Your Client’s Website Has AI Now: State AI Acts, Chatbot Disclosure Laws, and the Federal Preemption Fight

Donata Stroink-Skillrud
Donata Stroink-Skillrud | Termageddon LLC

Donata Stroink-Skillrud is a licensed attorney and Certified Information Privacy Professional, she co-founded Termageddon in 2016 after years of fielding client questions about privacy policies and terms of service in private practice. She chairs the ePrivacy Committee of the American Bar Association and hosts the Privacy Lawls podcast.

Live Video-Broadcast: October 1, 2026

2 hour CLE

Tuition: $195.00
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

 

The AI Compliance Clock Started January 1, 2026, While Washington Fights the States Over Who Regulates It

For years, businesses added AI faster than the law could respond. That ended on January 1, 2026, when Texas TRAIGA, California’s SB 243 chatbot disclosure law, AB 2013 training data transparency, AB 489 healthcare AI restrictions, and Illinois HB 3773 all took effect. The Colorado AI Act’s algorithmic discrimination duties follow on June 30, 2026, and international companies must also account for the EU AI Act.

The stakes are already concrete. Deploy an undisclosed chatbot, and SB 243 applies. Screen applicants with AI, and HB 3773 liability follows. Let an AI vendor “listen in” on customer chats, and CIPA wiretapping claims arrive. The FTC polices deceptive AI claims, while the December 11, 2025 executive order sends a federal task force against the same statutes — live today, constitutionally contested tomorrow.

Attendees will leave with the working tools: an AI inventory that maps every tool to the statutes it triggers, disclosure and consent language, privacy policy and vendor contract terms, and impact assessment and audit frameworks that hold up with regulators and plaintiffs alike.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • State AI Law Wave
    Which duties took effect January 1, 2026 under Texas TRAIGA, California’s SB 243, AB 2013, and AB 489, and Illinois HB 3773 — and what the Colorado AI Act’s reasonable-care obligations add on June 30, 2026.
  • The Federal Preemption Fight
    How the December 11, 2025 executive order’s AI litigation task force, the FCC preemption proceeding, and the March 11, 2026 agency deliverables change counseling on statutes that are live but constitutionally contested.
  • Enforcement Already Underway
    Where FTC actions on deceptive AI claims and undisclosed AI use, and early state attorney general enforcement, are already producing exposure for AI-enabled businesses.
  • EU AI Act Exposure
    What international compliance requires of clients operating across borders, including the EU AI Act’s labeling requirements.
  • AI Inventories and Disclosures
    How to build an AI inventory mapping every chatbot, generative tool, and algorithmic system to the statutes it triggers, then draft the chatbot notices, privacy policies, terms of service, and vendor AI contract terms they require.
  • Litigation-Ready Compliance Programs
    How to reduce exposure to CIPA wiretapping claims against AI chatbots and build the impact assessments, employment AI audits, and documentation practices that hold up with regulators and plaintiffs.

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Date / Time: October 1, 2026 

  • 12:00 pm – 2:10 pm Eastern
  • 11:00 am – 1:10 pm Central
  • 10:00 am – 12:10 pm Mountain
  • 9:00 am – 11:10 am Pacific

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Donata Stroink-Skillrud, President | Termageddon LLC

Donata Stroink-Skillrud is the president of Termageddon LLC and the legal engineer behind its privacy policy generator, writing the policy questions and text and keeping them up to date as privacy and technology legislation changes. A licensed attorney and Certified Information Privacy Professional, she co-founded Termageddon in 2016 after years of fielding client questions about privacy policies and terms of service in private practice. She chairs the ePrivacy Committee of the American Bar Association and hosts the Privacy Lawls podcast.

  • Education & Credentials

Donata is a licensed attorney in Illinois (ARDC No. 6320882) and a Certified Information Privacy Professional (CIPP). Her interest in privacy law began when she was personally affected by the 2013 Target data breach, and she went on to practice privacy and technology law before founding Termageddon.

  • Recognition & Leadership

Donata is a Fellow of the American Bar Foundation and a member of the American Bar Association’s Rule of Law Initiative Board. She previously served as the ABA’s Representative to the United Nations Economic and Social Council, and as Vice-Chair of the ABA’s ePrivacy Committee before becoming its Chair.

  • Professional Involvement

Donata chairs the American Bar Association’s ePrivacy Committee and has served on the ABA’s Science and Technology Council and its Cybersecurity Legal Task Force. She has chaired the Chicago Chapter of the International Association of Privacy Professionals and the Chicago Bar Association’s Privacy and Cybersecurity Committee. She hosts the Privacy Lawls podcast and speaks nationally on website privacy compliance, including “Building WordPress Websites with ‘Privacy by Design’ in Mind” at WordCamp US 2024.

  • Experience

Donata’s work centers on the legal obligations of businesses that operate websites and digital tools. At Termageddon, she monitors changing privacy and technology legislation and converts new requirements into the policy questions and text the company’s generator produces, keeping businesses’ website policies current as laws change. Before founding the company, she practiced privacy and technology law in private practice, advising clients on privacy policies and terms of service.

Agenda

SESSION 1 – The 2026 State AI Law Wave — What Is Live, What Is Delayed, and What Washington Is Doing About It | 12:00pm – 1:00pm

This session discusses the international landscape such as the EU AI Act and maps the state AI statutes now enforceable and those arriving later in 2026: Texas TRAIGA’s prohibited-use regime and attorney general enforcement; California’s suite of January 1, 2026 laws, including companion chatbot disclosures (SB 243), training data transparency (AB 2013), healthcare AI restrictions (AB 489), and frontier model obligations (TFAIA); Illinois’s discriminatory-AI employment amendment (HB 3773); and the Colorado AI Act’s reasonable-care duties for high-risk AI systems, delayed to June 30, 2026. Attorneys will then examine the December 11, 2025 federal executive order — its AI litigation task force, the Commerce and FTC deliverables due March 11, 2026, the FCC preemption proceeding, and funding conditions on states — and learn how to counsel clients on complying with statutes that are simultaneously live and under constitutional attack.

BREAK | 1:00pm – 1:10pm

SESSION 2 – Counseling the AI-Enabled Business — Disclosures, Chatbot Litigation Risk, and a Practical Compliance Program | 1:10pm – 2:10pm

This session translates the new AI legal landscape into a practical counseling framework. Attorneys will learn how to build an AI inventory that identifies every chatbot, generative tool, and algorithmic system a client deploys and maps each to the statutes it triggers; how to draft the disclosures and consent flows that chatbot and bot-disclosure laws now require; and how to update privacy policies, terms of service, and vendor contracts to address AI training rights, data reuse, and indemnification. The session also covers the extension of CIPA wiretapping and eavesdropping theories to AI chatbots and AI-powered session analytics — including how plaintiffs allege that third-party AI vendors “listen in” on customer conversations — and closes with a compliance-program roadmap covering impact assessments, employment AI audits, and documentation practices that position clients defensibly with regulators and plaintiffs alike.

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

California

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Florida

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 General Hours

Receive CLE credit in Florida via attorney submission.
Georgia

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Illinois

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Indiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
2 Substantive

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maryland

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Michigan

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Minnesota

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Missouri

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
120 General minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Nevada

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Pennsylvania

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Tennessee

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Virginia

Not Eligible
2 General Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 Law & Legal Hours

Receive CLE credit in Washington via attorney submission.
Wisconsin

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
2.4 General

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
Derivatives, Digital Assets, and AI in Financial Markets
Derivatives, Digital Assets, and AI in Financial Markets Fri, September 11, 2026
Live Webcast