and the requested accommodation. I will then address recent state and local fair housing statutes and regulations that have addressed ESA requests.

BREAK | 2:30pm – 2:40pm ET

SESSION 3 – Defending Housing Providers in Assistance Animal Disputes: Investigations, Enforcement, and Litigation Strategy | 2:40pm – 3:20pm ET

Once an assistance animal dispute progresses beyond the accommodation request, defense counsel must protect the housing provider through investigations, administrative proceedings, and litigation while minimizing future exposure. This session examines practical defense strategies for representing landlords, cooperatives, condominium associations, and property managers after a complaint has been filed. Attendees will learn how to respond to HUD and state agency investigations, preserve privileged communications, evaluate evidentiary risks, prepare decision-makers for testimony, and strengthen internal policies to reduce repeat claims. The program emphasizes proactive counseling that positions housing providers for successful resolution while maintaining compliance with the Fair Housing Act.

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

California

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Florida

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 General Hours

Receive CLE credit in Florida via attorney submission.
Georgia

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Illinois

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Indiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
2 Substantive

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maryland

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Michigan

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Minnesota

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Missouri

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
120 General minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Nevada

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Pennsylvania

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Tennessee

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Virginia

Not Eligible
2 General Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 Law & Legal Hours

Receive CLE credit in Washington via attorney submission.
Wisconsin

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
2.4 General

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars