Beneficiary Designations Override the Trust: Coordinating Retirement Accounts, Life Insurance, and TOD Registrations

Mark D. DeBofsky
Mark D. DeBofsky
DeBofsky Law, Ltd

Mark DeBofsky is a Chicago-based attorney and one of the country's leading practitioners in ERISA law, disability insurance, and employee benefits litigation. He is the founding partner of DeBofsky Law, Ltd. (previously known through iterations as DeBofsky & Associates and DeBofsky, Sherman & Casciari), a firm that concentrates on representing individuals whose disability, health, and life insurance claims have been denied.

Barry Salkin
Barry Salkin
The Wagner Law Group

Barry Salkin is Of Counsel at The Wagner Law Group, resident in the firm's New York office, where he concentrates his practice in ERISA and employee benefits law. Before joining the firm, he served as counsel and senior attorney at leading Manhattan law firms. His clients have included multi-national corporations, closely held companies, financial institutions, governmental agencies, investment groups, hospitals, physicians' organizations, tax-exempt organizations, and high-net-worth individuals.

Live Video-Broadcast: September 1, 2026

2 hour CLE

Tuition: $195.00
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

 

The designation decides who inherits. SECURE 2.0 decides what they keep

The first program established that the beneficiary form — not the will or trust — controls who inherits retirement accounts. Once the designation controls, the analysis has only begun. The post-SECURE Act and SECURE 2.0 regime now dictates what the named beneficiary actually receives, when, and at what tax cost.

The choice of beneficiary now drives the payout timeline and the income tax result. Name a spouse, and rollover versus inherited IRA elections set the schedule. Name a trust, and demanding see-through requirements decide the outcome. Death before or after the required beginning date changes the annual RMDs inside the 10-year window. Accumulation trusts run into compressed trust brackets; qualified plans add the ERISA overlay of QJSA/QPSA spousal consent.

This session delivers the working framework. Attendees master the post-SECURE beneficiary hierarchy, the five eligible designated beneficiary categories, and the spousal elections. They leave able to structure designations and trust terms that work after death, not just on paper.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Post-SECURE Beneficiary Hierarchy
    Distinguish designated from non-designated beneficiaries and apply the five categories of eligible designated beneficiaries (EDBs).
  • The 10-Year Rule
    Apply annual RMDs within the 10-year window under the final RMD regulations, distinguishing deaths before and after the required beginning date.
  • Spousal Beneficiary Elections
    Choose between the rollover and inherited IRA election and apply the SECURE 2.0 “spouse as employee” election.
  • Trusts as Beneficiaries
    Meet see-through trust requirements and select conduit versus accumulation trusts, including trusts for minors and disabled or chronically ill beneficiaries (SNTs).
  • The ERISA Overlay
    Navigate QJSA/QPSA spousal consent, plan document terms, and nonspouse rollovers where qualified plans diverge from IRAs.
  • Tax Traps and Responses
    Counter compressed trust brackets with qualified disclaimers, the IRD deduction, and Roth accounts under SECURE 2.0.

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Date / Time: September 1, 2026

  • 2:30 pm – 4:40 pm Eastern
  • 1:30 pm – 3:40 pm Central
  • 12:30 pm – 2:40 pm Mountain
  • 11:30 am – 1:40 pm Pacific

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Mark D. DeBofsky, Founding Partner | DeBofsky Law, Ltd

Mark DeBofsky is a Chicago-based attorney and one of the country’s leading practitioners in ERISA law, disability insurance, and employee benefits litigation. He is the founding partner of DeBofsky Law, Ltd. (previously known through iterations as DeBofsky & Associates and DeBofsky, Sherman & Casciari), a firm that concentrates on representing individuals whose disability, health, and life insurance claims have been denied.

  • Education & Credentials

DeBofsky earned a B.A. from the University of Michigan in 1977, then went on to law school, graduating from the University of Illinois College of Law in 1980. He was admitted to practice law that same year and has now practiced for over four decades.

  • Recognition & Leadership

DeBofsky’s professional accolades are extensive. He has been selected to the Super Lawyers list for 20 consecutive years as of 2025, and has been repeatedly named among the Top 10 and Top 100 Illinois Lawyers, in addition to being the subject of a Super Lawyers feature story. He was named to the 2026 edition of The Best Lawyers in America®, one of the legal profession’s most respected peer-review honors. He has been ranked among the top five percent of Illinois attorneys in Social Security Disability law by the Leading Lawyers Network and has earned Martindale-Hubbell’s AV® Preeminent™ peer review rating.

  • Professional Involvement

Alongside his legal practice, DeBofsky has taught as an adjunct professor of law, serving at the University of Illinois-Chicago School of Law (formerly John Marshall Law School) from 2000 to 2022. His public service work includes completing an appointment to a task force selected by Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker to study mental health parity issues in disability insurance, after which he received a three-year appointment to the U.S. Department of Labor’s ERISA Advisory Council in 2023.

DeBofsky is a prolific legal author. He has been a regular columnist for Law360 since 2020 and for the Chicago Daily Law Bulletin since 2004. He also contributes annually to the ERISA Survey of Federal Circuits published by the American Bar Association, has served for many years as a senior editor of Employee Benefits Law published by Bloomberg, and was recently appointed to the editorial board of Bender’s Labor & Employment Bulletin (LEXIS-NEXIS). He is also a frequent lecturer at conferences hosted by organizations such as the American Bar Association, the American Association for Justice, the Illinois State Bar Association, the Illinois Institute of Continuing Legal Education, the Chicago Bar Association, and LexisNexis/Mealey’s.

  • Experience

DeBofsky has built his career primarily around ERISA (Employee Retirement Income Security Act) litigation, insurance coverage disputes, and employment litigation on behalf of plaintiffs. Many of his cases have produced precedent-setting decisions issued by the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the Third, Seventh, Eighth, and Ninth Circuits. In 2008, he was nominated as a finalist for LexisNexis’ Insurance Law Center Policyholder Attorney of the Year award.

DeBofsky continues to practice at DeBofsky Law in Chicago, representing professionals, executives, and policyholders whose disability or insurance claims have been denied or wrongfully terminated, and remains active as a public commentator — including recent appearances discussing the complexities of disability insurance coverage for high-income professionals.

 

Barry Salkin, Of Counsel | The Wagner Law Group

Barry Salkin is Of Counsel at The Wagner Law Group, resident in the firm’s New York office, where he concentrates his practice in ERISA and employee benefits law. Before joining the firm, he served as counsel and senior attorney at leading Manhattan law firms. His clients have included multi-national corporations, closely held companies, financial institutions, governmental agencies, investment groups, hospitals, physicians’ organizations, tax-exempt organizations, and high-net-worth individuals.

  • Education & Credentials

Mr. Salkin earned his J.D., cum laude, from Harvard Law School in 1977. He also holds a Ph.D. (1974) and an M.A. (1969) in American History from Harvard University, and received his B.A. in History, summa cum laude, from Rutgers University in 1968, where he was class valedictorian. He is admitted to practice in New York and before the U.S. Tax Court, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

  • Recognition & Leadership

Mr. Salkin has been a Fellow of the American College of Employee Benefits Counsel since 2006. He has been named to the New York Super Lawyers list each year since 2011 and has been listed in Who’s Who in America since 2020. His pro bono service has also been recognized: he received Pro Bono Partnership’s Volunteer of the Year award in 2010 and was recognized as a founding volunteer attorney of that organization in 2017.

  • Professional Involvement

Mr. Salkin is a co-author of the IRA Answer Book and serves on the editorial board of the Journal of Pension Planning & Compliance and the editorial advisory board of the Benefits Law Journal. Since 2000, he has served on the Legal Advisory Counsel of the National Association of Professional Employer Organizations. A prolific author, he has published dozens of articles on ERISA and employee benefits topics in publications including the Benefits Law Journal, Bloomberg Tax’s Compensation Planning Journal, the New York University Review of Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation, 401(k) Advisor, and LexisNexis Practical Guidance, including recent analyses of the Roth catch-up contribution requirement under the SECURE 2.0 Act, pooled employer plans, and the Department of Labor’s Voluntary Fiduciary Correction Program. He is also a frequent speaker, with presentations for the Pennsylvania Bar Institute, Strafford, The Knowledge Group, and the National Association of Professional Employer Organizations.

  • Experience

Mr. Salkin has significant experience in drafting, amending, and negotiating the full range of employee benefit plans, including defined benefit pension plans, profit sharing plans, 401(k) plans, and both qualified and non-qualified deferred compensation programs. His practice also encompasses group medical and health plans, including Health Care Reform, HIPAA, and COBRA matters, as well as executive compensation, fiduciary compliance, ERISA audits, and ERISA litigation. His work extends to tax-exempt organizations and to bankruptcy and restructuring matters involving employee benefit plans.

Agenda

SESSION 1 – After the Designation: SECURE 2.0, the 10-Year Rule, and Trusts as Beneficiaries of Retirement Accounts | 2:30pm – 3:30pm

The first program established that the beneficiary form—not the will or trust—controls who receives retirement accounts, life insurance, and TOD assets. This session takes the next step: once the designation controls, what does the named beneficiary actually receive, when, and at what tax cost? Barry Salkin walks practitioners through the post-SECURE Act and SECURE 2.0 distribution regime for inherited retirement accounts, including the final RMD regulations, the 10-year rule, eligible designated beneficiary categories, spousal elections, and the demanding requirements for naming trusts—conduit or accumulation—as retirement account beneficiaries. Attendees will learn how the choice of beneficiary drives the payout timeline and income tax result, and how to structure designations and trust terms so the client’s plan works after death, not just on paper.

BREAK | 3:30pm – 3:40pm ET

SESSION 2 – Recent Litigation Involving Disputes Over Beneficiary Designations and Lessons Learned | 3:40pm – 4:40pm

This session examines recent litigation involving beneficiary designations, retirement and life insurance benefits, marriage and divorce, powers of attorney, slayer statutes, and interpleader actions, highlighting key court rulings, practical lessons, and strategies for avoiding beneficiary designation disputes before they arise.

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

California

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Florida

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 General Hours

Receive CLE credit in Florida via attorney submission.
Georgia

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Illinois

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Indiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
2 Substantive

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maryland

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Michigan

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Minnesota

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Missouri

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
120 General minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Nevada

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Pennsylvania

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Tennessee

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Virginia

Not Eligible
2 General Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 Law & Legal Hours

Receive CLE credit in Washington via attorney submission.
Wisconsin

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
2.4 General

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
iPad for Lawyers: The Complete Mobile Practice Toolkit
iPad for Lawyers: The Complete Mobile Practice Toolkit Wed, August 26, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay
When AI Notetakers Break Privilege in Internal Investigations
When AI Notetakers Break Privilege in Internal Investigations Fri, August 28, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay