The Daubert Exclusion Just Got Reversed: Defending Causation Experts Under Amended Rule 702

Jessica Benson Cox
Jessica Benson Cox
Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Jessica Benson Cox is a trial attorney based in Indianapolis who defends clients in personal injury matters built on complex questions of science and medicine, including cases involving traumatic brain injuries, medical devices, pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, consumer products, and digital platforms.

Eric M. Friedman
Eric M. Friedman
Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Eric M. Friedman is an Indianapolis-based product liability defense attorney whose practice centers on the scientific and expert witness issues that arise in tort litigation.

Live Video-Broadcast: October 8, 2026

2 hour CLE

Tuition: $195.00
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

 

The Daubert Fight No Longer Ends at Exclusion

The December 2023 amendments to Federal Rule of Evidence 702 made the preponderance standard explicit and added a reliability-of-application requirement. Then the Second Circuit’s July 2026 acetaminophen MDL decision reversed a landmark exclusion and remanded for further proceedings. The exclusion fight now runs in two rounds.

Miss a methodological gap at deposition and the exclusion motion loses its foundation. Ignore law-of-the-case limits on remand and a renewed challenge collapses. The Paraquat, Onglyza, Engilis, and Zantac exclusions now define the boundaries of an acceptable general-causation methodology. Plaintiffs answer reversals with updated reports and substitute experts.

Attendees leave with a replicable deposition-to-Daubert framework for exposing methodological deficiencies and converting concessions into exclusion arguments. They also gain a concrete remand framework for auditing reinstated expert reports, identifying application-level attack vectors, and anticipating plaintiffs’ supplementation maneuvers.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Amended Rule 702 Framework
    How the December 2023 preponderance standard reshapes exclusion motions and remand challenges
  • Deposition Strategy
    Locking in methodological gaps that convert into winning Daubert arguments
  • Building the Daubert Motion
    Structuring and arguing exclusion motions drawing on Paraquat, Onglyza, Engilis, and Zantac
  • Acetaminophen MDL Reversal
    What the Second Circuit’s July 2026 decision actually held and binds
  • Law-of-the-Case Constraints
    Where fresh application-level attacks remain available after an appellate reversal
  • Plaintiffs’ Counter-Moves
    Anticipating updated reports, substitute experts, and supplementation maneuvers on remand

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Date / Time: October 8, 2026

  • 12:00 pm – 2:10 pm Eastern
  • 11:00 am – 1:10 pm Central
  • 10:00 am – 12:10 pm Mountain
  • 9:00 am – 11:10 am Pacific

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Jessica Benson Cox, Partner | Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Jessica Benson Cox is a trial attorney based in Indianapolis who defends clients in personal injury matters built on complex questions of science and medicine, including cases involving traumatic brain injuries, medical devices, pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, consumer products, and digital platforms. She serves as co-chair of Faegre Drinker’s pharmaceutical and medical device practice team and brings more than 15 years of experience in mass tort litigation, where she currently co-leads an MDL in the Southern District of Indiana and has directed science and expert strategy in litigation over local anesthetics, orthopedic products, and cardiovascular devices.

  • Education & Credentials

Jessica earned her J.D., cum laude, from Case Western Reserve University School of Law in 2006, where she served as articles editor of the Law Review, and her B.S. in Child Development and Psychology, magna cum laude, from Vanderbilt University in 2003. She is admitted to the Indiana bar and to the U.S. District Courts for the Central District of Illinois and the Northern and Southern Districts of Indiana.

  • Recognition & Leadership

Jessica is ranked in Chambers USA for Indiana Litigation: Product Liability (2026) and was named a Law360 Rising Star in Product Liability in 2019, in large part for her bellwether trial work. Her honors also include the Indianapolis Business Journal’s Forty Under 40 (2018), the Indiana State Bar Association’s Outstanding Young Lawyer award (2015), and Indiana Super Lawyers Rising Star recognition in General Litigation (2015, 2017–20) and Personal Injury – Products: Defense (2016). She serves as co-chair of Faegre Drinker’s pharmaceutical and medical device practice team.

  • Professional Involvement

Jessica is active in the American Bar Association’s Section of Litigation, where she participates in the Pharmaceutical, Medical Device, and Biotech Subcommittees, and she belongs to the Indiana State Bar Association and the Defense Research Institute. She served on the Law360 Product Liability Editorial Advisory Board in 2020 and has served on the board of directors of the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation’s Indiana State Chapter since 2012.

  • Experience

Jessica has developed bellwether trial selection strategies, pursued screening orders that led to the dismissal of hundreds of cases, overseen inventory and individual settlement negotiations, and helped streamline discovery and motion practice in large-scale litigation. She has tried cases involving complex medical issues in jurisdictions across the country, including work on the Cook Medical IVC filter national MDL and the trial team that secured a complete defense verdict for the NCAA, and her team has achieved dismissals through motion practice under the laws of 21 states. She also advises pharmaceutical companies on product liability considerations for biologics and biosimilars and on compliance with state and federal restrictions on pharmaceutical marketing.

 

Eric M. Friedman, Associate | Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Eric M. Friedman is an Indianapolis-based product liability defense attorney whose practice centers on the scientific and expert witness issues that arise in tort litigation. A biochemist before becoming a lawyer, he moves comfortably between medical literature and case law, defending the science behind clients’ products, developing defense theories, and identifying weaknesses in opposing experts’ opinions. He serves as co-chair of Faegre Drinker’s Product Liability and Mass Torts Science & Experts Team and writes frequently on developments in expert witness discovery and admissibility.

  • Education & Credentials

Eric earned his J.D., magna cum laude and Order of the Coif, from the University of California, Hastings College of the Law in 2011, where he served as senior articles editor of the Hastings Law Journal. He also holds an M.A. in Molecular and Cell Biology from the University of California, Berkeley (2007) and a B.S. in Biochemistry from the University of Wisconsin – Madison (2003). He is admitted to the bars of California and Indiana and to the U.S. District Courts for the Southern District of Indiana and the Central and Northern Districts of California.

  • Recognition & Leadership

Eric has been named to the Best Lawyers “Ones to Watch” list for Product Liability Litigation – Defendants each year from 2022 through 2025 and recognized by JD Supra as a “Top 10 Product Liability Author” in its Readers’ Choice Awards from 2023 through 2025. He has appeared on Faegre Drinker’s Pro Bono Honor Roll from 2020 through 2025 and serves as co-chair of the firm’s Product Liability and Mass Torts Science & Experts Team.

  • Professional Involvement

Eric is a member of the Indianapolis Bar Association and the Defense Research Institute, and he contributes regularly to the Faegre Drinker on Products blog, writing on developments in expert witness discovery and admissibility.

  • Experience

Eric defends companies against a wide variety of tort claims, with particular depth in the scientific and expert witness issues that arise in product liability litigation, including work on the Cook Medical IVC filter national MDL. Before joining the firm, he practiced with a defense firm in the San Francisco Bay Area, assisting clients on hundreds of California tort cases from pre-litigation through settlement and trial. He also works pro bono to help veterans obtain disability benefits.

Agenda

SESSION 1 – Running the General-Causation Exclusion Motion: Deposition to Daubert | 12:00pm – 1:00pm

This session walks defense counsel through the full arc of a general-causation exclusion motion under amended Federal Rule of Evidence 702—from targeted deposition of the plaintiff’s causation expert through Daubert briefing and hearing. Attorneys will learn how the December 2023 amendment’s explicit preponderance standard and reliability-of-application requirement change both deposition strategy and motion practice, drawing on recent landmark exclusions in the Paraquat, Onglyza, Engilis, and Zantac litigations. Participants will leave with a replicable framework for exposing methodological deficiencies at deposition and converting those concessions into winning exclusion arguments at the Daubert stage.

BREAK | 1:00pm – 1:10pm

SESSION 2 – The Remand Playbook: Re-Challenging Reliability After a Reversal | 1:10pm – 2:10pm

This session examines what defense counsel must do after an appellate court reverses a Daubert exclusion and remands for further proceedings — a scenario now live in the Second Circuit’s July 2026 acetaminophen MDL decision. Attorneys will learn how the 2023 amendments to FRE 702 sharpen the defense’s toolkit on remand, how law-of-the-case doctrine constrains re-challenge strategy, and how to attack expert reliability at the methodology-application level rather than the methodology-acceptance level. Attendees will leave with a concrete framework for auditing reinstated expert reports, identifying new attack vectors, and anticipating plaintiffs’ supplementation maneuvers on remand.

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

California

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Florida

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 General Hours

Receive CLE credit in Florida via attorney submission.
Georgia

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Illinois

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Indiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
2 Substantive

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maryland

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Michigan

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Minnesota

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Missouri

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
120 General minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Nevada

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Pennsylvania

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Tennessee

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Virginia

Not Eligible
2 General Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 Law & Legal Hours

Receive CLE credit in Washington via attorney submission.
Wisconsin

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
2.4 General

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
When AI Notetakers Break Privilege in Internal Investigations
When AI Notetakers Break Privilege in Internal Investigations Fri, August 28, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay
Derivatives, Digital Assets, and AI in Financial Markets
Derivatives, Digital Assets, and AI in Financial Markets Fri, September 11, 2026
Live Webcast