Jessica Benson Cox is a trial attorney based in Indianapolis who defends clients in personal injury matters built on complex questions of science and medicine, including cases involving traumatic brain injuries, medical devices, pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, consumer products, and digital platforms.
Eric M. Friedman is an Indianapolis-based product liability defense attorney whose practice centers on the scientific and expert witness issues that arise in tort litigation.
Live Video-Broadcast: October 8, 2026
Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs
The Daubert Fight No Longer Ends at Exclusion
The December 2023 amendments to Federal Rule of Evidence 702 made the preponderance standard explicit and added a reliability-of-application requirement. Then the Second Circuit’s July 2026 acetaminophen MDL decision reversed a landmark exclusion and remanded for further proceedings. The exclusion fight now runs in two rounds.
Miss a methodological gap at deposition and the exclusion motion loses its foundation. Ignore law-of-the-case limits on remand and a renewed challenge collapses. The Paraquat, Onglyza, Engilis, and Zantac exclusions now define the boundaries of an acceptable general-causation methodology. Plaintiffs answer reversals with updated reports and substitute experts.
Attendees leave with a replicable deposition-to-Daubert framework for exposing methodological deficiencies and converting concessions into exclusion arguments. They also gain a concrete remand framework for auditing reinstated expert reports, identifying application-level attack vectors, and anticipating plaintiffs’ supplementation maneuvers.
Key topics to be discussed:
This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.
Date / Time: October 8, 2026
Closed-captioning available
Jessica Benson Cox, Partner | Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP
Jessica Benson Cox is a trial attorney based in Indianapolis who defends clients in personal injury matters built on complex questions of science and medicine, including cases involving traumatic brain injuries, medical devices, pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, consumer products, and digital platforms. She serves as co-chair of Faegre Drinker’s pharmaceutical and medical device practice team and brings more than 15 years of experience in mass tort litigation, where she currently co-leads an MDL in the Southern District of Indiana and has directed science and expert strategy in litigation over local anesthetics, orthopedic products, and cardiovascular devices.
Jessica earned her J.D., cum laude, from Case Western Reserve University School of Law in 2006, where she served as articles editor of the Law Review, and her B.S. in Child Development and Psychology, magna cum laude, from Vanderbilt University in 2003. She is admitted to the Indiana bar and to the U.S. District Courts for the Central District of Illinois and the Northern and Southern Districts of Indiana.
Jessica is ranked in Chambers USA for Indiana Litigation: Product Liability (2026) and was named a Law360 Rising Star in Product Liability in 2019, in large part for her bellwether trial work. Her honors also include the Indianapolis Business Journal’s Forty Under 40 (2018), the Indiana State Bar Association’s Outstanding Young Lawyer award (2015), and Indiana Super Lawyers Rising Star recognition in General Litigation (2015, 2017–20) and Personal Injury – Products: Defense (2016). She serves as co-chair of Faegre Drinker’s pharmaceutical and medical device practice team.
Jessica is active in the American Bar Association’s Section of Litigation, where she participates in the Pharmaceutical, Medical Device, and Biotech Subcommittees, and she belongs to the Indiana State Bar Association and the Defense Research Institute. She served on the Law360 Product Liability Editorial Advisory Board in 2020 and has served on the board of directors of the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation’s Indiana State Chapter since 2012.
Jessica has developed bellwether trial selection strategies, pursued screening orders that led to the dismissal of hundreds of cases, overseen inventory and individual settlement negotiations, and helped streamline discovery and motion practice in large-scale litigation. She has tried cases involving complex medical issues in jurisdictions across the country, including work on the Cook Medical IVC filter national MDL and the trial team that secured a complete defense verdict for the NCAA, and her team has achieved dismissals through motion practice under the laws of 21 states. She also advises pharmaceutical companies on product liability considerations for biologics and biosimilars and on compliance with state and federal restrictions on pharmaceutical marketing.
Eric M. Friedman, Associate | Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP
Eric M. Friedman is an Indianapolis-based product liability defense attorney whose practice centers on the scientific and expert witness issues that arise in tort litigation. A biochemist before becoming a lawyer, he moves comfortably between medical literature and case law, defending the science behind clients’ products, developing defense theories, and identifying weaknesses in opposing experts’ opinions. He serves as co-chair of Faegre Drinker’s Product Liability and Mass Torts Science & Experts Team and writes frequently on developments in expert witness discovery and admissibility.
Eric earned his J.D., magna cum laude and Order of the Coif, from the University of California, Hastings College of the Law in 2011, where he served as senior articles editor of the Hastings Law Journal. He also holds an M.A. in Molecular and Cell Biology from the University of California, Berkeley (2007) and a B.S. in Biochemistry from the University of Wisconsin – Madison (2003). He is admitted to the bars of California and Indiana and to the U.S. District Courts for the Southern District of Indiana and the Central and Northern Districts of California.
Eric has been named to the Best Lawyers “Ones to Watch” list for Product Liability Litigation – Defendants each year from 2022 through 2025 and recognized by JD Supra as a “Top 10 Product Liability Author” in its Readers’ Choice Awards from 2023 through 2025. He has appeared on Faegre Drinker’s Pro Bono Honor Roll from 2020 through 2025 and serves as co-chair of the firm’s Product Liability and Mass Torts Science & Experts Team.
Eric is a member of the Indianapolis Bar Association and the Defense Research Institute, and he contributes regularly to the Faegre Drinker on Products blog, writing on developments in expert witness discovery and admissibility.
Eric defends companies against a wide variety of tort claims, with particular depth in the scientific and expert witness issues that arise in product liability litigation, including work on the Cook Medical IVC filter national MDL. Before joining the firm, he practiced with a defense firm in the San Francisco Bay Area, assisting clients on hundreds of California tort cases from pre-litigation through settlement and trial. He also works pro bono to help veterans obtain disability benefits.
SESSION 1 – Running the General-Causation Exclusion Motion: Deposition to Daubert | 12:00pm – 1:00pm
This session walks defense counsel through the full arc of a general-causation exclusion motion under amended Federal Rule of Evidence 702—from targeted deposition of the plaintiff’s causation expert through Daubert briefing and hearing. Attorneys will learn how the December 2023 amendment’s explicit preponderance standard and reliability-of-application requirement change both deposition strategy and motion practice, drawing on recent landmark exclusions in the Paraquat, Onglyza, Engilis, and Zantac litigations. Participants will leave with a replicable framework for exposing methodological deficiencies at deposition and converting those concessions into winning exclusion arguments at the Daubert stage.
BREAK | 1:00pm – 1:10pm
SESSION 2 – The Remand Playbook: Re-Challenging Reliability After a Reversal | 1:10pm – 2:10pm
This session examines what defense counsel must do after an appellate court reverses a Daubert exclusion and remands for further proceedings — a scenario now live in the Second Circuit’s July 2026 acetaminophen MDL decision. Attorneys will learn how the 2023 amendments to FRE 702 sharpen the defense’s toolkit on remand, how law-of-the-case doctrine constrains re-challenge strategy, and how to attack expert reliability at the methodology-application level rather than the methodology-acceptance level. Attendees will leave with a concrete framework for auditing reinstated expert reports, identifying new attack vectors, and anticipating plaintiffs’ supplementation maneuvers on remand.
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved via Attorney Submission
2 General Hours
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 Substantive
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)
No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
120 General minutes
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Not Eligible
2 General Hours
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Approved via Attorney Submission
2 Law & Legal Hours
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2.4 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General