Surveillance Pricing Enforcement: Responding to the California CCPA Sweep and New York’s Algorithmic Pricing Act

Toni Michelle Jackson
Toni Michelle Jackson
Crowell & Moring LLP

Toni Michelle Jackson is a first-chair litigator with more than 15 years of government service, she leads class and collective actions, multidistrict litigation, and other complex matters in federal and state courts, and advises clients facing State Attorneys General investigations, inquiries, and litigation.

Joanna Rosen Forster
Joanna Rosen Forster
Crowell & Moring LLP

Joanna Rosen Forster is a bet-the-company litigator, she represents companies from startups to publicly traded enterprises in high-stakes litigation, class actions, and government investigations, with a focus on technology, digital assets, e-commerce, and AI.

Live Video-Broadcast: September 23, 2026

2 hour CLE

Tuition: $195.00
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

 

From FTC Study to Nationwide Enforcement

Surveillance pricing moved from a Federal Trade Commission study to a nationwide enforcement front in under two years. The FTC's January 2025 report examined how eight dynamic pricing intermediaries use AI-driven consumer data, the Department of Justice and a ten-state coalition pursued algorithmic price coordination in rental housing, and class action resolutions now total roughly $360 million and rising.

With no federal enforcement action specifically targeting surveillance pricing, state Attorneys General have become the frontline enforcers. California's investigative sweep of retail, grocery, and hotel businesses treats unexpected price targeting as potentially unlawful data processing under the CCPA, New York is probing food delivery pricing algorithms under its algorithmic pricing disclosure law, and Washington has pursued deceptive promotional pricing. States from Connecticut to Tennessee have enacted surveillance pricing statutes, more state and federal bills are pending, and plaintiffs have filed the first surveillance pricing class action.

Attendees walk out with a sector-by-sector breakdown of risk across retail and e-commerce, hospitality, consumer goods, financial services, and healthcare, along with compliance priorities tailored to each. The program closes with an eight-question internal audit checklist drawn from Congressional inquiries for use as a compliance gap analysis tool.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Surveillance Pricing Mechanics
    Data collection, consumer profiling, and pricing engine deployment online and in-store.
  • Enforcement Landscape
    The FTC report, rental housing actions, state AG sweeps, and promotional pricing enforcement.
  • Liability Exposure
    First-party, third-party, and intermediary liability, including the developer versus deployer distinction.
  • Legislative Landscape
    Enacted state statutes, pending bills, federal proposals, and the debate about discounts.
  • Litigation Playbook
    The airline ECPA class action and the disclosure gap theory driving exposure.
  • Sector Compliance Priorities
    Sector-by-sector risk breakdowns and the eight-question internal audit checklist.

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Date / Time: September 23, 2026 

  • 12:00 pm – 2:10 pm Eastern
  • 11:00 am – 1:10 pm Central
  • 10:00 am – 12:10 pm Mountain
  • 9:00 am – 11:10 am Pacific

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Toni Michelle Jackson, Partner | Crowell & Moring LLP

Toni Michelle Jackson is a partner at Crowell & Moring LLP and chair of the firm’s State Attorneys General Practice Group. A first-chair litigator with more than 15 years of government service, she leads class and collective actions, multidistrict litigation, and other complex matters in federal and state courts, and advises clients facing State Attorneys General investigations, inquiries, and litigation.

  • Education & Credentials

Toni earned her B.B.A. from The George Washington University in 1988 and her J.D. from the University of Minnesota Law School in 1991. She is admitted in the District of Columbia and Minnesota and before the Supreme Court of the United States, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, and several federal district courts. She began her career as a law clerk to the Hon. Gerald W. Heaney of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit and later clerked for the Hon. John M. “Jack” Mason of the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota.

  • Recognition & Leadership

While serving as Deputy Attorney General in the Public Interest Division of the District of Columbia Office of the Attorney General from 2018 to 2021, Toni received the Attorney General’s Award for Outstanding Head of a Division in recognition of her contributions in leadership, service, and training. Her earlier leadership roles at the office include Chief of the Equity Section from 2015 to 2018 and Chief of General Litigation Section III of the Civil Litigation Division.

  • Professional Involvement

Toni chairs Crowell & Moring’s State Attorneys General Practice Group and is a member of the District of Columbia Bar and the U.S. Supreme Court Bar. Her recent speaking engagements include “Ensuring and Protecting Access to the Courts” at the DAGA Denver Policy Conference in September 2025.

  • Experience

Toni served as Senior Trial Attorney in the Employment Litigation Section of the U.S. Department of Justice Civil Rights Division from 2008 to 2015 and held Assistant Attorney General and section leadership roles in the District of Columbia. Her representative matters include defending a major railroad in multidistrict litigation alleging a multibillion-dollar conspiracy to fix fuel prices, representing a leading e-commerce platform in a major antitrust lawsuit filed by the D.C. Attorney General challenging nationwide pricing policies, and representing a leading online retailer in a multistate Attorneys General investigation into driver tips. She also defends wage and hour class and collective actions under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act and state wage and hour laws in federal courts across the country.

 

Joanna Rosen Forster, Partner | Crowell & Moring LLP

Joanna Rosen Forster is a partner at Crowell & Moring LLP and a member of the firm’s State Attorneys General Practice. A bet-the-company litigator, she represents companies from startups to publicly traded enterprises in high-stakes litigation, class actions, and government investigations, with a focus on technology, digital assets, e-commerce, and AI.

  • Education & Credentials

Joanna earned her J.D. from the University of California, Berkeley School of Law in 2006 and her B.A. in Political Science from the University of California, Berkeley in 2000. She is admitted in California and before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and the Northern, Central, Eastern, and Southern Districts of California. She served as a law clerk to the Hon. Consuelo B. Marshall of the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California.

  • Recognition & Leadership

Joanna received the 2025 Burton Award for Distinguished Legal Writing and was named a Leading Commercial Litigator for 2026 by the Daily Journal. She previously served as Deputy Attorney General in the Corporate Fraud Section of the California Department of Justice from 2015 to 2021 and as General Counsel and Chief Compliance Officer of ContextLogic, Inc., a publicly traded e-commerce platform operating in over 60 countries.

  • Professional Involvement

Joanna serves on the board of the Jewish Community Center of San Francisco and on the Family Services Committee of Family House Inc. She frequently speaks and publishes on issues integral to her practice, including a June 2026 Crowell & Moring webinar on surveillance and personalized pricing.

  • Experience

Joanna secured a jury verdict, judgment, and an eight-figure damages award for c3.ai, a leading enterprise AI software and application company, in a Delaware Superior Court matter alleging misappropriation of trade secrets and breach of contract. Her other representative matters include defending a major retail platform against class action allegations of deceptive and unfair pricing practices and misleading online disclosures, and defending a nationwide e-tailer against claims of deceptive pricing and illegal processing of personal data. Earlier in her career, she served on the litigation team that secured over $1 billion in recovery for CalPERS and CalSTRS in residential mortgage-backed securities matters, work recognized with the Attorney General’s Award for Excellence in 2019.

Agenda

SESSION 1 – How Surveillance Pricing Works, Who Is Liable, and How Enforcement Took Shape | 12:00pm – 1:00pm

This session defines surveillance-based personalized pricing, distinguishes it from algorithmic and dynamic pricing, and walks through the data ecosystem behind it, from online tracking and electronic shelf labels to the three-stage pipeline of data collection, consumer profiling, and pricing engine deployment. Attorneys will trace the enforcement arc from the FTC’s January 2025 surveillance pricing report and the rental housing enforcement action to the mounting class action resolutions, examine first-party, third-party, and intermediary liability theories, including the developer versus deployer distinction, and survey state Attorney General enforcement approaches in California, New York, and Washington. The session closes with the emerging debate over whether personalized discounts remain permissible.

BREAK | 1:00pm – 1:10pm

SESSION 2 – Legislation, Litigation, and Sector-by-Sector Compliance Priorities | 1:10pm – 2:10pm

This session maps the enacted, passed, and pending legislation reshaping the field, including new surveillance pricing statutes in Connecticut, Maryland, Tennessee, and New York, pending state and federal bills, and the California and New York measures setting the national standard, alongside FTC rulemaking and Congressional inquiries in Washington, D.C. Attorneys will examine the first surveillance pricing class action against the airline industry and the disclosure gap theory driving it, then work through a sector-by-sector risk breakdown covering retail and e-commerce, hospitality, consumer goods, financial services, and healthcare. The session closes with sector-specific compliance priorities and an eight-question internal audit checklist for identifying client compliance gaps.

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

California

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Florida

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 General Hours

Receive CLE credit in Florida via attorney submission.
Georgia

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Illinois

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Indiana

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
2 Substantive

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maryland

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Michigan

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Minnesota

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Missouri

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
120 General minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Nevada

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Pennsylvania

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hour(s)

Tennessee

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Virginia

Not Eligible
2 General Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 Law & Legal Hours

Receive CLE credit in Washington via attorney submission.
Wisconsin

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
2.4 General

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
Managing Tariff and Trade Enforcement Risk in 2026
Managing Tariff and Trade Enforcement Risk in 2026 Mon, September 28, 2026
Live Webcast