Toni Michelle Jackson is a first-chair litigator with more than 15 years of government service, she leads class and collective actions, multidistrict litigation, and other complex matters in federal and state courts, and advises clients facing State Attorneys General investigations, inquiries, and litigation.
Joanna Rosen Forster is a bet-the-company litigator, she represents companies from startups to publicly traded enterprises in high-stakes litigation, class actions, and government investigations, with a focus on technology, digital assets, e-commerce, and AI.
Live Video-Broadcast: September 23, 2026
Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs
The Enforcement Letters Are Already Out
January 2026 changed the posture on surveillance pricing. California's Attorney General opened an investigative sweep of businesses that use consumer personal information to set individualized prices. New York's Attorney General sent a demand letter to Instacart under the state's Algorithmic Pricing Disclosure Act. Personalized pricing moved from legislative debate to active state enforcement.
The exposure is already concrete. Use personal data for unexpected price targeting and the CCPA sweep treats it as unlawful data processing. Deploy algorithmic pricing without clear and conspicuous disclosure and N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law § 349-a exposure follows. Share pricing algorithms through a common vendor and California AB 325 adds Cartwright Act risk. Platform liability extends to third-party partners using marketplace pricing tools.
Attendees walk out with a structured audit of client personalization and pricing practices across four compliance tracks. A practical checklist flags gaps in client data flows, vendor contracts, privacy policies, and consumer-facing opt-out mechanisms. The program closes with scalable compliance frameworks built for the rapidly expanding multi-state legislative landscape rather than state-by-state point solutions.
Key topics to be discussed:
This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.
Date / Time: September 23, 2026
Closed-captioning available
Toni Michelle Jackson, Partner | Crowell & Moring LLP
Toni Michelle Jackson is a partner at Crowell & Moring LLP and chair of the firm’s State Attorneys General Practice Group. A first-chair litigator with more than 15 years of government service, she leads class and collective actions, multidistrict litigation, and other complex matters in federal and state courts, and advises clients facing State Attorneys General investigations, inquiries, and litigation.
Toni earned her B.B.A. from The George Washington University in 1988 and her J.D. from the University of Minnesota Law School in 1991. She is admitted in the District of Columbia and Minnesota and before the Supreme Court of the United States, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, and several federal district courts. She began her career as a law clerk to the Hon. Gerald W. Heaney of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit and later clerked for the Hon. John M. “Jack” Mason of the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota.
While serving as Deputy Attorney General in the Public Interest Division of the District of Columbia Office of the Attorney General from 2018 to 2021, Toni received the Attorney General’s Award for Outstanding Head of a Division in recognition of her contributions in leadership, service, and training. Her earlier leadership roles at the office include Chief of the Equity Section from 2015 to 2018 and Chief of General Litigation Section III of the Civil Litigation Division.
Toni chairs Crowell & Moring’s State Attorneys General Practice Group and is a member of the District of Columbia Bar and the U.S. Supreme Court Bar. Her recent speaking engagements include “Ensuring and Protecting Access to the Courts” at the DAGA Denver Policy Conference in September 2025.
Toni served as Senior Trial Attorney in the Employment Litigation Section of the U.S. Department of Justice Civil Rights Division from 2008 to 2015 and held Assistant Attorney General and section leadership roles in the District of Columbia. Her representative matters include defending a major railroad in multidistrict litigation alleging a multibillion-dollar conspiracy to fix fuel prices, representing a leading e-commerce platform in a major antitrust lawsuit filed by the D.C. Attorney General challenging nationwide pricing policies, and representing a leading online retailer in a multistate Attorneys General investigation into driver tips. She also defends wage and hour class and collective actions under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act and state wage and hour laws in federal courts across the country.
Joanna Rosen Forster, Partner | Crowell & Moring LLP
Joanna Rosen Forster is a partner at Crowell & Moring LLP and a member of the firm’s State Attorneys General Practice. A bet-the-company litigator, she represents companies from startups to publicly traded enterprises in high-stakes litigation, class actions, and government investigations, with a focus on technology, digital assets, e-commerce, and AI.
Joanna earned her J.D. from the University of California, Berkeley School of Law in 2006 and her B.A. in Political Science from the University of California, Berkeley in 2000. She is admitted in California and before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and the Northern, Central, Eastern, and Southern Districts of California. She served as a law clerk to the Hon. Consuelo B. Marshall of the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California.
Joanna received the 2025 Burton Award for Distinguished Legal Writing and was named a Leading Commercial Litigator for 2026 by the Daily Journal. She previously served as Deputy Attorney General in the Corporate Fraud Section of the California Department of Justice from 2015 to 2021 and as General Counsel and Chief Compliance Officer of ContextLogic, Inc., a publicly traded e-commerce platform operating in over 60 countries.
Joanna serves on the board of the Jewish Community Center of San Francisco and on the Family Services Committee of Family House Inc. She frequently speaks and publishes on issues integral to her practice, including a June 2026 Crowell & Moring webinar on surveillance and personalized pricing.
Joanna secured a jury verdict, judgment, and an eight-figure damages award for c3.ai, a leading enterprise AI software and application company, in a Delaware Superior Court matter alleging misappropriation of trade secrets and breach of contract. Her other representative matters include defending a major retail platform against class action allegations of deceptive and unfair pricing practices and misleading online disclosures, and defending a nationwide e-tailer against claims of deceptive pricing and illegal processing of personal data. Earlier in her career, she served on the litigation team that secured over $1 billion in recovery for CalPERS and CalSTRS in residential mortgage-backed securities matters, work recognized with the Attorney General’s Award for Excellence in 2019.
SESSION 1 – Auditing Client Personalization Practices Against California’s Surveillance Pricing Sweep | 12:00pm – 1:00pm
This session examines California’s January 2026 investigative sweep targeting businesses that use consumer personal information to set individualized prices, analyzing the CCPA legal theories the Attorney General is pursuing and the overlapping regulatory obligations now in effect. Attorneys will learn how to conduct a structured audit of client personalization and pricing practices across four compliance tracks: CCPA purpose limitation and notice, ADMT opt-out obligations, Cartwright Act shared-algorithm exposure under AB 325, and mandatory risk assessment readiness. Participants will leave with a practical checklist for identifying gaps in client data flows, vendor contracts, privacy policies, and consumer-facing opt-out mechanisms before enforcement letters arrive.
BREAK | 1:00pm – 1:10pm
SESSION 2 – Complying with New York’s Algorithmic Pricing Disclosure Act After the Instacart Demand | 1:10pm – 2:10pm
This session covers New York’s Algorithmic Pricing Disclosure Act (N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law § 349-a), the Attorney General’s January 2026 demand letter to Instacart, and the practical compliance obligations that follow from both. Attorneys will learn how to identify which pricing mechanisms trigger the statute’s disclosure requirements, how the AG has interpreted ‘clear and conspicuous’ disclosure at every consumer-facing touchpoint, and how platform liability extends to third-party partners using marketplace pricing tools. The session also surveys the rapidly expanding multi-state legislative landscape so practitioners can build scalable compliance frameworks rather than state-by-state point solutions.
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved via Attorney Submission
2 General Hours
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 Substantive
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)
No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
120 General minutes
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Not Eligible
2 General Hours
Approved for CLE Credits
2 General
Approved via Attorney Submission
2 Law & Legal Hours
Pending CLE Approval
2 General
Pending CLE Approval
2.4 General
Pending CLE Approval
2 General