Vessel Accidents: The First Moves That Keep the Owner’s Liability Capped at the Value of the Ship

Elizabeth A. Strunk
Elizabeth A. Strunk | Liskow & Lewis

Elizabeth A. Strunk practice draws directly on her prior career at sea, which shapes how she approaches vessel casualties and maritime disputes. She writes and speaks regularly on maritime topics, with publications addressing limitation of liability proceedings, pilot error and state statutes, Jones Act seaman status, and choice-of-law provisions in marine insurance contracts.

Live Video-Broadcast: August 14, 2026

1 hour CLE

Tuition: $395.00
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
This program is only available to All-Access Pass Members.
All-Access Pass

Free access to all CLE programs w/active subscription. Annual subscription only $395/yr.

Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

 

A vessel owner's liability cap holds only if counsel moves first

This program is built around one hypothetical incident rather than a doctrine walk-through. A harbor pilot is aboard, a casualty occurs, vessel arrest becomes appropriate, and a Limitation of Liability action follows. Every substantive topic in the hour comes into play through that single fact pattern.

The stakes compound quickly. Lose evidence in the first hours, and exposure grows. Miss a mandatory notification, and the USCG investigation hardens. A witness pleads the 5th Amendment, and testimony vanishes. Confuse a Supplemental Rule C arrest with a Rule B attachment, and jurisdiction for impending suits slips away. Let a claimant break limitation, and exposure is no longer capped at the value of the vessel.

Attendees leave knowing the early moves that limit a client's exposure: evidence preservation, litigation holds, FOIA requests, and witness statements. They can weigh arrest against attachment, defend a vessel owner's limitation, and explain why harbor pilots answer only for gross negligence while the master keeps ultimate responsibility.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • The Hypothetical Scenario
    One incident, a harbor pilot aboard a vessel, carries through the initial casualty response, a vessel arrest, and a subsequent Limitation of Liability action.
  • Immediate Casualty Response
    Early actions vessel owners and their counsel take to limit a client's exposure, including evidence preservation, litigation holds, FOIA requests for public documents and data, and witness statements.
  • USCG Investigations & Notifications
    Mandatory notification requirements, cooperation with local and federal investigation authorities, and the implications of witnesses pleading the 5th Amendment during interviews or depositions.
  • Vessel Arrest Strategies
    The differences between a Supplemental Rule C arrest and a Rule B attachment, the legal mechanics of arrest, and its benefits, such as determining jurisdiction for impending suits or limitations.
  • Limitation of Liability Act
    How the Act benefits vessel owners, and how a claimant can break limitation so exposure is no longer capped at the value of the vessel.
  • Harbor Pilot Liability
    The very limited liability harbor pilots carry, including state laws limiting liability to gross negligence and the ultimate responsibility of a vessel's master.

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Date / Time: August 14, 2026 

  • 1:00 pm – 2:00 pm Eastern
  • 12:00 pm – 1:00 pm Central
  • 11:00 am – 12:00 pm Mountain
  • 10:00 am – 11:00 am Pacific

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Elizabeth A. Strunk | Liskow & Lewis

Elizabeth A. Strunk is an attorney in the Maritime practice group at Liskow & Lewis in Houston. Before joining the firm, she practiced in Seattle, where her work centered on incident response and litigating maritime disputes in state and federal courts. Her path to the law ran through the wheelhouse: she spent years as a deck officer aboard ocean-going tugboats and cargo ships, handling a wide range of cargoes and calling at ports worldwide, and she holds a USCG Master license, unlimited tonnage upon oceans, as well as a Master of Towing Vessels license, upon oceans.

  • Education & Credentials

Ms. Strunk earned her J.D., cum laude, from the University of Baltimore School of Law in 2020, where she served as Editor-in-Chief of the University of Baltimore Law Review, and she holds a B.S. in Marine Transportation from Massachusetts Maritime Academy (2011). She is admitted to practice in Texas (2024), Oregon (2023), and Washington (2021), and before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit and federal district courts in Texas, Washington, and Oregon. During law school she interned for the Honorable Marvin J. Garbis and the Honorable A. David Copperthite at the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland, and she later served as a law clerk to the Honorable Douglas R. M. Nazarian on the Appellate Court of Maryland (2020–2021).

  • Recognition & Leadership

At Massachusetts Maritime Academy, Ms. Strunk received the Captain S. Fraser Sammis Award for Outstanding Knowledge and Interest in Cargo Stowage and Handling. Her leadership within the maritime community includes service as Editor-in-Chief of the University of Baltimore Law Review and as a former Co-Chapter President of the Pacific Northwest Chapter of the Women’s International Shipping and Trading Association.

  • Professional Involvement

Ms. Strunk serves as an At-Large Board Member of the Maritime Insurance Association of Seattle and as an Advisory Board Member of the Houston Maritime Arbitrators Association. She is the Maritime Law Association’s Young Lawyer Division Liaison for Autonomous Ships and Smart Marine Technology and a member of the Houston Mariners Club.

  • Experience

Ms. Strunk’s practice draws directly on her prior career at sea, which shapes how she approaches vessel casualties and maritime disputes. She writes and speaks regularly on maritime topics, with publications addressing limitation of liability proceedings, pilot error and state statutes, Jones Act seaman status, and choice-of-law provisions in marine insurance contracts. She has previously presented this program’s subject matter to the Marine Insurance Association of Seattle.

Agenda

SESSION 1 – Liabilities, Limitations, and Arrests – Oh My! | 1:00pm – 1:12pm

Explanation of a hypothetical scenario that includes a harbor pilot aboard a vessel, the initial casualty response, a scenario in which arrest of the vessel could be appropriate, and a subsequent Limitation of Liability action.

SESSION 2 – Casualty Response | 1:12pm – 1:24pm

Discussion of immediate actions in the aftermath of a casualty. This topic will include early actions to be taken by vessel owners and their counsel to limit a client’s exposure such as evidence preservation, litigation holds, FOIA requests for the preservation of public documents and data, witness statements, and cooperation with local and federal investigation authorities. This topic will also touch on mandatory notification requirements, USCG investigations, and the implications of witnesses pleading the 5th Amendment during interview or depositions.

SESSION 3 – Arrest | 1:24pm – 1:36pm

Discussion of the differences between a Supplement Rule C Arrest and a Supplemental Rule B attachment in order to recover from various losses and exposures. This topic will also discuss the legal mechanics of arrest, and the benefits of vessel arrest, such as determining jurisdiction for any impending suits or limitations.

SESSION 4 – Limitation of Liability | 1:36pm – 1:48pm

Discussion of the Limitation of Liability Act and the potential benefits to vessel owners. This topic will also include a discussion of how a claimant can break a vessel owner’s limitation of liability, and thus, the vessel owners exposure would no longer be capped at the value of the vessel.

SESSION 5 – Pilot Liability | 1:48pm – 2:00pm

Discussion of the very limited liability that harbor pilots carry, including relevant state laws limiting liability to gross negligence as well as the ultimate responsibility of a vessel’s master.

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

California

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
1 CLE Hour(s)

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Florida

Approved via Attorney Submission
1 General Hours

Receive CLE credit in Florida via attorney submission.
Georgia

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Illinois

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Indiana

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
1 Substantive

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
1 CLE Hour(s)

Maryland

No MCLE Required
1 CLE Hour(s)

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Michigan

No MCLE Required
1 CLE Hour(s)

Minnesota

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Missouri

Approved for CLE Credits
1.2 General

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
60 General minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
1.2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

Nevada

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Pennsylvania

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
1 CLE Hour(s)

Tennessee

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

Virginia

Not Eligible
1 General Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
1 General

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
1 Law & Legal Hours

Receive CLE credit in Washington via attorney submission.
Wisconsin

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
1.2 General

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
1 General

More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
The AI Skills Every Attorney Needs: Think, Prompt, Win
The AI Skills Every Attorney Needs: Think, Prompt, Win Thu, July 30, 2026
On-Demand
Live Replay