Section 1983 in Theory and Practice: Qualified Immunity’s Shaky Foundations and the Life Cycle of a Civil Rights Case

William Most
William Most | Most & Associates

William Most is a civil rights litigator and the founder of Most & Associates in New Orleans, Louisiana. He has practiced before the U.S. Supreme Court, state supreme courts, multiple federal and state courts of appeal, and trial courts from California to Louisiana to Maine, and he is licensed in Louisiana and California. Before entering the law, he worked as a fisheries biologist.

Live Video-Broadcast: August 31, 2026

2 hour CLE

Tuition: $195.00
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

 

The Strongest Defense in Civil Rights Litigation May Not Survive Its Own Statute

Qualified immunity has shaped civil rights litigation for decades, and most practitioners treat it as settled. It is not. Recent scholarship argues the doctrine contradicts the original text of Section 1983 and lacks historical support. The ground under the defense is moving.

The consequences reach every stage. Plead a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and qualified immunity frames the fight. Survive dismissal, and an interlocutory appeal can freeze the case. Bring a Monell claim, and proving it becomes the battle.

This program pairs practice with theory. A civil rights litigator walks through the life cycle of a § 1983 suit, from pleading through trial. Attendees see how qualified immunity, interlocutory appeals, and Monell claims shape strategy at every stage. The program then tests the doctrine itself: its text, its history, and its policy. Attendees leave with a stage-by-stage litigation framework and the textualist case against the doctrine — practitioner judgment no summary replaces.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Section 1983 Fundamentals
    How the basics of 42 USC 1983 frame every claim decision from pleading through trial.
  • Qualified Immunity Mechanics
    What qualified immunity is, how it operates, and how it drives strategy at every stage of a civil rights case.
  • Interlocutory Appeals
    How interlocutory appeals of qualified immunity rulings can freeze a § 1983 suit, and how to plan around them.
  • Proving Monell Claims
    What it takes to prove a Monell claim and where that proof fits in the life cycle of the case.
  • The Textualist Challenge
    How recent research showing qualified immunity contradicts the original text of Section 1983 arms new arguments against the defense.
  • History and Policy
    Whether qualified immunity is historically supported or good policy, and how those doubts change what you argue.

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Date / Time: August 31, 2026

  • 1:00 pm – 3:10 pm Eastern
  • 12:00 pm – 2:10 pm Central
  • 11:00 am – 1:10 pm Mountain
  • 10:00 am – 12:10 pm Pacific

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

William Most, Founder | Most & Associates

William Most is a civil rights litigator and the founder of Most & Associates in New Orleans, Louisiana. He has practiced before the U.S. Supreme Court, state supreme courts, multiple federal and state courts of appeal, and trial courts from California to Louisiana to Maine, and he is licensed in Louisiana and California. Before entering the law, he worked as a fisheries biologist.

  • Education & Credentials

Mr. Most graduated from Harvard College in 2005 and earned his law degree from the U.C. Berkeley School of Law in 2011, where he was elected to the Order of the Coif, an honor limited to the top ten percent of the class. He holds a Certificate of Specialization in Environmental Law. His bar admissions include the State of Louisiana, the State of California, the Supreme Court of the United States, the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the First, Fifth, and Ninth Circuits, and federal district courts across Louisiana and California.

  • Recognition & Leadership

Mr. Most has been named to the Louisiana Super Lawyers list for 2024, 2025, and 2026, following four consecutive selections to the Louisiana Rising Stars list from 2020 through 2023. He received the New Orleans Chapter of the Federal Bar Association’s 2025 Public Service Award and holds a Certificate of Honor from the San Francisco District Attorney. His peers have repeatedly voted him among the Top Lawyers listed in New Orleans Magazine in the Labor & Employment and Employee Benefits Law categories. He served as Chair of the New Orleans Bar Association Civil Rights Committee for the 2023–2024 and 2024–2025 terms.

  • Professional Involvement

Mr. Most is Of Counsel to the ATA Law Group, a California-based law firm, and has served as a board member of the National Police Accountability Project. He is a Fellow of the Institute of Politics in New Orleans and a Scholar of the National Lawyers Guild. He has been an editor of the Climate Change Law and Policy Reporter, a city-council-appointed member of the San Francisco Urban Forestry Council, and a Court Appointed Special Advocate for foster youth. He has testified before the state legislature, made hundreds of media appearances, and presents frequently on civil rights topics, including recent programs on qualified immunity, Section 1983 actions, and the life cycle of a civil rights case.

  • Experience

Mr. Most practiced at the California law firm of Briscoe Ivester & Bazel LLP before moving to New Orleans and founding Most & Associates. His clients have included individuals, businesses, families, municipalities, state agencies, American Indian tribes, journalists, law enforcement officers, prisoners, tenants, and non-profits, among many others. His appellate oral arguments include Hicks v. LeBlanc, Grant v. LeBlanc, McNeal v. LeBlanc, Rogers v. Smith, and Brown v. Burmaster in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, along with arguments before the First Circuit, the Maine Supreme Court, and California and Louisiana appellate courts.

Agenda

SESSION 1 – The Life Cycle of a Civil Rights Case | 1:00pm – 2:00pm

This session walks through the life cycle of a civil rights case, beginning with the basics of 42 USC 1983. It then turns to the qualified immunity considerations that arise as the case moves forward, the interlocutory appeals those rulings can trigger, and what it takes to prove Monell claims.

BREAK | 2:00pm – 2:10pm

SESSION 2 – Qualified Immunity: Key Problems and Why Textualism Should Eliminate It | 2:10pm – 3:10pm

This session opens with what qualified immunity is and how it works. It then examines how recent research shows the doctrine contradicts the original text of Section 1983, whether it is historically supported, and whether it is good policy — and why textualism should eliminate it.

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

California

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Florida

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 General Hours

Receive CLE credit in Florida via attorney submission.
Georgia

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Illinois

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Indiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
2 Substantive

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maryland

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Michigan

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Minnesota

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Missouri

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
120 General minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Nevada

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Pennsylvania

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Tennessee

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Virginia

Not Eligible
2 General Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 Law & Legal Hours

Receive CLE credit in Washington via attorney submission.
Wisconsin

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
2.4 General

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
The AI Skills Every Attorney Needs: Think, Prompt, Win
The AI Skills Every Attorney Needs: Think, Prompt, Win Thu, July 30, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay