Asset Tokenization 101: Navigating the Process, Legal Frameworks, and Future Trends

Jonathan Bench
Jonathan Bench | Kirton McConkie PC

Jonathan is a Shareholder in the International Practice Group at Kirton McConkie, based in the firm’s Salt Lake City office. He focuses his practice on both international and domestic business transactions, assisting entrepreneurs, companies, and financial institutions, including venture capital and private equity funds.

Live Video-Broadcast: March 26, 2025

2 hour CLE

This program is available to All-Access Pass Members.
Subscribe to Federal Bar Association CLE Pass...
Co-Sponsored by myLawCLE
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ live webinars.
Learn More

Program Summary

This course offers legal professionals an in-depth exploration of the rapidly evolving landscape of asset tokenization. Participants will gain a comprehensive understanding of the tokenization process, including the distinctions between fungible and non-fungible tokens, and examine various use cases such as tokenized stock, treasuries, bonds, commodities, real estate, carbon credits, celebrity fan bases, and art. The agenda also addresses critical legal frameworks and regulatory considerations, highlighting current challenges and the role of global standardization initiatives. By the end of the session, attendees will be equipped with the knowledge necessary to navigate the complexities of asset tokenization, ensuring they are well-prepared to advise clients in this transformative area.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Understanding asset tokenization
  • The tokenization process and use cases
  • Legal frameworks and regulatory considerations
  • Standardization initiatives and future outlook

This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.

Date / Time: March 26, 2025

  • 1:00 pm – 3:10 pm Eastern
  • 12:00 pm – 2:10 pm Central
  • 11:00 am – 1:10 pm Mountain
  • 10:00 am – 12:10 pm Pacific

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Jonathan Bench_FedBarJonathan Bench | Kirton McConkie PC

Jonathan is a Shareholder in the International Practice Group at Kirton McConkie, based in the firm’s Salt Lake City office. He focuses his practice on both international and domestic business transactions, assisting entrepreneurs, companies, and financial institutions, including venture capital and private equity funds. His global clientele spans Asia, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and the Americas. Jonathan has worked and consulted in the U.S., Asia, and South America, and he is fluent in Chinese and Cantonese and working toward Spanish fluency.

He is a sought-after speaker for national and global trade and legal organizations, particularly on topics related to foreign direct investment between the U.S. and China, strategies like friendshoring or nearshoring as alternatives to the China market, and emerging technologies. Jonathan serves on the board of directors for World Trade Center Utah and dedicates time to mentoring entrepreneurs through various nonprofit organizations.

He is also recognized as a legal expert in the fast-moving and complex emerging technologies ecosystem, including business and regulatory issues surrounding artificial intelligence (AI) and various web3 components: decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs), smart contracts, decentralized finance (DeFi), cryptocurrencies, coins, and tokens, including non-fungible tokens (NFTs). His blockchain experience encompasses collaborations with international DAO communities, NFT artists and studios, layer-2 blockchain developers, metaverse companies, and celebrity brand influencers. Jonathan also represents entrepreneurs who are developing tools and communities focused on AI applications to a range of businesses.

Agenda

I. Understanding asset tokenization | 1:00pm – 1:30pm

  • Asset tokenization
    • Definition and significance of asset tokenization
      1. Intangible vs tangible assets (Real World Assets (RWA))
    • Historical context and market growth
    • Key concepts: Fungible vs. non-fungible tokens (NFTs)
  • Liquidity enhancement and transaction efficiency
  • Democratization of access to investment opportunities
  • Legal and operational challenges

II. The tokenization process and use cases | 1:30pm – 2:00pm

  • The tokenization process
    • Steps involved in tokenizing an asset
    •  Types of tokens: Security tokens vs. utility tokens vs everything else
  • Exploring use cases for tokenization
    • Tokenized stock: Investment contract or not
    • Tokenized treasuries: Advantages and disadvantages
    • Tokenized bonds: Market implications and challenges
    • Tokenized commodities: Accessibility and market volatility
    • Tokenized real estate: Fractional ownership and regulatory hurdles
    • Tokenized carbon credits: Market transparency and regulatory issues
    • Tokenized enthusiasm: Capitalizing on a celebrity’s fan base
    • Tokenization in art and collectibles: Opportunities and risks

Break | 2:00pm – 2:10pm

III. Legal frameworks and regulatory considerations | 2:10pm – 2:40pm

  • Navigating legal frameworks in tokenization
    • Legal recognition of tokenized assets (securities vs currencies vs digital assets)
    • Ownership rights and transfer of tokenized assets
    • Addressing fractional ownership and consolidation of interests
  • Regulatory and policy considerations
    • Current regulatory landscape and challenges
    • The role of global bodies (e.g., IOSCO) in standardization
    • Case studies: SEC v. Ripple Labs and implications for tokenized assets

IV. Standardization initiatives and future outlook | 2:40pm – 3:10pm

  • Relevant standardization initiatives
    • ISDA Tokenized Collateral Model Provisions
    • UCC Article 12 amendments and their impact on digital assets
  • Large-scale adoption of tokenization
    • Interoperability and integration into existing financial systems
    • Consumer protection measures and regulatory frameworks
    • Future trends and the evolving landscape of asset tokenization

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

California

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hours

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Florida

Approved via Attorney Submission
2.5 General

Receive CLE credit in Florida via attorney submission.
Georgia

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Illinois

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Indiana

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
2 Substantive

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hours

Maryland

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hours

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Michigan

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hours

Minnesota

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General

Missouri

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
120 General Minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Nevada

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Pennsylvania

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
2 CLE Hours

Tennessee

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Utah

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Virginia

Not Eligible
2 General Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Washington

Approved for CLE Credits
2 Law & Legal

Wisconsin

Pending CLE Approval
2.4 General

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
2.4 General

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
Insurance and Bad Faith Litigation in Fire Loss Cases
Insurance and Bad Faith Litigation in Fire Loss Cases Thu, March 20, 2025
On-Demand
Live Replay
Divorce Law 101 (2025 Edition)
Divorce Law 101 (2025 Edition) Fri, March 21, 2025
Live Webcast
Gun Trust 101 (2025 Edition)
Gun Trust 101 (2025 Edition) Fri, March 21, 2025
On-Demand
Live Replay
Ethical Strategies with Law Firm Podcasts
Ethical Strategies with Law Firm Podcasts Mon, March 24, 2025
Live Webcast
AI-Generated Trade Secret Litigation
AI-Generated Trade Secret Litigation Wed, March 26, 2025
Live Webcast
1031 Exchanges 101 (2025 Edition)
1031 Exchanges 101 (2025 Edition) Thu, March 27, 2025
On-Demand
Live Replay