From the Bench: What Persuades, What Frustrates, and What Lawyers Should Know (Presented by the Federal Bar Association Professional Development Committee, General Division)

Hon. Jia M. Cobb
Hon. Sean A. Camoni
David Labkowski
Hon. Jia M. Cobb | U.S. District Courts - District of Columbia
Hon. Sean A. Camoni | U.S. District Courts - Middle District of Pennsylvania
David Labkowski | Labkowski Law, P.A.

Live Video-Broadcast: October 27, 2026

1 hour CLE

Tuition: $395.00
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
This program is only available to All-Access Pass Members.
Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

 

The judges will tell you exactly what works — and what to stop doing

What makes a judge trust your argument — and what causes that trust to unravel? United States District Judge Jia M. Cobb and United States Magistrate Judge Sean A. Camoni take the question head on, in a candid conversation from the Bench’s perspective about everyday federal practice, moderated by commercial litigator David Labkowski.

The hour tracks the work itself. Motion practice and written advocacy: brief structure and length, decisive issues, record citations and adverse authority, useful replies, and compliance with local rules and chambers practices. Oral advocacy: addressing the Court’s concerns, answering difficult questions, making strategic concessions — and avoiding evasiveness, interruptions, and repetition. Then civility, professionalism, and judgment: choosing battles, meaningful meet-and-confers, and presenting discovery disputes efficiently.

Attendees hear practical perspectives on the habits judges appreciate, the procedural missteps and counterproductive combativeness that frustrate them, and how preparation, candor, and sound judgment make advocacy more persuasive — closing with Q&A to the panel.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • What Persuades a Judge
    The habits judges appreciate — and how preparation, candor, and sound judgment make advocacy more persuasive.
  • Focused Briefs, Useful Replies
    Drafting focused, persuasive briefs and useful replies that identify the requested relief, address decisive issues, and accurately present the record and authority.
  • Responsive Oral Advocacy
    Answering difficult questions directly, addressing judicial concerns, and making appropriate concessions.
  • Credibility, Built or Broken
    Practices that build or undermine credibility, including compliance with local rules and individual practices, candor, civility, and respect for the Court’s time.
  • Discovery Disputes, Done Right
    Conducting meaningful meet-and-confers and presenting discovery disputes efficiently — with judgment about which issues require judicial intervention.
  • What Frustrates the Bench
    The procedural missteps, counterproductive combativeness, and mistakes judges wish lawyers would stop making.

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Date / Time: October 27, 2026

  • 2:00 pm – 3:00 pm Eastern
  • 1:00 pm – 2:00 pm Central
  • 12:00 pm – 1:00 pm Mountain
  • 11:00 am – 12:00 pm Pacific

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

FedBar Logo_FedBarHon. Jia M. Cobb, District Court Judge | U.S. District Courts – District of Columbia

Judge Jia M. Cobb was appointed to the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in November 2021.

  • Education & Credentials

She received a B.A., magna cum laude, from Northwestern University. She then received a J.D., cum laude, from Harvard Law School, where she also served as Coordinating Editor of the Harvard Law Review.

  • Recognition & Leadership

The American Bar Association rated Judge Cobb “Well Qualified” in connection with her nomination to the federal bench, and her November 2021 appointment made her the fourth African American woman to serve on the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.

  • Professional Involvement

Judge Cobb has taught trial advocacy as an adjunct professor at American University Washington College of Law and as a visiting faculty member at Harvard Law School’s Trial Advocacy Workshop. She previously served as an elected member of the District of Columbia Bar’s Criminal Law and Individual Rights Section Steering Committee.

  • Experience

After law school, Judge Cobb clerked for the Honorable Diane P. Wood on the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. Following her clerkship, she worked as a trial attorney at the Public Defender Service for the District of Columbia (PDS) from 2006 to 2012. At PDS, Judge Cobb supervised incoming attorneys and was a member of the Forensic Practice Group. In 2012, Judge Cobb joined Relman Colfax PLLC, a national plaintiff-side civil rights firm based in Washington, D.C. At Relman Colfax, Judge Cobb handled a variety of complex civil rights litigation matters, including those involving allegations of housing discrimination, employment discrimination, and police misconduct. She was a partner at Relman Colfax from 2019 until her appointment to the bench.

 

FedBar Logo_FedBarHon. Sean A. Camoni, Magistrate Judge | U.S. District Courts – Middle District of Pennsylvania

Judge Camoni took the bench in July 2025 after serving as an AUSA for nearly 10 years.

  • Education & Credentials

Judge Camoni earned his undergraduate degree from Villanova University and his J.D. from Seton Hall University School of Law.

  • Recognition & Leadership

He rose to serve as a Deputy Chief of the Criminal Division in the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Middle District of Pennsylvania before his appointment to the bench.

  • Experience

He began his legal career as a litigation associate at Sullivan & Cromwell in New York. Before taking the bench, he served for nearly a decade as an Assistant United States Attorney in the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, and earlier as a law clerk to the late U.S. District Judge James M. Munley of the same district. Appointed a full-time United States Magistrate Judge, he was sworn in in July 2025 and sits in Williamsport.

 

David Labkowski | Labkowski Law, P.A.

David is based in Miami and practices in New York and Florida, focusing on high-stakes commercial litigation in federal and state courts.

  • Education & Credentials

David earned his J.D. from New York Law School, where he received the Dean’s Merit Scholarship and made the Dean’s List, after undergraduate studies at Florida International University’s Landon Undergraduate School of Business (Dean’s List). He is admitted in New York and Florida; before the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the Second, Ninth, Eleventh, and D.C. Circuits; and in the Southern, Eastern, and Northern Districts of New York and the Southern, Middle, and Northern Districts of Florida.

  • Recognition & Leadership

He serves as a Director of the Miami Beach Bar Association.

  • Professional Involvement

David is a member of the Federal Bar Association, where he serves on the Professional Development Committee, and a member of the American Association of Jewish Lawyers & Jurists and the Jewish Lawyers Association of Miami.

  • Experience

He leads Labkowski Law, P.A., which currently has three associates, litigating commercial disputes — contract, copyright, judgment-enforcement, cross-border, and appellate matters — in New York and Florida state and federal courts, including the Commercial Division of the New York Supreme Court and the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the Second and D.C. Circuits.

Agenda

SESSION 1 – From the Bench: What Persuades, What Frustrates, and What Lawyers Should Know | Hon. Jia M. Cobb & Hon. Sean A. Camoni & David Labkowski | 2:00pm – 3:00pm

What makes a judge trust your argument—and what causes that trust to unravel? Join United States District Judge Jia M. Cobb and United States Magistrate Judge Sean A. Camoni for a candid conversation from the Bench’s perspective about what works, what falls flat, and what frustrates the Bench in everyday federal practice. From focused briefs and useful replies to direct answers at oral argument, the panel will explore how lawyers can make their strongest points without sacrificing credibility. The discussion will also address procedural missteps, counterproductive combativeness, meaningful discovery meet-and-confers, and when to seek judicial intervention. Attendees will hear practical perspectives on the habits judges appreciate, the mistakes they wish lawyers would stop making, and how preparation, candor, and sound judgment can make advocacy more persuasive.

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

California

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
1 CLE Hour(s)

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Florida

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Georgia

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Illinois

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Indiana

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
1 Substantive

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
1 CLE Hour(s)

Maryland

No MCLE Required
1 CLE Hour(s)

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Michigan

No MCLE Required
1 CLE Hour(s)

Minnesota

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Missouri

Approved for CLE Credits
1.2 General

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
60 General minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

Nevada

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Pennsylvania

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
1 CLE Hour(s)

Tennessee

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Virginia

Not Eligible
1 General Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
1 Law & Legal Hours

Receive CLE credit in Washington via attorney submission.
Wisconsin

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
1.2 General

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
Recovering Elder Financial Exploitation Losses
Recovering Elder Financial Exploitation Losses Tue, October 20, 2026
Live Webcast
iPad for Lawyers: The Complete Mobile Practice Toolkit
iPad for Lawyers: The Complete Mobile Practice Toolkit Fri, October 23, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay