Live Video-Broadcast: August 6, 2026
Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs
The Supreme Court's 2026 decision in Urias-Orellana v. Bondi holds that substantial evidence governs the entire persecution determination. That changes what you must build into the trial record—before the immigration judge ever rules.
Miss the pretermission window, and EOIR PM 25-28 and Matter of H-A-A-V- can end the case before a hearing. Fall short on corroboration, and Matter of G-C-I- and the I-589 completeness rules cut against you. Plead the social group loosely, and the revived Matter of A-B- I hands the agency its denial.
You leave with a record-building checklist tuned to the new standard, viable PSG formulations that survive particularity and circularity, arguments to challenge the agency's unlawful standards, and a clear read on which claims still win.
What Will You Learn
How substantial evidence now governs the persecution determination, how pretermission compresses record-building, and how the revived Matter of A-B- I reshapes PSG and domestic violence-based asylum pleading.
What Will You Gain
A working checklist for front-loading evidence and defending pretermission, viable PSG formulation strategies, arguments for challenging the agency's unlawful standards, and clarity on which claims remain viable.
Key topics to be discussed:
This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.
Date / Time: August 6, 2026
Closed-captioning available
Daniella Prieshoff, Managing Attorney | Tahirih Justice Center
Daniella Prieshoff is the Senior Managing Attorney at Tahirih Justice Center’s Maryland office, where she provides trauma-informed counsel and representation to immigrant survivors of gender-based violence. She represents survivors in defensive and affirmative asylum, withholding of removal, relief under the CAT, VAWA cancellation of removal, VAWA petitions, and T and U visa petitions before the immigration courts, the Board of Immigration Appeals, and U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. She is adjunct faculty at the University of Baltimore School of Law, teaching trial advocacy, and is a native Spanish speaker.
Daniella earned her J.D. from the University of Baltimore Law School in 2012 and her B.A. from the University of Maryland, College Park. She began her legal career in 2012 as judicial law clerk to the Honorable Glenn T. Harrell on the Maryland Supreme Court.
Daniella serves on the Legal Advisory Council for the HEAL Refugee Health & Asylum Collaborative’s Forensic Evaluation Clinic.
Daniella is adjunct faculty at the University of Baltimore School of Law, where she teaches trial advocacy.
Before re-joining Tahirih in 2021, Daniella was a Senior Attorney at Kids in Need of Defense, where she supervised a team of attorneys and a paralegal and advocated for unaccompanied immigrant children in their asylum, Special Immigrant Juvenile Status, and T and U visa petitions. Earlier, she was a Senior Attorney at Tahirih’s Baltimore office, advocating for immigrant survivors of gender-based violence in their immigration and domestic relations matters, and a Staff Attorney at Farmworker Legal Services of Michigan, where she represented indigent immigrant farmworkers in immigration and employment cases, initiated an advocacy project to expand representation of workplace sexual assault survivors, and developed a community partners network sensitive to their needs.
Anne Peterson, Senior Counsel | Center for Gender & Refugee Studies
Anne Peterson is Senior Counsel at the Center for Gender & Refugee Studies (“CGRS”), where her work includes advocating for asylum seekers’ rights and protections through strategic litigation and amici support and by providing technical assistance and training to asylum practitioners. Anne has over sixteen years of experience representing clients before the immigration courts, the Board of Immigration Appeals, and the Federal District Courts and Courts of Appeals.
Anne earned her J.D. from Golden Gate University School of Law and her B.A. in English/Socio-linguistics from The Evergreen State College. She is admitted to practice in California, Washington, and New York, and before numerous Federal District Courts and Courts of Appeals.
Anne’s litigation advocacy has resulted in several positive precedential decisions. Most recently she was co-counsel in Alfaro-Zelaya v. Bondi, a nexus and Convention Against Torture challenge in a gender-based persecution claim, and O.C.V. v. Garland, which overturned Matter of M-R-M-S-, and was amicus counsel in Tipan Lopez v. U.S. Attorney General, which rejected the BIA’s restrictive nexus test.
Anne advocates for asylum seekers through strategic litigation and amici support, regulatory analysis and policy advocacy, and developing practice advisories and presenting trainings for advocates. She provides technical assistance to attorneys and focuses on educating and mentoring other attorneys and collaborating to develop case strategies.
Anne represents clients before the immigration courts, the Board of Immigration Appeals, and the Federal District Courts and Courts of Appeals, with litigation advocacy that has produced several positive precedential decisions. Before law school, she worked as a chef in San Francisco, California, and Seattle, Washington.
Anne Dutton, Senior Counsel | Center for Gender & Refugee Studies
Anne Dutton is Senior Counsel at the Center for Gender & Refugee Studies (“CGRS”), where she engages in strategic litigation on a range of asylum issues and provides technical assistance and training to other attorneys representing asylum seekers. Anne first joined CGRS as an Equal Justice Works Fellow. She is a Spanish speaker.
Anne earned her J.D. from the University of Minnesota Law School and her M.S.W. from the University of Minnesota School of Social Work. She received her B.A. in Social Work, magna cum laude, from St. Olaf College. She is admitted to practice in California and Minnesota and clerked for the Honorable Gerard E. Lynch of the Second Circuit.
At the University of Minnesota Law School, Anne served as Student Director of the Federal Immigration Litigation Clinic and Articles Submission Editor of the University of Minnesota Law Review, graduating magna cum laude.
Anne engages in strategic litigation on a range of asylum issues and provides technical assistance and training to other attorneys representing asylum seekers. Prior to law school, she worked for Lutheran Immigration and Refugee Service’s policy advocacy office, covering issues related to unaccompanied children, immigration detention, and refugee and asylum law.
Anne first joined CGRS as an Equal Justice Works Emerson Fellow, where her work focused on advancing children’s asylum claims in jurisdictions including Atlanta, Charlotte, and Kansas City, serving as lead counsel on model cases involving child applicants from Central America, monitoring and intervening in key appellate cases, and providing training and technical assistance to pro bono attorneys. Before assuming her Staff Attorney role, she clerked for the Honorable Gerard E. Lynch of the Second Circuit.
SESSION 1 – Building the Asylum Trial Record After Urias-Orellana | 1:00pm – 2:00pm
Examine how Urias-Orellana v. Bondi—holding substantial evidence governs the persecution determination—changes the trial record, how EOIR PM 25-28 and Matter of H-A-A-V- compress the window through pretermission, and how recent BIA decisions tighten corroboration and I-589 completeness.
BREAK | 2:00pm – 2:10pm
SESSION 2 – PSG and Gender-Based Claims After Matter of K-E-S-G- & S-S-F-M- | 2:10pm – 3:10pm
Examine how Matter of K-E-S-G- and Matter of S-S-F-M-, which resurrect Matter of A-B- I, reshape pleading particular social groups and domestic violence-based claims, and learn to formulate PSG definitions, argue around the revived dicta, and leverage conflicting circuit authority.
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved via Attorney Submission
2 General Hours
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 Substantive
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)
No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
120 General minutes
Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Not Eligible
2 General Hours
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Approved via Attorney Submission
2 Law & Legal Hours
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2.4 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General