AI Voice and the TCPA: Bringing and Defending the New Class Actions

Ryan L. McBride
Ryan L. McBride
Kazerouni Law Group, APC

Ryan McBride is a partner at Kazerouni Law Group, APC, where he manages the firm’s San Diego office and carries a caseload of class action, mass tort, and complex civil matters across the five states in which he is licensed: Arizona, California, Washington, Utah, and Florida. His practice centers on consumer protection, and he recently argued a successful appeal before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.

Brittany Andres
Brittany Andres
Troutman Amin, LLP

Brittany Andres is an attorney at Troutman Amin, LLP, the Irvine, California-based complex litigation and privacy firm, where her practice focuses on class action defense litigation under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) and related compliance counseling. The National Law Review has designated her a “Go-To Thought Leader” in Telecom Law. Known throughout the TCPAWorld as “the Baroness,” she brings a performer’s composure to high-stakes litigation, having competed as a world-class dancer before entering the practice of law.

Live Video-Broadcast: August 21, 2026

2 hour CLE

Tuition: $195.00
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

 

One FCC ruling turned every AI voice call into a class action trigger — for both sides

The FCC’s February 2024 Declaratory Ruling created an independent liability trigger for AI-generated voice calls. A first-wave case docket is already forming, and an emerging platform liability theory now targets technology providers. TCPA litigation no longer stops at the caller.

Structure a class definition well and it captures an entire vendor ecosystem. Deploy statutory damages math and settlement leverage multiplies. Miss the critical steps at the outset of litigation and the defense loses its best liability and class certification challenges. Consent attacks and vicarious liability chains decide who pays.

This program works both sides of the case. Plaintiff-side attorneys leave with the class action architecture, damages framework, and consent attack strategies to pursue AI voice callers. Defense counsel leave with a practical playbook — what to do, and what to avoid, in the TCPAWorld — plus current SMS trends.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • AI Voice Liability Trigger
    The FCC’s February 2024 Declaratory Ruling makes AI-generated voice calls an independent TCPA liability trigger.
  • First-Wave Case Docket
    A working survey of the first-wave docket and the pleading strategies driving TCPA class actions against AI voice callers.
  • Class Definitions and Consent
    How to structure class definitions that capture entire vendor ecosystems and mount consent attacks across vicarious liability chains.
  • Damages and Settlement Leverage
    How to deploy statutory damages math to maximize settlement leverage, including the emerging platform liability theory targeting technology providers.
  • Defense Litigation Playbook
    The critical steps from the outset of litigation that position the defense to challenge liability and class certification.
  • SMS Trends
    Current SMS trends and practical guidance on what to do, and what to avoid, in the TCPAWorld.

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Date / Time: August 21, 2026

  • 1:00 pm – 3:10 pm Eastern
  • 12:00 pm – 2:10 pm Central
  • 11:00 am – 1:10 pm Mountain
  • 10:00 am – 12:10 pm Pacific

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Ryan L. McBride, Partner | Kazerouni Law Group, APC

Ryan McBride is a partner at Kazerouni Law Group, APC, where he manages the firm’s San Diego office and carries a caseload of class action, mass tort, and complex civil matters across the five states in which he is licensed: Arizona, California, Washington, Utah, and Florida. His practice centers on consumer protection, and he recently argued a successful appeal before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.

  • Education & Credentials

Mr. McBride earned his law degree from Thomas Jefferson School of Law in San Diego, where he served as President of the Sports Law Society, as Academics Director for the Student Bar Association, and as a member of the National Sports Law Negotiation Competition Team. He graduated cum laude from Arizona State University, where he was a Pat Tillman Scholar, played #1 singles and doubles on the tennis team, and served as President of the Student-Athlete Advisory Committee; he later earned a master’s degree from ASU. He is admitted to practice in Arizona, California, Utah, Washington, and Florida, as well as before the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.

  • Recognition & Leadership

Mr. McBride’s honors include the Wiley W. Manuel Certificate for Pro Bono Legal Services and the Pat Tillman Community Leadership Award, which he received alongside the Arizona Cardinals’ Taitusi “Deuce” Lutui and the Phoenix Coyotes’ Shane Doan. He was named a partner at Kazerouni Law Group in 2023.

  • Professional Involvement

Mr. McBride is a member of the Maricopa County Bar Association, the San Diego County Bar Association, and the American Bar Association. Before law school he served in the Teach For America Corps while completing his master’s degree, and after law school he volunteered at a local domestic violence restraining order clinic. He is conversant in Spanish.

  • Experience

Mr. McBride began his legal career by founding and running his own law firm before joining Kazerouni Law Group. He now manages the firm’s San Diego location and a multi-state caseload of class action, mass tort, and complex civil cases, with a focus on consumer protection.

 

Brittany Andres, Attorney | Troutman Amin, LLP

Brittany Andres is an attorney at Troutman Amin, LLP, the Irvine, Californiabased complex litigation and privacy firm, where her practice focuses on class action defense litigation under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) and related compliance counseling. The National Law Review has designated her a “Go-To Thought Leader” in Telecom Law. Known throughout the TCPAWorld as “the Baroness,” she brings a performer’s composure to high-stakes litigation, having competed as a world-class dancer before entering the practice of law.

  • Education & Credentials

Ms. Andres earned her Juris Doctor from Chapman University, Dale E. Fowler School of Law, and her Bachelor of Arts in Psychology from the University of California, Irvine.

  • Recognition & Leadership

The National Law Review named Ms. Andres a 2022 Go-To Thought Leader in telecommunications law, citing in part her widely read analysis of the Rocket Mortgage TCPA class action and its ATDS allegations.

  • Professional Involvement

Ms. Andres is a regular author at TCPAWorld.com, the firm’s nationally followed publication on TCPA litigation and compliance developments, and a contributing author at insideARM, where her coverage has addressed ATDS rulings arising from debt collection calls.

  • Experience

Ms. Andres has extensive experience handling high-exposure and complex cases from inception to resolution. Her defense-side TCPA practice and commentary span class certification, ATDS, and consent issues, with published case analyses including Dickson v. Direct Energy and Jackson v. Direct Building Supplies.

Agenda

SESSION 1 – Building TCPA Class Actions in the Age of AI | 1:00pm – 2:00pm

This session equips plaintiff-side attorneys with the legal foundation, class action architecture, and damages framework needed to bring TCPA class actions against AI voice callers. Attendees will learn how the FCC’s February 2024 Declaratory Ruling created an independent liability trigger for AI-generated voice calls, how to structure class definitions that capture entire vendor ecosystems, and how to deploy statutory damages math to maximize settlement leverage. Attorneys will leave with a working understanding of the first-wave case docket, viable consent attack strategies, and the emerging platform liability theory targeting technology providers.

BREAK | 2:00pm – 2:10pm

SESSION 2 – Litigation Strategies: A Defense Playbook to Winning a TCPA Lawsuit | 2:10pm – 3:10pm

In this session, take a deep dive into the key strategies for successfully defending a TCPA class action lawsuit. Learn the critical steps to take from the outset of litigation and how to position you defense to challenge liability and class certification. This session will provide practical guidance on what to do, and what to avoid, when navigating the complex TCPA world.

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

California

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Florida

Pending CLE Approval
2 General Hours

Georgia

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Illinois

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Indiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
2 Substantive

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maryland

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Michigan

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Minnesota

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Missouri

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
120 General minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Nevada

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Pennsylvania

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Tennessee

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Virginia

Not Eligible
2 General Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 Law & Legal Hours

Receive CLE credit in Washington via attorney submission.
Wisconsin

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
2.4 General

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
iPad for Lawyers: The Complete Mobile Practice Toolkit
iPad for Lawyers: The Complete Mobile Practice Toolkit Wed, August 26, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay
When AI Notetakers Break Privilege in Internal Investigations
When AI Notetakers Break Privilege in Internal Investigations Fri, August 28, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay