Don Foty is an experienced trial and appellate lawyer that specializes in representing workers in class and collective action lawsuits. He is considered an industry expert on wage and hour matters, including matters pertaining to the Fair Labor Standards Act. He has served as class counsel in over 100 wage and hour class actions and/or collective actions across the country.
Sarah R. Schalman-Bergen is a partner at Lichten & Liss-Riordan P.C., who has dedicated her career to creating systemic change for workers and individuals who are not being treated fairly. She has secured numerous significant settlements for the workers she represents, totaling well over $100 million.
Live Video-Broadcast: October 1, 2026
Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs
Most wage cases are not won on the hours — they are won on the rate.
The regular rate is no longer a background calculation. The DOL’s January and May 2026 opinion letters reset how excluded bonuses are analyzed. FAB 2025-3 removed pre-litigation liquidated damages, and the revived PAID program can extinguish claims outright. The arithmetic is now the case.
Miss a nondiscretionary bonus in the rate, and every overtime week understates the claim. File in the Second or Eleventh Circuit, and Cheeks and Lynn’s Food Stores put the model before a judge. File in the Third, Fifth, or Sixth, and Bazemore and Gilstrap may remove that review. Extrapolate past the discovery sample, and Tyson Foods and Daubert decide whether the numbers survive.
You leave with the four-step pay-record reconstruction and a week-by-week spreadsheet built on three liquidated-damages scenarios. Add stratified-sampling language for a variation-heavy collective and discovery demands aimed at the recordkeeping gap. The lodestar cross-check is wired in from day one, so the fee petition does not unwind the recovery.
Key topics to be discussed:
This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.
Date / Time: October 1, 2026
Closed-captioning available
Don J. Foty, Founding Partner | Foty Law Group
Don Foty is an experienced trial and appellate lawyer that specializes in representing workers in class and collective action lawsuits. He is considered an industry expert on wage and hour matters, including matters pertaining to the Fair Labor Standards Act. He has served as class counsel in over 100 wage and hour class actions and/or collective actions across the country.
He attended The University of Texas at Austin where he studied finance and was admitted into the Business Honors Program. After graduating from The University of Texas at Austin, he attended the University of Houston Law Center.
Admitted: State Bar of Texas; U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth and Seventh Circuits; U.S. Court of Federal Claims; U.S. District Courts for the Northern, Southern, Eastern, and Western Districts of Texas, the District of Colorado, the District of North Dakota, the Northern, Southern, and Central Districts of Illinois, the District of Maryland, the Eastern District of Michigan, the District of New Mexico, the Western District of Oklahoma, and the Northern District of Ohio.
Mr. Foty has been recognized as one of the top 100 civil trial lawyers in the U.S. by the National Trial Lawyers Association, one of the top 100 lawyers in the U.S. in employment law by the National Advocates, and as a “Super Lawyer” in Texas by the Super Lawyers publication.
Mr. Foty writes and presents on wage and hour law. He has authored articles on Fair Labor Standards Act topics for the American Bar Association, the Houston Bar Association, and Houston Lawyer Magazine, and has presented to the Houston Bar Association on FLSA matters. Local and national news organizations interview him regularly on subjects related to the civil justice system, and his cases have been covered in the national media.
For 20 years, he has represented workers in various unpaid wage disputes, including cases involving unpaid pre- and post-shift screenings, tip credit disputes, overtime misclassification disputes, regular rate miscalculation claims, independent contractor misclassification disputes, claims for compensation for working off-the-clock, fluctuating workweek disputes, claims for unpaid meal periods, and claims for unpaid waiting and travel time, amongst other unpaid wage claims.
In 2025 and 2026, he successfully prevailed before the Illinois Supreme Court and the Nevada Supreme Court in a pair of landmark decisions against Amazon. Johnson v. Amazon.com Servs., LLC, 2026 IL 132016 (Mar. 19, 2026); Malloy v. Amazon.com Servs., LLC, 578 P.3d 634 (Oct. 30, 2025).
Sarah R. Schalman-Bergen, Partner | Lichten & Liss-Riordan P.C.
Sarah R. Schalman-Bergen is a partner at Lichten & Liss-Riordan P.C., who has dedicated her career to creating systemic change for workers and individuals who are not being treated fairly. She has secured numerous significant settlements for the workers she represents, totaling well over $100 million.
Sarah earned a J.D., cum laude, from Harvard Law School in 2007 and a B.A., summa cum laude, from Tufts University in 2001, and has been a member of the Bar of Pennsylvania since 2007. She is admitted to practice before the U.S. Supreme Court; the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the Third, Fourth, Sixth, Eighth, Ninth, and Eleventh Circuits; the U.S. District Courts for the Eastern, Middle, and Western Districts of Pennsylvania, the District of Colorado, the Eastern and Western Districts of Arkansas, the Northern District of New York, the Northern District of Illinois, the Southern District of Indiana, the Northern District of Ohio, the Eastern District of Michigan, the Western District of Tennessee, the Southern, Eastern, and Western Districts of Texas, and the District of Nebraska; and the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
Sarah conducts her practice according to the highest ethical standards, and has received high judicial praise, including being described as “ethical, talented, and motivated to help hard working men and women” and “some of the finest legal representation in the nation.”
Sarah routinely speaks at conferences on issues relating to workers’ rights. She currently serves on Cornell’s ILR-Hotel School CIHLER Advisory Board, and is a Board Member of the Keystone Research Center. Sarah was named a 2020 Pennsylvania Super Lawyer, after being named as a Rising Star in every year over the prior decade. In 2021, she was named in Best Lawyers in America. In 2015, she was honored as a “Lawyer on the Fast Track” by The Legal Intelligencer.
Sarah works in partnership and routinely co-counsels with public interest law firms to lend expertise to their mission in litigation. She has served as volunteer of counsel to the AIDS Law Project of Pennsylvania for more than a decade, litigating discrimination and HIV-confidentiality cases. Sarah was honored for this work as an “Unsung Hero” by the Legal Intelligencer, Pennsylvania’s daily law journal.
While representing workers in all types of industries, Sarah has successfully challenged unlawful business practices involving last-mile logistics companies, cable installation companies, home health aide companies, meat and poultry plants, landscaping companies, in white collar jobs, and in the government. This litigation has resulted both in payment of back wages and in practice changes by the companies.
Prior to joining the Firm, Sarah was a partner at a plaintiff-side class action law firm, where she served as co-chair of the firm’s employment rights practice group. She has also practiced in the litigation department
SESSION 1 – Rebuilding the Regular Rate from Pay Records After the DOL’s 2026 Bonus Letters | 2:30pm – 3:30pm
This session teaches plaintiff-side attorneys how to reconstruct the FLSA regular rate using pay records, bonus plan documents, and the DOL’s January and May 2026 opinion letters as both analytical frameworks and evidentiary tools. Attendees will learn the mechanical four-step audit methodology for identifying improperly excluded compensation, allocating periodic bonuses workweek-by-workweek, and computing the correct overtime premium. By the end of the session, attorneys will be able to identify the most common employer miscalculations that generate viable FLSA claims, structure discovery demands around recordkeeping obligations, and apply the circuit-specific burden-of-proof framework to their cases.
BREAK | 3:30pm – 3:40pm
SESSION 2 – Building the FLSA Damages Model That Survives Settlement Scrutiny and the Fee Petition | 3:40pm – 4:40pm
This session teaches plaintiff-side FLSA practitioners how to construct a week-by-week damages model that performs under two sequential stress tests: judicial settlement-fairness review and the fee petition. Attorneys will learn how the 2025 DOL policy shifts—including FAB 2025-3 and the revived PAID program—alter the damages ceiling, how to present scenario-based liquidated-damages ranges at mediation, and how fee-petition arithmetic must be wired into the damages model from day one.
Attendees leave able to build a defensible spreadsheet, identify collective-wide extrapolation risks, and structure their litigation file so the lodestar cross-check does not unwind the recovery.
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved via Attorney Submission
2 General Hours
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 Substantive
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)
No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
120 General minutes
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Not Eligible
2 General Hours
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Approved via Attorney Submission
2 Law & Legal Hours
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2.4 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General