The $2,500-Per-Record Federal Claim: Prosecuting and Defending DPPA Class Actions Over DMV-Sourced Data

Austin Whitten
Austin Whitten
Pittman, Dutton, Hellums, Bradley & Mann, P.C

Austin Whitten is a Partner with Pittman, Dutton, Hellums, Bradley & Mann, P.C., where he focuses his practice on complex civil litigation, including class actions and mass torts, catastrophic personal injury, insurer bad faith and fraud, product liability, and wrongful death cases. He currently prosecutes several class actions across the country, including matters involving data breaches and violations of consumer protection laws.

Logan S. Booth
Logan S. Booth
Ogletree Deakins

Logan S. Booth, CIPP/US, is a Shareholder at Ogletree Deakins, where he advises clients on data privacy and cybersecurity, complex technology transactions, high-stakes investigations, and crisis management. His experience includes representing organizations in proactive and reactive data privacy matters, leading teams through multi-jurisdictional regulatory investigations, and advising on domestic and cross-border mergers and acquisitions, leveraged buyouts, and securities offerings.

On-Demand: September 14, 2026

2 hour CLE

Tuition: $195.00
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

 

A business that never touched a DMV database can still owe $2,500 per record

A 2024–2026 wave of ALPR and parking-company litigation has changed who gets sued under the DPPA. Downstream-recipient and vendor-chain theories now reach businesses that never directly accessed a DMV database. Buying, using, or reselling DMV-sourced data is enough to draw a federal class action.

Use DMV data without a permitted purpose, and 18 U.S.C. § 2724 attaches. Miss the 'from a motor vehicle record' tracing requirement, and the claim dies. Plead a bare statutory violation, and Article III standing fails post-TransUnion. Certify a class, and $2,500 per record drives exposure into the millions.

Attendees leave with working tools for both sides of the case. Plaintiffs' counsel gain a practical framework for complaint drafting, discovery targeting, and damages calculation. Defense counsel learn to evaluate each statutory element and defeat claims through standing challenges, permitted-purpose defenses, and early motions. The takeaways are litigation judgment — where each element is most vulnerable and which defenses actually decide these cases.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • DPPA Statutory Elements
    What plaintiffs must allege and prove under 18 U.S.C. § 2724 — motor vehicle record origin, lack of a permissible use, and knowledge — and where each element is most vulnerable to challenge.
  • Motor Vehicle Record Tracing
    How plaintiffs trace personal information to a motor vehicle record source, and how the tracing requirement and key circuit authority decide motions to dismiss and summary judgment.
  • Standing After TransUnion
    How plaintiffs plead Article III standing in a DPPA class action without relying on a bare statutory violation, and the complaint-drafting pitfalls that defeat it.
  • Permitted-Purpose Defenses
    Which of the 14 DPPA permitted purposes parking companies and data brokers invoke most often, where those defenses fail, and how each side litigates them through early motion practice.
  • Vendor-Chain Liability
    How downstream-recipient and second-leg theories in the 2024–2026 ALPR and parking-company litigation wave extend DPPA exposure to businesses that obtain, use, or resell DMV-sourced data — and how to mitigate that risk.
  • Class-Wide Damages Exposure
    How the $2,500 per-record statutory damages mechanic drives class-wide exposure, the discovery tools that prove chain of custody from DMV to defendant, and practical strategies for containing damages.

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Austin Whitten, Partner | Pittman, Dutton, Hellums, Bradley & Mann, P.C

Austin Whitten is a Partner with Pittman, Dutton, Hellums, Bradley & Mann, P.C., where he focuses his practice on complex civil litigation, including class actions and mass torts, catastrophic personal injury, insurer bad faith and fraud, product liability, and wrongful death cases. He currently prosecutes several class actions across the country, including matters involving data breaches and violations of consumer protection laws. Austin grew up in Florence, Alabama, attended the University of Alabama on a Presidential Scholarship, and has practiced with Pittman, Dutton, Hellums, Bradley & Mann since completing law school.

  • Education & Credentials

Austin earned his undergraduate degree from the University of Alabama with honors, magna cum laude, in 2012, after attending the university on a Presidential Scholarship. He earned his Juris Doctor degree from the University of Alabama School of Law in 2015. While in law school, he practiced in the school’s Civil Law Clinic and won his first jury trial as a third-year student.

  • Recognition & Leadership

Austin’s biography highlights his successful representation of plaintiffs and clients in complex litigation, including class actions, data-privacy matters, consumer-protection cases, insurer bad faith and fraud cases, personal injury matters, environmental contamination cases, and product liability litigation. His representative case results include a $9.75 million consumer-protection class action settlement and several data-privacy class action settlements.

  • Professional Involvement

Austin practices with Pittman, Dutton, Hellums, Bradley & Mann, P.C., where he represents people and small businesses that have been injured or taken advantage of by others. His practice includes prosecuting class actions across the country, including cases involving data breaches and violations of consumer protection laws, as well as handling complex civil litigation, catastrophic personal injury, insurer bad faith and fraud, product liability, and wrongful death cases.

  • Experience

Austin has practiced at Pittman, Dutton, Hellums, Bradley & Mann, P.C. since graduating from the University of Alabama School of Law in 2015. His experience includes representing lead plaintiffs in consumer-protection and data-privacy class actions, as well as securing recoveries in insurer bad faith and fraud, personal injury, environmental contamination, premises liability, and product liability cases. His representative results include settlements and recoveries ranging from $95,000 to $9.75 million.

 

Logan S. Booth, Of Counsel | Fisher & Phillips LLP

Logan S. Booth, CIPP/US, is a Shareholder at Ogletree Deakins, where he advises clients on data privacy and cybersecurity, complex technology transactions, high-stakes investigations, and crisis management. His experience includes representing organizations in proactive and reactive data privacy matters, leading teams through multi-jurisdictional regulatory investigations, and advising on domestic and cross-border mergers and acquisitions, leveraged buyouts, and securities offerings. Logan also draws on five years of experience as a management consultant, where he helped businesses navigate issues at the intersection of law, commerce, and public policy. He is admitted to practice in Illinois and New York and is also an officer in the United States Navy Reserve, having served in the intelligence and public affairs communities.

  • Education & Credentials

Logan earned his J.D. from Columbia Law School in 2014, an M.B.A. from Northwestern University in 2021, an M.A. from New York University in 2011, and a B.A. from New York University, summa cum laude and Phi Beta Kappa, in 2010. He is a Certified Information Privacy Professional/United States (CIPP/US), is a member of the International Association of Privacy Professionals, and is admitted to practice in Illinois and New York. He is also a graduate of the Center for Information Warfare Training and Defense Information School.

  • Recognition & Leadership

Logan was named a Chicago Council on Global Affairs Emerging Leaders Fellow in 2025 and an Aspen Strategy Group Rising Leaders Fellow in 2023. In 2023, he also received the Jewish United Fund of Metropolitan Chicago’s 36-Under-36 Award. His leadership activities include serving as Chair of the Repair the World Chicago Advisory Council and as Young Leadership Division Campaign Chair for the Jewish United Fund of Metropolitan Chicago.

  • Professional Involvement

Logan is a member of the International Association of Privacy Professionals. He also serves in the United States Navy Reserve as an officer and has served in both the intelligence and public affairs communities. His professional work encompasses data protection and cybersecurity, technology transactions, and crisis management.

  • Experience

Logan has represented organizations in proactive and reactive data privacy and cybersecurity matters and has led teams through multi-jurisdictional regulatory probes. His transactional experience includes domestic and cross-border mergers and acquisitions, leveraged buyouts, and securities offerings. He regularly advises on the use, licensing, acquisition, and commercialization of data and technology. His crisis-management experience includes counseling boards and executives through misconduct investigations, reductions in force, WARN Act compliance, unionization initiatives, leadership transitions, Congressional and government investigations, product recalls, clinical trial errors, and environmental disasters. He also served as the principal crisis communications consultant for Norfolk Southern following the East Palestine train derailment.

Agenda

SESSION 1 – Defending the Downstream-Recipient DPPA Claim: Liability Exposure for Businesses That Use DMV Data | 2:30pm – 3:30pm

This session will focus on the legal liabilities that arise when businesses are alleged to have used or resold state-originated DMV data without a valid or permissible purpose — and how defense counsel can evaluate, contain, and defeat those claims. The session will cover the essential elements plaintiffs must establish under 18 U.S.C. § 2724 (origin from a motor vehicle record, lack of a permissible use, and knowledge or reasonableness), and where each element is most vulnerable to challenge. Particular attention will be given to the main hurdles plaintiffs face in this litigation — including Article III standing post-TransUnion and the ‘from a motor vehicle record’ tracing requirement — and the permitted-purpose defenses that most often decide parking-company, ALPR, and data-broker class actions, where statutory damages of $2,500 per record can drive class-wide exposure into the millions.

BREAK | 3:30pm – 3:40pm

SESSION 2 – Building the Downstream-Recipient DPPA Claim Against Business That Use DMV Data | 3:40pm – 4:40PM ET

This session examines how plaintiffs’ attorneys can construct and prosecute federal DPPA claims under 18 U.S.C. § 2724 against private businesses that obtain or use DMV-sourced personal information without a permitted purpose, with a focus on downstream-recipient and vendor-chain liability theories. Attendees will learn the statutory elements required to establish a viable claim — including the critical ‘from a motor vehicle record’ tracing requirement, Article III standing pleading post-TransUnion, and the 14 permitted-purpose exceptions most frequently litigated in parking-company and data-broker class actions. Attorneys will leave with a practical framework for complaint drafting, discovery targeting, and damages calculation in cases where statutory minimums of $2,500 per record drive class-wide exposure into the millions.

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

California

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Florida

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 General Hours

Receive CLE credit in Florida via attorney submission.
Georgia

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Illinois

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General

Indiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
2 Substantive

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maryland

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Michigan

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Minnesota

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Missouri

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2.4 General

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
120 General minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General

Nevada

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Pennsylvania

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Tennessee

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Virginia

Not Eligible
2 General Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 Law & Legal Hours

Receive CLE credit in Washington via attorney submission.
Wisconsin

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
2.4 General

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars