Defending the Municipal 30(b)(6) in Monell Cases: Notice, Designation, and Damage Control

Shannon T. O’Connor
Shannon T. O’Connor | Kenney Shelton Liptak Nowak LLP

Shannon T. O’Connor is a Partner at Kenney Shelton Liptak Nowak LLP, where she defends municipalities, police departments, school districts, and public officials in government litigation, with nearly 65 federal cases in the United States District Courts of New York and multiple appeals before the Second Circuit Court of Appeals.

Live Video-Broadcast: October 26, 2026

2 hour CLE

Tuition: $195.00
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

 

One Designee’s Answer Is the Municipality’s Admission

The 2025 federal consent decree withdrawals ended DOJ oversight, and plaintiffs’ counsel are rewriting their Rule 30(b)(6) notices around what happened next. Under the 2020 amendment’s good-faith conferral requirement, the fight over noticed topics now begins before any dispute reaches the court.

Accept an overbroad topic, and the designee testifies to decades of policy, complaint, and litigation history. Skip the proportionality and temporal-scope arguments, and the record grows. Designate the wrong witness, and every answer becomes a party admission. Prepare inadequately, and sanctions follow. Let questioning drift into legal characterizations, and the rollback theory is built from the municipality’s own testimony.

Attendees walk out with concrete strategies for objecting to overbroad topics and invoking proportionality, FRE 407 and protective order arguments for rollback evidence, a designee selection framework, a preparation protocol keyed to Monell’s four liability pathways, and practical techniques for post-deposition damage control.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Post-Decree Notice Landscape
    How the 2025 consent decree withdrawals reshape the topics plaintiffs’ counsel will notice in Monell cases, and the narrowing strategy for each anticipated topic.
  • Conferral and Particularity
    Using the 2020 Rule 30(b)(6) amendment’s conferral requirement and particularity standards as a structured defense mechanism before a dispute reaches the court.
  • Rollback Evidence and FRE 407
    FRE 407, post-decree rollback evidence, and protective order practice for insulating the deposition record from consent decree rollback theories.
  • Binding-Admission Exposure
    What the designee’s words do to the municipality as a party admission, and who should and should not sit in the chair.
  • Preparation and Sanctions
    The Rule 30(b)(6) preparation obligation, sanctions for failure, and Monell-specific preparation on training records, complaints, and prior lawsuits as notice.
  • Controlling the Record
    Tactical techniques for managing scope, contention questions, and legal characterizations during the deposition, plus post-deposition damage control.

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Date / Time: October 26, 2026

  • 12:00 pm – 2:10 pm Eastern
  • 11:00 am – 1:10 pm Central
  • 10:00 am – 12:10 pm Mountain
  • 9:00 am – 11:10 am Pacific

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Shannon T. O’Connor, Partner | Kenney Shelton Liptak Nowak LLP

Shannon T. O’Connor is a Partner at Kenney Shelton Liptak Nowak LLP, where she defends municipalities, police departments, school districts, and public officials in government litigation, with nearly 65 federal cases in the United States District Courts of New York and multiple appeals before the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. Her civil rights defense work centers on Section 1983 claims, Fourth Amendment unlawful search and seizure and excessive force claims, and First Amendment retaliation claims, and includes several no-cause verdicts on civil rights claims against public officials. Her cases of first impression have been instrumental in shaping policies on police use of force, school searches, workplace compliance, and civil service law.

  • Education & Credentials

Ms. O’Connor earned her J.D. from Syracuse University College of Law and her B.A. in History and Women’s Studies from the State University of New York, University at Buffalo. She is admitted to practice in New York State, in the United States District Courts for the Eastern, Northern, Southern, and Western Districts of New York, and before the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

  • Recognition & Leadership

She holds a Martindale-Hubbell AV Preeminent peer review rating and was selected to Super Lawyers in 2024 after being named to Upstate New York Super Lawyers Rising Stars from 2016 to 2020. The International Municipal Lawyers Association recognized her with the Marvin J. Glink Award in 2018 and the Amicus Service Award in 2019, and she serves as an IMLA Local Government Fellow. She was also named to the Irish Legal 100 in 2018 and received the Community Service Appreciation Award from the City of Syracuse Neighborhood Watch Association in 2011.

  • Professional Involvement

Ms. O’Connor serves as New York State Co-Chair of the International Municipal Lawyers Association and is a Fellow of the organization. She is a member of the Northern District of New York Federal Court Bar Association, the New York State Bar Association, and the Women’s Bar Association of the State of New York, and is a past President, Vice President, and Secretary of the Central New York Women’s Bar Association.

  • Experience

With more than 15 years of experience in municipal law, government litigation, constitutional law, employment law, and school law, Ms. O’Connor represents municipalities, school districts, police departments, teachers, administrators, private entities, and non-profit organizations from the trial courts through the appellate level. Beyond civil rights defense, her practice includes Title VII workplace and employment discrimination matters, wrongful termination, age, race, gender, and disability discrimination claims, sexual harassment and retaliation claims, Civil Service Law §75 disciplinary hearings for public employees, whistleblower retaliation defense, and internal investigations of unlawful discrimination and prohibited workplace conduct. She appears before the EEOC, HUD, the New York State Division of Human Rights, the New York State Department of Labor, and the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, and since 2015 has been retained for investigations by the New York State Office of the Attorney General for public entities and private businesses.

Agenda

SESSION 1 – Negotiating the Monell 30(b)(6) Notice After the Consent Decrees End | 12:00pm – 1:00pm

This session examines how municipal defense attorneys should negotiate, narrow, and respond to Rule 30(b)(6) deposition notices in §1983 Monell cases against the backdrop of the 2025 federal consent decree withdrawals. Attorneys will learn how the end of DOJ oversight reshapes the topics plaintiffs’ counsel will notice, what doctrinal and evidentiary tools are available to limit institutional testimony, and how to use the 2020 Rule 30(b)(6) amendment’s conferral requirement as a structured defense mechanism. Participants will leave with concrete strategies for objecting to overbroad topics, invoking proportionality, and insulating the deposition record from the most dangerous consent decree rollback theories.

BREAK | 1:00pm – 1:10pm

SESSION 2 – Preparing the Municipal Designee and Controlling the Deposition Record | 1:10pm – 2:10pm

This session addresses the selection, preparation, and in-deposition management of the municipal 30(b)(6) designee in Monell litigation. Attorneys will learn how designee testimony functions as a party admission, how to structure preparation to satisfy the Rule 30(b)(6) obligation while minimizing binding concessions, and how to control the deposition record in real time. Attendees will leave with a framework for designee selection, a preparation protocol keyed to Monell’s four liability pathways, and concrete techniques for managing scope, contention questions, and post-deposition damage control.

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

California

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Florida

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Georgia

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Illinois

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Indiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
2 Substantive

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maryland

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Michigan

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Minnesota

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Missouri

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
120 General minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Nevada

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Pennsylvania

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Tennessee

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Virginia

Not Eligible
2 General Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 Law & Legal Hours

Receive CLE credit in Washington via attorney submission.
Wisconsin

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
2.4 General

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
Getting Rid of Tax Penalties (Presented by Tax Rep)
Getting Rid of Tax Penalties (Presented by Tax Rep) Mon, October 12, 2026
Live Webcast
The Necessary Evils of Funding a Trust
The Necessary Evils of Funding a Trust Wed, October 14, 2026
Live Webcast