Recovering Elder Financial Exploitation Losses

Anne Marie Murphy
Anne Marie Murphy
Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, LLP

Anne Marie Murphy is a Partner at Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, LLP, one of the nation’s premier plaintiff-side litigation firms, where her practice spans complex commercial litigation, class actions, consumer rights, securities and financial fraud, and elder abuse litigation.

Theresa E. Vitale
Theresa E. Vitale
Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, LLP

Theresa E. Vitale is a Partner in the Los Angeles office of Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, LLP, where she represents individuals, consumers, whistleblowers, employees, and public entities in high-stakes litigation in state and federal courts and in arbitration.

Live Video-Broadcast: October 20, 2026

2 hour CLE

Tuition: $195.00
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

 

Mandatory Fee-Shifting Changes Which Elder Abuse Cases You Can Afford to Take

Elder financial exploitation is no longer a case you decline because the client has nothing left. Key jurisdictions now mandate attorney's fee awards upon proof of financial elder abuse, the December 2024 interagency regulatory standards give banks a defined duty, and the Ninth Circuit reads California’s Elder Abuse Law more restrictively than state trial judges.

Plead a bank claim on knew-or-should-have-known and the federal actual-knowledge standard ends it. Build the undue influence record before filing and the burden shifts to the wrongdoer. Skip the collectability analysis and a liability win recovers nothing. Stack a fiduciary breach claim with the statutory elder abuse claim and mandatory fees, double damages under Probate Code § 859, and trebling under Civil Code § 3345 come into play. Miss the removal and preemption defenses and the case leaves the forum you chose.

You leave with a replicable case-selection and pleading methodology: a fee-shifting statutory map of the key jurisdictions, an evidentiary architecture for undue influence, a case-economics screen for selection and settlement leverage, and a framework for choosing the strongest enabler-liability theory against banks, facilities, and fiduciaries, then structuring the multi-theory complaint that maximizes both recovery and the fee award.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Recognizing the Fact Patterns
    Spotting the typical financial elder abuse fact patterns — and the wrongdoers, institutions, and fiduciaries behind them — so case screening starts with the right liability targets.
  • Mapping Fee-Shifting Statutes
    Identifying the key jurisdictions where attorney’s fee awards are mandatory rather than
    discretionary, and satisfying the preponderance standard that unlocks them.
  • Building the Evidentiary Record
    Assembling the undue influence and financial abuse record that triggers burden-shifting
    presumptions before trial, so the wrongdoer must explain the transactions.
  • Running the Case Economics
    Screening selection, collectability, and settlement leverage before filing, and avoiding the
    common plaintiff-side mistakes that cost fee awards after a liability win.
  • Pleading Against the Banks
    Meeting the federal actual-knowledge standard versus knew-or-should-have-known, using the December 2024 interagency regulatory standards as duty evidence, and accounting for the Ninth Circuit’s narrower reading of California’s Elder Abuse Law when choosing the forum and anticipating removal and preemption.
  • Stacking Enabler Liability
    Choosing the strongest theory against POA agents, trustees, guardians, investment advisors, and nursing facilities, then structuring multi-theory complaints that stack mandatory fee-shifting, § 859 double damages, and § 3345 trebling.

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Date / Time: October 20, 2026

  • 2:30 pm – 4:40 pm Eastern
  • 1:30 pm – 3:40 pm Central
  • 12:30 pm – 2:40 pm Mountain
  • 11:30 am – 1:40 pm Pacific

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Anne Marie Murphy, Partner | Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, LLP

Anne Marie Murphy is a Partner at Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, LLP, one of the nation’s premier plaintiff-side litigation firms, where her practice spans complex commercial litigation, class actions, consumer rights, securities and financial fraud, and elder abuse litigation. A recognized leader in the field of financial elder abuse, Anne Marie has tried elder abuse cases to jury verdict, published on holding financial institutions liable for elder exploitation, and spent more than a decade in leadership at California Advocates for Nursing Home Reform — making her one of the most experienced voices in California on recovering losses for exploited seniors and using the fee-shifting provisions of the Elder Abuse and Dependent Adult Civil Protection Act to make those recoveries economically viable.

  • Education & Credentials

Anne Marie earned her J.D. from Georgetown University Law Center and her B.A. from Vassar College. While in law school, she served as a Legislative Assistant in the United States Senate, gaining early insight into the statutory drafting and policy considerations that underlie remedial legislation such as elder protection statutes. She holds an AV-Preeminent rating from Martindale-Hubbell and a 10/10 rating from AVVO.

  • Recognition & Leadership

Anne Marie has been named to the 2026 Law dragon 500 Leading Plaintiff Financial and Consumer Lawyers and has been selected to Super Lawyers every year since 2013, including its Top 100 Northern California and Top 50 Women lists. The Daily Journal has recognized her among the Top 100 Women Lawyers in California and the Top 25 Plaintiff Attorneys in the state. She is a Fellow of the Litigation Counsel of America, has been named to the Irish Legal 100, has received multiple Presidential Awards of Merit from the Consumer Attorneys of California (CAOC), and was a finalist for CAOC’s Consumer Attorney of the Year. She serves on CAOC’s Board of Directors and Executive Committee, is a past Chair of its Women’s Caucus, co-chairs its annual Convention and Sonoma Seminar, and sits on the editorial board of CAOC’s
Forum Magazine.

  • Professional Involvement

Anne Marie is a past President and current Board Secretary of California Advocates for Nursing Home Reform (CANHR), the state’s leading elder-rights advocacy organization, and served thirteen years (2010–2023) as a Commissioner on the California Commission on Access to Justice. She is the author of “Financial Elder Abuse: Holding Institutions Liable” (Forum Magazine, 2019) and has lectured extensively at accredited seminars on elder abuse litigation developments, continuing care retirement community litigation, class action settlements, trial skills, and amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. She is a member of the American Association for Justice, the San Mateo County Bar Association, the San Mateo Trial Lawyers Association, the Irish American Bar Association of Northern California, and is a
lifetime member of California Women Lawyers. She also serves on the Advisory Board of the Berkeley Civil Justice Research Institute.

  • Experience

Over her career, Anne Marie has served as court-appointed co-lead counsel in a nationwide securities class action, litigated against Major League Baseball’s antitrust exemption, argued before the Ninth Circuit and the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, and recovered millions of dollars for consumers in nationwide class actions. She has tried cases to jury verdict in elder abuse, business, real estate, and probate and trust matters. Her deep experience litigating financial elder abuse claims against banks, brokerages, care facilities, and individual wrongdoers — together with her command of the attorneys’ fees, costs, and enhanced-remedies provisions available under California’s elder abuse statutes — makes her uniquely positioned to walk practitioners through building the plaintiff’s fee-shifting case and maximizing recovery for victims of elder financial exploitation.

 

Theresa E. Vitale, Partner | Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, LLP

Theresa E. Vitale is a Partner in the Los Angeles office of Cotchett, Pitre &
McCarthy, LLP, where she represents individuals, consumers, whistleblowers, employees, and public entities in high-stakes litigation in state and federal courts and in arbitration. Her practice includes elder abuse, financial fraud, consumer class actions, catastrophic injury and wrongful death, environmental and toxic exposure, whistleblower and quitam matters, and municipal litigation. Theresa has recently been at the forefront of elder financial abuse litigation against major national banks, giving her firsthand experience in the pleading, discovery, and fee-shifting strategies that drive recoveries
for exploited seniors.

  • Education & Credentials

Theresa earned her J.D. from Loyola Law School, Los Angeles, with a concentration in public interest law, and her B.A. in English with a minor in Italian Studies from the University of California, Berkeley. She is admitted to practice in California. During law school, she completed an externship with the ACLU of Southern California’s Immigrants’ Rights Group, where she advocated on behalf of unaccompanied minors— early work that shaped her commitment to representing vulnerable populations.

  • Recognition & Leadership

Theresa has been recognized as a Super Lawyers Rising Star each year from 2023 through 2026, and received the Animal Legal Defense Fund’s Pro Bono Award in both 2023 and 2024 for her work on animal trafficking fraud litigation. She serves as Co-Chair of Membership for the Los Angeles County Bar Association’s Barristers/Young Attorneys Section, where she helps lead one of the largest young-lawyer organizations in the country.

  • Professional Involvement

Beyond her practice, Theresa is active in her community as Membership Director of The Eagle Rock Association (TERA), a neighborhood nonprofit in Los Angeles. She is a frequent contributor to bar association programming and a committed pro bono advocate, and her public-interest background informs a litigation approach centered on accountability for institutions whose conduct harms individuals — including the financial institutions that facilitate or fail to prevent the exploitation of elderly customers.

  • Experience

At Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, Theresa has litigated a broad range of complex matters, including elder financial abuse claims against major banks, toxic exposure cases involving hydrogen sulfide, animal trafficking fraud, trucking and product liability cases, sexual abuse matters, and consumer class actions. Her work on behalf of elder abuse victims has required her to navigate the interplay between California’s Elder Abuse and Dependent Adult Civil Protection Act, financial institution reporting obligations, and the statutory attorneys’ fee and enhanced-damages provisions that make individual elder exploitation cases economically viable to pursue — making her uniquely positioned to break down how plaintiffs’ counsel build, prove, and recover on the fee-shifting case.

Agenda

SESSION 1 – Building the Elder Exploitation Case | 2:30pm – 3:30pm

This session equips plaintiff-side attorneys with the statutory, evidentiary, and economic framework for building elder financial exploitation cases structured to recover mandatory attorney’s fees—but more importantly to help senior citizens who have often lost everything they carefully saved for retirement. Attendees will learn how to identify fee-shifting statutes in key jurisdictions, satisfy the preponderance standard, trigger burden-shifting presumptions, and assess case economics before filing. Attorneys leave with a replicable case-selection and pleading methodology.

BREAK | 3:30pm – 3:40pm

SESSION 2 – Holding the Banks, Facilities, and Fiduciaries That Enabled Elder Exploitation Accountable | 3:40pm – 4:40pm

This session teaches plaintiff-side attorneys how to build and prosecute civil claims against the third-party institutions and fiduciaries that enabled elder financial exploitation — including banks, nursing facilities, POA agents, trustees, and guardians. Attendees will learn how to plead actual knowledge against financial institutions (Federal court standard), navigate the December 2024 interagency regulatory standards, and stack statutory remedies including mandatory fee-shifting, double damages under California Probate Code § 859, and potential trebling under Civil Code § 3345. Attendees will also learn how the 9th Circuit has adopted a more restrictive reading of California’s Elder Abuse Law than state court trial judges and how that impacts case selection and pleading. By the end of this session, attorneys will be equipped to identify the strongest enabler-liability theory for a given fact pattern, anticipate defense removal and
preemption tactics, and structure multi-theory complaints that maximize both recovery and fee awards.

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

California

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Florida

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 General Hours

Receive CLE credit in Florida via attorney submission.
Georgia

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Illinois

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Indiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
2 Substantive

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maryland

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Michigan

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Minnesota

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Missouri

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
120 General minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Nevada

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Pennsylvania

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Tennessee

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Virginia

Not Eligible
2 General Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 Law & Legal Hours

Receive CLE credit in Washington via attorney submission.
Wisconsin

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
2.4 General

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars