Minors’ Online Privacy & Safety: Navigating the Evolving Legal Landscape

Joel Schwarz
Joel Schwarz
The Schwarz Group, LLC

Joel Schwarz is the Managing Partner of The Schwarz Group, LLC, a boutique consultancy providing risk-based legal, technical, and compliance guidance across cybersecurity, privacy, data governance, and emerging technologies, and an adjunct professor at Albany Law School. His career spans internet enforcement and privacy oversight in government and industry, from prosecuting cybercrime at the US Department of Justice to serving as Special Counsel for Internet Matters and Assistant Attorney General in the New York State Attorney General's Office Internet Bureau.

Julia B. Jacobson
Julia B. Jacobson
Squire Patton Boggs

Julia B. Jacobson is a partner in the Data Privacy, Cybersecurity & Digital Assets practice at Squire Patton Boggs, based in New York. She counsels national and international clients on privacy and cybersecurity compliance strategies across the fast-moving landscape of US state privacy laws, consumer marketing initiatives (including mobile, email, and social media marketing compliance), artificial intelligence and technology transactions, and data breach response.

Live Video-Broadcast: October 20, 2026

2 hour CLE

Tuition: $195.00
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

 

Every Level of Government Is Now Regulating Minors Online. Liability Can Follow the Officers

For years, protecting minors online meant one statute: COPPA. That era is over. The FTC's amended COPPA Rule took effect June 23, 2025, Congress is weighing new federal legislation, and the states have built an accelerating patchwork — consumer privacy laws with minor-specific provisions, Age-Appropriate Design codes, online safety laws, app-store accountability, parental consent, and digital ID and age-verification mandates — much of it under active constitutional challenge.

The stakes are already visible. Meta faces private class actions and multi-state attorney general actions. Public school districts are suing social media companies. The FTC is wielding Section 5 of the FTC Act against unfair and deceptive practices — and, as Drizly showed, penalties can follow officers personally. State UDAP enforcement adds another front. Abroad, social media bans and digital duties of care are reshaping obligations for global platforms.

This two-session program converts that landscape into practitioner work product: a method for conducting a children's privacy review, a framework for identifying the appropriate compliance approach, updated online notices, parental notices, and consent mechanisms, and a clear picture of what good-faith compliance efforts and ongoing monitoring look like.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Amended COPPA and Federal Proposals
    What the amended COPPA Rule and related regulatory updates require of covered operators, and how proposed federal legislation focused on minors could reshape the baseline.
  • The State Patchwork Decoded
    How the defined terms — minor, organizations in scope, age-verification versus age-gating — differ across state consumer privacy laws with minor-specific provisions, and where constitutional challenges stand.
  • Design Codes and Online Safety Laws
    How Age-Appropriate Design laws aimed at minors' online safety and mental health interact with minors' online safety laws covering AI companions, addictive feeds, and CSAM.
  • Age Gates, App Stores, and Global Duties
    What app-store accountability, social media parental consent, and digital ID and age-verification laws demand of developers and platforms, alongside international social media bans, duties of care, and age-appropriate default settings.
  • Litigation and Officer Liability
    How the Meta private class actions and multi-state AG actions, public school district suits, FTC Act Section 5 enforcement (e.g., Drizly), and state UDAP enforcement create penalties that can follow officers personally.
  • The Compliance Roadmap
    How to conduct a children's privacy review, identify the appropriate compliance approach, update online notices, parental notices, and consent mechanisms, and show good-faith compliance efforts with ongoing monitoring.

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Date / Time: October 20, 2026

  • 2:30 pm – 4:40 pm Eastern
  • 1:30 pm – 3:40 pm Central
  • 12:30 pm – 2:40 pm Mountain
  • 11:30 am – 1:40 pm Pacific

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Joel Schwarz, Managing Partner | The Schwarz Group, LLC

Joel Schwarz is the Managing Partner of The Schwarz Group, LLC, a boutique consultancy providing risk-based legal, technical, and compliance guidance across cybersecurity, privacy, data governance, and emerging technologies, and an adjunct professor at Albany Law School. His career spans internet enforcement and privacy oversight in government and industry, from prosecuting cybercrime at the US Department of Justice to serving as Special Counsel for Internet Matters and Assistant Attorney General in the New York State Attorney General’s Office Internet Bureau.

  • Education & Credentials

Joel earned his law degree, cum laude, from Albany Law School and his undergraduate degree, cum laude, from SUNY Binghamton, and holds an Advanced Information Technologies certification from New York University. He holds the CIPP certification from the International Association of Privacy Professionals and the CDPSE certification.

  • Recognition & Leadership

Joel stood up and led the Civil Liberties & Privacy Office of the National Counterterrorism Center as its first Civil Liberties & Privacy Officer, developing agency-wide privacy and civil liberties compliance programs. He is the author of the forthcoming book From Main Street to C-Suite: Cybersecurity, Privacy, and Working with Law Enforcement (Spring 2027).

  • Professional Involvement

Joel is a co-founder and board member of the Student Data Privacy Project, a foundation focused on protecting student data privacy and holding EdTech companies accountable. He develops and teaches Master’s and LL.M. courses on cybercrime, cybersecurity, and privacy at Albany Law School, serves as a cybercrime and privacy expert for a Washington, DC television news station, and speaks and writes frequently on privacy, data protection, cybersecurity, and emerging technologies, with contributions appearing in The Hill, Bloomberg, Education Week, and the IAPP’s Privacy Advisor.

  • Experience

As a Trial Attorney in the US Department of Justice’s Computer Crime and Intellectual Property Section, Joel prosecuted cybercrime cases and represented law enforcement in negotiating the APEC Privacy Framework. In the New York State Attorney General’s Office, he served as Special Counsel for Internet Matters and Assistant Attorney General for the Internet Bureau. In the private sector, he served as Senior Principal at Global Cyber Risk LLC and as Senior Director of Global Internet Enforcement & Data Analytics for BSA | The Software Alliance, where he managed GDPR implementation and developed and administered BSA’s GDPR-Compliant Policy Framework, and earlier served as e-commerce and privacy counsel for MetLife.

 

Julia B. Jacobson_Squire Patton Boggs_FedBarJulia B. Jacobson, Partner | Squire Patton Boggs

Julia B. Jacobson is a partner in the Data Privacy, Cybersecurity & Digital Assets practice at Squire Patton Boggs, based in New York. She counsels national and international clients on privacy and cybersecurity compliance strategies across the fast-moving landscape of US state privacy laws, consumer marketing initiatives (including mobile, email, and social media marketing compliance), artificial intelligence and technology transactions, and data breach response.

  • Education & Credentials

Julia earned her LL.M. (2001) and J.D. (1999) from Boston University School of Law and her B.A. from the University of Michigan (1988). She is admitted to practice in Massachusetts (1999), holds the CIPP/US and CIPM certifications from the International Association of Privacy Professionals (IAPP), and earned a Data Ethics Certificate from the University of San Francisco (2021).

  • Recognition & Leadership

Julia is a Fellow of Information Privacy of the IAPP. She serves on the board of iTechLaw and co-chaired its 2022 World Technology Law Conference.

  • Professional Involvement

Julia co-chairs the Boston chapter of the IAPP Knowledge Net and serves on the Privacy, Cybersecurity & Digital Law Steering Committee of the Boston Bar Association. She speaks frequently on state privacy laws, dark patterns, AI governance, data security, web scraping, vendor management, and marketing compliance.

  • Experience

Julia’s practice spans privacy notices and policies, data governance, incident response, cross-border data transfers, vendor management, and consumer marketing campaigns. She has brought more than 20 years of experience negotiating technology agreements and serves as a data breach coach for national and international clients.

Agenda

SESSION 1 – The Legal Framework — Federal, State, and International Laws Governing Minors Online | 2:30pm – 3:30pm

This session maps the substantive legal framework governing minors’ online privacy and safety. It opens with the federal picture — the amended COPPA Rule and related regulatory updates, plus proposed federal legislation focused on minors — before turning to the states, beginning with the defined terms that drive every compliance analysis (who counts as a minor, which organizations are in scope, and how age-verification and age-gating obligations differ) and an overview of the constitutional challenges working through the courts. The session then surveys each category of state law: consumer privacy laws with minor-specific provisions, Age-Appropriate Design laws focused on minors’ online safety and mental health, minors’ online safety laws addressing AI companions, addictive feeds, and CSAM, app-store accountability laws, social media and parental consent laws, and digital ID and age-verification laws. It closes with the international landscape, including social media bans, digital duties of care, AI companion rules, and age-appropriate default settings. Penalties and potential liability — including personal liability — are addressed within the discussion of each law.

BREAK | 3:30pm – 3:40pm

SESSION 2 – Litigation, Enforcement, and Compliance in Practice | 3:40pm – 4:40pm

This session turns from the legal framework to enforcement, litigation, and compliance in practice. It examines the multistate and private litigation shaping the field — the Meta lawsuits, including private class actions and the multi-state attorney general actions, and public school district suits against social media companies — alongside FTC Act Section 5 unfair and deceptive acts and practices enforcement, including the potential personal liability and penalties that follow officers (e.g., Drizly), and state UDAP enforcement. The session then provides a practical roadmap for complying with minors’ privacy and online safety laws: conducting a children’s privacy review, identifying the appropriate compliance approach, updating compliance systems and documentation (online notices, parental notices, consent mechanisms, and related materials), understanding what good-faith compliance efforts look like, and building ongoing monitoring.

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

California

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Florida

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Georgia

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Illinois

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Indiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
2 Substantive

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maryland

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Michigan

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Minnesota

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Missouri

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
120 General minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Nevada

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Pennsylvania

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Tennessee

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Virginia

Not Eligible
2 General Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 Law & Legal Hours

Receive CLE credit in Washington via attorney submission.
Wisconsin

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
2.4 General

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
Managing Tariff and Trade Enforcement Risk in 2026
Managing Tariff and Trade Enforcement Risk in 2026 Mon, September 28, 2026
Live Webcast