Compounded and Unapproved Peptides: Regulatory Exposure and Defense for Prescribers and Clinics

David Holt
David Holt
Holt Law

David (“DJ”) Holt is the attorney and owner of Holt Law, a boutique multi-state health law firm built exclusively for healthcare businesses. A biomedical engineer before he became a lawyer, he counsels healthcare professionals, licensed facilities, medical spas, management services organizations, and healthcare investors, and writes regularly on the regulatory and liability risks of compounded and unapproved peptides, including the 503A and 503B compounding rules.

Patricia Vilma Graham
Patricia Vilma Graham
Holt Law

Patricia Vilma Graham is an associate attorney at Holt Law, where she works with healthcare businesses and professionals on the regulatory and business-law matters the firm concentrates on. She is based in the San Diego area.

Live Video-Broadcast: August 31, 2026

2 hour CLE

Tuition: $195.00
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

Regulators Are Moving Faster Than the Case Law

Peptide prescribing has moved from gray area to enforcement target. FDA Category 2 designations and shortage-list determinations under 503A and 503B of the FD&C Act have triggered a federal enforcement cascade. State medical boards and pharmacy boards are now acting directly against peptide-prescribing clinics.

The exposure compounds at each step. Compound a GLP-1 past a shortage-list deadline, and federal action follows. Rely on an RUO label, and state enforcement follows anyway. Face a patient claim, and plaintiffs press the malpractice per se theory built on unapproved status. Tender the claim, and standard medical malpractice policies routinely leave gaps for unapproved substances.

This two-session program delivers the working defense file. Attendees gain the compliance obligations and documentation standards that survive regulatory scrutiny, and learn to deploy informed consent as both shield and sword. They leave with a concrete framework for pre-claim risk reduction, post-claim defense strategy, and coverage dispute litigation. That is practitioner judgment for an area where appellate precedent is still forming.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Federal Category Framework
    How 503A and 503B of the FD&C Act and the peptide reclassification determine what a clinic or pharmacy may lawfully compound.
  • GLP-1 Enforcement
    Shortage-list actions, compounding deadlines, and the litigation outcomes that show how federal regulators are enforcing them.
  • State Board Actions
    The medical board and pharmacy board theories now targeting peptide-prescribing clinics, including the RUO label trap.
  • Malpractice Liability Theories
    How plaintiffs frame the malpractice per se theory and where the standard of care sits in an emerging field.
  • Informed Consent Strategy
    Consent and documentation practices that work as both shield and sword in board investigations and malpractice defense.
  • Coverage Gap Disputes
    Where standard medical malpractice policies leave gaps for unapproved substances and how to litigate the resulting coverage disputes.

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Date / Time: August 31, 2026

  • 1:00 pm – 3:10 pm Eastern
  • 12:00 pm – 2:10 pm Central
  • 11:00 am – 1:10 pm Mountain
  • 10:00 am – 12:10 pm Pacific

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

David (“DJ”) Holt, Attorney and Owner | Holt Law

David (“DJ”) Holt is the attorney and owner of Holt Law, a boutique multi-state health law firm built exclusively for healthcare businesses. A biomedical engineer before he became a lawyer, he counsels healthcare professionals, licensed facilities, medical spas, management services organizations, and healthcare investors, and writes regularly on the regulatory and liability risks of compounded and unapproved peptides, including the 503A and 503B compounding rules.

  • Education & Credentials

Holt earned his J.D. from Mitchell Hamline School of Law and holds a B.S. in Biomedical Engineering. He practices as a multi-jurisdictional health lawyer through Holt Law, LLC in Minnesota and Holt Law, PC in California.

  • Recognition & Leadership

Holt holds Avvo’s highest rating, a 10.0 “Superb”, and Holt Law carries an A+ rating from the Better Business Bureau. He hosts The David Holt Show podcast.

  • Professional Involvement

Holt founded DocuHealth, an online marketplace providing legal documents to healthcare providers, and co-founded miVoyce and CutMedicalBills, ventures focused on helping individuals manage medical bills and healthcare decisions. He has volunteered with LegalCORPS, providing pro bono transactional legal assistance to Minnesota entrepreneurs.

  • Experience

Holt’s practice concentrates on the legal problems of operating a healthcare business, including entity structure and the corporate practice of medicine, management services agreements, compliance, and regulatory defense. His published analysis of peptide compliance covers the FDA’s Category 2 designation of BPC-157 and the limits of the 503A and 503B compounding pathways for unapproved peptides.

 

Patricia Vilma Graham, Associate Attorney | Holt Law

Patricia Vilma Graham is an associate attorney at Holt Law, where she works with healthcare businesses and professionals on the regulatory and business-law matters the firm concentrates on. She is based in the San Diego area.

  • Education & Credentials

Graham earned her J.D. from Michigan State University College of Law and is a member of the State Bar of California (License #356432). She participated in the International Student Ambassador Program at the University of San Francisco.

  • Recognition & Leadership

Graham served as President of Phi Alpha Delta and took first place in a competition addressing how AI technology can be used to increase access to justice.

  • Professional Involvement

Graham publishes legal scholarship on technology and the courts. Her note, Emojis: An Approach to Interpretation, appeared at 46 UC Law SF Communications & Entertainment Law Journal 123 (2024), and her companion piece, Decoding Emojis: Lessons from Abroad, ran in the Michigan State Law Review Forum (2024).

  • Experience

Graham’s practice at Holt Law centers on healthcare business matters.

Agenda

SESSION 1 – FDA Compounding Rules and Medical Board Defense for Peptide-Prescribing Clinics | 1:00pm – 2:00pm

This session examines the FDA’s regulatory framework governing peptide compounding under 503A and 503B of the FD&C Act, the enforcement cascade triggered by Category 2 designations and shortage-list determinations, and the state-level medical board and pharmacy board actions now targeting peptideprescribing clinics. Attorneys will gain working knowledge of the compliance obligations, documentation standards, and defense strategies applicable to prescribers and clinics facing regulatory scrutiny. Attendees will leave able to identify the specific legal theories being deployed by state and federal regulators and to counsel clients on reducing exposure before and during an investigation.

BREAK | 2:00pm – 2:10pm

SESSION 2 – Defending Malpractice Claims and Coverage Disputes in Peptide Prescribing | 2:10pm – 3:10pm

This session examines the malpractice and insurance coverage risks facing clinics and prescribers who administer or prescribe compounded and unapproved peptide therapies. Attorneys will learn how to identify and counter the malpractice per se theory, build a documentation-based defense, and navigate coverage gaps that standard medical malpractice policies routinely create for unapproved substances. Participants will leave with a concrete framework for pre-claim risk reduction, post-claim defense strategy, and coverage dispute litigation in an area where appellate precedent is still forming.

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

California

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Florida

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 General Hours

Receive CLE credit in Florida via attorney submission.
Georgia

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Illinois

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Indiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
2 Substantive

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maryland

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Michigan

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Minnesota

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Missouri

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
120 General minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Nevada

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Pennsylvania

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Tennessee

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Virginia

Not Eligible
2 General Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 Law & Legal Hours

Receive CLE credit in Washington via attorney submission.
Wisconsin

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
2.4 General

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
Branding for Firms: Ethics & Strategy
Branding for Firms: Ethics & Strategy Thu, July 16, 2026
Live Webcast
Using AI in Your Law Practice: A Step-by-Step Guide
Using AI in Your Law Practice: A Step-by-Step Guide Wed, July 22, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay
iPad for Lawyers: The Complete Mobile Practice Toolkit
iPad for Lawyers: The Complete Mobile Practice Toolkit Thu, July 23, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay
The AI Skills Every Attorney Needs: Think, Prompt, Win
The AI Skills Every Attorney Needs: Think, Prompt, Win Thu, July 30, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay