Legal AI in 2026: From Chatbots to AI Agents in Law Practice

Danielle Benecke
Danielle Benecke
Baker McKenzie

Danielle Benecke leads Baker McKenzie's Applied AI practice, an award-winning team of lawyers and technologists delivering AI-enabled solutions for complex, high-stakes business and regulatory challenges. Her team partners directly with global clients to design and deploy intelligent, defensible workflows across major transactions, incident response, compliance programs, and operational matters. A technology lawyer by background, Danielle has spent her career advising global tech leaders on AI development, commercialization, and responsible use.

Adam G. Gutbezahl
Adam G. Gutbezahl
Ruberto, Israel & Weiner, P.C.

Adam G. Gutbezahl is a Shareholder at Ruberto, Israel & Weiner, P.C. and a member of the firm's Litigation Department and Commercial Real Estate, Construction Law, and Employment Law Groups. He represents individuals and businesses in a wide range of matters, including complex commercial, employment, land use, and real estate disputes. With jury and bench trial experience in both state and federal courts, he combines courtroom advocacy with practical counseling to help clients mitigate risk and avoid litigation. Adam is also widely recognized as a thought leader on the legal implications of Generative Artificial Intelligence, advising businesses on AI governance, workplace compliance, and emerging legal issues.

Live Video-Broadcast: August 24, 2026

2 hour CLE

Tuition: $195.00
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

 

AI Has Moved from Chat-Based Tools to Multi-Step Agents

Legal AI in 2026 is no longer a chat window. It has moved from chat-based tools to multi-step agents. That shift is reaching everyday practice across transactions, disputes and investigations, and recurring work. This program shows what is real, what is emerging, and what is overclaimed.

The stakes are concrete. Select the wrong model and legal analysis suffers. Skip verification and hallucinations reach your work product. Mishandle client documents and confidential information is exposed. Using these models defensibly requires understanding their respective strengths and limitations — and keeping legal judgment central.

Attendees leave with a working playbook: when GPT-5.5, Claude 5, or Gemini 3.5 performs best for drafting, long-document review, and investigative work; practical approaches for discovery, chronologies, deposition outlines, and case assessments; and verification workflows that document attorney review and withstand scrutiny.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Models, Tools, Workflows, Agents
    How AI moved from chat-based tools to multi-step agents across three eras, and what each term means for practice.
  • Real vs. Overclaimed
    Where AI actually sits in legal today: the four levels of impact across transactions, disputes and investigations, and recurring work.
  • Matching Model to Task
    When GPT-5.5, Claude 5, or Gemini 3.5 performs best for legal analysis, drafting, long-document review, and investigative work.
  • Discovery and Document Review
    Using AI to organize productions, identify key themes, summarize large document sets, and accelerate first-pass analysis.
  • Faster Litigation Work Product
    Developing chronologies, witness profiles, deposition outlines, investigation timelines, and case assessments with AI assistance.
  • Oversight, Confidentiality, and Judgment
    Verifying AI-generated analyses, identifying hallucinations, documenting attorney review, and protecting privileged client information — the judgment that stays with counsel.

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Date / Time: August 24, 2026

  • 1:00 pm – 3:10 pm Eastern
  • 12:00 pm – 2:10 pm Central
  • 11:00 am – 1:10 pm Mountain
  • 10:00 am – 12:10 pm Pacific

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Danielle Benecke, Founder & Global Head, Machine Learning Practice | Baker McKenzie

Danielle Benecke leads Baker McKenzie’s Applied AI practice, an award-winning team of lawyers and technologists delivering AI-enabled solutions for complex, high-stakes business and regulatory challenges. Her team partners directly with global clients to design and deploy intelligent, defensible workflows across major transactions, incident response, compliance programs, and operational matters. A technology lawyer by background, Danielle has spent her career advising global tech leaders on AI development, commercialization, and responsible use. She focuses on unlocking new legal capabilities that were not previously achievable, using frontier AI to build bespoke workflows embedded into live mandates. Danielle is recognized in Chambers Global, Lawdragon Global 100, and Forbes Top Lawyers, and has received industry honors including Law.com Innovator of the Year and Financial Times Changemaker of the Year. She holds a Masters from Stanford and serves as a venture coach with Stanford Law School’s CodeX.

  • Education & Credentials

Danielle holds a Master of Laws, Science, and Technology from Stanford University.

  • Recognition & Leadership

Fortune 500 clients have described her work as “nothing short of spectacular.” She has served on Baker McKenzie’s Global Digital Media and Copyright Steering Committee and on its North America IP and Technology leadership team.

  • Professional Involvement

At Stanford, Danielle was a member of the Graduate School of Business’ Venture Studio and a Fellow of the Legal Design Lab, and she has served as a venture coach in CodeX’s AI and Law program.

  • Experience

Danielle founded and leads Baker McKenzie’s Machine Learning Practice globally, building on her prior practice as a senior IP and technology lawyer with the firm.

 

Speaker_Adam G. GutbezahlAdam G. Gutbezahl, Esq., Shareholder | Ruberto, Israel & Weiner, P.C.

Adam G. Gutbezahl is a Shareholder at Ruberto, Israel & Weiner, P.C. and a member of the firm’s Litigation Department and Commercial Real Estate, Construction Law, and Employment Law Groups. He represents individuals and businesses in a wide range of matters, including complex commercial, employment, land use, and real estate disputes. With jury and bench trial experience in both state and federal courts, he combines courtroom advocacy with practical counseling to help clients mitigate risk and avoid litigation. Adam is also widely recognized as a thought leader on the legal implications of Generative Artificial Intelligence, advising businesses on AI governance, workplace compliance, and emerging legal issues.

  • Education & Credentials

Adam Gutbezahl earned his J.D., cum laude, from The George Washington University Law School in 2013, where he served on the Moot Court Board and as an Executive Editor of The George Washington Law Review. He received his B.A., cum laude, from The George Washington University in 2006. He is admitted to practice in Massachusetts, the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit.

  • Recognition & Leadership

Adam is recognized as a leading voice on the legal implications of Generative Artificial Intelligence and serves on multiple AI steering committees and task forces. He publishes ChatAdamG, a monthly newsletter examining AI’s impact on the workplace, employment law, and business operations. His honors include Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly Excellence in Law – Up and Coming Lawyer (2025), Massachusetts Super Lawyers Rising Star – Real Estate (2024, 2025), Boston Magazine Top Lawyer (2024, 2025), Ones to Watch – Rising Stars by the New England Real Estate Journal (2024), selection to the Boston Future Leaders Program by Harvard Business School and the Greater Boston Chamber of Commerce (2024), the Outstanding Faculty Award from the National Business Institute (2023), and Emerging Leader of the Year from the MetroWest Chamber of Commerce (2022).

  • Professional Involvement

Adam is actively involved in numerous legal and community organizations. He serves on the Boston Bar Association’s Privacy, Security & Digital Law Group Steering Committee and Curriculum Advisory Committee, is a member of the American Bar Association’s Artificial Intelligence & Robotics Group, the Massachusetts Bar Association’s Business Law Artificial Intelligence Practice Group, and the Massachusetts Real Estate Bar Association’s Artificial Intelligence Task Force. He also serves on the Greater Boston Chamber of Commerce’s Future Tech Leadership Council, the Performing Arts Center of Metrowest Board of Directors, the Wayland Trust Fund Commission, and the Wayland Youth Soccer Board of Directors, and is a member of ProVisors, MetroWest HRMA, and the Society for Human Resource Management. He is a frequent speaker and author on Generative AI and its legal and practical implications for employers.

  • Experience

Adam represents clients in complex commercial, employment, land use, and real estate litigation in Massachusetts state and federal courts. In 2024, he successfully served as first-chair trial counsel in two separate cases, achieving favorable outcomes in both. In addition to handling high-stakes litigation, he counsels businesses on developing best practices to reduce legal risk, with a particular focus on the implementation and governance of Generative AI in the workplace.

Agenda

SESSION 1 – AI in Legal Practice in 2026: From Tools to Agents | 1:00pm – 2:00pm

This session gives practicing attorneys a clear, practical picture of where AI actually stands in 2026 and how it is being used in real legal work today – what is real, what is emerging, and what is overclaimed. Rather than a compliance or ethics briefing, it focuses on the technology and its application: how AI has moved from chat-based tools to multi-step agents, and what that means for everyday practice. Through concrete case studies across transactions, disputes and investigations, and recurring work, attendees will see how lawyers are actually deploying AI while keeping legal judgment central. Professional responsibility considerations are noted where they arise, but the session is designed for general credit rather than as a formal ethics program.

BREAK | 2:00pm – 2:10pm

SESSION 2 – Using GPT-5.5, Claude 5, and Gemini 3.5 in Litigation, Investigations, and DocumentIntensive Practice | 2:10pm – 3:10pm

Large language models have become valuable tools for litigation teams, investigations, and complex document review, but selecting the right model—and using it in a defensible manner—requires understanding their respective strengths and limitations. This session examines how GPT-5.5, Claude 5, and Gemini 3.5 fit into modern litigation workflows, including factual analysis, chronology development, document summarization, deposition preparation, and discovery strategy. Attendees will learn practical approaches for incorporating AI into high-volume legal work while preserving attorney oversight, protecting confidential information, and maintaining work product that can withstand scrutiny.

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

California

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Florida

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Georgia

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Illinois

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Indiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
2 Substantive

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maryland

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Michigan

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Minnesota

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Missouri

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
120 General minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Nevada

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Pennsylvania

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Tennessee

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Virginia

Not Eligible
2 General Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 Law & Legal Hours

Receive CLE credit in Washington via attorney submission.
Wisconsin

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
2.4 General

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
The AI Skills Every Attorney Needs: Think, Prompt, Win
The AI Skills Every Attorney Needs: Think, Prompt, Win Thu, July 30, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay