Suing AI Scrapers: A New Fee-Shifting Claim and the Rights It Requires

Christopher E. Hart
Christopher E. Hart | Anderson & Kreiger LLP

Christopher E. Hart advises organizations on risk where technology, data, and regulation meet, with a practice spanning privacy, cybersecurity, artificial intelligence, and emerging technologies. He works with clients ranging from startups to global enterprises on compliance strategy, data incident response, and investigations, including under frameworks such as the GDPR and the CCPA.

Live Video-Broadcast: September 29, 2026

2 hour CLE

Tuition: $195.00
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

 

The Strongest Claim Against an AI Scraper May Not Be Copyright Infringement

A new litigation strategy is emerging against AI scrapers: DMCA § 1201 anti-circumvention claims. The remedy engine is 17 U.S.C. § 1203, which carries statutory damages and fee-shifting. Pending cases, including Reddit v. SerpApi, Google v. SerpApi, Bartz v. Anthropic, and the YouTube creator lawsuits, are writing the playbook in real time.

The stakes compound before any complaint is filed. Miss the registration timing rules and statutory damages disappear. Rest on terms of service alone and Copyright Act preemption looms after X Corp. v. Bright Data. Deploy no technical protection measure and the § 1201 claim never forms. Meanwhile, § 1202 CMI claims face a double scienter standard, and the CFAA has narrowed after Van Buren.

Attendees leave with practitioner work product: a framework for choosing the right cause of action, a circumvention evidence record, per-act statutory damages calculations, and a pre-suit documentation framework covering registration, rights chain audits, and robots.txt, ai.txt, and TDM Reservation Protocol headers.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Fee-Shifting Claims
    How DMCA § 1201 and § 1203 remedies change scraping litigation strategy.
  • Pending Cases
    Litigation templates from Reddit v. SerpApi, Google v. SerpApi, and Bartz v. Anthropic.
  • Parallel Tracks
    Pairing § 1202 CMI claims, the CFAA, and state-law theories with § 1201.
  • Damages Proof
    Building the circumvention evidence record and calculating per-act statutory damages.
  • Registration & Terms
    Copyright registration timing and terms of service enforceability after Bright Data.
  • Rights Infrastructure
    Auditing AI training rights chains and deploying technical protection measures pre-suit.

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Date / Time: September 29, 2026

  • 1:00 pm – 3:10 pm Eastern
  • 12:00 pm – 2:10 pm Central
  • 11:00 am – 1:10 pm Mountain
  • 10:00 am – 12:10 pm Pacific

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Christopher E. Hart, Counsel | Anderson & Kreiger LLP

Christopher E. Hart advises organizations on risk where technology, data, and regulation meet, with a practice spanning privacy, cybersecurity, artificial intelligence, and emerging technologies. He works with clients ranging from startups to global enterprises on compliance strategy, data incident response, and investigations, including under frameworks such as the GDPR and the CCPA. He also represents clients in high-stakes disputes and government investigations arising from data security incidents and regulatory scrutiny. A certified privacy professional (CIPP/US, CIPP/E, CIPM), he is a frequent speaker and writer on privacy, cybersecurity, and AI legal developments.

  • Education & Credentials

Chris earned his J.D., magna cum laude, Order of the Coif, from Duke University School of Law in 2005, an M.A. from St. John’s College in 2002, and a B.A. from Harvard University in 2000. He is admitted to the bars of Massachusetts, the District of Columbia, and Maryland, and his court admissions include the U.S. Supreme Court and the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the First, Third, Fourth, Ninth, and District of Columbia Circuits. He holds the CIPP/US, CIPP/E, and CIPM certifications and served as a judicial law clerk to the Honorable Anthony J. Scirica, Chief Judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.

  • Recognition & Leadership

Chris has been recognized by Best Lawyers in America for Privacy and Data Security Law (2024-2026) and Artificial Intelligence Law (2026), and by Super Lawyers for Civil Litigation (2025-26). Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly named him a “Go To Lawyer” for Cyber/Data Security in 2024, and Boston Magazine has listed him as a Top Lawyer in Civil Litigation Defense (2021), Commercial Litigation (2022), and Criminal Law Litigation (2023). He also received a JD Supra Readers’ Choice Award as a top author in the field of cybersecurity (2017).

  • Professional Involvement

Chris serves as Vice President of the Boston Bar Association, where he previously served as Treasurer (2024) and chaired the Privacy, Data Security, and Digital Rights Conference (2022). He served as President/Governor of Region 1 (New England) of the Hispanic National Bar Association (2023-25) and currently serves as a Deputy Governor. He sits on the Advisory Board of the International Association of Privacy Professionals’ Privacy Bar Section (2019-present), is a member of the Standing Advisory Committee on the Rules of Appellate Procedure (2022-present), and teaches as an adjunct professor in Northeastern University’s Doctorate of Law and Public Policy Program.

  • Experience

Chris advises the Northeastern Institute for Experiential AI on AI legal requirements and regulations, conducted a state-by-state survey of consumer privacy laws and laws limiting the use of AI in businesses on behalf of a software company, and analyzed new comprehensive state data protection laws against HIPAA and the GDPR for a health insurance company. He conducted a Human Rights Impact Assessment for Microsoft relating to cloud and artificial intelligence technologies, and obtained a full recovery for a major international investment firm that suffered a multimillion-dollar loss in a payment fraud hack. He regularly represents organizations in disputes and government investigations arising from data security incidents.

Agenda

SESSION 1 – Suing AI Scrapers and Recovering Statutory Damages | 1:00pm – 2:00pm

This session examines the emerging litigation strategy of bringing DMCA §1201 anti-circumvention claims against AI scrapers, including the statutory damages and fee-shifting remedies available under 17 U.S.C. §1203. Attorneys will analyze the leading pending cases — Reddit v. SerpApi, Google v. SerpApi, Bartz v. Anthropic, and the YouTube creator lawsuits — to understand how courts are evaluating circumvention theories, CMI stripping under §1202, and parallel CFAA and state-law tracks. Attendees will leave with a working framework for choosing the right cause of action, building a circumvention evidence record, and calculating per-act statutory damages in high-volume scraping disputes.

BREAK | 2:00pm – 2:10pm

SESSION 2 – Building Defensible Content Rights Before the Scraping Claim | 2:10pm – 3:10pm

This session covers the transactional and IP preparatory steps content owners must take before a scraping lawsuit is viable — from timely copyright registration and enforceable terms of service to DMCA § 1201 technical protection measures and clean rights chains. Attorneys will learn how recent case law, including X Corp. v. Bright Data and Thomson Reuters v. Ross Intelligence, reshapes the enforceability of common content-protection strategies. Attendees leave with a concrete pre-suit documentation framework and an understanding of the contractual and technical infrastructure required to maximize recovery against AI scrapers.

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

California

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Florida

Pending CLE Approval
2 General Hours

Georgia

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Illinois

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Indiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
2 Substantive

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maryland

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Michigan

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Minnesota

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Missouri

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
120 General minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Nevada

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Pennsylvania

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Tennessee

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Virginia

Not Eligible
2 General Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 Law & Legal Hours

Receive CLE credit in Washington via attorney submission.
Wisconsin

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
2.4 General

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars