Limitation of Liability Clauses That Hold Up: Caps, Carve-Outs, and the Indemnification Interplay

Mark S. Adams
Mark S. Adams
Blank Rome LLP

Mark S. Adams is a partner in the Business Litigation group of Blank Rome LLP, based in the firm's Irvine, California office. A trial lawyer with extensive commercial dispute experience, including complex multi-party litigation and class actions, he concentrates his practice on contracts, corporate and partnership disputes, shareholder and investment controversies, real estate matters, and hospitality litigation.

Leah S. Baucom
Leah S. Baucom
K&L Gates LLP

Leah S. Baucom is a partner in the Corporate practice of K&L Gates LLP, based in Charlotte, North Carolina. She concentrates her practice on mergers and acquisitions and other corporate transactions, representing public and private companies, private equity sponsors, and financial institutions in mergers and acquisitions, investments, joint ventures, recapitalizations, and other business combination transactions, with frequent involvement in cross-border deals for clients based in multiple jurisdictions.

Live Video-Broadcast: August 25, 2026

2 hour CLE

Tuition: $195.00
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

 

The cap your client relies on may already be unenforceable.

Courts reshaped enforcement standards for liability caps and consequential damages waivers in 2025. The California Supreme Court's April 2025 VanLaw decision changed drafting for California-governed contracts. Ohio and New York added developments of their own. Clauses with structural, definitional, or jurisdictional defects now collapse under challenge.

Leave consequential damages undefined, and a court decides what the waiver covers. Keep prefatory language like “except as otherwise provided herein,” and the cap can vanish. Misalign indemnification triggers with carve-out language, and the obligation gets silently capped or rendered meaningless. In some contract types, state statutes void the cap outright.

This two-session program delivers practitioner work product. Attendees leave with a concrete enforceability checklist drawn from recent case law and a practical three-tier liability model. They gain market benchmarks for super-caps and carve-outs in SaaS and technology contracts, plus the vocabulary to defend client positions in negotiation.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Why Caps Fail
    How the structural and definitional defects identified in the most significant 2025 decisions, including the California Supreme Court's April 2025 VanLaw ruling, cause liability caps to collapse in litigation.
  • Damages Classification
    How courts decide whether a consequential damages waiver covers a specific category of loss when the contract never defines the term, and what to define up front to control the outcome.
  • State-Specific Voids
    Which state statutes and judicial doctrines affirmatively void liability caps in specific contract types, and how drafters account for them clause by clause.
  • Enforceability Drafting Techniques
    Which cap structures and mutual-drafting practices give courts reason to enforce rather than strike a clause, including an audit for prefatory language like “except as otherwise provided herein.”
  • Super-Cap Architecture
    How to structure a super-cap, justify the multiplier in negotiation, and benchmark client positions against current market standards in SaaS and technology contracts.
  • Carve-Outs and Indemnification
    How to negotiate the carve-out categories of IP, confidentiality, gross negligence, and fraud, and align indemnification trigger language with carve-out language to close structural traps.

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Date / Time: August 25, 2026

  • 1:00 pm – 3:10 pm Eastern
  • 12:00 pm – 2:10 pm Central
  • 11:00 am – 1:10 pm Mountain
  • 10:00 am – 12:10 pm Pacific

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Mark S. Adams, Partner | Blank Rome LLP

Mark S. Adams is a partner in the Business Litigation group of Blank Rome LLP, based in the firm’s Irvine, California office. A trial lawyer with extensive commercial dispute experience, including complex multi-party litigation and class actions, he concentrates his practice on contracts, corporate and partnership disputes, shareholder and investment controversies, real estate matters, and hospitality litigation.

  • Education & Credentials

Mark earned his J.D. from Loyola Law School, his M.B.A. from Baylor University, and his B.S. from the University of California, Los Angeles. He is admitted to the California bar and practices before the U.S. District Courts for the Central, Eastern, Northern, and Southern Districts of California, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, and the United States Court of Federal Claims.

  • Recognition & Leadership

Mark has been listed in Best Lawyers in America from 2023 through 2026 and was named a 2024 Legal Visionary by the Los Angeles Times Business of Law. His trial victories have drawn coverage in Forbes, Reuters, and Life Science Weekly, and the Wall Street Journal has recognized him as an authority on noncompete agreements. A frequent author and lecturer, he speaks in the United States and Europe on litigation strategies in hotel management and franchise disputes.

  • Professional Involvement

Mark is a member of the Orange County Bar Association and the Federal Bar Association. He devotes more than 200 hours each year to pro bono and community service work, including supporting underserved domestic violence victims, educating people with limited access to legal resources, representing pro bono clients, and providing meals to the underprivileged.

  • Experience

Mark has tried numerous cases in state and federal courts and in domestic and international arbitrations, has taken or defended nearly 1,000 depositions across North America, Europe, and the Middle East, and achieved two of California’s top 50 largest jury verdicts in a single year. In the hospitality sector, he has represented hundreds of hotel owners in disputes with management brands including Hilton, Hyatt, IHG, Fairmont, Choice, and Marriott, has litigated the termination of numerous long-term hotel management and franchise agreements, and represents the largest independent hotel management company in the United States, one of the largest globally. His results include a $10.5 million judgment in a defamation per se action, a directed verdict for defendants in a jury-tried investment dispute, dismissal of a $27 million breach of contract and fiduciary duty claim against a hotel management company, and resolution of a dispute over a terminated development agreement for a luxury hotel project in Miami, Florida, for more than $30 million.

 

Leah S. Baucom, Partner | K&L Gates LLP

Leah S. Baucom is a partner in the Corporate practice of K&L Gates LLP, based in Charlotte, North Carolina. She concentrates her practice on mergers and acquisitions and other corporate transactions, representing public and private companies, private equity sponsors, and financial institutions in mergers and acquisitions, investments, joint ventures, recapitalizations, and other business combination transactions, with frequent involvement in cross-border deals for clients based in multiple jurisdictions.

  • Education & Credentials

Leah earned her J.D., magna cum laude, from Duke University School of Law in 2011, where she served as Executive Editor of the Duke Law & Technology Review and as Executive Editor and Symposium Manager of the Duke Environmental Law & Policy Forum. She holds an M.S. (2008) and a B.S. (2006), magna cum laude, from the University of Massachusetts, where she graduated from the Commonwealth Honors College. She is admitted to the bars of New York and North Carolina and speaks Chinese.

  • Recognition & Leadership

Leah was named a 2021 Top Rising Star by The Deal, which recognizes exemplary US-based partners focused on M&A and private equity, and was recognized in The Deal’s Top Women in Dealmaking in 2023. The Legal 500 United States has recognized her as a Next Generation Partner for M&A: Middle-Market ($500m-999m) from 2024 through 2026 and as a Recommended Lawyer for Private Equity Buyouts: Middle-Market (Up to $500m) in 2024.

  • Professional Involvement

Leah is a member of the American Bar Association, the New York Bar Association, and the Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund.

  • Experience

Leah regularly advises on the full range of business combination transactions and often handles cross-border matters involving parties and operations in multiple jurisdictions, serving many foreign-based clients. Before joining K&L Gates, she practiced as an associate in the New York office of another international law firm. Her published work includes “Who Owns the Virtual Items?” in the Duke Law & Technology Review (2010).

Agenda

SESSION 1 – Drafting Liability Caps and Consequential Damages Waivers That Survive Challenge | 1:00pm – 2:00pm

This session examines how liability caps and consequential damages waivers are drafted, challenged, and struck down, with close attention to the most significant 2025 decisions reshaping enforcement standards. Attorneys will learn to identify the structural, definitional, and jurisdictional failure points that cause these clauses to collapse in litigation and to apply drafting techniques that improve enforceability. Participants leave with a concrete checklist of enforceability-enhancing practices drawn from recent case law and current market standards.

BREAK | 2:00pm – 2:10pm

SESSION 2 – Negotiating Carve-Outs, Super-Caps, and the Indemnification Interplay | 2:10pm – 3:10pm

This session covers the negotiation architecture for liability carve-outs, super-caps, and indemnification provisions in commercial contracts, with emphasis on technology and data-intensive agreements. Attorneys will learn how to structure and defend tiered liability frameworks, identify and close the most dangerous drafting traps in indemnification clauses, and apply current case law and market data to client negotiations. Attendees leave with a practical three-tier liability model and the vocabulary to benchmark client positions against market standards.

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

California

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Florida

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 General Hours

Receive CLE credit in Florida via attorney submission.
Georgia

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Illinois

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Indiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
2 Substantive

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maryland

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Michigan

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Minnesota

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Missouri

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
120 General minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Nevada

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Pennsylvania

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Tennessee

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Virginia

Not Eligible
2 General Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 Law & Legal Hours

Receive CLE credit in Washington via attorney submission.
Wisconsin

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
2.4 General

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
Using AI in Your Law Practice: A Step-by-Step Guide
Using AI in Your Law Practice: A Step-by-Step Guide Wed, July 22, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay
iPad for Lawyers: The Complete Mobile Practice Toolkit
iPad for Lawyers: The Complete Mobile Practice Toolkit Thu, July 23, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay
State National Security Law and Role Conflicts
State National Security Law and Role Conflicts Thu, July 23, 2026
Live Webcast
The AI Skills Every Attorney Needs: Think, Prompt, Win
The AI Skills Every Attorney Needs: Think, Prompt, Win Thu, July 30, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay