Fakes, Forgeries, and the Fight for Truth: Authenticating and Challenging Digital Evidence in the AI Age

Nicholas G. Himonidis
Nicholas G. Himonidis
The NGH Group, Inc

Nicholas G. Himonidis is a court-qualified expert witness in computer forensics and digital evidence authentication and has been appointed by courts as a Neutral Forensic expert. He is a licensed attorney and private investigator with more than 30 years of experience in private investigations, computer forensics, and law, and has participated in, conducted, and supervised thousands of investigations, forensic engagements, and e-discovery projects.

Simon M. Ragona III
Simon M. Ragona III
The NGH Group, Inc

Simon M. Ragona III is a digital forensics, cybersecurity, and technology professional with more than 18 years of experience in digital evidence authentication, cyber incident response, eDiscovery, and the investigation of AI-generated and AI-manipulated content. He has conducted and managed complex forensic investigations involving computers, mobile devices, cloud data, and other electronically stored information.

Live Video-Broadcast: October 7, 2026

2 hour CLE

Tuition: $195.00
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

 

The Exhibit Looks Real. That Is No Longer the Question

AI has made increasingly sophisticated manipulation of digital evidence accessible to virtually anyone. Emails, text messages, screenshots, photographs, audio, and video can be fabricated in ways appearance alone will not reveal. The question has shifted from what the exhibit shows to what the file can prove.

Accept a screenshot without the native file, and you lose the metadata that would have exposed it. Collect a device carelessly, and the artifacts you needed are gone. Retain an examiner too late, and authenticity is contested on your opponent’s timeline. Put an untested detection result in front of the court, and Rule 702 becomes the other side’s argument.

You leave with a working method rather than a doctrine summary. Know what to preserve and collect at the outset, and which forensic artifacts to demand. Know when the originating device or account is worth examining. Know how to test methodology, findings, and limitations — your expert’s or the opposing expert’s. Rule 702 and Daubert supply the frame; judgment supplies the rest.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Fabrication Made Easy
    How easily emails, texts, screenshots, photographs, audio, and video can now be fabricated changes what you accept at face value.
  • Native Files and Metadata
    How native files, metadata, EXIF data, and other forensic artifacts change what you demand in discovery and what you can prove with it.
  • Preservation and Collection
    How your preservation and collection choices — and whether you examine the originating device, account, or corroborating sources — change what authentication remains possible.
  • Detection Tool Limits
    How the actual capabilities and limitations of current deepfake-detection methods and tools change the weight a detection result deserves.
  • Retaining and Evaluating Experts
    How to decide when to retain a digital forensic expert, what an examination can realistically establish, and how to evaluate methodology, findings, and limitations on either side.
  • Authentication Under Rule 702
    How authentication and admissibility play out under Rule 702 and Daubert — and how you challenge both the exhibit and the expert’s conclusions.

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Date / Time: October 7, 2026

  • 12:00 pm – 2:10 pm Eastern
  • 11:00 am – 1:10 pm Central
  • 10:00 am – 12:10 pm Mountain
  • 9:00 am – 11:10 am Pacific

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Nicholas G. Himonidis, President & CEO | The NGH Group, Inc

Nicholas G. Himonidis is a court-qualified expert witness in computer forensics and digital evidence authentication and has been appointed by courts as a Neutral Forensic expert. He is a licensed attorney and private investigator with more than 30 years of experience in private investigations, computer forensics, and law, and has participated in, conducted, and supervised thousands of investigations, forensic engagements, and e-discovery projects. He has written and lectured extensively on digital evidence, e-discovery, and expert-witness issues, including presentations of “Fakes, Forgeries, and the Fight for Truth” to bar associations, matrimonial law organizations, and the New York State Judicial Institute.

  • Education & Credentials

Mr. Himonidis earned his Juris Doctor, magna cum laude, from St. John’s University School of Law in 1995, graduating in the top 2% of his class, and holds a Bachelor of Science, cum laude, from St. John’s University. He also completed computer forensics coursework at SUNY Farmingdale. He is admitted in New York, with inactive admissions in Maryland, the District of Columbia, and Virginia. He is a Certified Computer Forensic Specialist, Certified Fraud Examiner, Certified Cryptocurrency Forensic Investigator, and holds the Chainalysis Reactor Certification. He is also a licensed private investigator in New York and Connecticut.

  • Recognition & Leadership

Mr. Himonidis has qualified and testified as an expert in New York State Supreme Court and Family Court, Connecticut State Superior Court, and the United States District Court for the District of Nevada, and has provided expert testimony and reports in numerous other courts. He and The NGH Group have been appointed by the New York Supreme Court as neutral digital forensic examiners and cryptocurrency experts. He was appointed to the New York State Bar Association Task Force on Emerging Digital Finance and Currency in 2022 and formerly co-chaired the Nassau County Bar Association Cyber Law Committee. He received the Eugene R. Fink Memorial Award in 2024 and was named Investigator of the Year in 2018.

  • Professional Involvement

Mr. Himonidis has extensive CLE and CPE experience in digital evidence authentication. Recent presentations include programs on authenticating digital evidence in the AI age for the NYSBA Family Law Section and New York State Judicial Institute. He has also presented on deepfakes, digital manipulation, authentication of ESI in matrimonial and custody cases, and forensic expert testimony for AAML, AFCC, and other legal organizations. He was the featured speaker for a 4.0-credit NYSBA course on digital evidence in matrimonial cases. His publications have appeared in the Journal of the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers, ABA Family Advocate, and Nassau Lawyer.

  • Experience

Mr. Himonidis has served as President and CEO of The NGH Group, Inc. since 2017, overseeing forensic and investigative work and providing legal oversight for operations in the United States and abroad. From 2010 to 2017, he was Vice President and Head of Private Investigations at T&M Protection Resources. He founded and led NGH Associates, Ltd. from 1999 to 2010 and previously served as Vice President and General Counsel of Fenton Investigation & Security. He also practiced law at Squadron, Ellenoff, Plesent & Sheinfeld, LLP and Gebhardt & Smith. His experience includes complex matrimonial matters, financial fraud, civil RICO claims, insurance fraud, and embezzlement.

 

Simon M. Ragona III, Director of Forensics | The NGH Group, Inc

Simon M. Ragona III is a digital forensics, cybersecurity, and technology professional with more than 18 years of experience in digital evidence authentication, cyber incident response, eDiscovery, and the investigation of AI-generated and AI-manipulated content. He has conducted and managed complex forensic investigations involving computers, mobile devices, cloud data, and other electronically stored information. He regularly advises counsel and has provided oral and written expert testimony in multiple jurisdictions.

  • Education & Credentials

Mr. Ragona holds a Bachelor of Science in Economic Crime Investigation with a Computer Security concentration from Hilbert College, earned in 2007. His training included computer forensics, financial investigations, information security, and intelligence research. He has held the Certified Computer Examiner credential since 2008 and previously held EnCase Certified Examiner and AccessData Certified Examiner certifications. He also studied criminal justice at Erie Community College.

  • Recognition & Leadership

Mr. Ragona has provided expert testimony before the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York and the Connecticut State Superior Court, as well as non-party expert and expert deposition testimony in multiple matters. He has also provided confidential grand jury testimony. He was appointed to U.S. Government compliance Monitor teams for HSBC, Western Union, and MoneyGram, focusing on compliance technology, transaction monitoring, data analytics, and technical controls.

  • Professional Involvement

Mr. Ragona has presented and served as a panelist on digital evidence, authentication, cybersecurity, and technology issues in family-law matters. His presentations include programs on authenticating digital evidence in the AI age and authenticating digital media in child custody cases. He is a member of the International Society of Forensic Computer Examiners, High Technology Crime Investigation Association, and Association of Certified Fraud Examiners. He was formerly a member of the U.S. Secret Service Electronic Crimes Task Force.

  • Experience

As Director of Forensics at The NGH Group, Inc. since February 2023, Mr. Ragona manages digital forensic, cyber incident response, eDiscovery, artificial intelligence, and cybersecurity engagements. He advises counsel on digital evidence, including AI-generated and AI-manipulated content and issues of authentication, integrity, and reliability, and provides expert testimony in legal proceedings. He is also owner and president of LGC Innovations LLC. Previously, he held leadership positions at T&M Protection Resources and Calamu Technologies and began his career at Protiviti, Inc. following a computer forensics internship with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security.

Agenda

SESSION 1 – Authenticating Digital Evidence: Files, Metadata, and Forensic Artifacts | 12:00pm – 1:00pm

Digital evidence can be fabricated or manipulated in ways that are difficult to detect from appearance alone. This session examines common forms of digital evidence, including emails, texts, screenshots, photographs, audio, and video, and how native files, metadata, EXIF data, and other forensic artifacts can assist in evaluating authenticity. The presenters will also address preservation and collection considerations and what forensic examination can—and cannot—establish.

BREAK | 1:00pm – 1:10pm

SESSION 2 – AI-Generated Evidence, Experts, and Challenging Authenticity | 1:10pm – 2:10pm

AI has made increasingly sophisticated manipulation of digital evidence accessible to virtually anyone. This session examines AI-generated and AI-altered media, current deepfake-detection methods and their limitations, and how attorneys can retain and evaluate digital forensic experts. The presenters will also address authentication, admissibility, Rule 702/Daubert challenges, and strategies for examining or cross-examining digital forensic and deepfake-detection experts.

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

California

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Florida

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Georgia

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Illinois

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Indiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
2 Substantive

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maryland

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Michigan

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Minnesota

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Missouri

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
120 General minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Nevada

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Pennsylvania

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Tennessee

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Virginia

Not Eligible
2 General Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 Law & Legal Hours

Receive CLE credit in Washington via attorney submission.
Wisconsin

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
2.4 General

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
Derivatives, Digital Assets, and AI in Financial Markets
Derivatives, Digital Assets, and AI in Financial Markets Fri, September 11, 2026
Live Webcast