When AI Notetakers Break Privilege in Internal Investigations

Elizabeth Schlissel
Elizabeth Schlissel
Falcon Rappaport & Berkman

Elizabeth E. Schlissel is a Partner and Chair of the Labor & Employment Practice Group at Falcon Rappaport & Berkman LLP, where she is also a member of the firm's Healthcare Practice Group. She represents clients in employment litigation, investigations, regulatory matters, and other aspects of employment law.

Daryl T. Caffarone
Daryl T. Caffarone
Falcon Rappaport & Berkman

Daryl T. Caffarone, Esq. is an Associate in Falcon Rappaport & Berkman's Corporate & Securities, Intellectual Property, and Cannabis & Psychedelics Practice Groups. Her practice spans a broad range of areas but is particularly focused on corporate transactions, including mergers and acquisitions, joint ventures, private placements, corporate finance, and licensing.

Live Video-Broadcast: July 16, 2026

2 hour CLE

Tuition: $195.00
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

AI notetakers, applicant screeners, and HR analytics platforms now sit inside the internal investigation, recording witness interviews and generating logs no one treats as discoverable until a subpoena forces the question. United States v. Heppner (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 2026) drew the enterprise-versus-consumer privilege line, the DOJ's September 2024 ECCP update made documenting AI risk a condition of cooperation credit, and the Mobley, Otter.ai, and Eightfold AI litigations established direct vendor liability under Title VII, ADEA, ECPA, CIPA, and BIPA. Any attorney running an investigation, defending an employment claim, or advising on a SaaS stack is already exposed; consumer-grade transcription tools waive privilege and trigger wiretap and biometric claims by default. The program maps each statutory trigger against the tools in a client's stack, applies Kovel and Upjohn to third-party AI vendors, and delivers a vendor inventory memo and a thirty-day SaaS remediation playbook, zero-retention riders, model-training carve-outs, consent retrofits, and the DOJ-credit compliance memo. Attendees leave able to preserve privilege, authenticate or challenge AI outputs under FRE 901 and proposed Rule 707, and build the compliance record before enforcement arrives.

What Will You Learn

Attorneys will learn to identify which AI tools create discoverable records, waive privilege, or raise third-party claims, and how Mobley, Otter.ai, Heppner, and Eightfold AI define the liability perimeter.

What Will You Gain

Attorneys will gain a vendor inventory memo and a sequenced thirty-day SaaS remediation framework they can deploy immediately against an existing AI tool stack.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Privilege destruction
    AI platforms destroy attorney-client privilege and work product under the Heppner ruling.
  • Wiretap exposure
    AI notetakers create ECPA and CIPA exposure as unauthorized third-party interceptors.
  • Biometric liability
    BIPA liability covers voiceprints, employer deployment, and the Seventh Circuit damages cap.
  • Agent liability
    Vendor-as-agent liability under Title VII, ADEA, and ADA — Mobley v. Workday and EEOC amicus.
  • Consumer reports
    AI scoring outputs become consumer reports under FCRA and ICRAA, triggering pre-adverse-action obligations.
  • ECCP compliance
    The DOJ September 2024 ECCP requires documenting AI risk before the subpoena arrives.

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Date / Time: July 16, 2026

  • 1:00 pm – 3:10 pm Eastern
  • 12:00 pm – 2:10 pm Central
  • 11:00 am – 1:10 pm Mountain
  • 10:00 am – 12:10 pm Pacific

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Elizabeth Schlissel, Partner, Chair | Falcon Rappaport & Berkman

Elizabeth E. Schlissel is a Partner and Chair of the Labor & Employment Practice Group at Falcon Rappaport & Berkman LLP, where she is also a member of the firm’s Healthcare Practice Group. She represents clients in employment litigation, investigations, regulatory matters, and other aspects of employment law. Her practice spans representing companies in employment litigation in state and federal court, counseling employers and HR executives on compliance with federal, state, and local employment laws, conducting internal workplace investigations, and advising both employers and employees across a broad range of employment matters. She also has significant experience representing large healthcare networks in employment law matters.

  • Education & Credentials

Elizabeth completed her education at Boston University and Hofstra University School of Law. She is admitted to practice in the State of New York, as well as before the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York and the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.

  • Recognition & Leadership

Elizabeth serves as Chair of Falcon Rappaport & Berkman’s Labor & Employment Practice Group, a leadership position reflecting her standing within the firm’s employment practice. She holds the role of Partner at the firm.

  • Professional Involvement

As a member of the firm’s Healthcare Practice Group, Elizabeth’s involvement extends to representing hospital systems, physician groups, and hospital administrators in employment law matters. She regularly conducts on-site and remote video trainings with employees and management to prevent sexual harassment and discrimination and to promote appropriate responses by management to workplace complaints. She is also featured in the firm’s “Employment Edge with Liz” podcast series addressing employment law topics.

  • Experience

Elizabeth represents companies in all types of employment litigation in state and federal court, including wage and hour matters, discrimination, workplace harassment, retaliation, hostile work environment, breach of employment contracts and restrictive covenants, and failure to accommodate disabilities. She regularly represents employers in discrimination matters before the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the New York State Division of Human Rights, and the New York City Commission on Human Rights, and defends businesses in Americans with Disabilities Act lawsuits regarding premises and websites. She counsels employers, management teams, and HR executives on compliance and personnel matters, drafts and updates employee handbooks and policies, and represents healthcare networks in employment matters. Elizabeth conducts internal workplace investigations involving sexual harassment, discrimination, retaliation, misconduct, workplace assault, and employee theft, and represents employers in U.S. and New York State Department of Labor audits. She also counsels’ employees on offer letters, employment agreements, restrictive covenant agreements, and separation agreements.

 

Daryl T. Caffarone, Associate | Falcon Rappaport & Berkman

Daryl T. Caffarone, Esq. is an Associate in Falcon Rappaport & Berkman’s Corporate & Securities, Intellectual Property, and Cannabis & Psychedelics Practice Groups. Her practice spans a broad range of areas but is particularly focused on corporate transactions, including mergers and acquisitions, joint ventures, private placements, corporate finance, and licensing. She advises clients on intellectual property matters with a focus on compliance and registrations and addresses regulatory and transactional issues in the cannabis industry. She also assists the firm’s Taxation Practice Group with corporate and partnership reorganizations.

  • Education & Credentials

Daryl earned a Bachelor of Arts in political science and philosophy from New York University and a Juris Doctor from the Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University. She is admitted to practice in the State of New York.

  • Recognition & Leadership

While in law school, Daryl served as Editor-in-Chief of Volume 23 of the Journal of International Business and Law.

  • Professional Involvement

During law school, Daryl served as a research assistant for several articles concerned with constitutional law and First Amendment rights. She authored a published article, “Ireland’s Tax Code May Be Changing, But One Thing Remains: How Capital Allowances For Intangible Assets Continue to Draw Tech Giants to the Emerald Isle,” which appeared in the Journal of International Business and Law.

  • Experience

Daryl concentrates on her practice in corporate transactions, including mergers and acquisitions, joint ventures, private placements, corporate finance, and licensing. Within the Intellectual Property Practice Group, she advises clients on a variety of IP matters, with a focus on compliance and registration. Within the Cannabis & Psychedelics Practice Group, she focuses on regulatory and transactional issues in the cannabis industry. She additionally assists the Taxation Practice Group with corporate and partnership reorganizations.

Agenda

SESSION 1 – AI Tools as Third-Party Interceptors and Employer Agents | 1:00pm – 2:00pm

This session maps the statutory regimes Title VII, ADEA, ECPA, CIPA, and BIPA triggered when AI tools enter investigations, using Mobley, Otter.ai, and Heppner to define the vendor liability perimeter and build a vendor inventory memo.

BREAK | 2:00pm – 2:10pm

SESSION 2 – Privilege Defense, AI Discovery, and SaaS Contract Remediation | 2:10pm – 3:10pm

This session defends privilege when interviews run through AI vendors, applying Kovel and Upjohn, answering FRCP 34 and 45 demands, authenticating outputs under FRE 901 and Rule 707, and executing a thirty-day SaaS remediation playbook.

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

California

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Florida

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 General Hours

Receive CLE credit in Florida via attorney submission.
Georgia

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Illinois

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Indiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
2 Substantive

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maryland

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Michigan

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Minnesota

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Missouri

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
120 General minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Nevada

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Pennsylvania

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Tennessee

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Virginia

Not Eligible
2 General Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 Law & Legal Hours

Receive CLE credit in Washington via attorney submission.
Wisconsin

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
2.4 General

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
Professionalism and Civility (2026 Edition)
Professionalism and Civility (2026 Edition) Fri, June 19, 2026
Live Webcast
Employment Liability in Class Litigation
Employment Liability in Class Litigation Tue, June 23, 2026
Live Webcast
The AI Chatbot Wiretap Class Action Wave
The AI Chatbot Wiretap Class Action Wave Fri, June 26, 2026
Live Webcast
iPad for Lawyers: The Complete Mobile Practice Toolkit
iPad for Lawyers: The Complete Mobile Practice Toolkit Mon, June 29, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay
Playing Defense at 30(b)(6) Depositions (2026 Edition)
Playing Defense at 30(b)(6) Depositions (2026 Edition) Mon, June 29, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay
Creating a Trial Notebook: From A-Z (2025 Edition)
Creating a Trial Notebook: From A-Z (2025 Edition) Tue, June 30, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay
A, B, C’s of Revocable and Irrevocable Trusts
A, B, C’s of Revocable and Irrevocable Trusts Tue, June 30, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay