Matthew Sumner is a Partner at Neal & Leroy, LLC, where he counsels clients on technology transactions, commercial and corporate matters, intellectual property, and partnership agreements. He regularly serves as outside general counsel to emerging and middle-market companies, advising on the legal and business issues that arise throughout the lifecycle of technology-driven businesses.
MacKinzie Neal is an attorney at Neal & Leroy, LLC whose practice focuses on intellectual property, technology transactions, privacy, cybersecurity, and commercial agreements. She advises clients on protecting and commercializing intellectual property while navigating the legal issues surrounding emerging technologies, including artificial intelligence, blockchain technology, and digital assets.
Live Video-Broadcast: September 22, 2026
Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs
Your client's assignment agreement was drafted for a world without eleven state statutes and an AI coding assistant.
New York's Section 203-f changed the invention assignment drafting calculus, and New York is now one of eleven states that restrict what a PIIA can capture. The same agreements must now account for AI-generated code, which sits outside both the copyright and the work-for-hire ownership chains attorneys have relied on.
Rely on ‘work made for hire’ for outsourced software, and the contractor keeps the copyright. Skip the identification and reasonable-measures work recent DTSA cases require, and the trade secret claim fails at the pleading stage. Miss a GPL or AGPL obligation, and copyleft reaches the product. Jointly develop code without a written allocation, and divergent patent and copyright defaults hand one party the upside. Move the counterparty to the UK or China, and the default flips again.
Attendees walk out with the work product: a PIIA modernization checklist for all eleven restriction states, assignment language for employees, contractors, and vendors, drafting frameworks for improvement clauses, AI-tool disclosure provisions and background IP schedules, and royalty structures that survive patent expiration. These are judgment calls a form file cannot make.
Key topics to be discussed:
This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.
Date / Time: September 22, 2026
Closed-captioning available
Matthew Sumner, Partner | Neal & Leroy, LLC
Matthew Sumner is a Partner at Neal & Leroy, LLC, where he counsels clients on technology transactions, commercial and corporate matters, intellectual property, and partnership agreements. He regularly serves as outside general counsel to emerging and middle-market companies, advising on the legal and business issues that arise throughout the lifecycle of technology-driven businesses. His practice focuses on helping clients structure and negotiate complex transactions involving artificial intelligence, blockchain technology, digital assets, Web3, and other emerging technologies.
Mr. Sumner earned his Juris Doctor from New York University School of Law and his Bachelor of Arts from Lehigh University. He is admitted to practice law in New York and Pennsylvania.
As a Partner at Neal & Leroy, Mr. Sumner advises clients on sophisticated technology and commercial transactions across rapidly evolving industries. His practice emphasizes practical, business-oriented legal solutions for companies operating in emerging technology sectors.
Mr. Sumner regularly advises businesses on the legal and operational challenges associated with emerging technologies, including artificial intelligence, blockchain, digital assets, and Web3. His work involves collaborating closely with business leaders on strategic commercial and technology matters.
Before joining Neal & Leroy, Mr. Sumner served as in-house counsel for multiple startups, giving him firsthand insight into the practical and operational challenges faced by growing businesses. He also practiced as a senior associate at an Am Law 5 firm, where he handled complex commercial and transactional matters for clients across a variety of industries. Today, he combines that in-house and large-firm experience to advise clients on technology transactions, intellectual property, corporate matters, and commercial agreements involving cutting-edge technologies.
MacKinzie Neal, Senior Associate | Neal & Leroy, LLC
MacKinzie Neal is an attorney at Neal & Leroy, LLC whose practice focuses on intellectual property, technology transactions, privacy, cybersecurity, and commercial agreements. She advises clients on protecting and commercializing intellectual property while navigating the legal issues surrounding emerging technologies, including artificial intelligence, blockchain technology, and digital assets.
Ms. Neal earned her Juris Doctor from the University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School and her Bachelor of Arts from the University of Pennsylvania. She is admitted to practice law in New York.
Ms. Neal advises clients on sophisticated technology, intellectual property, and commercial matters involving rapidly evolving industries. Her practice combines legal and technical knowledge to help clients address issues involving artificial intelligence, blockchain technology, digital assets, privacy, and cybersecurity.
Ms. Neal works with clients on technology transactions, intellectual property ownership, privacy, cybersecurity, and commercial contracting involving emerging technologies. She collaborates with businesses developing innovative technologies and helps translate complex legal and technical concepts into practical business guidance.
Prior to joining Neal & Leroy, Ms. Neal practiced as a senior associate at an Am Law 5 firm, where she worked closely with product development, engineering, intellectual property, and corporate teams. That experience provides her with a strong understanding of the intersection between technology development and commercial legal practice. She now advises clients on technology transactions, commercial agreements, intellectual property, privacy, cybersecurity, and corporate matters, with a particular focus on artificial intelligence, blockchain technology, and digital assets.
SESSION 1 – Who Owns What? Allocating IP Rights Before Technology Hits the Market | 12:00pm – 1:00pm
This session explores how attorneys can help technology-driven clients establish clear ownership rights before software, AI tools, and other digital assets are developed or commercialized. Attendees will learn how to structure IP assignment provisions, address employee and contractor-created technology, manage open-source and third-party code risks, and navigate emerging AI-related ownership questions. The session provides practical guidance for drafting agreements that prevent ownership disputes before they arise.
BREAK | 1:00pm – 1:10pm
SESSION 2 – Licensing, SaaS, and Commercial Deals: Protecting IP as Technology Changes Hands | 1:10pm – 2:10pm
This session examines how IP rights are allocated and protected once technology enters the marketplace through licenses, SaaS agreements, vendor relationships, and strategic partnerships. Attendees will learn how to distinguish background IP from newly developed technology, negotiate ownership and usage rights, address AI and data-related provisions, and structure commercial agreements that preserve client control over valuable technology assets.
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved via Attorney Submission
2 General Hours
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 Substantive
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)
No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
120 General minutes
Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Not Eligible
2 General Hours
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Approved via Attorney Submission
2 Law & Legal Hours
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2.4 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General