Defending TCPA and State Mini-TCPA Text-Message Class Actions After McLaughlin

Irina N. Kashcheyeva
Virginia Bell Flynn
Chad R. Fuller
Irina N. Kashcheyeva | Foley & Lardner LLP
Virginia Bell Flynn | Troutman Pepper Locke LLP
Chad R. Fuller | Troutman Pepper Locke LLP

Live Video-Broadcast: August 28, 2026

2 hour CLE

Tuition: $195.00
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

The Supreme Court's 2025 decision in McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates v. McKesson Corp. ended reliance on prior FCC consent guidance. In the post-Chevron environment, district courts now split on whether text messages are 'telephone calls' under § 227(c)(5). The rules that governed text-message programs for years no longer bind the courts hearing these cases.

Send a marketing text without a defensible consent record, and a class action may follow. Miss a revocation under the FCC's April 2025 opt-out rules, and exposure compounds. Florida, Oklahoma, Washington, Maryland, and Texas mini-TCPA statutes open a second front. Those state claims can survive even when the federal claims are dismissed.

Attendees leave with a concrete framework for consent capture, revocation processing, recordkeeping retention, and state-by-state compliance mapping. They also gain a practical playbook for standing challenges, the texts-are-not-telephone-calls dismissal argument, arbitration and class-certification defenses, early-exit motions, and informed settlement benchmarking.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Post-McLaughlin Deference
    How the Supreme Court's 2025 McLaughlin decision ends reliance on prior FCC consent guidance and reshapes both compliance programs and pending TCPA defense strategy.
  • Consent Record Architecture
    What a consent capture record must contain — and how to document and segregate consent — to survive a class action challenge at summary judgment.
  • Revocation Rule Compliance
    How the FCC's April 2025 opt-out and revocation rules change the technical and operational infrastructure a texting program must maintain.
  • Standing And Dismissal
    When Article III concrete-injury challenges and the emerging texts-are-not-telephone-calls argument under § 227(c)(5) can end a single- or multi-text case early.
  • Class Certification Defenses
    Which consent-individualization, ascertainability, predominance, and arbitration defenses courts are actually sustaining, and how they inform settlement benchmarking.
  • State Mini-TCPA Exposure
    How Florida, Oklahoma, Washington, Maryland, and Texas statutes impose consent and recordkeeping requirements stricter than the federal baseline and create second-front risk even after federal dismissal.

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Date / Time: August 28, 2026

  • 1:00 pm – 3:10 pm Eastern
  • 12:00 pm – 2:10 pm Central
  • 11:00 am – 1:10 pm Mountain
  • 10:00 am – 12:10 pm Pacific

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Irina N. Kashcheyeva, Partner | Foley & Lardner LLP

Irina N. Kashcheyeva is a partner in Foley & Lardner LLP’s Detroit office and a member of the firm’s Consumer Law, Finance and Class Action Working Group and its Business Litigation & Dispute Resolution Practice Group. A commercial litigator, she defends companies in class action and single-plaintiff cases under the TCPA, the FCRA, the FDCPA and Regulation F, UDAAP theories, the FTC Holder Rule, and a range of state consumer protection and privacy statutes, with regular work for clients in the healthcare, financial services, and automotive manufacturing sectors.

  • Education & Credentials

Irina earned her law degree from Michigan State University College of Law, where her scholarship appeared in the Michigan State Law Review. Before entering private practice, she served as a law clerk to two federal judges, at the district court and court of appeals levels. She is fluent in Russian.

  • Recognition & Leadership

Irina was elected to the Foley & Lardner partnership effective February 1, 2023, as part of a class of 23 lawyers recognized as leaders across the firm’s practice groups and offices.

  • Professional Involvement

Irina writes frequently on consumer protection and TCPA developments. Her publications include analyses of the D.C. Circuit’s decision limiting the reach of the TCPA, the vacatur of the FCC’s One-to-One Consent Rule the day before it was set to take effect, standing arguments in data breach litigation, and requirements-contract law in the Michigan Business Law Journal and on Foley’s Consumer Defense Counsel blog.

  • Experience

Irina’s experience includes first-chairing arbitration hearings and court trials, preparing successful dispositive motions, opposing class certification, and handling the full range of discovery motion practice. She obtained dismissal of a putative TCPA class action against a marketing company at the pleadings stage by defeating agency and vicarious liability allegations, and she represented a Fortune 50 pharmacy in one of the largest TCPA class actions in the country, securing voluntary dismissal with prejudice on the eve of the class certification and summary judgment hearing. She has also first-chaired a lengthy arbitration for a pharmacy benefit manager in a significant breach of contract and business torts dispute.

 

Virginia Bell Flynn, Partner | Troutman Pepper Locke LLP

Virginia Bell Flynn is a partner in Troutman Pepper Locke’s Consumer Financial Services practice, within the Financial Services Litigation group. She represents clients in federal and state courts at both the trial and appellate levels in complex litigation and business disputes, health care litigation — including ERISA and out-of-network issues — and consumer litigation spanning more than 21 states. She has a long track record of resolving cases under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act and its state analogues, and increasingly counsels clients on compliance at the intersection of the TCPA and HIPAA.

  • Education & Credentials

Virginia received her J.D. from Washington and Lee University School of Law and her B.A. from The College of Charleston. Before joining the firm, she served as a judicial law clerk to the Honorable R. Terrence Ney of the 19th Judicial Circuit in Fairfax, Virginia.

  • Recognition & Leadership

Virginia has been recognized in Best Lawyers in America® for Consumer Law, Commercial Litigation, Health Care Law, and Mass Tort Litigation/Class Actions – Defendants, and she received a 2019 Law360 Rising Star award in consumer protection law, selected from more than 1,300 nominees as one of 175 attorneys under 40. She also serves as a co-leader of the Consumer Financial Services practice group’s AI task force.

  • Professional Involvement

Virginia writes and speaks regularly on TCPA developments, co-authoring an early analysis of McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates, Inc. v. McKesson Corp. for the American Bar Association’s Consumer Litigation Newsletter and appearing on The Consumer Finance Podcast’s TCPA year-in-review episodes. Her commentary has also appeared in Law360 and on the firm’s Consumer Financial Services Law Monitor.

  • Experience

Virginia’s results include summary judgment for Anthem, Inc. in a first-of-its-kind TCPA prerecorded-message putative class action in the Northern District of Ohio; dismissal with prejudice of a TCPA putative class action over informational health care text messages in the Eastern District of Louisiana; dismissal with prejudice at the pleadings stage of a putative TCPA class action for a California-based medical group; and defeat of class certification in a Rosenthal Act class action. She serves as compliance counsel on TCPA and TSR issues for national health insurers, pharmacies, banks, debt collectors, advertising and broadcasting companies, and other consumer-facing businesses.

 

Chad R. Fuller, Partner | Troutman Pepper Locke LLP

Chad R. Fuller is a partner in Troutman Pepper Locke’s San Diego office and a versatile litigator whose practice spans the managed care and financial services sectors. He defends insurers, managed care organizations, and financial services clients in single-plaintiff and multidistrict matters, and he defends clients against claims under the federal consumer protection statutes, especially the Telephone Consumer Protection Act and the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. His systematic approach to high-stakes litigation draws on experience managing hundreds of TCPA cases.

  • Education & Credentials

Chad earned his J.D. from the University of San Diego School of Law and his B.A. from the University of California, San Diego. He is admitted to practice in California.

  • Recognition & Leadership

Chad is recognized in Best Lawyers in America® for Commercial Litigation. As one of the few attorneys in the United States who tries TCPA cases to verdict, he is go-to counsel for financial services clients facing major consumer class action litigation.

  • Professional Involvement

Chad writes and speaks frequently on TCPA developments. His recent co-authored work includes “Why Does the TCPA Equal Chaos? The US Supreme Court Opens FCC Orders to New Challenges,” an early analysis of McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates, Inc. v. McKesson Corp. for the American Bar Association’s Consumer Litigation Newsletter, and an examination of the Eleventh Circuit’s reopening of the TCPA “lead generator loophole.” He is a regular guest on The Consumer Finance Podcast’s TCPA year-in-review episodes.

  • Experience

Chad serves as lead trial counsel in complex managed health care litigation involving bad faith, breach of contract, improper billing, Mental Health Parity Act, and out-of-network claims. He has defended consumer class actions alleging false advertising, product defects, and improper fees for software, telecommunications, home warranty, insurance brokerage, and auto finance companies, and he defends clients in privacy and data security litigation while advising on associated regulatory issues. His results include dismissal with prejudice at the pleadings stage of a putative TCPA class action for a California-based medical group under the FCC’s emergency-purpose exception.

Agenda

SESSION 1 – Defending TCPA Text Class Actions: Standing, Dismissal, and Settlement | 12:00pm – 1:00pm

This session covers defense-side litigation strategy for TCPA and state mini-TCPA text-message class actions following the Supreme Court’s 2025 decision in McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates v. McKesson Corp. Attorneys will learn how to deploy standing challenges, the emerging texts-versus-telephone-calls dismissal argument, arbitration and class-certification defenses, and state mini-TCPA exposure analysis. Attendees will leave with a practical framework for early-exit motions, class-cert opposition, and informed settlement benchmarking.

BREAK | 1:00pm – 1:10pm

SESSION 2 – Building a Defensible Text-Messaging Consent and Compliance Record | 1:10pm – 2:10pm

This session examines how to construct a text-messaging consent and compliance record that will withstand TCPA litigation and regulatory scrutiny in the post-McLaughlin, post-Chevron environment. Attorneys will learn how the Supreme Court’s 2025 McLaughlin decision, the growing circuit split on whether texts are statutory ‘calls,’ revised FCC revocation rules, and a patchwork of state mini-TCPA statutes collectively reshape what a defensible consent record must contain. Attendees will leave with a concrete framework for consent capture, revocation processing, recordkeeping retention, and state-by-state compliance mapping.

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska's recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

California

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Florida

Approved via Attorney Submission
2.5 General Hours

Receive CLE credit in Florida via Attorney Submission.
Georgia

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Illinois

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Indiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
2 Substantive

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maryland

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Michigan

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Minnesota

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Missouri

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

The Federal Bar Association reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney's behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
120 General Minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey's recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Nevada

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Pennsylvania

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Tennessee

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 Law and Legal Hours

Receive CLE credit in Washington via Attorney Submission. myLawCLE will supply Washington state attorneys with instructions on how to gain credit.
Wisconsin

Pending CLE Approval
2.4 General

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
2.4 General

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
A, B, C’s of Revocable and Irrevocable Trusts
A, B, C’s of Revocable and Irrevocable Trusts Thu, July 9, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay
Branding for Firms: Ethics & Strategy
Branding for Firms: Ethics & Strategy Thu, July 16, 2026
Live Webcast
Using AI in Your Law Practice: A Step-by-Step Guide
Using AI in Your Law Practice: A Step-by-Step Guide Wed, July 22, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay
iPad for Lawyers: The Complete Mobile Practice Toolkit
iPad for Lawyers: The Complete Mobile Practice Toolkit Thu, July 23, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay
The AI Skills Every Attorney Needs: Think, Prompt, Win
The AI Skills Every Attorney Needs: Think, Prompt, Win Thu, July 30, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay