Airline Passenger Injury Litigation: Building the Plaintiff’s Montreal Convention Case

Erin R. Applebaum
Erin R. Applebaum | Kreindler & Kreindler LLP

Erin R. Applebaum is a partner at Kreindler & Kreindler LLP in New York, where her practice is devoted to aviation accident litigation, including commercial airline disasters, general aviation accidents, and claims for passengers injured during air travel. Recognized as an authority on the Montreal Convention, she writes and teaches regularly on the law governing personal injury and wrongful death claims arising on international airline flights.

Live Video-Broadcast: October 1, 2026

2 hour CLE

Tuition: $195.00
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

 

The Compensation Ceiling Just Moved, and the Forum Map Is Splitting

In December 2024, the Special Drawing Rights compensation limits under the Montreal Convention were revised. The treaty governs passenger injury claims on international flights, so the change reprices every in-flight injury case. At the same time, an unresolved Fifth Circuit/Second Circuit divide on personal jurisdiction has unsettled where those cases can be brought.

Plead the Article 17 “accident” element loosely, and the claim fails at the threshold. Ignore Article 29, and preemption strips the state-law counts. Ask for punitive damages or standalone emotional injury, and the complaint invites dismissal. File in the wrong Article 33 forum, and the case stalls in a jurisdiction fight. The two-tier liability structure of Articles 17 and 21 — and the Article 20 contributory-negligence defense airlines commonly deploy — then shapes what the claim is worth.

This two-session program converts that terrain into practitioner work product. Attendees leave with a pleading checklist, a current map of available forums across the five-jurisdiction framework, and a structured approach to damages — including how to advise clients on realistic settlement ranges under the updated SDR ceiling.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • The “Accident” Element
    How to plead the Article 17 “accident” element so the claim qualifies at the threshold, and the evidentiary threshold and case law for proving it at settlement and trial.
  • Bodily Injury and Preemption
    What counts as compensable bodily injury, and how Article 29 preemption displaces state-law claims and sets punitive-damages and emotional-injury traps for the unwary complaint.
  • Two-Tier Liability Architecture
    How the two-tier liability structure under Articles 17 and 21 operates after the December 2024 SDR limit increase, and what the updated ceiling changes at the settlement table.
  • Forum Selection Strategy
    A current map of the five jurisdictions available under Article 33, and how the unresolved Fifth Circuit/Second Circuit personal jurisdiction divide changes where you file.
  • Physical and Psychological Damages
    How to structure a damages case for bodily injury and navigate the evolving law on damages for psychological injury.
  • Contributory Negligence Defense
    How to anticipate the Article 20 contributory-negligence defense airlines commonly deploy and build trial strategy around it.

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Date / Time: October 1, 2026

  • 2:30 pm – 4:40 pm Eastern
  • 1:30 pm – 3:40 pm Central
  • 12:30 pm – 2:40 pm Mountain
  • 11:30 am – 1:40 pm Pacific

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Erin R. Applebaum, Partner | Kreindler & Kreindler LLP

Erin R. Applebaum is a partner at Kreindler & Kreindler LLP in New York, where her practice is devoted to aviation accident litigation, including commercial airline disasters, general aviation accidents, and claims for passengers injured during air travel. Recognized as an authority on the Montreal Convention, she writes and teaches regularly on the law governing personal injury and wrongful death claims arising on international airline flights.

  • Education & Credentials

Erin earned her bachelor’s degree from the University of Miami in 2007 and her Juris Doctor from Brooklyn Law School in 2010. She is admitted in New York and before the U.S. District Courts for the Southern, Eastern, and Western Districts of New York. She serves as a mentor through Brooklyn Law School’s alumni mentorship program for students interested in plaintiffs’ litigation or aviation law.

  • Recognition & Leadership

Erin is Chair-Elect of the American Bar Association’s Aviation and Space Law Committee, Vice-Chair of the Aviation and Space Law Committee of the ABA’s Tort Trial & Insurance Practice Section, and a former co-chair of the New York City Bar Association’s Aeronautics Committee, where she also served as chair of its Subcommittee on Commercial Airline Casualty. Her recognitions include selection to Super Lawyers for 2025–2026 following a decade as a Super Lawyers Rising Star in Aviation and Aerospace Law, the 2025 Lawdragon 500 Leading Global Litigators and Lawdragon 500 X – The Next Generation lists, and the 2025 Compassionate Counsel Award from The Milestone Foundation.

  • Professional Involvement

Erin’s publications on the Convention include “An Update on the Law Governing Passenger Personal Injury and Wrongful Death Claims Arising on International Airline Flights” and “British Airways’ Position on Montreal Convention Accident Determination Rejected” in McGill’s Annals of Air and Space Law, and “Rough Skies Ahead: Legal Options for Turbulence Injuries” in the New York Law Journal. She has taught a Lawline CLE course on the Montreal Convention, presented “Litigating a Foreign Air Crash” at the ABA’s 25th Annual National Institute on Aviation Litigation, and is an active member of the American Association for Justice’s Aviation Law Section and a graduate of the 2018–19 ABA TIPS Leadership Academy.

  • Experience

Erin represents passengers and families in major international and domestic airline disasters. She is co-chair of the Plaintiffs’ Executive Committee in the litigation arising from the February 2025 crash landing of Delta Flight 4819 in Toronto, a court-appointed member of the Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee for the January 2025 Washington, D.C. midair collision, and served for six years on the court-appointed Plaintiffs’ Executive Committee in the Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302/737 MAX litigation, where she was instrumental in challenging Boeing’s Deferred Prosecution Agreement with the Department of Justice. Her docket has also included the Southwest Airlines Flight 1380 engine failure and the Liberty Helicopters doors-off helicopter crash in the East River, and she is a frequent commentator on aviation liability for outlets including Reuters, The New York Times, and NPR.

Agenda

SESSION 1 – Pleading the Montreal Convention Injury Claim and Choosing the Forum | 2:30pm – 3:30pm

This session walks plaintiff-side practitioners through every element required to successfully plead an Article 17 injury claim under the Montreal Convention, from threshold accident pleading through forum selection under Article 33. Attorneys will learn how to structure the complaint to survive preemption challenges, avoid punitive-damages and emotional-injury traps, and identify the strongest available forum given the current personal jurisdiction circuit split. Attendees leave with a practical pleading checklist and a current map of the five-jurisdiction landscape, including the December 2024 SDR limit revision and the unresolved Fifth Circuit/Second Circuit divide.

BREAK | 3:30pm – 3:40pm

SESSION 2 – Proving and Valuing In-Flight Injury Claims at Settlement and Trial | 3:40pm – 4:40pm

This session teaches plaintiff attorneys how to prove and value Montreal Convention bodily injury claims from the evidentiary threshold through damages quantification at settlement and trial. Attendees will master the two-tier liability architecture under Articles 17 and 21, the December 2024 SDR limit increase, the evolving law on psychological injury, and the Article 20 contributory-negligence defense. By the end of the hour, attorneys will be able to structure a damages case, anticipate the airline’s key trial defenses, and advise clients on realistic settlement ranges under the current SDR ceiling.

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

California

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Florida

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 General Hours

Receive CLE credit in Florida via attorney submission.
Georgia

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Illinois

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Indiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
2 Substantive

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maryland

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Michigan

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Minnesota

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Missouri

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
120 General minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Nevada

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Pennsylvania

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Tennessee

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Virginia

Not Eligible
2 General Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 Law & Legal Hours

Receive CLE credit in Washington via attorney submission.
Wisconsin

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
2.4 General

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
Derivatives, Digital Assets, and AI in Financial Markets
Derivatives, Digital Assets, and AI in Financial Markets Fri, September 11, 2026
Live Webcast